Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 11:19 on 8 Oct 2010. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT Joseph Cotterill Tracy Alloway Izabella Kaminska
the basic pattern of market moves since early August is broadly consistent
with a market anticipating additional QE. Second, the size of these asset
price moves suggests that markets have gone a good part of the distance
towards pricing the kind of program we expect. Finally, the experience of
QE1 is that the impact on assets grew for some time after the
announcement. This suggests that even after the moves seen thus far these
trends could extend in some asset classes.
renewed asset purchases at its November 2-3 meeting. We regard an initial
announcement of $500bn as likely but anticipate that the size of the
purchase program will ultimately total at least $1tr.
is consistent with a recent poll conducted by our fixed income sales team.
This survey polled 59 clients to find that 50% of participants expect more
quantitative easing with an average amount (over all participants) of
$500bn. (This survey was conducted on September 21 prior to the last FOMC
meeting and the recent speeches by Fed Presidents Dudley and Evans, both
of which signaled a high likelihood of QE2 as early as November. One
would expect that participants’ expectations have risen in response to
these events.)
Initiating coverage with Heritage as a top pick in the European E&P space Heritage’s geographical focus is on Iraqi Kurdistan, Africa and Russia. The company has high impact exploration projects in Iraqi Kurdistan and Malta, as well as ongoing leads and prospects in Pakistan, Tanzania and Mali. Heritage currently produces around 600b/d of oil in Russia and reported 2009 2P reserves of 60Mboe
Heritage provides exposure to relatively low-risk high-impact exploration upside in Iraqi Kurdistan and Malta in the near term; we see 92% unrisked upside over the coming year. At 79%, Heritage’s historical exploration and appraisal success rate is high relative to peers. Additional NAV upside would be provided by a positive resolution of a tax dispute in Uganda (.12% upside) and a licence legality dispute in Iraqi Kurdistan (18% upside). Employing political risk to mitigate geological risk
Heritage gains access to low geological risk exploration by operating in areas of relatively high political risk.
weighed down by concerns over Capital Gains Tax risk in Uganda,
inconclusive drilling results in Kurdistan, and delays to some other
exploration catalysts. However, following completion of the Ugandan
asset sale and payment of a 100p per share special dividend, Heritage
has re-scaled itself to be a high impact explorer, but with a proven track
record and very strong balance sheet this time.
• In this note we look at the key factors determining Heritage’s value,
namely the resource potential in Miran and political backdrop in Iraq.
We also look at the risk/reward ratio at the current share price. Core to
Heritage’s value, we provide an economic scenario analysis of the Miran
West project. Given its advantaged location (onshore, close to a major
oil export pipeline) and favorable production sharing contract, we
estimate a very attractive project IRR at $80 per barrel of 63% and a unit
NPV 15% of $2.8 per boe
at AHL for FY12. Possible biddersare:
• Banks: an unlikely option as they have been divesting their asset management activities
in the wake of the credit crisis, there are limits now on hedge fund ownership, good
asset managers do not appreciate being part of large process oriented banks, Man’s
distribution via local banks might also be compromised
• Other asset managers: this has the best industrial logic of the various options but the
buyer would have to be big enough for Man not to be too large within the group given
the specialist nature of its business (CTAs tend to be independently owned and
managed) which points to firms like Blackrock.
would be an add on, there would be scope to leverage Man’s global distribution
network, and it would give Man access to the US market where it is underrepresented.
It is also arguable that GLG makes Man more attractive in that it reduces the ‘black box’
element.
• We would not rule it out on that basis but still regard a bid as very speculative
Barclays FD and IR yesterday evening. As expected, the focus was on three areas.
