Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:07 on 6 Feb 2012. Participants in this chat were: Paul Murphy Bryce Elder/FT
PM
Welcome to Markets Live
PM
Prompt at 11am each morning
PM
And we are going to kick off on a positive note
PM
This is from the reformed Broker
PM
The clubbable Josh Brown
PM
One of Cardiff’s drinking pals in NY, as it happens
PM
Disorienting, ain’t it?
There you were, muddling through just like you’ve been told to do for the last four years and all of a sudden people start talking about a way out, a beginning of an end to the stagnation. Apparently there are economic reports that are consistently improving. Slowly but undeniably.
“We don’t have to live to like this forever, you mean?”
PM
No, you don’t. You can get up off the ground now and do something. You can guard your face with one glove instead of two now, you can use the other glove to throw a few jabs, go on offense for a change.
Remember what offense felt like? Remember what it felt like to move forward with plans and schemes and dreams – without having to steal a glance behind every day looking for the sucker punch? Without looking out for the next systemic left hook coming to bash you sideways? Feels pretty good to go on offense – let the other guy know you’re still punching.
We’ve all been through the ringer. Some of us have gained a little extra weight and sprouted some premature white hairs. Some of us have had to give up things and activities we loved. Some of us have downsized our lifestyles substantially. This economy has cost us all something – vacations, cars, jobs and even marriages.
PM
And when you’re living in a state of lowered expectations for so long, it becomes easy to imagine that this is the way it has to be. That this is it and the best you can do is not get killed.
But…
But what happens if the treadmill speeds up beneath our feet?
What if this is for real now after so many stutters and stoppages?
What if people keep getting jobs and giving jobs?
What if the malls and the restaurants and the morning commuter trains start filling up again?
Are you ready for that? Have you done anything over the last few years to set up for that possibility? Or have you spent all this time in the bunker, doing nothing because of “the conditions out there”?
It’s okay if you’ve been in hiding. Or just shuffling through the months with your head down so it couldn’t get chopped off again. We all did a little of that. But you might want to consider rubbing your eyes and coming outside. You might want to consider emerging and shaking off the bunker dust. Because there will be a future after all, gang. And the people who can switch their mindsets the fastest are gonna own that future. Same as it ever was.
BE
That’s enough American style optimism.
PM
Yes. We could come at this day from a whole different direction
PM
We are in fact just an hour away form the Great Greek Deadline
PM
Yes, we may have had a few of those – that all got missed.
PM
But this is the one we have to hand
PM
The 12 noon deadline imposed by the Eurogroup for the Greek politicians to get their stuff together.
PM
It’s pretty clear that if we don’t get solid positive news in the next hour or so, Greece will be moving headlong for default on March 13.
PM
The clock is quite literally ticking here.
PM
And we’re hear on Markets Live to chronicle the countdown.
BE
It’s noon continental Europe time.
BE
We’ve passed the deadline.
BE
You’ve missed your moment to chronicle this historic countdown.
PM
So what’s the outcome. Are Greece headed to default or not?
PM
So what’s the outcome. Are Greece headed to default or not?
BE
Well, it’s Greece, so we don’t know.
BE
Actually the latest report is that there wasn’t a deadline at all.
BE
To quote some unnamed official
BE
“The only deadline is to have a staff agreement for the second bailout and the agreement of the political leaders before Eurogroup.”
PM
And when’s the next eurogroup meet?
PM
We do need that can icon
PM
there’s a fat mouse under Bryce’s desk
BE
Actually, we should probably rename Manuel
BE
To reflect current tensions.
BE
Suggestions on the right, please.
BE
I’ll let you know what colour the mouse is when he comes out of my desk.
BE
So stay tuned for that.
BE
In the meantime, let’s have a quick look at the big board.
BE
Off 16 points, give or take.
BE
Opened lower, now edging back.
BE
We’ll blame Wall Street futures for that.
BE
(Stavros it is. Thanks, rabble.)
BE
(@Nately: Stavros Mousaka. Just for you.)
BE
So, ragbag among the risers.
BE
Gold, oil, banks, drugs.
PM
It really is a ragbag this morning
BE
(Stavros Mousaka is now headed off towards the editor’s office.)
BE
Typically low Monday volume.
PM
We should visit Glencore / Xstrata
PM
After all the frothy stuff I read at the weekend, we’ve now got Glencore down 4% — heading the fallers list
PM
And Xstrata not far behind – down 2%
PM
This is on the back of the story that Glencore is going to up its premium. 2.8 Glen per XTA or there abouts.
