Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:20 on 6 Dec 2010. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT bryce.elder
newspapers believe is from French competitor Oberthur. Rumoured to be
around the 750-800p level (and all cash), we believe this represents a fair level
given our ongoing concerns regarding reputational damage. As we await
further details, we switch our recommendation from Sell to Hold and raise
our Target Price from 470p to 800p.
newspapers, though 3 articles all naming competitor Oberthur suggests some truth
behind it. The rumoured level of the approach is alleged to be in cash, and in the region
of 750-800p, so a material premium to Friday’s close and one which we believe
represents a realistic take-out level given the possibility of significant reputational damage
in the wake of the falsification of production standards.
come from a competitor given the problems any private equity firm would face in due
diligence given the nature of the business, and despite the market position and scarcity of
the asset we believe it unlikely this will become a bidding war. The accuracy of reports
on 750-800p needs as always to be taken with a pinch of salt until confirmed, though a
material premium to this – in our opinion – looks unlikely given the recent trading
update.
peak earnings (to March 2010), earnings we have serious doubts could be replicated in
the short to medium term. On current forecasts this multiple would rise to 35.7x to
March 2011, dropping to 28.2x – a more than generous valuation given the
unquantifiable risk of reputational damage as its current order book unwinds and new
contracts come up for negotiation. We see little possibility that there will be anything but
margin pressure, and that there remains a more than decent chance of its largest client
terminating its current contract given the length of time negotiations over production
problems have been under way. We switch our recommendation to Hold (Sell) and
target price to 800p (470p).
approach” and that it is highly preliminary and no certainty that it will lead to an
approach. Sky News ran a story on Friday evening suggesting that the potential
bidder is Oberthur and that it may follow on with a fresh offer.
Sky News reported that an offer was made from Oberthur (one of the other 2
privately-owned banknote printers) in the “past few weeks” that it values DLAR at
£750mn (760p per share), or ~15% above Friday’s close
manufacturing client) is 710p, based upon 12x earnings, but applying a 14x
multiple (closer to its U/L TSR of ~15%) would imply fair value of 820p.
Our bull case, which assumes that their largest customer stays and its business
as usual, suggests fair value of 830p, again assuming 14x EPS as opposed to
our 12x gives 970p
We would also highlight that there would likely be significant synergies achieved
through combining two fairly similar businesses with a high levels of fixed costs.
Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe 183.5bp (+4.5)
Markit iTraxx Senior Financials 155.5bp (+7)
Sovereigns – Greece 900bp (+13), Spain 310bp (+11), Portugal 440bp (+8), Italy 220bp (+9), Ireland 560bp (+19), Belgium 192bp (+12), France 94bp (+5)
11:03 03Dec10 -SPANISH/GERMAN 10-YEAR GOVERNMENT BOND YIELD SPREAD TIGHTENS FURTHER TO 215 BPS, NARROWEST SINCE NOV. 23
11:08 03Dec10 -BUND FUTURE
11:10 03Dec10 -GERMAN 10-YEAR BOND YIELD
10:33 06Dec10 RTRS-GERMAN GOVT SPOKESMAN GERMANY HAS GREAT INTEREST IN GROWTH OF STABILITY OF EURO
10:34 06Dec10 RTRS-GERMAN GOVT SPOKESMAN GERMANY FEELS COMMITTED TO EURO; IF EURO FAILS EUROPE WILL FAIL
10:34 06Dec10 RTRS-GERMAN GOVT SPOKESMAN SAYS EVERYTHING THAT IS GOOD AND NECESSARY FOR EURO WILL BE DONE
10:35 06Dec10 RTRS-GERMAN GOVT SPOKESMAN SAYS GERMANY SEES ABSOLUTELY NO NECESSITY FOR AN INCREASE OF SIZE OF EU RESCUE FUNDS
will need to draw on bailout funds – Irish Times
Mohamed A El-Erian, chief executive of investment management firm Pacific Investment Management Company (Pimco), told CNBC that Spain and Portugal are likely follow Ireland in drawing on the European Union’s bailout fund.
