Print

Markets Live transcript 3 Jun 2010

Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 11:12 on 3 Jun 2010. Participants in this chat were: Bryce Elder Miles Johnson, FT

BE
Good morning.
BE
And welcome to Markets Live.
BE
Note: actual contents may differ from those advertised.
BE
Neil’s still off, so that picture on the back page of C&M is not entirely accurate.
BE
Miles does, however, step in for a second consecutive appearance.
MJ
Morning all
BE
And we’ve had some kind of software upgrade at FT Towers overnight
BE
So if we’re knocked off line suddenly, that’ll be why.
BE
Anyway, with all the disclaimers in place, we should crack on.
11:06AM
BE
So, Miles, where to start?
MJ
Well
MJ
has Tidjane gone yet?
BE
Nope.
BE
We covered all this yesterday, remember.
BE
AIA was a fantastic deal that just happened to be at the wrong time
BE
So he’s still clinging onto the ship’s hull like a limpet.
MJ
No no
MJ
Not AIA…
MJ
I was wondering what will happen
MJ
after the latest blow to his credibility
BE
Explain?
MJ

Gulf Keystone was notified on 1 June 2010 that the Prudential plc
group of companies, following an acquisition of shares in the Company,
hold in aggregrate 40,613,000 common shares of $0.01, representing
6.04% of the Company’s issued share capital.
BE
Oh, don’t you start.
BE
We get enough grief from the Keystone Cops as it is.
MJ
Fair enough
MJ
That crowd doesn’t take a joke very well
BE
Hm.
BE
Though, just for completeness, I guess we can include a share price.
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd (GKP:LSE): Last: 74.75, up 1.25 (+1.70%), High: 76.75, Low: 74.00, Volume: 1.32m
BE
So. Still a whisker below the placing price at the middle.
BE
BE
However, the Kurdistan Titan is not the main subject any more.
BE
We should turn instead to the Falklands.
MJ
Indeed
MJ
Quite a bloody sell off yesterday
MJ
For those who missed it
MJ
Rockhopper dived about 60 per cent just after we came off air yesterday
MJ
Bulletin boards were smoking with enraged punters
MJ
and a couple of wild theories were doing the rounds
BE
The loudest of which was that RKH’s tests had shown it had found heavy oil
BE
Which, for those not in with the lingo,would be bad news.
BE
Would bump up drill costs and likely make the whole thing non-commercial.
MJ
Another line
MJ
was that the falls were then exacerbated
MJ
by spread betters being stopped out
MJ
etc
BE
Well, obviously, the death spiral triggered the FTSE’s usual auction suspensions.
BE
And there’s a certain amount of talk about deals being cut OTC during those breaks.
BE
Anyway, the company denied all this “heavy oil” talk
BE
then put out a RNS pretty much saying, essentially, that the dog had eaten their oil sample
BE
As regards oil quality, there has been a delay in returning a sample to the UK due to air transport logistics difficulties between the Falkland Islands and the UK and subsequently clearing Customs. The sample is however now in the UK and analysis will be underway very shortly. Nevertheless, a sample of oil from the shallowest oil sand in the well was subjected to a preliminary test in Stanley and this indicated a medium grade crude, broadly in line with the Directors’ expectations, with an API of 26.3.
BE
A further announcement will be made when the full results are available which is expected to be in the next few days.
MJ
Hmmm
MJ
Shares did come back after that
MJ
And are up 3 per cent or so today
Rockhopper Exploration Plc (RKH:LSE): Last: 249.00, up 9 (+3.75%), High: 264.75, Low: 241.25, Volume: 2.57m
Desire Petroleum Plc (DES:LSE): Last: 83.75, up 2.5 (+3.08%), High: 87.75, Low: 81.50, Volume: 996.85k
Falkland Oil and Gas Ltd (FOGL:LSE): Last: 183.75, up 1.75 (+0.96%), High: 186.00, Low: 182.00, Volume: 234.97k
BE
Frankly, in spite of the retailer fraternity’s appetite to comment on every twitch on the order book ….
BE
there really is not much that can be said on this until the update comes out.
MJ
…not that an absence of news will temper the frenzied BB activity
BE
Yup.
BE
Though there is the issue of whether the company will need to raise money soon
MJ
Well clearly…
MJ
if they do have a big discovery
MJ
they will need more cash to develop it
BE
Clearly.
MJ
And what better time than when the share price is high
MJ
and there is momentum in the story
MJ
Anyway
MJ
RKP’s shop broker Oriel put out a note yesterday on the “update”
MJ

