The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Macquarie: The 'great unwind' is coming
  2. The €5.5 trillion unwind
  3. Further reading
  4. Britain's top export - drunks
  5. Turning Japanese? UK house prices
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Finance and Resources Director
Recruiter: International Accounting Standards
Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Project Accountant
Recruiter: Retail/ Private Banking
Finance Business Partner
Recruiter: Unilever
Head of Operational Rigour
Recruiter: Barclaycard International
Financial Controller – British Gas Business (ACA, ACCA, CIMA, CPA)
Recruiter: British Gas Business
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society

Site Navigation


Principal content

Commercial paper freeze forced Citi to double subprime CDO exposure

Over the worst months of the credit squall Citi was obligated to nearly double its exposure to subprime CDOs. “Agreements” meant the bank bought an extra $25bn of subprime CDO paper, at a time when the market for CDO debt was crashing.

In Citi’s 10-Q filing on Monday, which you can view here, the bank repeated its weekend disclosure of $43bn in CDO super senior debt “backed primarily by subprime collateral.” The crucial point being that most of that was made up of:

…approximately $25 billion in commercial paper principally secured by super senior tranches of high grade ABS CDOs.

Commercial paper (CP) is short term debt; carrying a typical maturity of 90 days. Citi declined to comment on the issuers of the debt, but did say said the debt was taken on “over the summer”.

Commercial paper might be more familiar to most as the Achilles heel of that other credit crunch protagonist, the SIV. But forget Citi’s SIVs. Trouble in the commercial paper market for CDOs is causing much more pain for Citi. Not only are CDOs loaded with subprime - unlike Citi’s SIVs - but the bank also has far more significant funding commitments to them.

FT Alphaville understands that Citi has numerous agreements in place with CDOs that force the bank, as arranger, to buy CDO commercial paper if they cannot place it. That unplaceable debt has totalled $25bn so far - but there could be more.

Deep down on page 73 of Citi’s 10-Q filing with the SEC on Monday, it says:

[Citi] may, along with other financial institutions, provide liquidity facilities, such as commercial paper backstop lines of credit to the VIEs. [Variable interest entities - off balance sheet vehicles Citi has an interest in].

The Company may be a party to derivative contracts with VIEs, may provide loss enhancement in the form of letters of credit and other guarantees to VIEs, may be the investment manager, and may also have an ownership interest in certain VIEs.

Most CDOs, of course, don’t normally issue CP. Traditionally, CDOs issue straight tranches of rated bonds. But Citi made CDOs issuing CP good business pre-crunch. You might say that commercial paper CDOs are a scion of the SIV world - using CP issuance to supplement their normal debt issues and create a more dynamic, flexible portfolio, benefiting from low yielding CP.

But also just like SIVs, CDOs need to keep refinancing that CP to pay off upcoming redemptions. But where they differ is that CP issuing CDOs mitigate that rollover risks by using their arranging banks’ as underwriters on all new CP issues. Whatever CP they can’t sell, agreements are in place as backup that ensure banks will buy.

And just like with SIV CP investors, over the summer, CDO CP buyers have dried up.
Money market funds - formerly among the biggest players in the CP markets - are loathe to touch anything containing MBS.

So Citi - unable to place CP on subprime CDOs it arranged as far back as 2005, - is having to buy it instead. Right when it can least afford to do so.

Crucially we should make clear that Citi isn’t necessarily being “forced” into buying that debt: not in the most literal sense of the word. The backstop “agreements” it has in place are not set in stone. It could have said no. But had it done so it may have seen CDOs default, or else a rush to sell assets to meet amortizing CP. In the event, that was evidently too ugly an option to countenance.

And Citi may only now be ruing that decision. Commercial paper is classed as “super senior” debt in CDOs, and had until October, held out as a secure tranche. But the contagion has spread right up the tree, and the rating agencies have shown now mercy for even the highest grades of debt. Super senior debt is far from secure.

Citi declined to comment.

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Nov 07   16:43 Posted by Utah Home Equity Loan | Sydney Financial Group [report]

    […] An article published by Financial Times takes a look at how Citi (a lender that provides Utah Home Equity Loan products as well as primary home loans) has been forced to double subprime CDO exposure due to the commercial paper freeze. According to the article: But also just like SIVs, CDOs need to keep refinancing that CP to pay off upcoming redemptions. But where they differ is that CP issuing CDOs mitigate that rollover risks by using their arranging banks’ as underwriters on all new CP issues. Whatever CP they can’t sell, agreements are in place as backup that ensure banks will buy. […]

  2. Nov 06   21:34 Posted by m torphy [report]

    Not likely. The CP wasn’t issued by the investment banks and thus they did not have the backstop agreements. The CP was issued by the commercial banks. The article is solid but like alot of the press around this fails to cut to the quick - if the holders of the SIVs, CDOs, CP, MBS, or whatever other alphbet soup they might be holding are forced to mark to market before the market can properly assess underlying collateral, we are all in for a significant haircut.

  3. Nov 06   14:21 Posted by bsb [report]

    ok, so who else has similar backstop agreements with CP for CDOs? Citi can’t be the only one. do you think barcap have such agreements? lehman?

This post is closed to further comments.