Mr El-Erian, whose company has more than $1 trillion under management said the EU has not taken control of the crisis.
“As long as they’re being seen as reactive we’re going to have a slow-motion wreck going on on in Europe. We’re going to wake up and it’s going to be a new country we’re talking about.”
Mr El-Erian warned that continuing solvency problems would undermine any hopes of recovery.
“Unless we see more than just liquidity support, unless we see something that deals with the balance sheets, expect this contagion to go up,” he said.
Riversdale Mining – a coking coal developer. Riversdale core projects are located in
the Tete province of Mozambique with a total coal resource of 13 billion tonnes, of
which around 30% is premium coking coal, whose quality is equal to that of the
Bowen Basin in Queensland, Australia. With only a 6% premium to the Riversdale’s
Friday closing price, we expect to see a higher second bid from Rio, which has a
higher likelihood of success.
coal to India and China has attracted Rio Tinto to Mozambique, which is shaping up
as a the next main coking coal exporting region, with forecast global share of
seaborne coking coal of just under 20% in 2025. Other big players with coal licenses
in the province include Vale, ENRC, Nippon Steel, Jindal and ETAStar. We also
would like to point the attention towards the only producer in the region, Beacon Hill
Resource, which is set to expand production to produce in excess of 2Mpta in
saleable coal in 2012, generating over $200m in revenue at current prices.
Rio Tinto has approached them with an A$15/sh bid which would value the
company at about A$3.5 bn (about US$3.6bn). RIV shares today traded through
this level. A controlling shareholder has been quoted in the press as saying he
wouldn’t sell for less than A$20/sh.
Moatize Basin of Mozambique, and expects to export 6 million tons of hard coking
coal and 2 million tons of thermal coal from Port Beira by late-2010.
RIV acquired Moatize tenements in 2006 and is on the cusp of first production
(end-2011), with a 10mtpa target by 2014/15, underpinned by ~11bn tonnes of
coal resources, providing RIV a multi-decade development/growth opportunity. By
2025, Mozambique is projected to account for ~20% of the seaborne met coal
market (55mtpa), and RIV’s contribution could potentially account for 20-25mtpa.
Riversdale is one of several companies exploring the coal reserves in Tete,
regarded as one of the last large unexploited coal basins in the world. The
company’s Mozambique tenement areas comprise 22 licences, positioning the
company as the largest tenement holder in the Tete Moatize area, with an
extensive area capable of supporting long-life-mine operations
held in joint venture with Indian steel giant Tata Steel, which holds a 35% interest.
Inasmuch as this is a “bolt on” sized transaction we don’t view it as particularly
material for Rio but perhaps slightly positive in terms of creating new optionality in
a new, promising mineral basin. While an earnings accretion analysis on stage 1
suggests that the transaction would be near term earnings dilutive (on current
share price: -0.5% dilution on 2013E EPS, at A$20: -0.7% dilution on 2013E
EPS), we assume that Rio, if they are looking at RIV, would be having an eye to
longer term expansions. Apparently, the various mines could easily support
expansions up to 20 Mtpa.
“Having seen the highly encouraging results from the first logs, the LWD, PEX and CMR, on this well, plus accompanying oil shows, it is extremely disappointing that the subsequent wireline logs and fluids sampling have dashed all the earlier promise of this being Desire’s first oil discovery in the North Falkland Basin. Despite this setback, the presence of hydrocarbons and good reservoir development have been identified in a number of the Rachel fan sands and we therefore continue to believe in the prospectivity of the East Flank Play fairway for future oil discoveries.”