Rockhopper Exploration (RKH, BUY, 242p) – Update on Sea Lion oil quality
• After a sharp move in Rockhopper’s share price, the company issued a release updating the market on the preliminary findings of the oil quality encountered in the Sea Lion discovery
• Analysis is currently ongoing but preliminary work in Port Stanley on a sample from the shallowest oil sand indicated a medium grade crude with an API of 26.3deg. This is consistent with the oil quality encountered by Shell in 1998
• There was no update on the viscosity of the oil at this stage which will be important for productivity. Whilst there is no explicit correlation between viscosity and gravity, it does tend to improve with lower gravity crude
• The crude quality is broadly consistent with the Arab Heavy grade (27deg) which has been trading at relatively tight spreads to Brent this year on a delivered basis into Europe/US (implying 5-10% discount on an FOB basis), while Mangala crude in Rajasthan (28 deg) is being sold on a pricing formula which has historically been at a 10-15% discount to Brent. Our indicative NAV/boe at US$80/bbl long-run of US$8.5/boe for the North Falklands assumes a 15% discount to Brent long-run. It should be stressed that the discount applied in our models is very preliminary at this stage with a number of factors impacting oil quality (including viscosity, sulphur content, wax content etc.) which have yet to be confirmed
MJ

• Whilst there was no updated resource guidance on the discovery, the tone of the announcement suggested that pre-drill estimates (CPR P50 of 170mmb) are likely to be still intact in our view or potentially exceeded
• Based on the pre-drill P50 reserve number, we would value Sea Lion at c570p/sh before taking account of any dilution which is likely given Rockhopper will need further funding to appraise the discovery
• We view this update positively and with further updates due in the coming days we re-iterate our BUY recommendation.
BE
Actually, Oriel are not shop. That’s Cannacord.
MJ
Appologies
BE
Or, rather, Canaccord. Apologies also.
BE
Anyway, let’s move on to the reason why comments on the right are so low today.
11:20AM
BE
So. We’re up.
MJ
We are
MJ
FTSE is up 88 points at 5239
BE
Wiping about £30bn onto the value of UK PLC this morning.
BE
That follows Wall Street’s rebound overnight following decent housing numbers.
BE
So, it’s another dead cat on a rocket.
BE
EmoticonEmoticon
BE
What’s leading, Miles?
MJ
Miners are doing well
BE
Yup.
Kazakhmys PLC (KAZ:LSE): Last: 1,207, up 48 (+4.14%), High: 1,214, Low: 1,189, Volume: 620.86k
MJ
Risk bounce
Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation PLC (ENRC:LSE): Last: 1,043, up 54.5 (+5.51%), High: 1,045, Low: 1,014, Volume: 437.08k
Xstrata Plc (XTA:LSE): Last: 1,018, up 25.5 (+2.57%), High: 1,035, Low: 1,012, Volume: 3.18m
BE
And, as you say, this looks largely like a simple risk-on trade.
BE
Although, merely as a footnote, I highlight the curious case of the Baltic Dry Index
MJ
say again?
BE
Well, just for curiosity I pulled the graph up this morning.
BE
And the Baltic’s standing pretty close to its year high
BE
Having rallied by about 60% from its February lows
BE
That seems a peculiarity
BE
Doesn’t really fit into the consensus view
BE
That China’s going into a destocking phase
BE
And some of the foam’s been scooped off the property bubble.
BE
China data on Tuesday suggest a sharp slowdown in manufacturing …
BE
( China take )
The Truth! Unvarnished. The price of rice always falls. Shanghai investors do not sell stocks. Torch protestors are vile.
BE
Yet the Baltic Dry, which has proved a reliable proxy for commodities pricing in the past, remains strong
MJ
Is the Baltic Dry still seen as a good forward indicator of international trade?
BE
I thought so.
BE
No idea if there’s something else moving shipping prices at the moment.
BE
Any ideas as to why that might be, ROTR?
MJ
Greek shipping magnates packing their stuff up and leaving Athens maybe?
BE
Ha. Perhaps.
BE
(Taxloss: interesting observation. Has the supply of ships fallen? I’d have thought that’d be the most illiquid factor here.)
BE
Oh, and just while we’re on miners.
BE
One of our readers notes Xstrata’s move to call Australia’s bluff on the Henry tax.
BE
Quick bit of comment on that from Ambrian.
BE