BE
Feedback I’ve had so far is that Glencore has a cheek to call 2.8 a premium.
BE
(Which is no surprise really. Holders always want more.)
PM
Does the take out price pump up Mick Davis payout
PM
he gets 5.7m i read at the weekend
PM
Guess he’s glad to be in mining, rather than banking or railways
BE
I don’t think he’ll end the year poorer, whatever the outcome.
PM
Tony T makes a key point over on the right
PM
This is a scheme of arrangement, so needs 75%
PM
And Glencore can’t vote their 34% stake
PM
so… 75% of 66%…. means this is not quite the done deal that some people seem to think it is
BE
No – though it’s surely be kamikaze logic for any institution to actually block.
BE
What would they be left with?
BE
It’s not as if Xstrata has a plan B.
BE
And it’s not as if they bought Xstrata shares full in the knowledge that the merger was certain.
PM
But it is must be fair to supposed that — in premium terms — the parties won’t “underbid”
PM
Anyway, here’s some sell side
PM
Based on our analysis, an exchange of 3.0 GLEN shares per XTA share (current ratio is 2.66x) would be earnings accretive for Glencore and Xstrata shareholders. This ratio would imply a 12.8% premium to the current XTA share price. A smaller premium offer of 5-10% is probably coming and would likely be high enough to win over XTA shareholders as the strategic benefit of a merger should offset small earnings dilution for XTA shareholders.
Positive implications of a Glencore/Xstrata merger: We would expect a merger between Glencore and Xstrata at a ratio of 3.0 GLEN shares per XTA share to be earnings accretive for Glencore and Xstrata and to lead to an equity valuation for the combined group that is greater than the current weighted average of the two valuations separately. A slightly lower ratio (we estimate 2.8x) would probably be high enough for Xstrata shareholders to accept as modest earnings dilution would be offset by a valuation rerating for XTA shareholders. The merged company would likely then pursue an aggressive, value accretive M&A strategy. Further consolidation in the mining industry should lead to higher valuations for mining equities in general. A Glencore/Xstrata merger should therefore be a game changer for the mining sector overall.
PM
EPS downgrades for Glencore, but target price upgrade: We are cutting our 2H 2011 EPS estimate for Glencore from $0.35 to $0.23, our 2012 EPS estimate from $0.83 to $0.70, and our 2013 EPS estimate from $1.05 to $0.94 as we have conservatively lowered our margin assumptions in Marketing and increased our cost assumptions in the company’s Industrial segments. Our estimates are now 5% below consensus for 2012 and in line with consensus for 2013. Despite these earnings estimate reductions, we are increasing our target price for Glencore shares from 525p to 575p as we expect a merger with Xstrata to happen and to create significant value for shareholders of both Glencore and Xstrata.
PM
Hefty earnings downgrades in there
BE
Liberum — who were on the Glencore ticket when it floated, of course — are rather more optimistic.
BE
We stick by our view a deal will be announced and tomorrow in the range of 2.7-2.8. Moreover at this level and with this board configuration we feel it will be accepted by Xstrata shareholders. Voting down a synergy led deal against the will of the Xstrata board seems like a long shot to us. With a long time to completion though and G being cheaper than XTA, the ratio at the close on Friday feels about right. We wouldn’t buy above 2.6x given what we perceive to be the albeit small completion risk.
BE
Rerating for X/G because it is iron ore lite? Although Glencore and Xstrata have outperformed the sector post the announcement of the potential merger, we feel there be more to go for. The initial price rise seems to be baking in the shared synergies and correcting for the deal risk uncertainty that was hanging over both shares. From here we expect the combined company to re-rate above the other majors. The key reason is it will be growing faster than its peers and it will be the only major without a big exposure to iron ore – arguably the only major commodity whose price is likely to be much lower than today 5 years out. The outlooks for its key commodity suite (copper, coal, zinc and nickel) look very good relative to that of iron ore. Currently, iron ore earnings account for a current 66%of RIO, 35% of BHP Billiton and 40% of Anglo in 2012E vs 0% for XTA/G.
BE
Which also dismisses the chances of actual rebellion.
