If you lend money to any of my people with you who is poor, you shall not be like a moneylender to him, and you shall not exact interest from him.
© The Financial Times Ltd 2016 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
Just because the amount of jargon which sprouts from the mouths of technologists and bankers needs occasional lambasting, here’s a transcript of a recent interview with technologist-turned-banker-turned-technologist Corrie Elston, CTO of financial services for Google Cloud Platform (formerly a technologist at Goldman Sachs) by Alexander Tabb, Tabb group founder and COO, on how excited Google is about getting into financial services in the next few years.
FWIW Corrie appears throughout in standard issue “do no evil” apparel — perhaps because there’s nothing like a goofy corporate T-shirt to take minds off critically evaluating the underlying dialogue in favour of simply thinking about cats on the internet or colourful inflatable furniture? Who knows?
Google has discovered the conglomerate, and segment reporting. The search business, and all the other businesses such as driverless cars and eternal youth, will be subsidiaries of Alphabet Inc.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin will run the centre and allocate capital. Here is a non-exhaustive and speculative list of reasons why they might be doing it: Read more
Climate campaigners have popularised the notion that fossil fuel assets might one day become “stranded” because, if global warming is to stay within the internationally agreed two degree Celsius limit, they can’t realistically be burned.
It’s a view that has gained a lot of traction with investment managers leading to growing debates about strategies to de-risk portfolios by way of active engagement at the shareholder level or outright divestment. Read more
This is a Google Map of the City of London:
It’s a “square mile” because back in the day — before phones, fax machines or the internet was invented — representatives from the key settlement banks had to gather in person to net and settle outstanding debts and claims against each other (a mile essentially being about as far as messengers could be asked to travel in a day). Read more
We were struck by a line from Kas Thomas, who thinks Google is turning into Yahoo (and will end up buying Twitter as it tries to stay relevant).
Along the way, there will be layoffs. Google’s R&D and G&A spending are out of control.
Presumably someone in Mountain View does keep an eye on the total, but even if research and development spending is under control, it is large: $10bn last year. Read more
Google has a $30bn warchest to spend on foreign acquisitions, or so it’s told regulators. If it decided to spend the cash in one go the options for what it could buy* are rather limited.
There are only seven companies outside North America (we skipped Canada, rather unfairly) valued between $29bn and $30bn:
John Gapper looks at the European Court of Justice’s ruling this week that Google must remove the internet search results of people who wish them to be cleared. He finds the ruling troubling.
Or as he states:
…this only shows that the EU’s 1995 data protection directive is an ass.
Before long, people’s search results will start to resemble official biographies, recording only the facts that they want other people to know, and not the remainder of reality.
This contrasts heavily with the view of digital privacy campaigners who see the move as a significant step in the right direction. Read more
From Huffington Post’s Bianca Bosker this week regarding Google’s acquisition of DeepMind, with regards to the latter’s concern that artificial intelligence poses an extinction level threat for humanity:
Google’s acquisition of DeepMind came with an estimated $400 million price tag and an unusual stipulation that adds extra gravity — and a dose of reality — to Legg’s warning: Google agreed to create an AI safety and ethics review board to ensure this technology is developed safely, as The Information first reported and The Huffington Post confirmed. (A Google spokesman said that DeepMind had been acquired, but declined to comment further.)
Isaacson also pointed out that Nest co-founder and CEO Tony Fadell will be joining Google as part of this deal. “Fadell was one of the team that created the iPod. He was very deep into the Apple culture … when Apple was so innovative.”
Matt makes the case for execution over true innovation. We think though that the tech world’s focus on disruptive innovation may have more to do with fear than hope. Parts of tech are wildly profitable, something that leads to what Andrew Smithers would call a bout of stockbroker economics when it comes to assessing the long term prospects of tech companies. Read more
Just asking, cos…
Back in 2009 Standard Chartered’s Wei Li and Stephen Green figured out that while the great Chinese firewall may be capable of restricting access to undesirable internet content on the mainland, it can’t stop people from searching for said undesirable content.
While Google has suffered some setbacks in China, the analysts believe the search engine is still responsible for some 12-13 per cent of mainland searches. Read more
Regulators in the US and EU have given grudging approval to Google’s $12.5bn acquisition of Motorola Mobility, the company’s biggest gambit in the smartphone patent wars, the FT reports. The US Department of Justice said it had “significant concerns” about how Google would enforce patents acquired in the Motorola deal. Apple sued Motorola Mobility for asserting rights infringement the very same day Google won approval for its deal, in a reminder of the criticisms directed at Google’s treatment of patents used by its rivals, Thomson Reuters Legal says. Google said the deal’s approval will “supercharge Android”, its smartphone software platform, Ars Technica says.
