Please don't tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans

  1. WeWrite-down
  2. No deal Brexit is not a hedge fund conspiracy
  3. Europe’s digital infrastructure issue
  4. Let’s give a helping hand to Andrew Yang
  5. Anatomy of a malware scam
  6. ARK Invest’s Tesla model gathers dust
  7. A delirious defence of Uber
  8. WeLiquid: Adam Neumann pockets $700m
  9. Yesterday, in efficient markets
  10. The warm fuzzy feeling of indirectly owning Tencent
  11. The best of Morgan Stanley's Adam Jonas
  12. Apple/Tesla: M&A and heartbreak
  13. Did Beyonce make $300m from Uber's IPO?
  14. Bitcoin is the 10-year Treasury of our time
  15. High resolution music is a solution looking for a problem
  16. Amazon is furious about this negative review
  17. Missing: $500bn of American savings
  18. Blockchain for Brexit: a wonderfully terrible idea
  19. The Bank of Hodlers [sic] (sigh)
  20. Behind the curtain at China Ding Yi Feng
  21. An answer to Mark Cuban's question
  22. Crumbs! It's CRYPTO: the movie!
  23. National Beverage Corp loses its fizz, and its mind
  24. Amazon won't spin-off Amazon Web Services
  25. Mensch! Dan McCrum is innocent, ok?
  26. Europe's $1 trillion tax gap
  27. Why online propaganda mobs are an investment red flag
  28. Davos has produced an amazing new guide on precisely how not to think about risk
  29. When the public relations industry does PR for itself
  30. Who wants to be crippled by student debt?
  31. The bitcoin price is wrong
  32. The warm fuzzy feeling of Goldman debt
  33. “Cryptoassets” are crashing again. Is it time to start calling them cryptoliabilities instead?
  34. Puff the tragic cryptowagon smokes out the Mumsnet demographic
  35. Don't write off the public sector
  36. Initiative Q: an elementary pyramid scheme with grandiose ideas [Update]
  37. Moral investments aren't outperforming
  38. No one is killing it in crypto (not even Woz)
  39. Too smooth: the red flag at Patisserie Valerie which was missed
  40. No, the housing crisis will not be solved by building more homes
  41. Sorry Civil, 'crypto-economics' and 'constitutions' won't save journalism
  42. 'Short-termism' isn't a thing, say Fed economists
  43. Coinbase wants to be “too big to fail”, lol
  44. Regulation and innovation don't have to be enemies
  45. Retailers get so lonely around the holidays
  46. Folli Follie: $1bn of fake sales, and what to learn from the debacle
  47. The new green evangelism
  48. Tilray, how low can it go?
  49. The ICO behind the tragic Everest stunt is now “airdropping” tokens from rockets
  50. Beware the Hindenburg Omen?
  51. The broken conversation about financial regulation
  52. The improbably profitable, loss-making Blue Prism
  53. The EM rout is not made in America
  54. Wages and growth and honestly we just give up
  55. Britain's first blockchain-enabled co-working space isn't blockchain-enabled
  56. There is a FIRE that never goes out
  57. The WeWork Garden of Eden
  58. IQE: lumpy 'Apple' sauce at the pricey Cardiff chip shop
  59. There's only so much a central bank can do alone
  60. Eight questions every first-time buyer should ask
  61. MiFID II: not all doom and gloom
  62. Tesla: getting to Q3 profitability
  63. Turkey contagion fears are overblown [Update]
  64. The chance of an inflation shock may be higher than you think
  65. Sorry Tim, the humanity is not being drained out of music
  66. Digital crop circles
  67. What could go wrong here?
  68. Sirius Minerals: money for a hole in the ground
  69. The Bank of England has a strange idea of what QE achieved
  70. One for the ladies...
  71. 'Of course, many ridiculous papers appeared'
  72. Is a change goin' to come?
  73. The capacity's not there yet (and probably never will be)
  74. Musk and Tesla are not inseparable
  75. Libraries, from Carnegie to Bezos
  76. Crypto & government: from anarchy to amity in the USA
  77. 'I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I cannot sanction this Series B round'
  78. RBC, through the FANG barrier
  79. Self-help to buy
  80. CFA: Chartered crypto analysts -- updated
  81. The Netflix dilemma -- updated
  82. Fujitsu's new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
  83. Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
  84. Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
  85. How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
  86. Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
  87. Oh, the digital humanity
  88. Sports are not markets, predictions ain't investment
  89. Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
  90. Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
  91. The node to serfdom
  92. Carney is down with the crypto kids
  93. Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
  94. It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
  95. Don't blame it on the sunshine
  96. In corporate America, brands develop you
  97. One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
  98. Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
  99. Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
  100. Let’s not try make 'crypto chicks' a thing
  101. Tokens all the way down
  102. Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
  103. A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
  104. How to buy Italian fire insurance
  105. Atlas bugged
  106. Inflating inflation
  107. Crypto's most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
  108. Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
  109. Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
  110. In defence of ticket touts
  111. RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
  112. Retail is not dead
  113. Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
  114. At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
  115. Egregious expectations - Intelsat edition
  116. Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
  117. Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
  118. Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
  119. Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
  120. “We're very disappointed in you, Spotify”
  121. 'Sex redistribution' and the means of reproduction
  122. Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
  123. No entitlement crisis in America
  124. Free cash flow to whom?
  125. Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
  126. Human capital and the jobs guarantee
  127. This is a tech bubble, when's the crash?
  128. The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
  129. FUD, inglorious FUD
  130. A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
  131. The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
  132. These hedge fund numbers can't be right
  133. The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
  134. Lies, damn lies, and charticles
  135. The world doesn't need more Elon Musks
  136. No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
  137. Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
  138. Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
  139. Amazon is not a bubble
  140. Japan's economic miracle
  141. Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn't like?
  142. Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
  143. Who needs the labels anyway?
  144. Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
  145. No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
  146. No one needs to buy Tesla
  147. How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
  148. Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
  149. Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
  150. The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
  151. Cigarettes are the vice America needs
  152. Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
  153. Musicians, don't just blame the labels for your lack of dough
  154. Giving stock away to staff doesn't absolve share buybacks
  155. A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
  156. Monopoly and its discontents
  157. A State of Mind
  158. America is not the least protectionist country in the world
  159. This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
  160. No Bloomberg, the world's richest people did not lose $114bn...
  161. Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
  162. Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
  163. Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
  164. Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
  165. Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
  166. Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition

Four years ago, analysts at Moody's warned that it was risky to sell leveraged loans to individual American investors.

This made a lot of sense. In the US, these loans are usually made to companies lower on the credit-quality scale, and the entire market is opaque, non-public and illiquid, with idiosyncratic contract terms. The analysts said the fund managers who sell these securities in open-ended mutual funds and ETFs could be putting their reputations at risk.

Sadly, it does not look like anyone listened.

Last week, investors sent nearly $1bn into loan funds, the most in more than a year. The majority of this came from institutions, according to EPFR, but individuals were responsible for almost $200m of inflows.

There are currently five ETFs that invest in leveraged loans, according to ETF.com, and last month Reuters reported that two companies are planning to introduce new ones. The two largest are BKLN, an $8bn fund run by Invesco and SRLN, a $3bn fund run by State Street, with the loan selection managed by Blackstone's GSO (engineer of the manufactured CDS default). On the mutual-fund side, Morningstar shows that at least 30 managers offer bank-loan funds, though some of that money is invested in floating-rate bonds.

Back in 2014, Moody's analysts had a nice explanation of loans' popularity:

Investor memories are short, largely ignoring that bank loans traded at less than 50 cents on the dollar as recently as 2008.

Yet their analysis focused primarily on the fact that it takes longer to complete a leveraged-loan trade than it does to settle ETF or mutual-fund trade. While that is a valid metric, it is too narrow, and allows the industry to try to improve settlement timelines ( median time of T+11!), instead of reevaluating the debt's structure or encouraging fund managers to stop marketing it to individual investors altogether.

As the Bank of England would tell you, the problem with using liquid open-ended vehicles (like ETFs and mutual funds) to invest in illiquid assets is not as dry as settlement time. Instead, it is the chance that a negative feedback loop will occur if this currently booming market turns sour. If poor performance in these funds lead to withdrawals, that could lead to even worse performance, and more withdrawals, and so on.

In short, they create the risk of a fire sale, which should be clear to anyone who watched UK open-ended property funds after Brexit.

Some academics have proposed that the process of creating and redeeming ETFs, performed by dealers known as authorised participants (APs), involves arbitrage that would mute a credit-selloff echo chamber. Matthew Bartolini, head of SPDR research for the Americas with SRLN sponsor State Street Global Advisors, touted ETFs' ability to facilitate price discovery for the market.

“It actually has more liquidity options than other fund structures,” he said. Loan ETFs are “providing liquidity to an illiquid asset class.”

But another pair of academics observed last year that times of market stress create an inner “conflict between APs’ dual roles as bond dealers and as ETF arbitrageurs.” They found that traders tend to act as dealers first in those situations:

First, increases in market volatility and bond market illiquidity reduce ETF arbitrage, consistent with the arbitrage effect and its limitations. Withdrawals from arbitrage can be quite large and results in consistent price discrepancies between ETFs and the underlying holdings of corporate bonds. An increase of 1% in the ETF premium generates an increase in AP arbitrage by 50 basis points; however, as market volatility rises, holding fixed the ETF premium, AP arbitrage declines: a one standard deviation increase in market volatility generates a 10% decline in AP arbitrage. Moreover, the decrease in arbitrage sensitivity is asymmetrically larger when the ETF premium is negative. This suggests an asymmetric risk since APs who attempt to correct this relative mispricing would become even more exposed to risks arising from liquidity mismatch.