PM
(Thanks for that Tony)
BE
Investor feedback – value issues dominate: there appears relatively little
resistance from investors to the idea of putting the two companies together,
but value issues and potential deal premiums are front and centre. Key
investor issues: 1) valuation of XTA’s longer term growth projects (2/3 year
growth plans seen as undervalued by some); 2) XTA’s higher beta and price
leverage in a recovering demand (rising price) environment; 3) XTA’s capex
and execution risks vs. GLEN capex light marketing business and nearer
term growth; 4) control premium; 5) XTA’s stronger balance sheet.
BE
Synergies in the price: since the deal announcement the combined MC of
the two companies has increased $10.3bn (13%) compared to a 3%
increase for the peer group. Part of the outperformance can be explained by
XTA and GLEN higher beta, but if we crudely assume the combined MC has
outperformed 9.4%, or $7.7bn, on the deal announcement alone, the market
is pricing in annual synergies of c.$770m (vs. our estimate range of $300-
700m).
PM
(Thanks for that Tony)
BE
View: We expect the two companies to soon announce a deal structure and
rationale / synergies. In reality, synergy numbers are very difficult to audit
and besides will only be confirmed years later. This deal is less about
synergies and more about strategic positioning – removing an imperfect
cross holding, avoiding direct competition and greater acquisition ability. The
newco will be high growth, geared to our preferred commodities copper and
coal and more M&A driven than XTA as a stand alone company. The current
shares are trading on a ratio of 2.66 in line with level at time of IPO, above
the eight month average of 2.52 and below the peak (in Jul 11) of 2.9. A
premium for XTA shareholders of 10% (to 2.9) would equalise the 2012/13
PEs and be in line with our target prices for each company. A merger offer in
line with the current ratio may meet resistance from some XTA shareholders
in our view.
BE
Deal structure: the companies have stated an all equity transaction is being
proposed. Gearing levels do not allow a significant cash component. To
enable capture of synergies a full merger would be required in our view to
remove related party and minority rights issues.
BE
Anglo as a target – price and politics: following the aborted takeover
attempt by XTA, the newco may take a second potentially more hostile
attempt, although not in the near term. XTA’s appetite for investing in SA
appears to have dimmed in recent years and price and politics would be
major obstacles. A potential carve-out of the non-SA units and maintenance
of an SA listing is a possibility.
PM
(Various screams going thru the newsroom here as the mouse does its tour)
BE
(It’s a big mouse. I think it may need upgraded to rat.)
BE
I guess we have to keep in mind over the weeks that come ….
BE
That the noise from the arbs in Xstrata and Glencore ….
BE
(Of which there will be plenty)
PM
(Atarashī — 13% i believe at circa 2.8 ratio)
BE
might not align with what actual long-term shareholders think.
PM
A french stie called BFM Business ahve got a doc…
PM
This is on the financial transaction tax — 0.01% thing
PM
My french is non-existent
PM
Will apply to trading in companies worth more than 1 bn euro
PM
Tax will be applied to notional amount of sov CDS also
BE
Stavros M the ratmouse last spotted at the International Desk.
BE
We’ll keep you updated to its movements.
BE
Bad day for Muppet Alpha
FT Alpha’s fantasy investment portfolio. We employ a modifed version of cartoonist Scott Adams’s bet on the bad guys for stock selection.
PM
Why wahat’s happened???
BE
Supergroup for one thing.
BE
Has come up from sub 500p in a matter of weeks.
PM
I would have thought pink velor tracksuits not good in this weather
BE
Don’t ask me. Don’t know who wears this stuff.
BE
And Oriel think they still will in a few years.
BE
This is Jonathan Pritchard.
BE
Supergroup is righting 2011’s wrongs, re-establishing a growth profile. Logos
are shrinking (good news) and logistics are functional again. With rising
internet sales likely to curb the appetite for physical stores, forecasts and
returns will increase. That makes the shares a BUY (up from Hold).
BE
An evolution of the brand: it has long been our contention that a more subtle
approach to logo-ing garments was required, and the new SS12 ranges carry much less of the very bold and obvious fonts seen previously. We think that this will widen the appeal of the brand, as it has always been our view that the underlying quality, fashionability and pricing of the clothes are very good. We just think the ‘sandwich board’ effect put some people off. We are most encouraged by what we have seen of the new range so far.
BE
Warehousing problems easing: both inspection of the stores and the company’s rhetoric suggest that the distribution problems that have dogged both of the previous two seasons are not repeating themselves this time around. The company has outsourced its warehousing to Wincanton, and whilst there will doubtless be the odd hiccough as the new ranges hit the stores, we are confident that the c.£9m hit to EBIT that the company faced this year will prove to be a one-off.