1. Barclays Capital Q3 revenues. Barclays suggested that consensus expects a 10-
20% fall in IB revenues across the industry Q3 on Q2. They made little comment on
their own performance relative to this but with the sell-side currently forecasting over
£6.5bn of top-line revenue in H2 2010 (versus £3.3bn in Q2) there is downside risk
to estimates, in our view. For sensitivity purposes, £3bn in each of Q3 and Q4 would
impact our revenue forecast by £700m. Assuming a £200m cost offset (leaving full
year CNIR at 65%) we would have to reduce our group PBT in 2010E by about 8%.
only hit our 2010E TNAV by 3p to 337p. Indeed, the accretion in the BlackRock
stake in the last 6 weeks would more than offset this. The bigger issue is next year.
We and consensus currently forecast Barclays Capital revenues at £15bn – inline with
group guidance of £3.7bn per quarter. But if this were say £14bn (a quarterly run-
rate of £3.5bn) at a 65% CNIR it would impact our group PBT estimates by £800m
or 10%. Given we are already £700m below consensus on other issues, it is possible
that consensus (which has been falling throughout the year) could still be materially
too high. Of course, it is impossible to predict what will happen next year in Barclays
Capital but our overriding point is that we don’t see an end to consensus downgrades
at the group level anytime soon. 2. Capital. Management confirmed that CRD3 and
CRD4 would increase RWA by £150bn. While this figure was pre-mitigation, it didn’t
sound like the scope to lower this was huge.
of expected redemptions 2010-2013 and there weren’t many ways of reducing this
further. Market risk RWA (£60bn) could be partly mitigated via hedging strategies but
that didn’t sound substantial either. The main area of focus is Counterparty Credit Risk
(£40-50bn on our estimates) primarily through the use of Central Clearing. We
continue to work with a mitigated number of around £100-125bn. On the enlarged
RWA base, management thought that the FSA might want an equity tier 1 ratio of 9-
10% with additional capital in the form of fully loss absorbable instruments – similar
to FINMA. But with Co-Co’s relatively expensive (and hence restricting ROE in much
the same way as equity) they were hoping that a cheaper form of capital meeting
Basel rules with sufficient market demand could be found. Management also said they
were happy that they had struck a prudent dividend payout ratio last year given
regulatory developments and it didn’t seem obvious to us that this was likely to change
in the near-term.
units of economic profit as possible to capital efficiency. A capital allocation
committee has been formed and is exploring how to boost group ROE. For example,
the group has set a 12.5-15.0% ROE hurdle on new retail business (20% ROTE) and
15-20% on investment banking – although it is not clear how head office and
preference share costs are allocated to this and both are set in relation to Basel 2 rather
than Basel 3. At the moment, the sale of entire businesses (e.g. Western Europe) is not
being considered as a way to boost ROE – there is “a lot of work to do first”. But sales
of asset portfolios are being considered. Overall, it seems that Barclays fully accepts
the challenges that lie ahead and the switch in focus from growth to returns in the last
few months – while stark – is a good thing. But a big turnaround is unlikely in the near-
term and as we discussed in our research last week we expect ROTE ~ COE for
several years capping the share price to TNAV. Furthermore, our 2010E TNAV is
340p but this ignores up to 30p of unrecognised pension fund deficit.
capital, liquidity) in a sector context rather than any substantial upside potential. For
example, we believe Barclays looks modestly interesting relative to RBS (Neutral)
where the 2010 PE (core business, normalised for impairment) is around 9 times
versus 8 times at Barclays (normalised for impairment) despite a lack of substantive
profits expected in 2011E. RBS GBM is also exposed to any industry slowdown in
Q3 (35% of core revenue) and we expect similar RWA inflation on CRD3 and CRD4
as Barclays (more including APS). Finally, RBS has £50bn of loans in Ulster Bank
and £4bn of Irish sovereign bond exposure and the potential for additional impairment
and RWA procyclicality in H2 is marked, in our view.
- Reported net debt was £358mm (after cash of £164mm) for net lev of 3.6x (or 4.3x pro forma for £70mm Red Football JV payment).
We downgrade Fresnillo to Underperform. Although we see Fresnillo as a high
quality company with good growth potential, the shares are trading on 3.2x NPV,
a significant premium to the rest of the sector on around 2x. While medium term
we are bullish on gold & silver as a proxy, short term the metals seem
overbought, perhaps spurred by recent producer de-hedging activities.
