Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 11:31 on 28 May 2010. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT Bryce Elder
The renewed weakness in equity markets over the last two
weeks has had a significant impact on investor confidence, not
least because it suggests that the recent ECB
intervention/stabilization package has failed to stem the rise in
risk aversion. At this juncture it is tempting to view current
events through the lens of 2008 given that it originated in
concerns over excess debt levels and a weak banking system
(in the euro-zone), however we think a more comparable
period is 1998.
While it would be imprudent to exclude the possibility that the
current situation plays out along 2008 lines (which would likely
see the FTSE head down toward our bear case forecast of
3600), we see four reasons to be more optimistic: 1) Global
economic growth is recovering, especially in Asia/EM and the
US; 2) Recent events are likely to delay any efforts to reduce
monetary stimulus/hike base rates; 3) The financial system is
more robust now given banks’ balance sheets are stronger; 4)
The oil price is sub $70 today versus $130 two years ago.
In our view the cyclical upswing remains strong and the advantage of the recent wobble is that interest rates, even in emerging markets, will not go up soon. Also, we don’t believe this situation is similar to late 2008. While measures of bank risk have risen a little, the rise is insignificant compared to back then
throws up investments that have got oversold. Some emerging markets now look
decidedly cheap (Russia on a PE of 5x, Korea on 8x), as do dividend yields for some
developed market stocks
capitulation and helps to explain the bounce in S&P 500 from key 1044.50.
Outflows from EM have been large in the past 4 weeks ($4.8bn) but not large
enough to trigger a buy signal from BofA ML EM flow trading rule (Page 6).
Yield: 745 million savers in the G7 now faced with zero interest rates for quarters
or years to come = capital to flow to high yielding corporate bonds & high dividend
paying stocks. Our forecast for a Fed hike just pushed out to Aug’2011 (Chart 2).
Growth: deflationary fiscal policies in G7 = scarce G7 growth = capital flows to
companies exposed to strong EM consumer and US corporate balance sheets.
The Asia crisis caused the tech bubble; the liquidity required to ease the burden
of the sovereign debt crisis could easily cause EM & credit bubbles medium-term
(Chart 4).
Outflows -$5.3B
outflows of $1.35B over the same period – anything >$500M is considered
extremely excessive…2 weeks ago it was $1.7bn, which was the 2nd largest on
record.
of the financial crisis, investors worldwide pulled out of equities and moved
into government debt. The ECB figures to March last year show that eurozone
debt benefited from safe haven flows, from inside as well as outside the
eurozone. Foreign investors pulled out of eurozone equities, but invested
heavily in debt instruments while eurozone investors repatriated funds. The
decline in net portfolio investment inflows from the 12 months to March 2009
to March this year was mainly due to the fact that eurozone residents stopped
repatriating funds.
€421.1B in foreign investment in eurozone equities and bond instruments in
the eurozone.
up of the interbank money market or that a credit crunch is hampering
investment and overall growth. However, most data in Europe is only available
through March, and with uncertainty remaining high and market confidence not
fully restored this AMG data may be a leading indicator of a further drying
up of liquidity ahead for the Eurozone.
- LINK: http://www.amgdata.com/
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
11:11 28May10 RTRS-HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
wellbore
Despite yesterday’s mixed messages regarding the success in stopping the
Macondo (GoM) leak, the ‘top kill’ procedure – injecting drilling mud to counteract
the well pressure and then cement the well – is still ongoing. BP made some
progress in temporarily suppressing the flow but not enough mud is going into the
wellbore. At their daily update COO Suttles indicates that the procedure needs
some changes (eg, introducing new materials) and that at least another 24 hours
are required before cementing. Yet there is still no gurantee that the process will
work and BP has already lined up alternative processes,
In addition, the US Geological Survey (USGS) has independently estimated that
the flow rate at Macondo is in the 12-19kb/d range. Whilst this is clearly larger
than the previous 5kb/d estimate, it is inline with the flowrates of typical wells in
the area as we had indicated (see BP: Making tangible progress 21-May). We
note that this new information makes no difference to our worst case liability
estimate of US$10bn – based on the recently proposed liability limit.