These funds have the ability to borrow up to a third of their asset value from banks, of course. But that alone can't save a fund in the middle of a meltdown, as we learned from Third Avenue's Focused Credit Fund, which was forced to liquidate in late 2015 after a sudden and unexpected selloff in high-yield bonds.

And it is worth pointing out that the research above focussed on the corporate bond market, which is much more liquid than the leveraged-loan market.

A total of $54.6bn of leveraged-loans traded in secondary markets in March, according to the most recent figures publicly available. The corporate bond market traded an average $33.5bn each day that month. High-yield bonds alone were more active than loans, with a volume of $11.4bn -- again, that's daily. Assuming there were 24 trading days in March, the loan market would have posted $2.3bn of average daily volume.

BKLN follows an index that tracks the largest 100 loans, which means its holdings are more liquid than the rest of the loan market, said Scott Baskind, head of global senior loans at Invesco.

“I think about these loans as being very similar to the very liquid end of the high yield bond market,“ he said.

Questions of credit quality remain, however. Analysts say loans of all sizes carry more risk than they used to, because the covenants that usually protect investors from corporate excesses have weakened. BKLN's seventh-largest holding is debt from Caesars Resort Collection, a casino company whose covenants deteriorated after a private-equity buyout years ago. While the erosion in loan covenant quality has been widespread, investors say, the most aggressive erosion of lender protections have come in deals from private-equity sponsors.

In contrast, SRLN's investments are chosen according to GSO's judgement, not their size. The bright side of such an arrangement is that the fund does not need to invest in debt of companies simply because they have borrowed enough to make it into the index. But that also means it is not constrained by BKLN's requirement to buy secured debt. While the fund plans to buy mostly senior secured loans, its prospectus says it might also buy unsecured debt, or even ”warrants and other equity securities".

The prospectus also describes some of the thinking behind GSO's credit selection. SRLN's last report said it owned more than 250 loans, including those from Neiman Marcus, Four Seasons Holdings and Ancestry.com. The bond documents say GSO looks for companies with a strong market position and cash flow, skilled management teams, and-- hahahahaha, wait for it:

Private equity sponsorship. Often the Sub-Adviser will seek to participate in transactions sponsored by what it believes to be high-quality private equity firms. The Sub-Adviser believes that a private equity sponsor’s willingness to invest significant sums of equity capital into a company is an implicit endorsement of the quality of the investment. Further, private equity sponsors of companies with significant investments at risk have the ability and a strong incentive to contribute additional capital in difficult economic times should operational issues arise.

The ETF also owns loans from SRS Distribution, which we must assume have better terms than its bonds.

Related links:
'Some of the worst covenants we've ever seen' -- FT Alphaville
Loan funds attract new money
-- FT
Leveraged loan rush -- FT

