<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FT Alphaville &#187; UBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/tag/ubs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville - Market Commentary - FT.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The great Aussie bank share price bubble</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/05/02/1484222/reintroducing-the-great-aussie-bank-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/05/02/1484222/reintroducing-the-great-aussie-bank-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 23:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hume</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ANZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Bank of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Australia Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westpac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1484222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Via UBS:</p> <p>The Aussie banks are very good companies. They are profitable, resilient, well capitalised, well managed, shareholder focused and have a very strong industry and regulatory structure. However, following the significant leveraging of the Australian &amp; NZ households over the last thirty years they are now low growth and remain heavily exposed to housing, funding markets &amp; unemployment risk.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/05/02/1484222/reintroducing-the-great-aussie-bank-bubble/" class="more-link">Continue reading: The great Aussie bank share price bubble</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/05/02/1484222/reintroducing-the-great-aussie-bank-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some backing for the UBS bonus model</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/03/21/1434282/some-backing-for-the-ubs-bonus-model/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/03/21/1434282/some-backing-for-the-ubs-bonus-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankers Bonuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squam Lake Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1434282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>René Stulz and other academics members of the avowedly non-partisan Squam Lake Group have come out with an update of their well-received 2010 paper on fixing finance, post the crisis. Click below to read their fresh thoughts on banker pay and the knotty problem of properly aligning incentives.</p> <p><a title="Aligning Incentives at Systemically Important Financial Institutions - Squam Lake Group" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/files/2013/03/Squam-bonus-bond-memo-Mar-19-2013.pdf" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1434292" src="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/files/2013/03/Screen-shot-2013-03-21-at-3.38.56-PM-e1363880338786.png" alt="" width="200" height="259" /></a></p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/03/21/1434282/some-backing-for-the-ubs-bonus-model/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Some backing for the UBS bonus model</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/03/21/1434282/some-backing-for-the-ubs-bonus-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UBS bonuses go bail-inable</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/05/1371652/ubs-bonuses-go-bail-inable/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/05/1371652/ubs-bonuses-go-bail-inable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Mackenzie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankers Bonuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1371652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UBS reported a fourth quarter loss of CHF1.2bn &#8212; actually CHF1.9bn, when considering Libor fines and other regulatory and legal costs, plus restructuring costs. The loss came in <a title="UBS Posts Quarterly Loss on Libor Fine, Reorganization Cost - Bloomberg" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-05/ubs-posts-quarterly-loss-on-libor-fine-reorganization-costs.html" target="_blank">a little lower</a> than the median estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.</p>
<p>The full <a title="Financial results for Q4 - UBS" href="http://www.static-ubs.com/global/en/about_ubs/investor_relations/shared/quarterlies/2012/4q12/_jcr_content/par/table_f8e7.2069730185.file/dGFibGVUZXh0PS9jb250ZW50L2RhbS9zdGF0aWMvcXVhcnRlcmxpZXMvMjAxMi80cTEyLzRxMTItZmluYW5jaWFsLXJlcG9ydC5wZGY=/4q12-financial-report.pdf" target="_blank">monstrous PDF is here</a>, but meanwhile, we note the FT&#8217;s Daniel Schäfer <a title="UBS leads way with bonuses shake-up - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/47d6e2ae-6ee9-11e2-9ded-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">scooped </a>an interesting change to the bank&#8217;s bonus policy for its 6,500 highest earners:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/05/1371652/ubs-bonuses-go-bail-inable/" class="more-link">Continue reading: UBS bonuses go bail-inable</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/05/1371652/ubs-bonuses-go-bail-inable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBS in for another round of bonus awkwardness, with added Libor angle</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/29/1358812/rbs-in-for-another-round-of-bonus-awkwardness-with-added-libor-angle/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/29/1358812/rbs-in-for-another-round-of-bonus-awkwardness-with-added-libor-angle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Mackenzie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1358812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Soon, it appears, we&#8217;ll have another big Libor settlement to write about &#8212; this one from RBS. Both <a title="RBS tips UK back into bonus debate - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/061bb7b4-695c-11e2-b254-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">the FT</a> and <a title="U.S. Wants Criminal Charges for RBS - WSJ" href="http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323644904578270070760266356.html?mg=reno64-wsj" target="_blank">the WSJ</a> are tipping the fines to be in the order of £500m. The FT says it could be more than £400m to the US authorities and about £100m to the FSA; the WSJ doesn&#8217;t mention how it might breakdown between the US and UK, but says the settlement &#8220;could be completed within the next two weeks&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, yikes! RBS (or specifically, an Asian unit of RBS) might have to plead guilty to some criminal charges if the US prosecutors have their way, says the WSJ.</p>
