<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FT Alphaville &#187; Interest Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/tag/interest-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville - Market Commentary - FT.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are rates mispriced or are investors missing something?</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/22/1396292/are-rates-mispriced-or-are-investors-missing-something/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/22/1396292/are-rates-mispriced-or-are-investors-missing-something/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Izabella Kaminska</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk On Risk Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1396292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The disconnect we've noticed between commodity fundamentals and forward rates appears to be popping up in other asset classes as well. </p>
<p>Priya Misra, rates strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, makes a very interesting point on Friday about what she sees in her sector.</p>
<a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/22/1396292/are-rates-mispriced-or-are-investors-missing-something/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Are rates mispriced or are investors missing something?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/02/22/1396292/are-rates-mispriced-or-are-investors-missing-something/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stevens and the RBA hold the line</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/06/1247201/stevens-and-the-rba-hold-the-line/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/06/1247201/stevens-and-the-rba-hold-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hume</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glenn Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Bank of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1247201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So Glenn Stevens likes the nags after all.</p>
<p>Well, sort of.</p>
<p>For the first time since he took the helm of the RBA in 2006, the governor did not tinker with interest rates on <a title="Green Moon wins Melbourne Cup - SMH" href="http://www.smh.com.au/sport/horseracing/green-moon-wins-melbourne-cup-20121106-28vkx.html" target="_blank">Melbourne Cup</a> day (a public holiday across parts of the country).</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/06/1247201/stevens-and-the-rba-hold-the-line/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Stevens and the RBA hold the line</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/06/1247201/stevens-and-the-rba-hold-the-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A tale of two VaRs</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/10/18/1218491/a-tale-of-two-vars/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/10/18/1218491/a-tale-of-two-vars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Alloway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Essential AV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/?p=1218491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Buried in Morgan Stanley&#8217;s <a title="Morgan Stanley Q3 2012 results" href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20121018005491/en/Morgan-Stanley-Reports-Quarter-2012" target="_blank">decent third-quarter results</a> (excluding the <a title="FT Alphaville posts on DVA" href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/tag/dva/" target="_blank">absurdity that is DVA</a> of course) is this intriguing footnote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Morgan Stanley’s average trading Value-at-Risk (VaR) measured at the 95% confidence level was $63 million compared with $76 million in second quarter of 2012 and $99 million in the third quarter of the prior year. The Firm modified its VaR model this quarter to make it more responsive to recent market conditions.</p></blockquote><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/10/18/1218491/a-tale-of-two-vars/" class="more-link">Continue reading: A tale of two VaRs</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/10/18/1218491/a-tale-of-two-vars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now, that is one mighty fine interest rate sensitivity disclosure</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/20/1125121/now-that-is-one-mighty-fine-interest-rate-sensitivity-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/20/1125121/now-that-is-one-mighty-fine-interest-rate-sensitivity-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BB&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net interest margin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1125121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While interest rates are likely to stay low for some time yet, they can&#8217;t be that way forever. When rates finally go up, banks could be in a position to profit &#8212; provided their balance sheets are ready.</p> <p>An investor could attempt to research which banks will be best placed for such a shift. For retail banks in particular, since their business models are not as diverse as investment banks, a handy disclosure to look for in financial statements would be <a title="Net Interest Income - Investopedia" href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/net-interest-income.asp" target="_blank">net interest</a> income sensitivity.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/20/1125121/now-that-is-one-mighty-fine-interest-rate-sensitivity-disclosure/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Now, that is one mighty fine interest rate sensitivity disclosure</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/08/20/1125121/now-that-is-one-mighty-fine-interest-rate-sensitivity-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well, we were asking about ECB negative rates&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/07/05/1072941/well-we-were-asking-about-ecb-negative-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/07/05/1072941/well-we-were-asking-about-ecb-negative-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotterill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Draghi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1072941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://av.r.ftdata.co.uk/files/2012/07/LisaECBquestion.