Fraud – it brings people together. As Bloomberg reported on Wednesday:
Victims of Bernard Madoff and accused Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford are banding together to lobby Congress for a law that could require Wall Street firms to pay billions of dollars to cover some of the losses they suffered.
…
Together, the groups hope to persuade Congress to add a requirement to the regulatory overhaul bill, now under Senate consideration, that brokerage firms pay about $4 billion in additional fees to the Securities Investor Protection Corp. fund. SIPC protects U.S. investors’ accounts against fraud or bankruptcy. The victims also want Congress to require the fund to compensate them up to $500,000 each in losses.
As we’ve noted before on FT Alphaville, alleged fraudsters tend to go in for quite targeted marketing. Which means the nascent Stanford-Madoff victims coalition will be a bit of an interesting mix, as Bloomberg pointed out:
The result is a coalition of the Democratic-backed, East Coast, and mostly Jewish investors defrauded by Madoff, with the Republican-backed, largely Christian, Sunbelt residents victimized by Stanford. The disparate groups now find themselves bound by a common notion: They’ve been cheated, and they want the government to make them whole.
Speaking of targeting, the SEC warned on Wednesday of a “phony website targeting Madoff fraud victims”:
The Securities and Exchange Commission is alerting investors about a Web site that falsely claims to have recovered $1.3 billion in funds hidden by convicted Ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff in Malaysia. The site asks Madoff victims to submit information to verify that they are on a refund list — a ploy commonly used by con artists to further rip off financial fraud victims.
The phony Web site claims to be home to the “International Security Investor Protection Corporation” — a fictitious entity. The “ISIPC” Web site bears a certain likeness to the Securities Investor Protection Corporation’s (SIPC) Web site, mimicking its look, feel, and content in an attempt to achieve an aura of authenticity with Madoff victims. The “ISPIC” Web site claims to partner with several governments including the United States, and links to actual government Web sites to signify an affiliation. “ISIPC” also falsely claims to be sponsored by the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank.
Cunning.
As for the man formerly known as Sir Allen Stanford, his one-time friends and allies are abandoning him in droves.
The Jamaica Observer reported on Wednesday that the Antiguan government — various politicians within which had actively supported, and been backed by, Stanford in recent years — was distancing itself from the Texan businessman:
“The current Government, which assumed office in March 2004, did not sell any Crown lands to Stanford, received no loans from Stanford, and was not a beneficiary of any largesse of Stanford. In fact, R Allen Stanford considered this administration as his enemy,” the Antiguan Government said in a statement.
Related links:
What do Ponzi operators spend their money on? – FT Alphaville
Court rules Madoff victims cannot sue UBS – FT
Article Series - The Stanford Series
- As Stanford allegations fly, the SEC investigates...
- US MARSHALS SEEN ENTERING HOUSTON OFFICE OF STANFORD FINANCIAL GROUP - REUTERS EYEWITNESS
- Arise, Sir Allen...lest we assume the worst
- Sir Allen's Antigua, or the curious case of Stanford International Bank
- ROBERT STANFORD ACCUSED OF `MASSIVE FRAUD' BY SEC
- The fractal Stanford
- The full SEC complaint against Stanford
- Stanford scandal in pictures
- It's just not cricket
- Have you seen this bank?
- Where in the world is Sir Allen?
- What does the 'F' stand for in FINRA?
- Stanford's mysterious billions
- Stanford's AIM foray
- A Freudian slip?
- Sir Allen Stanford, you've been served
- But which passport will he surrender?
- SIB and Stanford Trust Company Limited put into receivership
- Eastern Caribbean Central Bank "takes control" of the Bank of Antigua
- The Stanford campaign donations: pay 'em back, not forward
- Clients of Allen, by the numbers
- This land is our land, Antigua government to say
- Antigua government moves closer to seizing Stanford properties
- From "investment fraud" to "massive Ponzi scheme"
- New details on alleged "massive Ponzi scheme"
- Stanford's US employees join the jobless queue
- Irony du jour
- Invested with Sir Allen? The FBI wants you (to contact them)
- Stanford pleading the fifth
- IRS says Sir Allen owes $200m in back taxes
- Ralph Janvey to Stanford employees: BYOB
- Laura Pendergest-Holt agrees to extend indictment deadline
- Vantis reports "significant shortfall of assets" at Stanford International Bank
- Sir Allen speaks
- Stanford victims unite!
- Frozen-out Stanford investors petition Congress
- Antiguan financial services providers launch PR offensive
- The SEC has strong words for Sir Allen Stanford
- When it came to Sir Allen Stanford, many warnings went unheeded
- Sir Allen's cowboy lawyer
- Authorities still failing to get along
- Laura Pendergest-Holt to face more charges, Fox Business says
- The DEA connection
- Avast, ye salty Stanford lawfirm website
- Judge rules Sir Allen Stanford must stay in jail pending trial
- Stanford CFO James Davis "intends to plead guilty", laywer says
- Sir Allen's request to unfreeze funds for legal fees denied
- The Tripoli-St John's Nexus
- "Fraud victims" want $24bn from the government of Antigua and Barbuda
- Sir Allen discovers there's no air conditioning in jail
- James Davis pleads guilty to charges related to that $7bn Ponzi
- Big Brother's blood oaths
- "The investors ought not have to pay for the receiver's PR firm"
- Sir Allen's Bellagio problem
- Stanford's Bellagio debt, redux
- A public defender rides to Sir Allen's rescue
- Allen Stanford, puppetmaster: By Freddie Flintoff
- Jail proving a big headache for Sir Allen [UPDATED]
- Arise Allen Stanford, un-knighted...
- Ponzi victims, unite!
- Strategies to cope with the SEC