Xstrata suspends two Australian Projects in response to proposed Super-Tax

The day after Australia’s government and miners talked of a compromise Xstrata last night released an announcement that it is immediately suspending expenditure on two Australian projects, the A$6bn Wandoan Coal Project and the smaller A$600m life extension project for the Ernest Henry copper mine, citing the proposed Resources Super Profits Tax (RSPT). Xstrata said if the tax is implemented as proposed its initial internal review findings have concluded it will impact the economics of these projects and they will become uneconomic under its long-term assumptions. The suspension means the immediate loss of jobs for Queensland.

BE

Comment

Australian Prime Minster Kevin Rudd’s description of the miners threats of pulling investment on Tuesday as “balderdash” and “bunkum” might just have been the catalyst for Xstrata to put out last night’s press statement in Australia.

The Wandoan Power Project is essentially in the design phase and the immediate suspension means around A$586m of design and further exploration has been stopped and contractors laid off.

BE

The Ernest Henry Copper mine is essentially approaching the end of it life and Xstrata had approved plans to spend A$600m on extending its life by 12years by transforming this open pit operation into an underground mine. This work has essentially been suspended, with the loss jobs, and affects the majority of the underground development work to support the life extension. It will mean halving the mine’s production from 2012 (to 50ktpa and 70koz gold) and reduce the mine life from 2024 to 2019.

Interestingly the Wandoan Project might hit home harder than if it was just another coal mine. Is a coal project in the Surat Basin in Queensland and part of a larger integrated Gasification Combined Cycle plant (400MW) and development of a 200MT potential carbon storage scheme. Xstrata has spent some A$200m to date on the project feasibility studies and early work was due to start next month on construction of accommodation blocks and further exploratory drilling. This work is now suspended.

The war of words between the miners and the Australian government continue, with the miners redirecting investment spend into a mounting media attack on the Rudd’s government’s plans in an effort to draw the government to the discussion/negotiation table. Whilst a full back down by the government is too much to hope for, one can sense a compromise can be struck. The question is how many more projects are going to be shelved before this happens and could it be settled before the General Election, if so it would probably seal Rudd’s return to power?.

11:29AM
MJ
Before we move on from commods
MJ
That FSA coffee bust yesterday was interesting
BE
Aha. Yes. One of two interesting statements from the Superenforcer.
MJ
From the FT
MJ