Our price objective remains at GBp1250, about 3x NPV and the upper end of the
trading range for most precious metals stocks. While our long term prices for
precious metals are considerably below spot (gold $950, silver $15) even if we
assume long term at spot prices, FRES’s P/NPV would only drop to 2x. For more
analyses see NPV upside from spot gold prices and our sensitivity table.
The current environment of low interest rates, strong investment demand and
potential quantitative easing is bullish for precious metals commodities in general.
However, with recent strength in both gold and silver we are cautious on a 1-2
month view. Key to our expectation for a “pause” is that AngloGold has completed
its hedge book buyback (78 tonnes of gold) ahead of schedule. As such, we
believe a key driver for recent bullion demand has been removed. Last year, after
Barrick announced the completion of its hedge book buyback, gold prices fell by
10% over a month. Near term, our currency strategist is also looking for a
recovery in the USD, with our base EUR:USD forecast at 1.25 by year end.
The current environment of low interest rates, strong investment demand and
potential quantitative easing is bullish for precious metals commodities in general.
However, with recent strength in both gold and silver we are cautious on a 1-2
month view. Key to our expectation for a “pause” is that AngloGold has completed
its hedge book buyback (78 tonnes of gold) ahead of schedule. As such, we
believe a key driver for recent bullion demand has been removed. Last year, after
Barrick announced the completion of its hedge book buyback, gold prices fell by
10% over a month. Near term, our currency strategist is also looking for a
recovery in the USD, with our base EUR:USD forecast at 1.25 by year end.
We remain bullish on the outlook for precious metals in the medium term, and are
looking for gold to reach $1500/oz and silver to reach $25/oz. This is based on
central banks maintaining loose monetary policy, and the liquidity creation that
this results in will be supportive of the gold/silver price. Furthermore, we believe
reserve diversification into gold is set to continue, for instance by central banks.
· Within weeks the third 15 cubic meter excavator is likely to arrive (the fourth in the New Year) and higher grade ore should be available to the mill – first from Andreevskaya and in December from Bakhmut which are within the Pioneer mine lease.
The mill at Pioneer is processing 14,000t/d (full capacity as we expected) but at 1.9 gm/t. However, the operations team were clear and confident on the availability of the higher grade ore from Andreevskaya and Bakhmut; which will be needed to achieve the targeted 4.4gm/t average grade for the December quarter.
· If achieved, this would give rise to a solid 160,000 ozs in Q4 from the Pioneer resin plant, assuming full availability for the period and 90pc recovery. Add that to a further 30,000ozs from the Pokrovsky plant in Q4 and we could see an additional 190,000ozs in Q4 from the plants before adding in perhaps some 10 to 20 thousand ounces from alluvials and the heap leach pads.
This compares with the 140,000oz preliminary estimate for Q3 from the company recently and the 166,000ozs produced in the first half of this year.
· But it is also clear from the site visit that the operations team has created a lot of production flexibility by developing access to many high grade but small areas of mineralisation. And with currently high gold prices, one could see the logic in bringing forward gold production by blending in more of the high grade ore. We believe from our inquiries on site that gold recovery measures would not be affected if substantially higher grades were fed to the mill. Remember, stage 1 of the Pioneer mill was processing 11.8 gm ore only last year with no impact on recovery. We are not suggesting this kind of grade will return or indeed anything other than the targeted 4.4gm/t average. But the option is there and what a nice option to have.
· Our summary of the detailed geology and exploration update is that there are plenty more small high-grade zones on the Pioneer lease with which to sweeten the large low grade resources there.