The result is a disappointment, especially following the encouraging
announcement from last week. The good reservoir encountered in a
number of fans is a positive for the potential of the basin as a whole, but
the fact that a second oil discovery has not been made is a negative as
further oil discoveries in the area on top of Rockhopper’s earlier Sealion
discovery, will de-risk the chances of commercialization in the view of the
market (although we would regard Rockhopper’s Sealion as commercial in
its own right). We would expect this result to be a material negative for
Desire, especially following the good performance following the previous
announcement. Rockhopper has a smaller (7.5%) stake in the asset.
We currently value the Rachel prospect at 9p/share for Desire and 3p /
share for Rockhopper. However, following last week’s positive reaction, we
would expect the reaction to the downside to be greater today. Our price
target is under review.
· Revision of water resistivity parameters indicates that the main 8m sand has only residual oil and that the mobile fluid is water. The deeper sands are still interpreted to be oil bearing, but those are thin and poor quality sandstones.
· Desire has about £75m cash at the moment (a little less after all Rachel North expenses are paid), which is sufficient for two more wells and 3D seismic data.
· The result is clearly extremely disappointing for Desire (92.5%), who will now move to the Dawn/Jacinta location where the risking was unchanged after Rockhopper’s Sea Lion discovery. For Rockhopper too, with 7.5% of Rachel North, this is a jolt. We continue to think that commerciality in the basin will depend on finding more reserves than Sea Lion looks likely to deliver at the moment, and that some diversification of development risk will be beneficial.
sands that have been encountered, as well as oil that has passed through. Discovering where this oil has migrated to
is clearly the challenge for Desire and other operators in the basin. However, we are cutting our target price from
142p to 96p due to the results from Rachel. Although this morning’s sell-off appears to be overdone, we are
maintaining an ACCUMULATE on the shares. Rockhopper remains a BUY with an adjusted target of 489p.
tenancies is unsustainable. It is now crucial that a clear solution is
imposed. Having considered alternatives, we believe the
preferable outcome is to allow the A and B securitisations to
default. We believe shareholders should use their influence to
press for this outcome. Once this issue is resolved, the value in
Spirit and group assets, which we put at 91p, will be apparent.
and B securitisations to default. This has two major advantages: (i) removal of
uncertainty associated with highly indebted tenanted pubs, which has been
established as an unattractive investment model (ii) retention of the cash being
paid to support the bond structure
value of the A and B bonds. We believe the difficulties of reaching such an
agreement may be great, there would be continuing uncertainty about the
financial health of the structure, the equity value is small at PV of 25p, and it
takes 13 years to be realised.
benefits of the pubs to the equity holders. Equally, this would leave bondholders
with the 5,325 pubs. That would lead to a binary decision on what to do with
those pubs, both outcomes of which are unattractive to the bondholders:
per pub, this would realise only £1,385m, about 52p in the £, we
estimate, compared with nominal value of debt of £2,663m. We
appreciate that the average quality of these pubs would be superior to
the recent disposals. However, this would be a fire sale. Also, as shown
below, that price equates to 5–6x EBITDA which, on a distress sale
basis, is probably the highest that could realistically be expected.
in the market and thus of value, the bondholders would need to appoint
management and build a complete support structure that would include
beer purchasing, customer service, property management, HR and
accounting. In the case of a default, these functions currently supplied by
Punch would not be available to them.
material prejudice test, we expect the security trustee to call a meeting of the bondholders.
The rating agencies play a big role in deciding whether the proposals fail the material
prejudice test. If all the rating agencies confirm the ratings of the bonds, the note trustee
and the issuer security trustee will be entitled to assume that the modification of the
transaction documents will not be materially prejudiced to the interests of the noteholders.
In our view, the rating agencies should to decline to provide a view in this situation given
the importance to bondholders.
We think negotiations will start with Punch B, given that the case for group support is less
clear since we expect the EBITDA DSCR to fall to below 1.0x in FY11. These options are not
mutually exclusive; in fact, we would argue that Punch will try to relax the covenants first
before trying the more costly demerger route.