  1. WeWrite-down
  2. No deal Brexit is not a hedge fund conspiracy
  3. Europe’s digital infrastructure issue
  4. Let’s give a helping hand to Andrew Yang
  5. Anatomy of a malware scam
  6. ARK Invest’s Tesla model gathers dust
  7. A delirious defence of Uber
  8. WeLiquid: Adam Neumann pockets $700m
  9. Yesterday, in efficient markets
  10. The warm fuzzy feeling of indirectly owning Tencent
  11. The best of Morgan Stanley's Adam Jonas
  12. Apple/Tesla: M&A and heartbreak
  13. Did Beyonce make $300m from Uber's IPO?
  14. Bitcoin is the 10-year Treasury of our time
  15. High resolution music is a solution looking for a problem
  16. Amazon is furious about this negative review
  17. Missing: $500bn of American savings
  18. Blockchain for Brexit: a wonderfully terrible idea
  19. The Bank of Hodlers [sic] (sigh)
  20. Behind the curtain at China Ding Yi Feng
  21. An answer to Mark Cuban's question
  22. Crumbs! It's CRYPTO: the movie!
  23. National Beverage Corp loses its fizz, and its mind
  24. Amazon won't spin-off Amazon Web Services
  25. Mensch! Dan McCrum is innocent, ok?
  26. Europe's $1 trillion tax gap
  27. Why online propaganda mobs are an investment red flag
  28. Davos has produced an amazing new guide on precisely how not to think about risk
  29. When the public relations industry does PR for itself
  30. Who wants to be crippled by student debt?
  31. The bitcoin price is wrong
  32. The warm fuzzy feeling of Goldman debt
  33. “Cryptoassets” are crashing again. Is it time to start calling them cryptoliabilities instead?
  34. Puff the tragic cryptowagon smokes out the Mumsnet demographic
  35. Don't write off the public sector
  36. Initiative Q: an elementary pyramid scheme with grandiose ideas [Update]
  37. Moral investments aren't outperforming
  38. No one is killing it in crypto (not even Woz)
  39. Too smooth: the red flag at Patisserie Valerie which was missed
  40. No, the housing crisis will not be solved by building more homes
  41. Sorry Civil, 'crypto-economics' and 'constitutions' won't save journalism
  42. 'Short-termism' isn't a thing, say Fed economists
  43. Coinbase wants to be “too big to fail”, lol
  44. Regulation and innovation don't have to be enemies
  45. Retailers get so lonely around the holidays
  46. Folli Follie: $1bn of fake sales, and what to learn from the debacle
  47. The new green evangelism
  48. Tilray, how low can it go?
  49. The ICO behind the tragic Everest stunt is now “airdropping” tokens from rockets
  50. Beware the Hindenburg Omen?
  51. The broken conversation about financial regulation
  52. The improbably profitable, loss-making Blue Prism
  53. The EM rout is not made in America
  54. Wages and growth and honestly we just give up
  55. Britain's first blockchain-enabled co-working space isn't blockchain-enabled
  56. There is a FIRE that never goes out
  57. The WeWork Garden of Eden
  58. IQE: lumpy 'Apple' sauce at the pricey Cardiff chip shop
  59. There's only so much a central bank can do alone
  60. Eight questions every first-time buyer should ask
  61. MiFID II: not all doom and gloom
  62. Tesla: getting to Q3 profitability
  63. Turkey contagion fears are overblown [Update]
  64. The chance of an inflation shock may be higher than you think
  65. Sorry Tim, the humanity is not being drained out of music
  66. Digital crop circles
  67. What could go wrong here?
  68. Sirius Minerals: money for a hole in the ground
  69. The Bank of England has a strange idea of what QE achieved
  70. One for the ladies...
  71. 'Of course, many ridiculous papers appeared'
  72. Is a change goin' to come?
  73. The capacity's not there yet (and probably never will be)
  74. Musk and Tesla are not inseparable
  75. Libraries, from Carnegie to Bezos
  76. Crypto & government: from anarchy to amity in the USA
  77. 'I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I cannot sanction this Series B round'
  78. RBC, through the FANG barrier
  79. Self-help to buy
  80. CFA: Chartered crypto analysts -- updated
  81. The Netflix dilemma -- updated
  82. Fujitsu's new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
  83. Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
  84. Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
  85. How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
  86. Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
  87. Oh, the digital humanity
  88. Sports are not markets, predictions ain't investment
  89. Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
  90. Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
  91. The node to serfdom
  92. Carney is down with the crypto kids
  93. Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
  94. It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
  95. Don't blame it on the sunshine
  96. In corporate America, brands develop you
  97. One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
  98. Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
  99. Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
  100. Let’s not try make 'crypto chicks' a thing
  101. Tokens all the way down
  102. Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
  103. A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
  104. How to buy Italian fire insurance
  105. Atlas bugged
  106. Inflating inflation
  107. Crypto's most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
  108. Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
  109. Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
  110. In defence of ticket touts
  111. RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
  112. Retail is not dead
  113. Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
  114. At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
  115. Egregious expectations - Intelsat edition
  116. Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
  117. Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
  118. Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
  119. Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
  120. “We're very disappointed in you, Spotify”
  121. 'Sex redistribution' and the means of reproduction
  122. Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
  123. No entitlement crisis in America
  124. Free cash flow to whom?
  125. Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
  126. Human capital and the jobs guarantee
  127. This is a tech bubble, when's the crash?
  128. The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
  129. FUD, inglorious FUD
  130. A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
  131. The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
  132. These hedge fund numbers can't be right
  133. The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
  134. Lies, damn lies, and charticles
  135. The world doesn't need more Elon Musks
  136. No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
  137. Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
  138. Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
  139. Amazon is not a bubble
  140. Japan's economic miracle
  141. Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn't like?
  142. Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
  143. Who needs the labels anyway?
  144. Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
  145. No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
  146. No one needs to buy Tesla
  147. How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
  148. Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
  149. Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
  150. The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
  151. Cigarettes are the vice America needs
  152. Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
  153. Musicians, don't just blame the labels for your lack of dough
  154. Giving stock away to staff doesn't absolve share buybacks
  155. A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
  156. Monopoly and its discontents
  157. A State of Mind
  158. America is not the least protectionist country in the world
  159. This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
  160. No Bloomberg, the world's richest people did not lose $114bn...
  161. Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
  162. Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
  163. Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
  164. Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
  165. Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
  166. Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2019. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Read next:

Read next:

Lookout, there’s a dollar crunch!

FT Alpha Tweets