BE
A revision of the target for store numbers?: the company’s body language at the
Interims suggested that the long-standing target of 150 stores in the UK might be about to be brought down. We think that this would be the right strategy for the company. Our view is that 80-100 genuine destination stores is enough of a store portfolio to fulfil the UK’s demand, when it is tied in with a functioning internet service. Superdry was not in the industry vanguard in terms of creating a multi-channel offer, but its customers certainly require one and we would expect that non-store sales could realistically make up 25% of the mix on a ten year view, up from the current 8%.
BE
January was probably tough: there’s a current trading statement on Wednesday 8th, but it only updates us on a quiet month in sales terms. We’d expect LFL to have fallen away from December’s excellent 9% to be about flat, meaning that Q3’s total LFL will come in at 4%. Of much more importance will be anything the company might choose to say about distribution or its outlook for the near future.
BE
From Hold to BUY: the shares have had a bit of a run but trade at no more than a
sector valuation to May 2013. 2011 was far from a vintage year for the company but
with earnings momentum beginning to be re-established, we think that the shares will rerate as the growth characteristics become clearer. We are upgrading to BUY.
BE
So the theme, if I can summarise ….
BE
Is “management get sensible and start acting rational.”
BE
Which would be nice, I guess.
BE
Better than the opposite.
BE
But whether this means they can roll the brand across borders …. dunno.
BE
Elsewhere in Muppet Alpha ….
BE
The rabble have noticed GKP’s up again,
PM
That’s be exxon bidding again i guess
BE
Up about 150% since the start of November, by the looks of things.
BE
What can we say except the obvious …………….
BE
No, we don’t know if Exxon will buy.
BE
And neither does anyone else.
BE
Logic tells you that they might be a bit shy of doubling down in a warzone
BE
And buying a company with a market cap that’s already … hang on ….
BE
TWO POINT EIGHT BILLION POUNDS.
BE
That’s bigger than Invensys.
BE
Bigger than Daily Mail & General Trust.
PM
Well, does have how many billion barrels of oil oozing out of the ground…
BE
Bigger than Cookson, Segro, Amlin …. companies with actual revenue.
BE
Yes, of course. IT HAS LOTS OF OIL. KEEP BUYING.
BE
There’s more than a hint of tulip mania about this.
BE
Still, well done to all holders. Congratulations. Super. We have no news to justify the gain, and if you’re honest neither do you.
PM
The FT’s Peter Spiegel saying wed or thurs for the next eurogroup meeting
PM
So 2/3 more days of Greek squabbling to come
PM
Oh, and let me share this
PM
That’s positive discrimination at the Squid
PM
This one-day event will introduce Year 13 female A-Level / International Baccalaureate students to the dynamic world of financial services through a tailor-made programme of presentations, interactive case studies and skills sessions. Benefit from meeting with industry professionals, to learn more about the unique culture and career opportunities our firm has to offer.
PM
This one-day event will introduce Year 13 female A-Level / International Baccalaureate students to the dynamic world of financial services through a tailor-made programme of presentations, interactive case studies and skills sessions. Benefit from meeting with industry professionals, to learn more about the unique culture and career opportunities our firm has to offer.
PM
(THAT WAS SECOND GO ON THAT QUOTE)
PM
New occasional feature now
PM
Bit where we square off all those requests to get into our blogroll etc…
PM
Dear Mr. Paul Murphy:
There’s a new blog in town – my MoreLiver’s Daily. Or rather, it’s been around since last July.
http://morelivers.blogspot.com/
Why I emailed you: I believe your team might find the content interesting. It would be an honor to be included in your blogroll
Me: ex-derivatives salesman turned journalist
Topics: macro, markets, derivatives, off-topic
Content: Links to content from blogs, think tanks, researchers, central banks – no news. Also my own views.
Bent: Sceptical – look what they do, not what they say.
PM
Positioning: less aggressive/crazy than Zero Hedge. About as crazy as old-skool front-office people. Less educated than alphaville, but more than Abnormal Returns.
Audience: small, but convincing: daily readers SocGen, Governor’s Office of Central Bank of Croatia, several hedge funds and smaller banks, private professional traders, other blogs.
Target audience: people who already have BB, all the news and bank research, but not the time to go through all the blogs.