1. Relaxation of covenants. It looks as if Punch will have to negotiate with bondholders on
covenant changes, since we expect the rating agencies to find it difficult to confirm the
ratings of any material proposed modifications. In our view, both Punch A and B are
unlikely to accept any changes that do not enhance their position. Punch B does have
the added complication in that drawings on the liquidity facility could create tensions
between the different classes of notes, given that the liquidity facility drawings to pay
interest on junior bonds will rank senior to the senior bonds. However, the issuer
security trustee, when deciding whether to accept modifications, does not appear to be
entitled to take account of subordination in the capital structure; as a result, we would
expect bondholders to be given the vote (see our explanation of the modification
procedure later in the report).
The plans have emerged as new Punch chief executive Ian Dyson undertakes a review of the group, with a market value of £417 million.
Well the management might be about to deliver us a crate full of “I told you so”. On Friday, the group’s shares jumped sharply, finishing the day at 170p — only 10p off the price at which the company floated in July. They have traded as low as 123½p in the intervening months.
Such a sharp jump would normally have traders suspecting a takeover approach. This can never be ruled out, but those close to the company say there is no predator lurking.
It’s possible that they would be last to know, and Amazon, Google or maybe even Marks & Spencer is about to table a knockout bid, but it’s more likely the shares are finally finding some fans among institutional investors.
The float in Ocado is not that big — only 55% of its equity is publicly traded — so it doesn’t take much to get the shares moving. If it makes its forecast numbers at the end of the year, which it is likely to do, that will help investor sentiment and could keep the share price momentum going. If it goes past the magic 180p, it will be a nice Christmas present for the company — and a painful lesson for the hundreds of hedge fund traders who have taken a short position on the stock, betting it would go down.
n Net debt in-line – Current net debt of £109m vs. £129m last year. Consistent with interim estimate of £100m and year end estimate of £89m.
n Potential rights issue – Mouchel explicitly state that ‘its banks remain supportive’. They now say that they are ‘simultaneously exploring alternative funding strategies’. We believe that these would include right issue, placing and convertible in order of probability. £180m facility falling to £170m in March.
n BUY – We expect the shares to move a long way to our fair value target of 115p. BUY.
does not believe that these preliminary approaches reflect the true value
of the Company”. In our view, with the recent share price fall, this was
perhaps inevitable – the prospects for the group in the medium term
appear to be improving but the short term squeeze on cash means the
shorter term prospects of the group are very uncertain.
already, and such a refinancing would likely put the group on solid
footing to get it through to the medium term. It is as yet uncertain
however what the long suffering shareholders would look for in exchange for their support.
the business, supported by in-line trading conditions. In addition to
preparatory work made to divest non-core activities (likely to be in
Regulated Industries) the group has received “approaches” for the
entire business which appear preliminary in nature. However, we
view the reaction to last week’s press comment surrounding the
appointment of Deloitte as overdone. With the shares down
significantly (-31% over one month, versus a flat market), we upgrade
from Sell to Hold.
Mouchel’s Q1 IMS highlights several contract wins, which despite overall
challenging conditions, leave the group trading in-line with expectations. Notable
wins include a ten-year local authority outsourcing contract with Bournemouth
Council, worth £150m and continued progress for highways maintenance in
Australia with three wins now in Perth, Mid-West and Kimberley area. Providing
further cause for optimism, while the order book is still at £1.8bn (£1.8bn at the full
year), the pipeline of tenders and near-term opportunities has increased to £2.6bn
(from £2.2bn at the full year). Reassuringly, the group is starting to see greater
clarity around client budgets and forward programmes and has seen an increase in
the number of local authorities preparing for outsourcing contracts.