The extension of the offshore drilling moratorium for 6 months and the suspension
of some 30 approved projects in the GoM is a harsher step than we had
anticipated. Whilst BP – and the other European companies affected (Shell,
Statoil, Repsol, Eni) – have a global portfolio deep enough to minimise the impact,
the ban could affect the promising lower tertiary prospects, somewhat reducing
the medium term growth potential in the GoM.
Ford area for an estimated US$1.1bn
This morning Shell announced two separate deals that significantly increase their
position in the North American shale gas market. The company has acquired
privately held East Resources for some US$4.7bn – mainly 650k acres in the
Marcellus shale area – and a number of leases totalling 250k acres in the Eagle
Ford area for an estimated US$1.1bn. In total both transactions add some 16TCF
of nat gas resources to Shell.
compares well against the US$5-14k/acre seen in the area – and US$4,500/acre
for the Eagle Ford acreage – against a range of US$4-10k/acre for the area.
We see Shell’s move into the shale gas area as positive as it allows them to
cement a solid position in the US nat gas market at a reasonable price.
DGA Kurdistan Team Leader
The $35.5bn asking price that Prudential is paying for AIA includes 2,024m Prudential shares to be
issued as the transaction is completed. These shares equate to a 10.9% holding in the pro forma group.
We estimate using current FX rates and a pro forma TERP price of 171 pence that a reduction of up to
$5bn in the consideration could be achieved by reducing or even eliminating the paper consideration.
Reducing the consideration by $3.5bn (in line with the 10% fall in equity markets since the deal was
announced) would see the number of shares handed over the AIG fall to 607m. Adjusting the transaction
in this way would also potentially save the need to re-price the rights issue and the associated work on a
supplementary prospectus. All else being equal the shareholder vote on the rights issue could take place
as planned on 7th June.
Reducing the consideration by $5bn would make the deal earnings neutral by 2013/14 and raises our fair
value per share (on a cum rights basis) by 12% to 904 pence. A cut of $3.5bn would see earnings dilution
of 5% in 2013 with neutrality in 2015 – our fair value per share estimate would rise to 872 pence.
The impact of eliminating the hybrid debt consideration would have a similar effect as cutting the amount
of paper handed over to AIG. We estimate earnings dilution of 6% in 2013, falling to 3% in 2015. Our
fair value per share under this scenario would be 865 pence.
We feel the investment case for Prudential, together with AIA, remains compelling. We believe investors
able to identify the long-term drivers of growth in developing Asian life markets and ride out the medium
term dilution in earnings will be handsomely rewarded for doing so. The price paid for AIA at $35.5bn is
high, however we believe the underlying value of AIA (we estimate $49bn) is indicative of the considerable
upside to come.
our valuation for the pro-forma group whilst also substantially reducing the dilutive impact of the deal on
existing shareholders. While a reduction in price would be welcomed we remain convinced that the deal
remains an attractive opportunity as is. The lack of confirmatory detail on any reduction in price means we
hold back from adjusting our earnings forecasts and target price for Prudential at this time. We rate
Prudential Outperform with an 810 pence price target on a cum-rights basis, 255 pence ex-rights.
Press commentary (seemingly well informed) flags that Pru is pushing for a price reduction to $30bn (from $35.5bn) but AIG seem to be reluctant to go below $31bn. If Pru is able to negotiate a price cut to around these levels, we think the deal has a greater than 50% chance of going ahead, against the c20% chance at present.
Modelling an eventual price of $30.5bn makes the deal earnings neutral in 2013 and delivers a ROI of 10%, assuming 20% AIA earnings growth. This just about works mathematically, although it still requires shareholders to build in some relatively aggressive assumptions. While this helps with the deal dynamics, PRU will still need to rebuild relationships with investors and reassure that they can execute on the acquisition and deliver the 20% growth pa in AIA earnings which is key for the deal being successful.
