Print

[The Stanford Series] From “investment fraud” to “massive Ponzi scheme”

The SEC has amended its complaint against R. Allen Stanford, Laura Pendergast-Holt and James Davies.

Here’s a summary of the allegations, emphasis FT Alphaville’s:
1. For at least a decade, R. Allen Stanford and James M. Davis, through companies they control, including Stanford International Bank, Ltd. (“SIB”) and its affiliated Houston-based investment advisers, Stanford Group Company (“SGC”) and Stanford Capital Management (“SCM”), executed a massive Ponzi scheme. In carrying out the scheme, Stanford and Davis misappropriated billions of dollars of investor funds and falsified SIB’s financial statements in an effort to conceal their fraudulent conduct.

2. Laura Pendergest-Holt, the chief investment officer of Stanford Financial Group (“SFG”) and a member of SIB’s investment committee, facilitated the fraudulent scheme by misrepresenting to investors that she managed SIB’s multi-billion investment portfolio of assets and employed a sizeable team of analysts to monitor the portfolio.

3. By year-end 2008, SIB had sold approximately $8 billion of self-styled “certificates of deposits” (the “CD”) by touting: (i) the bank’s safety and security; (ii) consistent, double-digit returns on the bank’s investment portfolio; and (iii) high return rates on the CD that greatly exceeded those offered by commercial banks in the United States.

4. Contrary to SIB’s public statements, Stanford and Davis, by February 2009, had misappropriated at least $1.6 billion of investor money through bogus personal loans to Stanford and “invested” an undetermined amount of investor funds in speculative, unprofitable private businesses controlled by Stanford.

5. In an effort to conceal their fraudulent conduct and maintain the flow of investor money into SIB’s coffers, Stanford and Davis fabricated the performance of the bank’s investment portfolio. Each month, Stanford and Davis decided on a pre-determined return on investment for SIB’s portfolio. Using this pre-determined number, SIB’s internal accountants reverse-engineered the bank’s financial statements to report investment income that the bank did not actually earn. SIB’s financial statements, which were approved and signed by Stanford and Davis, bore no relationship to the actual performance of the bank’s investment portfolio.

6. In addition to sales of the CD, SGC and SCM advisers, since 2004, have sold more than $1 billion of a proprietary mutual fund wrap program, called Stanford Allocation Strategy (“SAS”), using materially false and misleading historical performance data. The false data enabled SGC/SCM to grow the SAS program from less than $10 million in 2004 to over $1.2 billion in 2009 and generate fees for SGC/SCM (and ultimately Stanford) in excess of $25 million. The fraudulent SAS performance results were also used to recruit registered financial advisers with significant books of business, who were then heavily incentivized to re-allocate their clients’ assets to SIB’s CD program.

7. By engaging in the conduct described in this Complaint, Defendants directly or indirectly, singly or in concert, have engaged, and unless enjoined and restrained, will again engage in transactions acts, practices, and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a)], and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] or, in the alternative, have aided and abetted such violations. In addition, through their conduct described herein, Stanford, SGC, and SCM have violated Section 206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Adviser’s Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and 80b-6(2)] and Davis and Pendergest-Holt have aided and abetted such violations. Finally, through their actions, SIB and SGC have violated Section 7(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 80a-7(d)]. 

(HT the ever-vigilant Joanna Chung)

Article Series - The Stanford Series

  1. As Stanford allegations fly, the SEC investigates...
  2. US MARSHALS SEEN ENTERING HOUSTON OFFICE OF STANFORD FINANCIAL GROUP - REUTERS EYEWITNESS
  3. Arise, Sir Allen...lest we assume the worst
  4. Sir Allen's Antigua, or the curious case of Stanford International Bank
  5. ROBERT STANFORD ACCUSED OF `MASSIVE FRAUD' BY SEC
  6. The fractal Stanford
  7. The full SEC complaint against Stanford
  8. Stanford scandal in pictures
  9. It's just not cricket
  10. Have you seen this bank?
  11. Where in the world is Sir Allen?
  12. What does the 'F' stand for in FINRA?
  13. Stanford's mysterious billions
  14. Stanford's AIM foray
  15. A Freudian slip?
  16. Sir Allen Stanford, you've been served
  17. But which passport will he surrender?
  18. SIB and Stanford Trust Company Limited put into receivership
  19. Eastern Caribbean Central Bank "takes control" of the Bank of Antigua
  20. The Stanford campaign donations: pay 'em back, not forward
  21. Clients of Allen, by the numbers
  22. This land is our land, Antigua government to say
  23. Antigua government moves closer to seizing Stanford properties
  24. From "investment fraud" to "massive Ponzi scheme"
  25. New details on alleged "massive Ponzi scheme"
  26. Stanford's US employees join the jobless queue
  27. Irony du jour
  28. Invested with Sir Allen? The FBI wants you (to contact them)
  29. Stanford pleading the fifth
  30. IRS says Sir Allen owes $200m in back taxes
  31. Ralph Janvey to Stanford employees: BYOB
  32. Laura Pendergest-Holt agrees to extend indictment deadline
  33. Vantis reports "significant shortfall of assets" at Stanford International Bank
  34. Sir Allen speaks
  35. Stanford victims unite!
  36. Frozen-out Stanford investors petition Congress
  37. Antiguan financial services providers launch PR offensive
  38. The SEC has strong words for Sir Allen Stanford
  39. When it came to Sir Allen Stanford, many warnings went unheeded
  40. Sir Allen's cowboy lawyer
  41. Authorities still failing to get along
  42. Laura Pendergest-Holt to face more charges, Fox Business says
  43. The DEA connection
  44. Avast, ye salty Stanford lawfirm website
  45. Judge rules Sir Allen Stanford must stay in jail pending trial
  46. Stanford CFO James Davis "intends to plead guilty", laywer says
  47. Sir Allen's request to unfreeze funds for legal fees denied
  48. The Tripoli-St John's Nexus
  49. "Fraud victims" want $24bn from the government of Antigua and Barbuda
  50. Sir Allen discovers there's no air conditioning in jail
  51. James Davis pleads guilty to charges related to that $7bn Ponzi
  52. Big Brother's blood oaths
  53. "The investors ought not have to pay for the receiver's PR firm"
  54. Sir Allen's Bellagio problem
  55. Stanford's Bellagio debt, redux
  56. A public defender rides to Sir Allen's rescue
  57. Allen Stanford, puppetmaster: By Freddie Flintoff
  58. Jail proving a big headache for Sir Allen [UPDATED]
  59. Arise Allen Stanford, un-knighted...
  60. Ponzi victims, unite!
  61. Strategies to cope with the SEC
Print