The regulator said Mr Kerr “deliberately manipulated” the Liffe robusta coffee futures and options markets on August 15 2007 on behalf of a client, which it did not identify. It is unclear whether the FSA will take action against the client, but coffee market participants said it was likely to do so.
Mr Kerr organised a series of trades during a key period of the day, which serves to price options, to boost artificially the price of coffee futures, the FSA said. Mr Kerr moved the market to $1,752 a tonne, up from about $1,145. The “small size of the coffee futures market meant that it was particularly vulnerable to price manipulation,” the FSA said.
BE
Robusta’s the rubbish one, isn’t it?
MJ
I think so
MJ
So, noone is safe
MJ
from the watchful eye of the FSA
MJ
even coffee futures traders
BE
And all the way up to the pinstripes at JP Morgan.
MJ
ah yes
BE
Record fine.
MJ
Can we put we put up the statement for the ROTR
BE
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined J P Morgan Securities Ltd (JPMSL) £33.32 million for failing to protect client money by segregating it appropriately.
BE
(And, by plea bargaining, JPM cut the fine from £47.6m.)
BE
Under the FSA’s client money rules, firms are required to keep client money separate from the firm’s money in segregated accounts with trust status. This helps to protect client money in the event of the firm’s insolvency.
BE
Between 1 November 2002 and 8 July 2009, JPMSL failed to segregate the client money held by its futures and options business (F&O) with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A (JPMCB).  The error occurred following the merger of JPMorgan and Chase. Instead of being held overnight in a segregated money market account, JPMSL’s F&O client money was held in an unsegregated account with JPMCB. This error remained undetected for nearly seven years.
BE
During this period, the client money balance held by the F&O business of JPMSL varied between $1.9 billion (in December 2002) and $23 billion (in October 2008). Had the firm become insolvent at any time during this period, this client money would have been at risk of loss.
BE
And here’s what Ms Eliot Ness thinks about it.
BE
Margaret Cole, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, said:
BE
“JPMSL committed a serious breach of our client money rules by failing to segregate billions of dollars of its clients’ money for nearly seven years. The penalty reflects the amount of client money involved in this breach.
BE
“The FSA has repeatedly emphasised the importance of ensuring that client money is adequately protected. Despite being one of the largest holders of client money in the UK, JPMSL failed to do so. This penalty sends out a strong message to firms of all sizes that they must ensure client money is segregated in accordance with FSA rules. Firms need to sit up and take notice of this action– we have several more cases in the pipeline.”
11:35AM
BE
Ok, ROTR
BE
We know there are posting problems today.
BE
We’re suffering the same latency issues as you chaps.
BE
Apologies. Much as we’d like to fix it, we’re just here to do the typing.
BE
We’ve no idea how the machine actually works.
11:37AM
BE
So. Where now?
BE
Miles? You still with us?
MJ
Sorry, some people coming over to talk
MJ
So
MJ
Obligatory Macondo watch
BE
Fair enough.
BE
We’re rallying today.
BP Plc (BP.:LSE): Last: 442.30, up 12.55 (+2.92%), High: 450.05, Low: 435.25, Volume: 40.27m
BE
(The autoquote worked! Hooray!)
MJ
First time in a while
MJ
the autoquote that is
BE
And, indeed, the rally.
MJ
So, why up?
BE
Um …..
BE
Because they’ve started throwing diamonds down the hole?
BE
Or because Fitch, the ultimate rear-view mirror in terms of news prescience, has downgraded?
BE
For anyone who missed that, here’s the upshot.
BE
Fitch Downgrades BP plc to ‘AA’ from ‘AA+’; Placed on Watch Negative
BE
The placement of the company’s IDR and senior unsecured ratings on RWN reflects Fitch’s concern that BP is still facing substantial additional risks in relation to the oil spill. Factors that could lead to possible further downgrades of BP’s ratings include, but are not limited to, the actual oil well flow rate (as opposed to the US government’s estimated revisions) permanently increasing; the failure of the relief well currently being drilled by BP to completely arrest the oil flow from the leaking well in a timely fashion; and clean-up costs exceeding Fitch’s worst case expectations of around USD5bn in any one year.
BE

Additional factors which also support the RWN include the possibility of US legislative changes that materially widen BP’s immediate payment responsibility beyond containment and clean-up (eg, long term unemployment benefits to affected Gulf coast residents, job training and added costs of environmental tests beyond the USD500m already pledged by the company); the impact of any potential criminal charges filed against the company; and BP permanently halting drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico.
BE
Fitch’s understanding remains that, as 65% owner of the well, BP is primarily responsible for funding clean-up operations in relation to the Deepwater Horizon accident. Fitch continues to anticipate that these operations could reach costs of USD2-3bn in 2010 for the company, depending on how much oil eventually reaches the US shoreline. Fitch remains concerned that despite the current high oil price environment that supports the strength of the company’s balance sheet to finance the cost of the spill response, BP could face potential criminal or civil penalties. Specific negative rating action, however, would depend on the size and timing of these payments. On current assessments, Fitch believes that any further downward rating action driven by direct spill-related costs, were it to occur, would most likely leave BP within the ‘AA’ category. A substantially lower likelihood, in Fitch’s view, is the prospect of an immediate payment of adverse legal judgements against the company of sufficient magnitude to create a sustained impact on financial metrics to a level below that consistent with the ‘AA’ category.
BE
As of Q1-2010, BP has USD6.8bn of cash on balance sheet and USD5.25bn in committed undrawn credit facilities versus short-term debt maturities of USD8.4bn (USD4.5bn of which are amortisations on long-dated revenue bonds and US prepaid natural gas transactions). Fitch anticipates that short-term debt maturities could be re-financed if necessary in order to free up additional funds for the clean-up operation which provides support to the current ratings.
MJ
As ever, a lovely read
BE
Meanwhile, as Nately notes, BP’s attempting a charm offensive with shareholders beginning today.
BE
Although, frankly, there’s only so much reassurance they can offer.
BE
Taxloss, I note, is of the belief that “the worst of the news is now out there”
BE
I’m not so sure.
BE
Just say we reach late July and there’s been no improvement.
BE
Can BP keep promising a dividend when it delivers second-quarter results?
BE
I’m not sure that’d play to well in the Obama camp.
MJ
I agree – this will be an attritional process
MJ
in PR terms, if this goes on into August, when there will be no other news, that will be very tough for the company
MJ
Nothing happens in August, BP will be on the front pages every day
BE
(Taxloss: apologies for misinterpreting. The comment I meant was from The Itch. And, yes, you’re absolutely right.)
BE
So anyway, want to read another sellside note arguing that it’s all in the price?
MJ
Yes please!
BE
This is from HSBC
BE
And they reckon … wait for it …. it’s all in the price.
BE