Sincerely Yours,
Mr. Juhani “MoreLiver” Huopainen
PM
Hi – I contribute to a precious metals blog (not one of the crazy ones – please don’t hit ‘delete’ straight away!) – “Screwtape Files” – and have been reading quite a lot of the excellent stuff on FT Alphaville recently posted about goldbugs and their psychology. I think there’s quite a lot of overlap in our interests.
I realise you’re probably bombarded with emails from bloggers looking to promote themselves, but if you had chance to look at our site (http://screwtapefiles.blogspot.com/) I’d really appreciate it, and I think you’d find it interesting.
For example, we’ve recently debunked the myth about 30% premiums on PSLV implying a shortage, and questionedZH’s remarkably partisan reporting, and I’ve just published a post about how the silver bugs behave in a very cult-like way. We’re also working on a huge project to dispel the “SLV has no silver” myth. Essentially it tracks every gold and silver bar (by number and allocation) in every major holding in the world, which should correct the nonsense spouted about SLV very soon. This project is near completion, and we hope that FT Alphaville might be interested in reporting on it when it’s ready.
PM
We make no money from our site (no ads, no click-thrus, no donate button), but do it just because we love testing facts and assertions, and trying to correct the enormous amount of misinformation that one reads around the precious metals blogosphere. But we’d really like to expand our readership so that we can better achieve our aim of correcting disinformation, so if you ever see any articles you think are worthy, then a link to them would be extremely appreciated. And if you think the site would interest your readers in general, then we’d of course love it if you could see your way to putting a link to it on your blogroll!
I hope you don’t think me too presumptuous in writing to you like this. And if you have any questions about the blog or us or our work, then please let me know.
Best regards,
Jeanne d’Arc
Screwtape Files
PM
We make no money from our site (no ads, no click-thrus, no donate button), but do it just because we love testing facts and assertions, and trying to correct the enormous amount of misinformation that one reads around the precious metals blogosphere. But we’d really like to expand our readership so that we can better achieve our aim of correcting disinformation, so if you ever see any articles you think are worthy, then a link to them would be extremely appreciated. And if you think the site would interest your readers in general, then we’d of course love it if you could see your way to putting a link to it on your blogroll!
I hope you don’t think me too presumptuous in writing to you like this. And if you have any questions about the blog or us or our work, then please let me know.
Best regards,
PM
Jeanne d’Arc
Screwtape Files
PM
Okay – a Silver Bug site that claims not to be screwball
PM
And it’s called Screwtape Files
PM
And Joan of Arc has a lemur or something as her pic.
PM
Lets move on from that
PM
Quesitons on the banks
PM
Why is Lloyds go up and Barclays down
PM
Lots of bank fallers across europe
PM
Fretting about the EBA
PM
cracking down on suspect re-weightings of asets
BE
(@Jarvis2009: you know as well as anyone that the question when investing is not “why?” it’s “why today?”)
BE
Yup – struggling for much new to day on the lenders.
BE
We’ll probably be getting more QE later this week
BE
Oh, and we’ve got Barclays results incoming as well.
PM
(Greek snap: building permits down 34% y-on-y)
BE
Actually, there’s a lot of cautious comment ahead of Barclays’ numbers.
BE
Comps from the US/European I-banks suggest that 4Q11 was not a vintage
quarter. Whilst expectations are low, we are concerned they are not low enough -
we would be cautious into numbers. With the stock up more than 30% since we
rolled it over on the Europe 1 list, we are removing from the list.
BE
Barclays made £1.3bn adjusted PBT in 3Q and consensus expects c. £0.9bn in
4Q. This looks optimistic to us. 4Q is unlikely to see the recurrence of a £660mn
hedge gain booked in 3Q, suffers from the c £400mn UK bank levy and also
should see Barcap revenues lower QoQ, with little if any flex in costs. As a result
we forecast £350mn of PBT and flag risk to 2012 EPS consensus.
BE
People are expecting a poor Q4: IBs so far have shown a 19% QoQ decline in
FICC and 13% in equities ($ basis). We pencil in -10% and -27% respectively at
BarCap, giving £2.1bn in total top line revenues for the Q. With costs flat the cost
income ratio for the year is likely to have increased to 71%. Whilst 4Q trends are
clearly disappointing, the big call is what happens in 2012. Revenue expectations
are low and if 1Q can match 1Q11 then this should soften the blow.
BE
Whilst we are cautious ahead of results, we still think Barclays is well placed and
if LTRO improves market confidence this will quickly feed into better EPS
performance – and perhaps a new upgrade cycle once 4Q has been digested.
