<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FT Alphaville &#187; OTC Derivatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/tag/otc-derivatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville - Market Commentary - FT.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open OTC secrets?</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/08/1253421/open-otc-secrets/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/08/1253421/open-otc-secrets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotterill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1253421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>David at Deus Ex Macchiato = <a title="The day after - Deus Ex Macchiato" href="http://blog.rivast.com/?p=6593" target="_blank">disturbed</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I went to a conference yesterday which started very well, but ended up about as scary as Romney’s economic policy. Why? <strong>Because a regulator from a minor European country (but who nevertheless is apparently influential at ESMA) suggested that it was official policy to substantially reduce the size of the OTC markets in general, and the inter-dealer market in particular.</strong></p></blockquote><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/08/1253421/open-otc-secrets/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Open OTC secrets?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/08/1253421/open-otc-secrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Derivatives industry no likey new margin requirements</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/17/1123041/derivatives-industry-no-likey-new-margin-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/17/1123041/derivatives-industry-no-likey-new-margin-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central counterparty clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over the counter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1123041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A survey of financial market participants most likely to be negatively affected by new regulations on uncleared swap trades revealed that they don&#8217;t like this new-fangled way of doing things at all. No, no, they really don&#8217;t.</p> <p>The completely predictable result was published in an article <a title="End-users will stop using derivatives – Risk.net poll - Risk" href="http://www.risk.net/risk-magazine/news/2198860/endusers-will-stop-using-derivatives-risknet-poll" target="_blank">in Risk on Wednesday</a>:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/17/1123041/derivatives-industry-no-likey-new-margin-requirements/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Derivatives industry no likey new margin requirements</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/17/1123041/derivatives-industry-no-likey-new-margin-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bank of England gets economical with its derivatives</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/22/1055811/the-bank-of-england-gets-economical-with-its-derivatives/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/22/1055811/the-bank-of-england-gets-economical-with-its-derivatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterparty Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1055811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it annoying when particular clients insist on being treated differently to everyone else? Like, just because your client is well, England, or Italy, or some other sovereign nation, doesn&#8217;t make them &#8216;special&#8217;. It&#8217;s also kind of annoying when they make regulations that make business tougher for banks and then <em>still </em>expect to be treated differently.</p> <p>Interestingly though, the Bank of England just stopped asking for one such special exception when it comes to certain derivatives that it enters into on behalf of the nation in order to best manage its balance sheet and the Treasury&#8217;s foreign exchange reserves.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/22/1055811/the-bank-of-england-gets-economical-with-its-derivatives/" class="more-link">Continue reading: The Bank of England gets economical with its derivatives</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/22/1055811/the-bank-of-england-gets-economical-with-its-derivatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the OCC should have looked</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/19/1050711/where-the-occ-should-have-looked/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/19/1050711/where-the-occ-should-have-looked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief investment office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM Whale-Watching Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1050711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it a problem if bank regulators depend, seemingly exclusively, on the banks themselves for information? Weren&#8217;t trade information warehouses, such as <a title="DTCC’s Global Trade Repository for OTC Derivatives (“GTR”)" href="http://dtcc.com/products/derivserv/suite/global_trade_repository_for_otc_derivs.php" target="_blank">DTCC&#8217;s for credit derivatives</a>, built in part to give regulators a bird&#8217;s eye view of markets? If so, why the hell does it sound like they aren&#8217;t being used?</p> <p>JPMorgan management have put their hands up since the announcement of $2bn of losses, effectively saying, &#8216;yeah, whoops, we totally messed that one up. Buck stops here. We&#8217;re looking into preventing that from ever happening again. We&#8217;ve learned that no matter how good a division&#8217;s past performance, one simply cannot ever be complacent.&#8217; They are taking their (very, very sizable) share of the blame.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/19/1050711/where-the-occ-should-have-looked/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Where the OCC should have looked</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/19/1050711/where-the-occ-should-have-looked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The high yield tranche piece</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/17/998981/the-high-yield-tranche-piece/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/17/998981/the-high-yield-tranche-piece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cdx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief investment office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM Whale-Watching Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=998981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Coverage of the <del>$2bn</del> <a title="And Now JP Morgan's $2 Billion Trading Loss Is Already $3 Billion (And Counting)  Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/jp-morgan-loss-grows-2012-5#ixzz1v9Mg7DzI - Business Insider" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/jp-morgan-loss-grows-2012-5" target="_blank">$3bn loss</a> emanating from JPMorgan&#8217;s Chief Investment Office on its synthetic credit portfolio continues a pace, and FT Alphaville&#8217;s tour continues too.</p> <p>The desire to understand what the trade was and the rationale behind it continues to bug us and many others. Interestingly, some of the discussion of late has come full circle. Bloomberg kicked off the London Whale saga on April 6th, and their <a title="JPMorgan Trader Iksil Fuels Prop-Trading Debate With Bets - Bloomberg" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-09/jpmorgan-trader-iksil-fuels-prop-trading-debate-with-bets.html" target="_blank">follow-up on April 9th</a> contained a detail that has now come back into the narrative. This time, though, it&#8217;s more than a mere sidenote &#8212; more on this in a minute.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/17/998981/the-high-yield-tranche-piece/" class="more-link">Continue reading: The high yield tranche piece</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/17/998981/the-high-yield-tranche-piece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What position transparency?