Updates – Oops. The original version of this presentation seems to date from October last year, although the details remain current. In any case, if it does date to October, we should make that clear. Apologies! Even so, it’s critical to understanding the Finnish collateral agreement. And it’s not like we have much else to go on.
This blog post by Osmi Soininvaara, a Finnish Green MP who has read the agreement, is also worth a read (H/T JussiR in comments). Soininvaara defends the reason for secrecy (to protect the other counterparties to the deal). But he argues that you don’t need to know the secret bits to know it’s a poor deal. He does have a point if there are legitimate business reasons to encrypt some parts of the deal, but we would still argue it’s important to know how credit events are defined, and how exactly the reference assets in this swap work. Read more
1Bernanke weighs in on robot wars; brings Keynes for backup
2Pump up, debase
3S&P 2,100, by Goldman Sachs
4Collateral crunch-counting gets sophisticated
5Apple Operations International, facts (?) du jour
Show more6Secret liquidity and Scottish independence
7The risk of a Japanese VaR shock
8In which the FTSE puts the crisis behind it
9Further reading
10A Kazakh muddle
Show fewer