Costs: The costs incurred in cleaning up the spill have hit nearly USD1bn, although this
only includes compensation payments of USD40m. Compensation payments are likely to
rise and together with spill-related fines this could take the total monthly cost to USD2.5-
4.0bn/month. In theory, BP is responsible for 65% of this.
BE

Dividend: We estimate that BP could incur up to USD14bn of costs before gearing hit
30% of capital employed, the top end of its target range. If the new marine riser works, we
believe the dividend should be safe. Costs could be around USD12.7bn (46p/share)
although partners’ contributions and tax offsets could reduce this to USD6.1bn (22p). If it
fails and the well continues to flow until the relief wells are completed in two months’
time, costs could rise to USD19.4bn (70p) or USD12.6bn (46p) net of tax/partners’ share.
BE

Growth hit? The six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling and the US authorities’
lack of trust in BP’s operating skills is likely to slow the pace of future BP developments.
BP projected that new Gulf of Mexico projects could add up to 120,000b/d to production
by 2015, equivalent to 3% of current group production. Much of that now looks likely to
be delayed beyond 2015 in our view. On the basis of BP’s 1Q 2010 US upstream margins,
we estimate this could cost BP up to USD1bn after tax in 2015, equivalent to around 6%
of our revised 2010e forecast.
BE

Target price: We cut our 2010-12 net income forecasts and reduce our long-term growth
rate for production from 2% to 0%. We also assume that the spill costs BP USD12.4bn at
the pre-tax level. These changes result in a cut in our target price to 660p from 715p. We
reiterate our Overweight stance but now see the stock as a high risk, high reward
investment given the uncertainty regarding costs and fines.
BE

Catalysts: The key catalyst and risk to our stance in the short term is the installation of
the new marine riser on the blow-out. In the medium term, it is the relief wells due for
completion in August. Other risks include realisations, margins and dollar exchange rates
that are materially lower than our long-term forecasts.
MJ
Elsewhere, there are slightly more negative views
MJ
Evo put out a note saying the dividend will be cut
MJ
based on this premise
MJ

“If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can’t
speak English”
BE
Sounds interesting. Can we see more?
MJ
Sure
MJ

We believe BP will bow to political pressure in the US and suspend
dividend payments for the remainder of 2010. By the company’s own
admission they are ‘responsible’, and if the latest global recession has
taught us anything it is that there is always a need to find someone to
blame: “If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can’t
speak English” Homer J Simpson.
We still don’t know if BP will cut/suspend its dividend or not but we do know that
there is significant political pressure mounting in the US. And although on our
numbers they can afford to (and should) pay the dividend we believe it will be
suspended for the remainder of the financial year 2010. This has a severe impact
on the UK dividend yield.
This was meant to be a short note all about why you should buy, not sell equities,
and how equities make strong positive returns in subsequent years from these
valuation levels (PE) and that the reversing of the reverse yield gap is historically
a strong buy signal for equities. We wanted to highlight the dangers of buying an
equity yield vs buying a bond yield, because an equity yield is only a promise that
can be broken and is clearly not as secure as a bond yield.
MJ