<p>Shockingly RBS does not like this. But&#8230; RBS may not have any choice:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/29/1358812/rbs-in-for-another-round-of-bonus-awkwardness-with-added-libor-angle/" class="more-link">Continue reading: RBS in for another round of bonus awkwardness, with added Libor angle</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/29/1358812/rbs-in-for-another-round-of-bonus-awkwardness-with-added-libor-angle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A mercenary UBS with no culture&#8217;, apparently</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/10/1330823/a-mercenary-ubs-with-no-culture-apparently/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/10/1330823/a-mercenary-ubs-with-no-culture-apparently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Masa Serdarevic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1330823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you wanted to see a group of British MPs not really getting why a group of former UBS execs didn&#8217;t get that <a title="Backgrounder: The Libor scandal - FT " href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e58b945e-5a53-11e2-bc93-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">a Libor scandal</a> was raging under their watch, the only place to be was the Thatcher Room in the House of Commons on Thursday.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/10/1330823/a-mercenary-ubs-with-no-culture-apparently/" class="more-link">Continue reading: &#8216;A mercenary UBS with no culture&#8217;, apparently</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/01/10/1330823/a-mercenary-ubs-with-no-culture-apparently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The three &#8216;muscateers&#8217;, captain &#8216;caos&#8217; and SUPERMAN Assemble (at UBS)</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313662/the-three-muscateers-captain-caos-and-superman-assemble-at-ubs/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313662/the-three-muscateers-captain-caos-and-superman-assemble-at-ubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1313662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The competition is on! Sure, UBS is already ahead of Barclays in the FSA fine stakes, but will the inevitable embarrassing communiques beat “<a title="LIBOR manipulation? Done for you, Big Boy - FT Alphaville" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/27/1062301/libor-manipulation-done-for-you-big-boy/" target="_blank">done for you, big boy”</a>? Opening gambit from the <a title="FINAL NOTICE To: UBS AG - FSA" href="http://www.fsa.gov.uk/static/pubs/final/ubs.pdf" target="_blank">FSA&#8217;s Final Notice to UBS</a> on Wednesday morning (emphasis ours):</p>
<blockquote><p>For example, on 18 September 2008, a Trader explained to a Broker: “<strong><em>if you keep 6s [i.e. the six month JPY LIBOR rate] unchanged today &#8230; I will f[**]king do one humongous deal with you &#8230;</em></strong></p></blockquote><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313662/the-three-muscateers-captain-caos-and-superman-assemble-at-ubs/" class="more-link">Continue reading: The three &#8216;muscateers&#8217;, captain &#8216;caos&#8217; and SUPERMAN Assemble (at UBS)</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313662/the-three-muscateers-captain-caos-and-superman-assemble-at-ubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some colour on UBS&#8217; &#8216;unquantifiable&#8217; Libor misconduct [updated]</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313552/some-colour-on-ubs-unquantifiable-libor-misconduct/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313552/some-colour-on-ubs-unquantifiable-libor-misconduct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Mackenzie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1313552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The FSA&#8217;s component of the <a title="UBS to pay SFr1.4bn in Libor settlement - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0c8bd408-4945-11e2-b25b-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">UBS settlement relating to Libor and Euribor</a> was £160m &#8212; the largest fine it has ever imposed.</p>
<p>The UK financial regulator made some revealing comments on the Swiss group&#8217;s transgressions, which it says &#8220;involved a significant number of employees and occurred over a period of years in a number of countries&#8221;:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313552/some-colour-on-ubs-unquantifiable-libor-misconduct/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Some colour on UBS&#8217; &#8216;unquantifiable&#8217; Libor misconduct [updated]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313552/some-colour-on-ubs-unquantifiable-libor-misconduct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UBS pays up</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313392/ubs-pays-up/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313392/ubs-pays-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Mackenzie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1313392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UBS will pay a total of CHF1.4bn ($1.5bn) &#8212; or, <a title="'That'll be two Barclays, please' - FT AV" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/13/1308452/thatll-be-two-barclays-please/" target="_blank">more than three Barclays</a> &#8212; in fines and profit disgorgements related to Libor and Euribor claims. The payments will go to US, UK and Swiss regulators. The bank has also warned of losses totalling about CHF2 to 2.5bn for the fourth quarter, largely due to the settlements and provisioning, although CHF500m related to its restructuring.</p>
<p>Here is the <a title="UBS Board of Directors authorizes settlements of LIBOR-related claims with US and UK authorities; Swiss regulator to issue order - UBS" href="http://www.ubs.com/global/en/about_ubs/about_us/news/news.html/en/2012/12/19/20121219a.html" target="_blank">statement</a>:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313392/ubs-pays-up/" class="more-link">Continue reading: UBS pays up</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/19/1313392/ubs-pays-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;That&#8217;ll be two Barclays please&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/13/1308452/thatll-be-two-barclays-please/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/13/1308452/thatll-be-two-barclays-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT Alphaville</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1308452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It might not be made public until Monday but<a title="UBS Libor fine could top $1bn - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/01d45ef0-4539-11e2-858f-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank"> the FT</a> reports a fine above $1bn could be landing on UBS&#8217;s doorstep to settle allegations of Libor manipulation. Driven largely, it appears, by CFTC and DoJ penalties.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s more than double the Barclays record <a title="Barclays fined a record £290m - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2a4479f8-c030-11e1-9867-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">set in June</a>&#8230;</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/13/1308452/thatll-be-two-barclays-please/" class="more-link">Continue reading: &#8216;That&#8217;ll be two Barclays please&#8217;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/13/1308452/thatll-be-two-barclays-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Negative&#8217; has such unfairly negative connotations</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/11/1305282/negative-has-such-unfairly-negative-connotations/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/11/1305282/negative-has-such-unfairly-negative-connotations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Keohane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Currencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Franc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1305282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear people,</p>
<blockquote><p>ATTENTION:</p></blockquote><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/11/1305282/negative-has-such-unfairly-negative-connotations/" class="more-link">Continue reading: &#8216;Negative&#8217; has such unfairly negative connotations</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/12/11/1305282/negative-has-such-unfairly-negative-connotations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