Reuters reports that Google and Facebook have reacted to a court directive in India on Monday warning them of a potential crackdown by authorities if they do not take steps to protect religious sensibilities. The two companies are among 21 that have been asked to block potentially offensive material. The move, off the back of private petitions to the court, have stoked fears over censorship. Last year, a law was passed in India that made companies like Google responsible for user-generated content on their sites, giving them 36-hours to take down content deemed offensive once there has been a complaint. The WSJ reports that the content in question in this case involved images of religious figures. These have since been taken down by Google but only on its localised India domain, making the content still available elsewhere.
Facebook already has so much cash, and so little desire for true shareholder control, that it should really call its IPO off instead of “gratifying” its venture capital backers and employees, the FT’s John Gapper writes in a must-read column. Investors have reacted warily to Facebook’s suggested $75bn-$100bn valuation of 100 times price to earnings, says Reuters. Google emerged on public markets in 2005 with a price 218 times its earnings, but was valued at $23bn at the time. Facebook’s price tag would make it worth 53 per cent of Google’s current valuation, despite the latter company earning 10 times the profit, notes the WSJ.
Google shocked Wall Street on Thursday with a big shortfall in its latest earnings, as an unexpected slump in pricing in its core search advertising business combined with slowing international growth and another jump in costs to dent recent optimism about the company’s prospects, the FT reports. The internet search giant also blamed the rising value of the dollar, foreign currency hedging costs and a writedown on its investment in wireless broadband carrier Clearwire for the disappointing numbers. The news led to an immediate 10 per cent drop in its share price in after-hours trading.
Google shocked Wall Street on Thursday with a big shortfall in its latest earnings, as an unexpected slump in pricing in its core search advertising business combined with slowing growth internationally and another jump in costs to dent recent optimism about the company’s prospects, reports the FT. The internet search giant also blamed the rising value of the dollar, foreign currency hedging costs and a writedown on its investment in wireless broadband carrier Clearwire for the disappointing numbers. The news led to an immediate 10 per cent drop in its share price in after-hours trading. Google’s quarterly results fell short of Wall Street’s heightened expectations for the holiday season, Reuters says. Several analysts zeroed in on an 8 per cent drop in cost-per-click, or money paid by marketers to the company for search ads, versus analyst estimates of a slight increase. It was the first such decline in more than two years, leading to nearly a half-dozen questions from analysts during the call and a terse one-liner from chief executive Larry Page who at one point requested that “maybe we can get our next question not about CPCs.”
European regulators have narrowed down a list of concerns about Google’s business practices in the region, pushing their two-year probe into a new stage, the FT says. While the European Commission has still not decided on whether to launch a formal complaint or to file a “statement of objections”, officials are looking closely at Google’s ranking of search results to include its own services near the top. Eric Schmidt, Google’s executive chair, flies into Brussels this week to meet Joaquín Almunia, the competition commissioner, reports the NYT.
Google’s latest quarterly earnings soared above most analysts’ forecasts as the internet search company rebounded to its highest growth rate since before the 2008 financial crisis and shrugged off recent signs of economic weakness, reports the FT. The third-quarter results, released late on Thursday, drove the company’s share price up by more than 6 per cent in after-hours trading, despite a continuation of the hiring binge that has caused unease on Wall Street this year. Reuters puts the results down to bumper ad sales and deft costs controls. There’s no rest for the internet giant, though; Google is in discussions with record label execs with a view to launching an online music store to rival iTunes, reports Bloomberg.
Eric Schmidt, chairman of Google, denied that the search company “cooked” its search results to gain an advantage over rivals, as he fended off persistent questioning during a Senate hearing into how Google wields its online power, the FT reports. However, his responses left some members of the US Senate’s antitrust subcommittee expressing frustration over how Google appeared to sidestep its own search algorithms to give prominence to its own online services, such as Maps and Finance. Asked by Herb Kohl, chairman of the subcommittee, if Google was a monopoly or had dominant power in search and other online markets – a status that would put it under special responsibility to avoid unfairly hurting competitors – Mr Schmidt said: “I would agree, senator, that we’re in that area … From our perspective, we see ourselves as having a special responsibility to debate all the issues that you are describing with us now.” A lawyer for the company, appearing later, denied that the comments amounted to an admission that Google was a monopoly.
Just as correlation does not imply causation, this post should not imply usefulness. Consider it a bit of light frippery at the end of a rather challenging week for symmetrical trading.
Here’s how it works. We’ve drawn the graphs of a few securities into Google Correlate, which finds search terms whose popularity matches the given trend over time. It is, in short, an automatic logical fallacy generator. Read more
The Chinese government has renewed the licence under which Google runs its local website, a decision that reassures investors over the legal basis for foreign internet companies’ business in the country, reports the FT. “We can confirm that the government has renewed our [internet content provider] licence,” a Google spokesperson said. The announcement comes less than a week after a set of new regulations took effect which appeared to put the legal structure of many foreign and overseas-listed Chinese internet companies at risk. The rules, spelling out how the Chinese government will review acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors for national security implications, say that foreign investors will not be able to avoid a review through techniques such as contracts that give them control over a domestic company.