However, (and it is a big however), the biggest risk to the equity yield is dividend
cuts. We aren’t forecasting wide scale dividend cuts but we stress test the UK
yield for changes in FX and also the effects of a BP dividend cut on the market.
We find that post a BP cut/suspension of the dividend the UK yield falls to 3.55%
from 3.90% – below the UK 10-year bond yield. In addition to this we have added
some dollar weakness into the equation and the yield falls further to 3.41%. The
equity yield doesn’t feel as cheap as it did, does it?
In 2003 and 2009 the reversing of the reverse yield gap was a huge buy signal for
equities. It could well be again but the yield on the UK is probably much lower
than people think it is.
BE
Cheers for that.
BE
And, just as a postscript on BP ….
BE
Did you catch this yesterday?
BE
BP CEO Tony Hayward Issues an Apology for Remarks
BE
“I made a hurtful and thoughtless comment on Sunday when I said that “I wanted my life back.” When I read that recently, I was appalled. I apologize, especially to the families of the 11 men who lost their lives in this tragic accident. Those words don’t represent how I feel about this tragedy, and certainly don’t represent the hearts of the people of BP – many of whom live and work in the Gulf – who are doing everything they can to make things right. My first priority is doing all we can to restore the lives of the people of the Gulf region and their families – to restore their lives, not mine.”
MJ
Oh yes, a Facebook mea culpa
MJ
The medium of choice it seems for CEOs in distress
BE
So it appears. It seems that’s how things are done now.
BE
We’ve reached a such an infantile, hysterical level of discourse
BE
that captains of industry feel it necessary to issue apologys on Facebook
MJ
Emoticon
BE
for off-duty comments that any rational person can see barely amount to a faux pas.
BE
We’ve not moved one inch beyond the days of burning Beatles records.
BE
In fact, we’ve regressed.
BE
Pathetic.
MJ
End of rant?
BE
Yes. End of rant.
BE
Thanks for listening.
11:51AM
MJ
So where next?
MJ
Spot of Afren maybe
BE
Sure. Let’s look at a faller.
MJ
Very oily session this is becoming
BE
Though it’s been neither waxy nor heavy.
BE
Anyway, so why the poor reaction to this Afren acquisition?
Afren Plc (AFR:LSE): Last: 88.35, down 3.6 (-3.92%), High: 93.15, Low: 88.00, Volume: 7.44m
MJ
Well, it is slightly dilutive
MJ
And Afren has not had the best record with high risk drilling, which is what it is going to be taking on here
MJ
But I am not sure why the market is so down on this
BE
Credit Suisse has a serious case of not fancying it.
BE
Here’s their downgrade.
BE
An unwelcome diversion
BE

Proposed Black Marlin Energy acquisition is a divergence from core
strategy. Although growth via acquisitions remains central to the Afren story,
we do not feel that an all share deal to add a fragmented portfolio of frontier
exploration assets is attractive to current shareholders. Following $326m of
equity issuance in 2009 (25% of current market cap), this divergence from
Afren’s core strategy may not be taken positively by the market in our view.
We now set our target price at a 20% discount to NAV to reflect the
uncertainty we have in company strategy prior to first production and cash
flow from the Ebok field. Target price decreases to 100p and we downgrade
to Neutral citing preference for other E&Ps with similar discounts to NAV.
Our EPS estimates for 2010-11E decrease 8% to 17p and 55p respectively.
BE

We are not yet convinced of the logic behind the deal. Afren was
established with a strategy to take advantage of Nigeria’s drive towards
indigenous oil production, with “first mover” advantage for accessing and
commercialising undeveloped resources. The deal activity that we had been
looking forward to was the acquisition of satellite fields around the
company’s key Ebok development in Nigeria. As such, we feel that exposure
to high-risk frontier exploration in East Africa is a divergence.
BE

Details of the proposed deal: approximately 76.8 mm new Afren shares
(7.9% of enlarged equity) are to be issued to Black Marlin Energy (BLM.V)
shareholders and option-holders in an all share deal valuing the company at
c.$US100m. This would expand Afren’s exploration portfolio through the
addition of 12 blocks in Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar and the Seychelles
and adds 6 exploration wells targeting net 460 mmboe to the 2011-12
programme. The deal requires the approval of 75% of the shareholders from
both companies and the transaction is expected to be completed by end Q3.
BE

Valuation: Although Afren trades at a 26% discount to our NAV of 125p,
based on $80 oil, we have a preference for Premier Oil (OP, TP 1,561p) and
Dana Petroleum (OP, TP 1,503p) where we see similar discounts to NAV.
BE
Thoughts?
MJ
Simply put, this is a cashed up Afren buying a cash poor, but oppurtunity rich company
MJ
Black Marlin, it should be noted, IPOd only in march
MJ
They clearly could not get access to the capital they needed to develop those assets
MJ
meaning Afren got them for a rather good price
BE
(@DanRWL: Yes. Andrew Gowers. Before BP he was top flak for Lehman Brothers.)
MJ
Anyway, we have a bit more comment
BE
Go on.
MJ
Here is Evolution’s take
MJ