Recent press comment has focused on the appointment of Deloitte to undertake a
limited scope review to progress Mouchel’s refinancing and, while the shares have
reacted negatively to this news (down 31% over one month), we view this reaction
as overstated given it does not change the group’s prospects or constitute new
news in the context of the necessity of a refinancing. We retain our view that
Mouchel will likely breach its fixed charge cover covenant in early 2011, given
quarterly testing and the phasing of profits through 2011, as cost savings are
weighted to the second half. As restructuring takes place, we expect net debt to
increase from £83.4m to £96.6m through 2011, implying a gearing level of 196%.
This would leave Mouchel with net debt:EBITDA of 2.4x still within its 3.0x
covenant (profits would need to fall by a further 26% before this level is tested).
However, it is the group’s fixed charge cover covenant (temporarily waived to
1.875x) that ensures a refinancing is required. We view today’s news that further
progress is being made and that the banks are supportive as positive. We are
hopeful that a refinancing can be concluded in early 2011.
Supporting a refinancing, the group has commenced preparatory work on
divesting non-core businesses, which we believe are in its Regulated Industries
division (Middle East and certain energy related businesses).
In an apparent repeat to the VT bid scenario, the group also notes that it has
received “approaches”, which could lead to an offer for the entire business. Given
the wording in the statement, we view this news as very preliminary in nature, but
could see the attraction in Mouchel’s activities to both trade and private equity.
Mouchel’s share price now shows 42% upside to our unchanged 80p fair value, but
given the risk surrounding refinancing we are still reluctant to turn positive on the
business at this juncture. The shares are down 31% over one month, versus a flat
FTSE All Share. The shares trade on a calendar 2011E EV/EBITDA of 4.8x (vs.
consulting peers 6.8x and outsourcers 7.5x) and a P/E of 8.9x (vs. consulting peers
10.4x and outsourcers 11.4x).We move our recommendation from Sell to Hold on an
unchanged 80p fair value, but await a successful refinancing before revisiting this
recommendation more meaningfully.
For 2011 we remain positive on Civil Aerospace, particularly the aftermarket, and
cautious on Defence, despite the sector underperformance in 2010. In a year
when developed economies should stabilize and emerging countries are expected
to continue their growth, we regard the civil aftermarket names as offering the
best risk/reward, with potential for c.8% consensus estimate upgrades in 2012.
Following our in-depth analysis, we are upgrading Roll-Royce to Buy (Price
objective (PO) 700p) and MTU to Neutral (PO €49), downgrading Cobham to
Neutral (PO 215p), Finmeccanica (PO €8) and Zodiac (PO €49) to
Underperform.
We expect the aftermarket to recover to double-digit sales growth over the next
two years (c.10-12%), assuming capacity (ASK) growth of 4.5-5%, as aircraft
utilisation improves and there is a further recovery in spares, pricing and scope of
services. The re-rating across civil aftermarket names has already happened in
2010. We believe the opportunity lies with stocks that offer some earnings
upgrade potential on 2011 and 2012 numbers.
Our top picks are Rolls-Royce (PO 700p) and Meggitt (PO 400p) where we are
on average c10% ahead of consensus in 2012.
Being cautious on Defence may seem a consensual call, especially after strong
underperformance in 2010. However, we believe Defence contractors are likely to
face a few years of continued pressure given 1) the tightening budgetary
environment (at least in the US and Europe), 2) increased customer focus on
affordability, and 3) greater competition in international markets. Across the
Defence names, we have reduced our estimates by c.4-6% over 2010-12 and are
5-7% below consensus EPS. Defence is likely to remain lacklustre in 2011 given
its lack of top- and bottom-line growth.
- Germany sees no reason to increase EU rescue fund. Officials stressed once
again that Germany rejects eurobonds and added that the government stands
“full-square” behind the euro and stability.
- Germany’s hard line stance has come under pressure and even Bundesbank
president Weber suggested that an increase in the stability fund may be
necessary, and there are some at the ECB who also support a eurobond,
although Weber is not one of them and Trichet also said that the ECB is not
promoting the idea.
- Meanwhile internal opposition in Germany against the euro project, which is
proving more and more costly for the taxpayer, is rising.