Conclusions – no surprise to see Pru trying to renegotiate the price, as we wrote yesterday, shareholder feedback suggests the chances of the deal proceeding in its current state are slim. Yesterday’s press gives Pru management sufficient ammunition to attempt a renegotiation, and although it may just be a last roll of the dice, AIG remain a motivated seller and may yet agree to a reduction. It seems the range is $30-31bn at present – not necessarily enough to make Pru shareholder support a slam-dunk, but materially more likely that it is at present.
––Net assets of £794.9m
––Cash balance of £95.9m
Thursday’s approval of Uefa’s new financial fair play rules means that, for the first time, clubs wishing to compete in the Champions League or Europa League must aim to break even each season.
In addition, club owners will be limited to investing just £38m in the three seasons after the regulations come in, starting in 2012/2013.
- I have not seen the full results yet but (from the press release) club does not yet appear to have paid out the £70mm distribution earmarked for Red Football JV in the bond docs (although cash balance is down to £96mm from £122mm at 2Q).
– 3Q revenues grew 4% YoY to £74.6mm from £71.6mm, helped by growth in Commercial (+12% YoY). Matchday turnover grew 3%, while Media fell 2% YoY.
- Reported EBITDA fell to £23.4mm from £25.9mm in 3Q09 but no colour in press release (may be impact of number of matches played).
- Net debt is £425mm for reported net lev of 3.6x (but 4.2x pro forma for £70mm Red Fooball JV payment).
- Spokesman again has said Man Utd is not for sale and Glazers “won’t entertain offers” for the club.
- Conference call at 12pm UK time.
We believe that Standard Chartered remains cheap in absolute terms, and highly
attractive over the longer-term, but, following its sustained relative outperformance
against our European banks universe, we now advise investors to concentrate
overweight positions in Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group and the French banks to take
maximum advantage of current distressed entry levels for those names. As such, we
(somewhat reluctantly) downgrade Standard Chartered from Outperform to Neutral.
Standard Chartered has outperformed European banks over 1 day, 1 week, 1
month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years and 10 years. It is currently enjoying
record client income in Wholesale Banking, recovering revenues in Consumer
Banking, an accelerating pace of decline in consumer impairments and record
profitability. With a loans:deposits ratio below 80%, and no reported exposure to
Greece, it has enjoyed something of a “safe haven” status, notwithstanding modest
anticipated dilution from its Indian listing, market disquiet over renewed Nedbank
speculation, and recent tensions in Korea. However it may underperform in any
wider sector/market recovery.
We have found it increasingly difficult to contain our enthusiasm for the undoubted
success of the unique and enduring Standard Chartered model, discussed in our
various reports Plenty more to go for!, 2 December, Simply the best, better than all
the rest!, 9 December, You’re just too good to be true!, 24 February, Anything you
want, you got it!, 3 March and Don’t you forget about me!, 4 May. But however much
we like the story, on a 12-month view we now see better value elsewhere.
Consensus has moved up, but our forecasts are substantially unchanged. We retain
a target price of 1900p, equivalent to 2.7x 2009 tNAV. Barclays trades on 0.9x,
Lloyds on 1.0x.
UK banks are down 15% over the month, bringing Barclays and LBG to 5x 2012
EPS. Market fears around funding, regulation and mid-austerity growth are well
rehearsed, but it strikes us that while downside risk has risen, some significant
positives are being overlooked: (i) GDP growth is still positive on consensus
despite planned austerity; (ii) the EU’s E750bn could refi Spain, Portugal and
Ireland for 3 years; (iii) ECB has provided enough ways for banks to get liquidity;
(iv) Regulators and governments appear more pragmatic about change.