Thought for the day: Afren acquisition – One eye on the future
Afren’s agreed all share acquisition of Canadian-listed explorer Black Marlin Energy (BLM) builds out the Pan African model and provides a tranche of drilling opportunities to grow the company beyond 2012 by which time key developments in Nigeria should be generating significant cash flows. The deal values BLM at C$106.5m. BLM shareholders receive 0.3647 Afren shares for each BLM share. Afren will issue 76.8m AFR shares. BLM provides AFR with an entre into East Africa and specifically licences in Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar and Seychelles. The net unrisked reserves potential on BLM is 1287m boe, doubling AFR’s net unrisked reserves to 2341m boe. AFR expects to spend c.US98m through to 2012 on seismic work and drilling of the BLM portfolio opportunities (mainly 2011 onwards). The deal may be dilutive on a 2P reserves basis for AFR as BLM has no 2P reserves. Measuring the deal on this basis misses the point though. It’s an investment in the future that costs US$186m (US$102m acq. + US$98m less US$14m) or US$0.14/boe unrisked, US$0.96/boe risked.
MJ
And here is RenCap
MJ

• Yesterday (2 June), Afren said it had reached an agreement to acquire Black Marlin Energy Holdings Ltd, in an all-share transaction that values Black Marlin at CAD106.5mn ($102mn), and for which Afren will issue 76.8mn shares. Completion of the deal requires shareholder approval from both companies and it is expected to close in late September. Black Marlin’s management, which holds 55% of the company’s shares, has entered into irrevocable undertakings to support and vote in favour of the transaction, and has agreed on a one-year lock-up on the Afren shares.
• We see the following positives: 1) In addition to Black Marlin, Afren’s management has said it remains on track to explore further acquisitions in Nigeria, where we believe it can create better value. Given news of the Black Marlin deal, we would not be surprised if a further acquisition were to use its First Hydrocarbon Nigeria subsidiary. 2) We see this acquisition as very cheap on an EV/boe basis. Afren will add 1,287mnboe of net unrisked prospective resources in the portfolio, and this is likely to increase to 1,739mnboe with the expected increase of working interest in some of the assets. Even if we apply only a 5% chance of success, the total consideration of $102mn suggests a purchase price of $1.59/boe, significantly lower than Afren’s current multiple of $2.52. 3) Black Marlin provides its own seismic services.
• We see the following negatives: 1) Despite Black Marlin’s attractive price tag, we would not factor in any value from its high-risk/high-reward exploration plays. We think Afren’s ability to convert low-risk Nigerian development projects into near-term cash flow is its main value driver. 2) In our view, the company has not performed well with its high-risk exploration plays in the past, so we think investors will demand tangible results before attributing value to these exploration assets.
• Our conclusion. Given our 2011E P/CFPS valuation approach, and our view that Afren’s high-risk exploration plays carry only option value for the company, we have cut our target price on the stock to GBP1.25, from GBP1.35, as a result of the share dilution and the fact that the acquired assets will not contribute to 2011 cash flow. Given our view of 36% upside potential and the increased option value, we reiterate our BUY rating. We have also revised our EPS/CFPS estimates (adjusted for the share dilution and our new 2010 Brent price forecast).

BE
(@Monkey: you’ll understand if I don’t comment on that.)
11:58AM
BE
Ok – nearly midday.
BE
And we’ve a few things to wrap up with.
BE
Don’t have any previews of the US jobs figures to hand, sadly.
BE
Though those are plentiful elsewhere.
BE
Think we’re looking at a surge in employment and a slight fall in the unemployment rate
BE
No idea if BP’s rock-polishing operations will move the dial there.
BE
And, of course, following that we have the most interesting G20 for quite some time.
MJ
yes
BE
Will there be a co-ordinated action to support the euro?
BE
(Has there been already?)
BE
(/conspiracy theory)
BE
Will the Chinese revalue?
MJ
How will Dave fit in? And George.
BE
Ah yes. That’s the big one.
BE
And is Clegg going?
BE
Will be be carrying Gideon’s suitcases?
BE
Anyway, these are all just questions and there are a couple more stock things to mention, so let’s push on.
12:03PM
MJ
A quick excursion to small cap corner before we go?
BE
Haven’t really had the time to look down there this morning.
BE
There’s some very flaky rumour about Tanfield
MJ
flaky RAW
RAW is market chatter – information that has not been formally tested through traditional journalistic channels (PRs etc). The story might be complete rubbish, but if we believe there is some substance to it we will say so. Either way, Reader Beware.
BE
Close to completing the sale of its electric vehicles thing, apparently.
BE
However, that doesn’t even qualify as raw by the usual definitions.
MJ
(Monkey – that is a genuine policy of the Monster Raving Loony Party)
BE
There’s also been a bit of talk around Ultra Electronics
BE
Which is a hardy perrenial of takeover targets.
BE
Though it’s doing absolutely nothing this morning following a move yesterday.
Ultra Electronics Holdings PLC (ULE:LSE): Last: 1,639, up 3 (+0.18%), High: 1,678, Low: 1,626, Volume: 41.07k
BE
On a more fundamental tack, WPP’s up on the back of a UBS upgrade
WPP Plc (WPP:LSE): Last: 670.50, up 23.5 (+3.63%), High: 676.00, Low: 665.00, Volume: 2.26m
BE
Which goes like this
BE