· Let’s see what tomorrow brings from Malomir and Albyn.
volume environment, but stable prices. This is not a bad outcome as it gives
the housebuilders a platform from which to improve margins as new land
comes through, sites are re-planned and build costs reduced, and is better
than the Halifax House Price Index suggests. However, with no real autumn
trading pick-up, the sector is lacking a catalyst for better performance. This
means that the stocks are likely to remain under a cloud. Our top picks are
Barratt (Buy) and Berkeley (Buy), and we are more cautious on Persimmon
(Hold) and Taylor Wimpey (Hold).
peers. The unlisted company told us that its sales rate was 5% slower in
September than in August, but that prices had remained firm. The two volume
builders confirmed that trading volumes continue to be sluggish, continuing the
trend seen since the summer, but, importantly, that prices have remained firm.
yesterday as the Halifax House Price Index claimed that house prices had fallen
3.6% in September, but it is worth remembering that Nationwide estimated a
+0.1% change for September. We think that the Halifax index may not be as
reliable a guide as it once was as that institution’s share of lending has fallen
significantly. We think that housebuilders are well placed to judge underlying
prices and therefore we estimate that house prices have been basically flat since
May 2010. This is not a bad outcome and gives the housebuilders a platform
from which to improve margins as new (lower cost) land is developed, sites replanned
and build costs reduced. But, improving trading could be a catalyst for
improving share price performance, and this appears to have been delayed at
best.
already discounted a deteriorating volume environment, as can be seen by the
sector underperforming the market by 10% in the last three months, with 7% of
that in the last month, so it is probably already too late to be much more cautious.
In addition, changing NAV or EPS estimates now is also somewhat premature, in
our view, especially if the Spending Review is more benign than feared. We also
note that interest rates remain very accommodating to house prices, and are not
expected to change anytime soon.
balance sheet, London exposure and hidden value. We also see extreme value
in Barratt, and would not be unduly concerned about NAV unless house prices
fell more than 5%. Bellway is the last of our Buy recommendations (and has
performed well since we upgraded) where we expect better performance as
cautious institutions return to the sector, but this may prove too optimistic. We
have no sell recommendations, but see risks in Persimmon as valuation is a bit
more stretched than others and it has significant exposure to Wales, North East
and Scotland, where employment is most overweight to the public sector, and we
remain concerned that Taylor Woodrow’s cash flows are still not strong enough
to sustain high debt levels.
similar to last quarter. Furthermore, a drop in dividend payout and initially
limited acceleration from Alberto Culver mean we lack triggers to become
more positive (especially in a cautious sector context). At 13.7x PER for FY11,
the shares are fairly valued, in our view. HOLD reiterated; TP down to €23.5
the margin progress (or lack thereof) at the 3Q10 results. After the disappointing 2Q10
margin increase of 10bp (consensus expected 40bp), the focus will clearly be on the
balance between input cost pressures, cost savings and A&P reinvestment rates. We
expect a 20bp reversal in underlying operating margins in 3Q10 to 16.6%; however we
still expect the FY10 underlying operating margin to be up 20bp to 15.0%. We expect a
similar organic growth rate to 2Q10 in 3Q10 of 3.7%. We doubt that another flat margin
delivery will bring excitement back to the shares.
ratio gradually from an above-average 58% in 2009 to an in line with peer group average
c.50% payout ratio in 2011. This should limit the dividend yield. In 2010, the drop in
payout might be more pronounced (INGF 52% payout), partly related to currency swings
1. BMY
BMY is looking for bolt on acquisitions in biotech but is after biologic assets and ATLN doesnt focus in this area. BMY also has the Abilify patent expiry in 2015 – which would be coterminous with Tracleer patent expiry.
2. GSK
GSK is looking to diversify into non pharma assets. A move for Actelion would be a reversal of this strategy
3.Roche
There is market speculation that company could be a white knight…but Roche is in the process of trying to save costs, not add capacity
Bayer is building out its PAH franchise with riociguat and is looking for acquisitions so its perhaps more of a possibility in theory but nothing more than that
Special Committee:
In terms of speculation about the formation of a special committee to evaluate strategic options – my view is that this seems like a sensible process bearing in mind the string of failures in R&D ….but such a committee should be reviewing all options such as buybacks, dividends, cost savings, acquisitions – not just a sale of the company
Tracleer:
Tracleer US patent expires in November 2015 and 2016 in Europe. Jefferies research team sees marketed products being worth around SFr50 a share with SFr6 of cash. Pipeline and cost savings would be other considerations although partnerships important.
