The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Further Reading
  2. Further Reading
  3. The credit crunch, crunched: Authers and Murphy on a screen near you
  4. Further Reading
  5. Pink Picks
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Divisional Financial Controller
Recruiter: TRL
Corporate Finance Controller / Corporate Finance Analyst
Recruiter: Travelodge
Acquisitions Analyst / Corporate Finance Analyst
Recruiter: Travelodge
Process & Control Development Manager
Recruiter: Norwich Union
Head of Project Finance
Recruiter: Global Investment Bank
Associate Director, Project Finance
Recruiter: Global Investment Bank
Collateral Frameworks and Registries Senior Advisor
Recruiter: FIAS, The World Bank Group
Group Finance Manager
Recruiter: Marks & Spencer

Site Navigation


Principal content

Subprime conspiracy unearthed. Maybe…

Suntans are peeling fast as most bankers furiously search their floppies for that memo from the summer of ‘03 that came on cold for the US mortgage market.

Most, but not all.

Indeed, you will be forgiven for not knowing that the current credit crisis could be the work of an evil cabal. Or so it seems from an article in Barron’s, which sources an anonymous “bearish hedge-fund operator” who, in turn, has been talking to an equally anonymous “senior Wall Street marketing director.”

Barron’s has obtained a letter sent by the ‘bhfo’ to his/her investors revealing:

This will go down as one of the biggest financial illusions the world has EVER seen.

FT Alphaville notes that the master plan involves the “alchemy of CDOs” in a ritual overseen by the ratings agencies. Combine the two and…

POOF…you magically have 80% of the structure rated ‘AAA’… despite the underlying collateral being a collection of BBB and BBB- rated assets.

But here’s the real scandal:

‘Real money’ [U.S. insurance companies, pension funds, etc.] accounts had stopped purchasing mezzanine tranches of U.S. Subprime debt in late 2003 and [Wall Street] needed a mechanism that could enable them to ‘mark up’ these loans, package them opaquely, and EXPORT THE NEWLY PACKAGED RISK TO UNWITTING BUYERS IN ASIA AND CENTRAL EUROPE!!!!

He told me with a straight face that these CDOs were the only way to get rid of the riskiest tranches of subprime debt. Interestingly enough, these buyers (mainland Chinese banks, the Chinese Government, Taiwanese banks, Korean banks, German banks, French banks, U.K. banks) possess the ‘excess’ pools of liquidity around the globe. These pools are basically derived from two sources: 1) massive trade surpluses with the U.S. in U.S. dollars, 2) petrodollar recyclers. These two pools of excess capital are U.S. dollar-denominated and have had a virtually insatiable demand for U.S. dollar-denominated debt…until now.

Mystery solved, then.

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Aug 25   13:28 Posted by steve barry [report]

    the joke is on asia and the middle east.
    we get the oil, the goods, and low interest rates.. FOR FREE!!!

  2. Aug 21   11:02 Posted by Hayek [report]

    What utter nonsense. The rating agencies publish their criteria for the world to see. The end investor in an RMBS or CDO or CDO-squared is not spared responsibility for evaluating the value of the resulting securities. There is no free lunch in the investment world - if a AAA-rated security is offered at a credit spread consistent with BBB-rated securities in another market, it is sure sign that either complexity or leverage suggest the security is not the equivalent of AAA ratings for which the default data are available and it is a sure sign that the security requires a higher capital haircut than other AAA securities. Also, if there is insufficient default data on the underlying collateral (measured in decades), the rating criteria is merely guesswork and it is the investor’s responsibility to query the basis upon which the criteria were developed and determine for himself or herself whether that criteria is an acceptable mapping to the benchmark ratings. The rating agencies are an easy target - but it is the investor that has responsibility for evaluating the investment he makes - even in a yield-seeking environment where risk is largely ignored in a desperate rush to expand assets under management.

This post is closed to further comments.