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1072961" title="Lisa at the ECB" src="http://av.r.ftdata.co.uk/files/2012/07/LisaECBquestion.png" alt="" width="512" height="239" /></a></p> <p>(That&#8217;s Lisa, at Thursday&#8217;s European Central Bank press conference)</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/07/05/1072941/well-we-were-asking-about-ecb-negative-rates/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Well, we were asking about ECB negative rates&#8230;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/07/05/1072941/well-we-were-asking-about-ecb-negative-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How NOT to argue that derivatives are the devil&#8217;s spawn</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041931/how-not-to-argue-that-derivatives-are-the-devils-spawn/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041931/how-not-to-argue-that-derivatives-are-the-devils-spawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Pollack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rate swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipalities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1041931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, The New York Times takes a big ol&#8217; swipe at derivatives for being evil and whatnot. That&#8217;s fine and well &#8212; and sometimes obligatory, particularly when it comes to certain structured products for which it&#8217;s hard to discern the benefit to anyone outside of a bank.</p> <p>But it can all go awry when someone starts arguing against derivatives and just gets it wrong. It makes us do a sad, frowny face <del>and then get incredibly frustrated</del>.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041931/how-not-to-argue-that-derivatives-are-the-devils-spawn/" class="more-link">Continue reading: How NOT to argue that derivatives are the devil&#8217;s spawn</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041931/how-not-to-argue-that-derivatives-are-the-devils-spawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A glimpse of an economy post this crisis</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041891/a-glimpse-of-an-economy-post-this-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041891/a-glimpse-of-an-economy-post-this-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=1041891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Iceland, of course. Kitchen-sinked and cleaned-up, the Icelandic central bank has just decided to push up rates by 25 basis points to combat signs of inflation amidst &#8220;robust&#8221; domestic demand.</p> <p><a title="Statement of the Monetary Policy Committee 13 June 2012 - Central Bank of Iceland" href="http://www.sedlabanki.is/?PageID=287&amp;NewsID=3230" target="_blank">Statement</a>:</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041891/a-glimpse-of-an-economy-post-this-crisis/" class="more-link">Continue reading: A glimpse of an economy post this crisis</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/06/13/1041891/a-glimpse-of-an-economy-post-this-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I see the periphery (sort of) in Treasuries&#8230;and convexity</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/03/15/924461/i-see-the-periphery-sort-of-in-treasuries-and-convexity/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/03/15/924461/i-see-the-periphery-sort-of-in-treasuries-and-convexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotterill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=924461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Real rates, to cut a long story short. Treasuries should be returning to trade inversely to equities, although stocks didn&#8217;t soar on the two days this week that bonds have slumped.</p> <p>While eurozone sovereign debt <em>did </em>improve.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/03/15/924461/i-see-the-periphery-sort-of-in-treasuries-and-convexity/" class="more-link">Continue reading: I see the periphery (sort of) in Treasuries&#8230;and convexity</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/03/15/924461/i-see-the-periphery-sort-of-in-treasuries-and-convexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We want negative Treasury yields</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/02/01/863251/please-sell-us-negative-treasury-yields/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/02/01/863251/please-sell-us-negative-treasury-yields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Cotterill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Havens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=863251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting exchange in the <a title="Minutes of the Meeting of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association January 31, 2012 - Treasury" href="http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1404.aspx" target="_blank">latest minutes</a> of the TBAC &#8211; Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which brings together primary dealers and US Treasury officials&#8230; (Hat-tip<a title="Bondscoop twitter account" href="[9:20:18 AM] Joseph Cotterill: https://twitter.com/#!/bondscoop" target="_blank"> Bondscoop</a>)</p> <p>The question was asked if it made sense for Treasury to permit bids and awards at negative interest rates in marketable Treasury bill auctions.  DAS Rutherford [Matthew Rutherford, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Finance] noted that there were operational issues associated with such a rule change, but that the hurdles were not insurmountable.   <strong>It was the unanimous view of the committee that Treasury should modify auction regulations to permit negative rate bidding and awards in Treasury bill auctions as soon as feasible.</strong> Rutherford noted that any decision on this policy change would likely be made at the May refunding.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/02/01/863251/please-sell-us-negative-treasury-yields/" class="more-link">Continue reading: We want negative Treasury yields</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/02/01/863251/please-sell-us-negative-treasury-yields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banking off the FOMC</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/01/27/853761/banking-off-the-fomc/</link>
		<comments>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/01/27/853761/banking-off-the-fomc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cardiff Garcia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/?p=853761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The obvious place to start when discussing the impact of Wednesday&#8217;s FOMC meeting on US banks is with the downward pressure on net interest margins that will result from the extended period of low rates.</p> <p>A short, helpful note from Nomura&#8217;s Brian Foran breaks down the issue into various components, and we&#8217;ll present each in order.</p><a href="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/01/27/853761/banking-off-the-fomc/" class="more-link">Continue reading: Banking off the FOMC</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/01/27/853761/banking-off-the-fomc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