The OECD released yesterday updated Euroland GDP growth forecasts of 1.2%
and 1.8% for 2010 and 2011, despite planned austerity measures in Greece,
Spain, Portugal, Italy, France and others. The DB forecasts are lower at 0.9% and
1.0% respectively, but not inconsistent with the normalisation of credit costs we
forecast for banks and a decent outcome if this growth is achieved whilst
countries such as Spain cut their budget deficits by two thirds. Lower for longer
interest rates are helpful to UK banks which are largely at the point of maximum
deposit spread compression.
It also strikes us that the disquiet over sovereign solvency has caused the market
to overlook the magnitude of protection afforded to banks by steps announced by
the EU (the E750bn is sufficient to cover the budget deficits and refi requirements
of Spain, Portugal and Ireland for the next three years), the ECB (providing liquidity
to the bond market and to banks), and the increasingly pragmatic tone evident in
regulator and political circles (see the text from yesterday’s bank resolution fund
as a recent example).
UK housing indicators were almost uniformly positive in April following a fairly
mixed March. House prices were up around 1%, whilst RICS reported more
buying interest, more houses sold than new ones put up for sale (tightening the
demand/supply balance) and greater surveyor optimism on the likely direction of
prices in the coming quarter. Mortgage volumes were slower and we expect to
see a pause in activity levels, and perhaps prices as the consequences of the UK’s
emergency budget on 22 June are awaited, and then digested.
Given the undemanding valuation of the UK domestic banks in particular, and the
fact that there are far fewer middle-of-the-road investor views in evidence at
present (we spend almost as much time discussion inflation as deflation, for
example), we see sector upside potential as sentiment moves to encompass the
mean view exemplified by the GDP forecasts highlighted above.
11:56 28May10 RTRS-LIBOR THREE-MONTH EURO RATES
11:56 28May10 RTRS-LIBOR THREE-MONTH STERLING RATES
11:56 28May10 RTRS-THREE-MONTH DOLLAR LIBOR/OIS SPREAD AT 29 BPS VS 30 BPS – REUTERS DATA
11:56 28May10 RTRS-THREE-MONTH EURO LIBOR/OIS SPREAD AT 23 BPS VS 24 BPS – REUTERS DATA
11:56 28May10 RTRS-THREE-MONTH STG LIBOR/OIS SPREAD AT 20 BPS VS 21 BPS – REUTERS DATA
repricing rather than an indication of imminent financial disaster and as such
we feel that the flight-to-quality rally has gone too far.
Libor does not look too high at 0.55%, rather nominal and real yields now look
too low against a backdrop of the slow but steady recovery in the global
economy in our view.
trigger further risk aversion. Equity markets are down between 15 and 20% on
the month, but they are still up between 15 and 20% on a year ago and 50% or
more from the lows. Such a correction is understandable given the pace of the
original move up and the fact that we are now likely to be facing a sustained
period of fiscal tightening that may slow the pace of the recovery. Meanwhile,
GDP growth continues to look encouraging, European sovereigns are finally
cementing more realistic fiscal packages, and even the UK’s latest budget
figures have shown cause for cautious optimism.
With bond yields close to all time lows, the funding burdens for many countries
should also be alleviated. This, we think, is a very important dynamic. In April
we had a falling Euro and rising bond yields among peripheral issuers. This
was a very worrying and dangerous dynamic.
12:06 28May10 RTRS-BP’S HAYWARD SAYS HAVE SENT OTHER MATERIALS INTO WELL, KNOWN AS ‘JUNK SHOT’
12:07 28May10 RTRS-BP’S HAYWARD SAYS PLANS TO PUMP MORE MUD INTO THE OIL WELL LATER TODAY
12:07 28May10 RTRS-U.S. INCIDENT COMMANDER THAD ALLEN SAYS NEXT 12-18 HOURS CRITICAL IN BID TO STOP OIL LEAK
Daring Dream, his other tip, made a much better fist of things, closing all the way to the finish but only managing to finish second in the 3.50pm at Ayr.