European ad agencies offer global growth drivers in weak currencies

Despite European macro risks, the EU ad agencies offer exposure to more robust drivers of global growth (e.g. c70% WPP revs from US, Germany & EM) whilst being listed in relatively weak currencies. We were previously more cautious on the risk-reward for WPP & Publicis given our belief that the shares reflected over-inflated investor expectations – but recent market weakness provides an opportunity to now acquire this GDP / FX exposure at more attractive valuations.

BE

* Forecasts upgraded 2-5%

We update our forecasts for recent sterling & euro weakness (as well Publicis’ recent share buyback). This leads to a 2% upgrade for WPP, c3% EPS upgrade for Havas and a 5% upgrade for Publicis, based on £/$ 1.45 & €/$ 1.23.

BE

* WPP – upgrading to Buy, 740p PT (from 700p) is DCF based

With WPP now the cheapest of its peers at 10.5x 2011E earnings and having under-performed Publicis by >10% YTD, we upgrade it to Buy. This weakness partly reflected their recent relative under-performance in organic growth delivery, but this growth differential could start to close in Q2, helping them revert away from their cyclical valuation low relative to Publicis & their un-stretched valuation relative to the market. We remain Buyers of Aegis & Havas in the mid-cap space.

BE
And Randgold’s down after a Merrill downgrade.
Randgold Resources Ltd (RRS:LSE): Last: 6,090, down 40 (-0.65%), High: 6,200, Low: 6,090, Volume: 163.15k
BE

Downgrade to Neutral, price objective GBp6200/sh
On a P/NPV basis we believe that Randgold is approaching a “peak” multiple
(3.0x). Valuation premium vs. peers has widened to +40% against a historic
average of +20%. At approx GBp6100/sh and on a relative basis, we see shares
as fully valued and downgrade to a Neutral rating. To be clear, we still see
Randgold as a high quality company with a record of “best-in-class” exploration &
project execution. We just think this is now largely discounted in the share price.
BE

NPV downgraded by 10% on Gounkoto and Massawa
As Gounkoto has progressed from the scoping to prefeasibility stage, projected
recovered ounces have declined and unit cash costs have been revised upwards.
We incorporate these changes into our base case financial model and in addition
push out the date of first production by around 9 months. We also revise first gold
output at Massawa (from 2013 to 2014) as more work is required on the
metallurgy than we initially anticipated.
BE

Risks to our valuation to both the upside and downside
On the upside we do highlight that the Kibali project in the DRC is not included in
our base case valuation and reported progress at the site is progressing well. We
also exclude any underground potential at Gounkoto, which could double the
current modelled mine life. On the downside, the Supreme Court in the DRC
recently annulled First Quantum’s title rights for two of its deposits. In our opinion,
higher perceived country risk will likely mean that progress in the DRC (however
positive) does not get fully reflected in the group’s share price.
BE
And that’ll do for those. Hope that’s useful to someone.
12:09PM
BE
Miles, anything on your mind before we finish?
MJ
No – I think we are done
BE
I think we are.
BE
So, thanks for all your comments today.
MJ
Thanks
BE
We know it’s always a struggle in a rising market, so every comment was appreciated.
BE
Hopefully we’ll get another tin-hat day tomorrow to drive a bit more traffic.
BE
Until then, good afternoon all.
MJ
Bye
Print