</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/12/997121/what-position-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/12/997121/what-position-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM Whale-Watching Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=997121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Synthetic credit portfolio&#8221;. That&#8217;s the book where the <a title="JPMorgan loses $2bn in ‘egregious’ error - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/828376bc-9ae4-11e1-94d7-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">$2bn in mark-to-market losses</a> took place for JP Morgan, according to an announcement made on Thursday. A result which has now cost them a their <a title="JPMorgan, a Fitch ratings harpooning - FT Alphaville" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/05/11/997061/jpmorgan-a-fitch-ratings-harpooning/" target="_blank">AA- rating from Fitch</a> and landed them <a title="S&amp;P CUTS JPMorgan Outlook To Negative - Business Insider" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/sp-cuts-jpmorgan-outlook-to-negative-2012-5" target="_blank">on negative outlook with S&amp;P</a>, as announced late on Friday.</p> <p>FT Alphaville has analysed <a title="[JPM Whale-Watching Tour] Too Big To Hedge - FT Alphaville" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/05/11/996131/too-big-to-hedge/" target="_blank">the credit trades </a>that might be in that portfolio, in an attempt to reason through what may have gone on. The fact, however, remains that we know precious little. Why is that? Is this acceptable that after the financial crisis that this can happen to a bank, let alone a systemically important one like JP Morgan?</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/12/997121/what-position-transparency/" class="more-link">Continue reading: What position transparency?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/12/997121/what-position-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Big To Hedge</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/11/996131/too-big-to-hedge/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/11/996131/too-big-to-hedge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM Whale-Watching Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markit CDX IG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=996131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout <a title="[JPM Whale-Watching Tour] - FT Alphaville" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/series/jpm-whale-watching-tour/" target="_blank">FT Alphaville&#8217;s coverage</a> of the credit trades of JP Morgan&#8217;s Chief Investment Office, there were two thoughts that kept nagging us. We&#8217;d think about them whenever we wrote about the technicals the trades might be creating. One was: could this really happen under CEO Jamie Dimon&#8217;s watch? The other was: where the hell are the regulators in all of this?</p> <p>We&#8217;ll get to these questions a bit later, as we would first like to review how the <a title="JPMorgan loses $2bn in ‘egregious’ error - FT" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/828376bc-9ae4-11e1-94d7-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">$2bn mark-to-market loss</a> announced on Thursday may have happened&#8230;</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/11/996131/too-big-to-hedge/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Too Big To Hedge</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/11/996131/too-big-to-hedge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decoding the latest OTC derivative BIStimates</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/10/994131/decoding-the-latest-otc-derivative-bistimates/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/10/994131/decoding-the-latest-otc-derivative-bistimates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterparty Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=994131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://av.r.ftdata.co.uk/files/2012/05/120510-argh.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px;" title="WHY???? - dreamstime" src="http://av.r.ftdata.co.uk/files/2012/05/120510-argh.jpg" alt="" width="154" height="154" /></a>Just when someone&#8217;s gone and put a decent dataset together, someone has to go and mess it up. Thanks, Spain and Australia. Really,<em> thank you</em>. None of us really cared that much anyway about the data being comparable from one period to the next. Whatevs.</p> <p>&#8211; FT Alphaville&#8217;s Internal Monologue</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/10/994131/decoding-the-latest-otc-derivative-bistimates/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Decoding the latest OTC derivative BIStimates</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/10/994131/decoding-the-latest-otc-derivative-bistimates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting for credit risk before the crisis – a case of a gateway drug?</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/20/968451/accounting-for-credit-risk-before-the-crisis-%e2%80%93-a-case-of-a-gateway-drug/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/20/968451/accounting-for-credit-risk-before-the-crisis-%e2%80%93-a-case-of-a-gateway-drug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Default Swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark to Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monolines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=968451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”</em></p> <p>In <a title="[CVA] A tragedy the monolines hath wrought - FT Alphaville" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/04/11/943241/a-tragedy-the-monolines-hath-wrought/" target="_blank">a recent Alphaville post</a>, I made the claim that if the monolines had been required to mark the credit risk that they had taken to market, they would not have played such a prominent role in the financial crisis. Here I want to provide some support for that claim.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/20/968451/accounting-for-credit-risk-before-the-crisis-%e2%80%93-a-case-of-a-gateway-drug/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Accounting for credit risk before the crisis – a case of a gateway drug?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/20/968451/accounting-for-credit-risk-before-the-crisis-%e2%80%93-a-case-of-a-gateway-drug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pass the margin on the left hand side</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/13/960471/pass-the-margin-on-the-left-hand-side/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/13/960471/pass-the-margin-on-the-left-hand-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central counterparty clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deus Ex Macchiato on CVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margin requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=960471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you read some of the regulations written recently, you may be forgiven for thinking that central clearing is the solution to all the risks in the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market.  Some rules mandate clearing for certain market participants and trades, while others impose higher capital requirements for staying outside of the system. There is, of course, an implicit assumption in all of this that central clearing is an unequivocally good thing.</p> <p>If only it were that easy.  In fact, there are lots of issues with OTC derivatives clearing.  Today, we’ll just look at one aspect: that of margin.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/13/960471/pass-the-margin-on-the-left-hand-side/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Pass the margin on the left hand side</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/04/13/960471/pass-the-margin-on-the-left-hand-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