888 expects 2010E profit to be significantly lower than previous market
expectations. Since the IMS of 28 April, when average daily revenue for the
first 25 days of Q2 was down 13% on Q1, 888 has continued to experience a
difficult trading environment with the exception of bingo; poker is
particularly weak. We are reducing our already below consensus estimates by
18% per annum 2010-12E. This leaves the group trading on a 2010E P/E of
11.2x and an EV/EBITDA of 5.9x supported by a 4.5% yield. We think the
group’s attractiveness as an M&A target will only increase with this warning
and as such will provide some downside support to the share price. We retain
our Buy recommendation but lower our price target to 80p (from 100p).
expectations. With other companies reporting solid trading this is increasingly
looking stock specific. The stock will fall significantly today but we cut our
rating to HOLD from BUY given the total lack of visibility on trading. Investors
should only Buy the shares on weakness if they believe a bid is forthcoming
reported pressure in the poker market, we think this represents
underperformance and demonstrates the need for scale. 888 have become the
latest company to shut down their French operations ahead of regulation which
will also affect profits.
the gambling sector have all reported much stronger trading in recent weeks, so
we think that this is looking increasingly stock specific. The closest read across is
probably to Party Gaming given the group’s focus on poker and casino, and the
fact that the company also reports in Dollars, which have been a part of 888’s
troubles. The lack of a large sportsbook will also affect both companies with the
World Cup approaching.
a guessing game. 888 say that they continue to trade profitably. To us, the most
relevant factor is that the company has c£35-40m cash on the balance sheet
compared with a market cap (at yesterday’s close) of £230m, or freefloat of just
c£90m. The company may continue to buy back shares. The cash pile should
of a bid should be buying the shares today.
Travis is buying BSS in a recommended cash and equity offer. The offer values BSS at 433p per share, a 33% premium to yesterday’s close. Travis is offering 232.91p in cash, 0.2608 new Travis shares for each BSS share, and the 6.09p BSS dividend. The deal values BSS at £553m. This equates to an EV of £639m if we include our BSS debt forecast. It has the backing of certain BSS shareholders – a stock that has always been tightly held by UK institutions with the top five currently holding 45%.
Based on our estimates for BSS, the multiples are 10x EV/EBITDA falling to a possible 7x based on synergies of 2% of BSS sales. Taking our 28.3p BSS eps for the y/e March 2011, the PE is 15.3x. Travis will pay circa £300m in cash (including the BSS dividend) which neatly equates to the size of its rights issue last year. Travis debt/EBITDA will rise from 1.3x to 2.0x under the deal.
The merger will create the largest UK plumbing and heating group – we estimate market share will rise from 17% to 25%. Travis sees no competition issues. Synergies will be mainly in sourcing, the supply chain and IT. With the backing of some BSS shareholders and a high headline price before synergies, we expect this deal to go through smoothly. Of the leading merchants, St Gobain could be the only possible counter-bidder and is unlikely in our view to get involved in a bidding war.
We remain buyers of Travis – stock trades on 10x 2011e earnings. This deal should bring healthy synergies to the group and remove major questions over Travis growth prospects. Our target price is based on peer group multiples, CS Quest™ and DCF. The group has sector-leading EBIT margins of 7.5% and outstanding 5-year CFROA returns of 13%.
EV/sales of 0.5x.
EV/EBITA of 12x (please note that BSS’s 2010 EBITA was lower than the £68m achieved in 2009).
This compares with Travis Perkins’ own pre-acquisition implied multiples (EV/sales of c0.7x; EV/EBITA of c8.9x).
Please note that the EV/sales and EV/EBITA differential, reflects the margin differential between the two businesses (Travis’s margin is c8%, well above the c4% achieved by BSS).
It will dilute the company’s exposure to retail (the contribution of Wickes will fall from around one-third to less than a quarter of group revenues), an advantage in the event of a consumer slowdown.
It could raise the growth prospects of the business (see above).
There is scope to generate synergies (both cost and revenue synergies) For example, a 1% revenue synergy on BSS’s sales would amount to c£14m, which would be an additional 5% to 2011 PBT (see table below).