BE
We believe that key economic drivers underpinning UK banks’ strategic
targets unveiled in 2011 may have changed materially enough to warrant a
review of strategy in order to address weaker than expected revenues. On
our forecasts, Barclays falls short of its 2013 ROE target of 13% when
adjusted for the full impact of regulation, but gets closer to COE than
Lloyds & RBS. Further, at current valuations of 0.6x TBV, we believe that
the market discounts weak revenues and sub-COE returns. We believe that a
continuing weak revenue environment may lead management to make
further cost and capital adjustments over time and this is likely to be positive
for the valuation of the shares. Barclays remains our preferred domestic UK
bank.
BE
The old idea that Bob simply HAS to do something about BarCap
BE
Even if it’s against his will.
BE
Although the impact of weak growth and lower for longer interest rates is
likely to be felt across divisions, we continue to see returns from
Barclays’ Retail and business banking operations ex Europe above
targets. Trends in asset quality may be less positive with limited further
improvements in loan losses and downside from Spain and Portugal. We
reduce our 2012 EPS estimates by c8% mainly for higher provisions.
BE
Post regulatory changes, returns from the IB industry fall from c16% to 8%
on our estimates and restructuring of IB operations to improve cost and
capital efficiency is likely to be a recurring theme across the sector. This
is a key issue for Barclays given Barcap consumes 56% of group capital in
2013 on our estimates, inline with the average for other Universal banks.
BE
Q4 results from US IBs and DBK imply a weak read across for Barcap
revenues, with Jan 2012 run-rate also indicated to be down yoy. Given
revenues have remained below management estimates of a normalized
run-rate since 2010 we see further action as increasingly necessary to
address costs and group structure under the ICB proposals.
BE
Assuming capital markets revenues remain under pressure, we estimate that
even a “light” restructuring plan incorporating Cost cuts (c8%) and
reduction in BarCap RWA (by c£30bn), would allow BarCap to
improve ROTE to over 13% from the current 10% in our forecasts. We
are now assuming that the group exceeds its £1bn initially targeted cost
cuts by £500mn in 2012E.
BE
(@Jarvis: sorry, we’re speaking at cross purposes. Was referring to Kurd comment, not banks comment.)
PM
We are beyond deadlines in dealing with this
PM
As soon as greek commitments are in place, EU ministers will be ready to meet
PM
Ocado retracing its steps
An internet food retailer that many believe is the second coming of Webvan. Loss making yet valued at close to £1bn on flotation.
PM
down 5% at 103 this morning
PM
down 5% after this move against Rothschild
PM
V funny header from Joseph end of last week on this
BE
Should’ve never listed.
BE
The investors who bought this really want their heads examined.
BE
The idea that a Rothshild wrapper could make an uninvestable company investable ….
PM
Dow pointing to a 60 point drop at the open in New York
BE
We made it somehow. In spite of no news, a dicky internet and a marauding rat.
PM
Dow headed to 60 piont fall acording to the futures
BE
Looked worse earlier. Do we have anything big on the results calendar today?
BE
Pre market, nothing much.
BE
CNA Financial, Harmony Gold, Hasbro, HCA Holdings, Humana, Loews, Sysco.
BE
Anadarko Petroleum and YUM! after hours.
BE
YUM! Brands. The stupidest name ever.
PM
Larard figs just coming out — bonuses to fall 20% there
BE
I’ll need a smaller violin to deal with that news.
PM
Hadn’t noticed this previously
PM
We have a spread betters price for Facebook market cap
PM
current quote: 115/117
PM
Not sure whether that is at IPO or end of first day…
PM
But we are done for today
BE
(@Itzman: the rats around News International’s compound were the size of golden retrievers. Terrifying when one came at you at 7pm.)
PM
Mr Murphy
Regarding your Alphaville team’s observations regarding GKP this am
What utter rubbish
Have any of you the faintest idea just how strategic this stock is becoming, because of what has been achieved in Kurdistan
Frankly, this morning’s utterances were puerile; ill-infofrmed prattle
Shame on you all
PM
That was you Bryce, not me
BE
That’s what we have to deal with, rabble.
BE
So tune in tomorrow for more “puerile; ill-infofrmed prattle”
BE
not sure what infofrmed means, but I’m taking it as a complement.
PM
Ptolemy — auto price thing is broken
BE
Everything’s broken. Corporate net’s up the spout.
PM
We’re mouse free for now
BE
For the moment. Right. close this now.