To close:
Its rather pointless speculating on speculation and you never say never but what Actelion (in one piece) has to offer is something that big pharma has been moving away from.
which see a further weakening of the Dollar and a trade-weighted appreciation relative to our previous forecast
of almost 4%. This still leaves us well above consensus. We have also delayed our expectation for the first ECB
rate hike to 2011Q3 from 2011Q2. Forecasting remains particularly uncertain in the present environment; the
four key risks to our new forecast are: different FX developments from what is anticipated; a greater than
expected drag on growth from fiscal consolidation; a dampening effect on growth from financial sector
deleveraging; and the risk of a credit event in the Euro-zone periphery.
drift toward unilateralism. However, the preconditions for successful cooperation
are not in place, and past attempts to coordinate under suboptimal conditions have
been damaging. Surprisingly, in the midst of the alleged “currency war”, nearly all
currencies are appreciating against the USD, even those whose authorities have
acted unilaterally. We do not want to underestimate risks of discord, but if major
countries set policy based on domestic reasons, while weakly adhering to soft
international norms, results might be better than under formal international
coordination.
The suggestion, arising from a broader discussion about whether the two companies should ally against Apple, highlights Microsoft’s willingness to consider more radical tactics as it tries to counter Apple’s success with the iPhone and iPad.
One said that it had not led to any active takeover discussions, while the other added that no deal was “imminent”. Both characterised the discussion as part of a regular series of meetings to consider a range of possible areas of co-operation.
secular concerns that must be addressed, namely around 1) lack of share in
tablets, 2) lack of a compelling mobile offering and 3) lack of critical mass in
online. Also, while not a secular issue in our view, Microsoft needs to gain scale
in the cloud. We’d expect that if Microsoft were to spend $20B on an acquisition
(equal to ADBE valuation at 52-wk high), it would be to address these issues or
augment the company’s positioning on one of these areas. We don’t see an
acquisition of Adobe doing this. Much of Adobe’s value is its cross platform
status, running on devices from Microsoft, Apple and now Google. We believe an
acquisition by Microsoft would jeopardize Adobe’s neutral status. Also, Microsoft
essentially has a parallel and competitive developer stack and a number of
technologies that sit very close to Windows (SilverLight, XPS) that compete with
Adobe and would have to be rationalized in an acquisition of Adobe.
top 5 Windows desktop applications (along with Office) making it easy to make the
case such an acquisition would be anti-competitive. Also, Microsoft remains
under the spotlight of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Consent Decree until May
2011. While this agreement mostly covers technical aspects of platform access
and prohibit bundling of certain technology with Windows, we believe that
Microsoft is unlikely to undertake an acquisition that would shed the spot-light
back on anti-trust issues.
definitively. We’d expect most business between the two companies would be
done below the CEO level. Perhaps both are concerned about Apple competition
or are looking at cooperating more closely in the developer area.
stocks have held gains fueled by M&A speculation (Symantec for example).
However due to the potentially few numbers of suitors we expect M&A excitement
could be short-lived. We continue to like the fundamental story at Adobe given
underappreciated growth and multiple that is inline with slower growing peers
(13x FY11 EPS). The next catalyst is MAX user conference the week of Oct 25th
where we expect Adobe management will give more detail around growth strategy
that few investors believe.
12:13 08Oct10 RTRS-BULLARD SAYS FACT THAT FED MISSING ITS POLICY TARGETS DO NOT MAKE CASE FOR FURTHER EASING A “SLAM DUNK” — CNBC
12:14 08Oct10 RTRS-BULLARD SAYS SECOND ROUND OF QUANTITATIVE EASING WOULD BE EFFECTIVE IN COUNTERING DEFLATION RISK — CNBC
