Print

Markets Live transcript 18 Feb 2010

Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:15 on 18 Feb 2010. Participants in this chat were: Bryce Elder Miles Johnson, FT

BE
Right – and we’re off ….
BE
Good morning
BE
And welcome to Markets Live
BE
FT Alphaville’s daily meander around all things stock
BE
And it’s half-term
BE
So Neil’s off to Chessington World of Adventure with his sprogs
BE
Meaning you’ve got me
BE
And a special guest appearance by Miles
BE
Formerly of this parish, now the FT’s Special Timis correspondent
MJ
Hello
MJ
Hope everyone is well
BE
Now, as usual, there are a couple of tech problems
BE
Most notably, my Reuters machine’s still not working
BE
Because THOMSON REUTERS IS PATHETIC
MJ
Steady on
BE
That’s only my opinion, obviously.
BE
I’m not speaking for the FT when I say THOMSON REUTERS IS UTTERLY USELESS AND PATHETIC
BE
And, of course, Neil didn’t leave login details for his Reuters box
MJ
Right
MJ
So we’re totally without prices?
BE
That’s right.
BE
Good, isn’t it? Markets Live, without live markets.
MJ
Well, we will try to muddle through as always
11:08AM
MJ
So, Bryce whats going on in the wider market?
BE
Well, we’re up
BE
Apparently
BE
FTSE looks to be testing the 5300 level
MJ
What happened arounf 9.30?
MJ
I must have missed somthing
BE
Hm.
BE
The UK public finances data?
MJ
Deficit stuff was bad though
BE
Bad is an understatement.
BE
Absolute shocker of a reading.
BE
Can cut to some comment from Andrew Goodwin, Senior Economic Advisor to the Ernst & Young ITEM Club
BE

First ever January deficit shows quite how dire a state the public finances are in

Higher debt payments are here to stay, emphasising challenges in tightening policy for the next government

BE
“These are pretty ghastly figures and come as somewhat of a surprise given the smaller overshoots of the past couple of months. January usually yields a healthy surplus due to receipts from corporation tax and even in the current climate it is surprising to see the government rack up a deficit. Overall the Chancellor should still just about achieve his full year forecast, given that the tax on bank bonuses is likely to raise more than expected, but if this overshoot is replicated in February and March then the forecast will certainly be under threat.
BE

“We remain most concerned about the outlook for the next few years. In our view the current HMT forecasts are far too optimistic, both in terms of the speed of recovery and the extent to which tax revenues will recover. Though the situation is not as serious as that in Greece, it is clear the major additional tightening will be required over the course of the next parliament. We estimate that a further £15bn of tightening will be needed just to comply with the terms of the Fiscal Responsibility Bill and there is a strong case for looking to reduce the deficit even more aggressively, once the recovery has become entrenched.

“The detail of today’s release emphasises the scale of the fiscal challenge facing the next government. Debt interest payments are soaring and, given that government debt continues to grow, these payments are only going to get larger. And yesterday’s softer labour market figures suggest that social benefit payments will remain high for some time to come. With these parts of public spending likely to remain high for the foreseeable future and the main parties promising to protect front-line services, this emphasises how difficult it will be to rein in spending after the election.”

BE
So I guess you could argue this knocks the idea of interest rate rises out of the park for at least a year
MJ
I guess so
MJ
Grim stuff
MJ
Have you any more musings on this?
BE
Nah – let’s return to the macro theme later and kick on with some stocks stuff.
11:13AM
BE
Right – time for some Thornycock.
MJ
Good idea
MJ
We can turn to the Falklands later on
MJ
Right
MJ
So Thornycock story on the splash today
MJ
Neil was working on that one with our defence correspondent
BE
EmoticonEmoticonEmoticon
MJ
before heading off for half term hols
MJ
Babcock raised its offer, and VT rebuffed this morning
BE
A pretty robust defence I thought
MJ
Ill put a bit up
MJ

he transaction would be a retrograde strategic step for VT, which has successfully reduced its exposure to MoD, which could be susceptible to budget cutbacks following the election. By contrast, Babcock, through the acquisition of DML in 2007, has significantly increased its exposure to MoD.

- Incremental growth of the enlarged group would be restricted. Babcock’s position as a contractor to MoD in the marine and Defence Estates areas is likely to create a conflict of interest that would prevent the enlarged group from participating in the potential outsourcing of MoD’s procurement activities. This is an area of potential growth in MoD and from which a standalone VT is extremely well positioned to benefit.

- The benefits of the potential cost synergies postulated by Babcock, to the extent that they can be realised, are unlikely to be fully retained by the enlarged group as MoD would typically expect to share in these cost savings, which in some cases is a contractual requirement.

MJ
“a retrograde step”.
MJ
Eg: A deal would increase VT’s exposure to MoD spending, which could be slashed post-election
MJ
And this whole conflict of interest problem
BE
What are the shares doing?
VT Group (VTG:LSE): Last: 650.00, up 28.5 (+4.59%), High: 665.00, Low: 636.50, Volume: 5.21m
Babcock International (BAB:LSE): Last: 551.00, down 15 (-2.65%), High: 560.00, Low: 547.00, Volume: 973.80k
BE
And, interestingly, Babcock’s really trying to push this.
BE
Chairman Mike Turner was on Bloomberg about half an hour ago saying he was prepared to go hostile
BE
: Babcock International Group Plc is willing to go hostile on its bid for VT Group Plc and take the offer straigh to shareholders, Chairman Mike Turner said in a telephone interview today.
BE
The sweetened bid for VT Group is “fair to both sets of shareholders,” and Babcock is “disappointed” that its bid has been rejected and that the company has not yet been given access to VT Group’s books, Turner said.
MJ
Now, I am catching up on this one
MJ
being an oil man now
MJ
But there seems to be some debate this morning
MJ
over how much strain this would actually put on Babcock’s balance sheet
BE
You’re talking about this bit from the RNS right?
BE
The transaction would put further strain on Babcock’s already leveraged balance sheet, which also remains exposed to pension liabilities of over £2 billion and a current net deficit of £287m1. Post transaction and based on the Revised Proposal, the enlarged group would have pro forma 2009 net debt / EBITDA of 2.8 – 3.0×2.
MJ
Yeah
MJ
a friendly broker sent over some ideas on this
BE
And?
MJ
Well, they don’t buy the idea that the new company’s debt levels
MJ
would be that much of a problem
MJ
Serco has 2.37x ND / EBITDA
MJ
And Rentokill – which accepted is not an ideal comparison
MJ
has 3.34x ND / EBITDA and still has a BBB- rating
BE
Rat killing? Not a perfect comparison, no.
BE
They did put the debt point last I suppose.
BE
Have you got any comment to whack up?
MJ
lets see
MJ
Here is a early morning take from Citi
MJ

Babcock (BAB.L)
Press speculation of increased bid for VT Group
 FT speculation — The FT reported this morning that Babcock is preparing to
increase its bid approach to c.£1.2bn, implying a range of 685-715p.

 Further synergies required — Within this range we estimate that the company
would need to increase the synergies required to c.£35-45m to support a higher
bid, something which we believe it possible if Babcock management are allowed
access to VT’s books.

MJ

 Strategic rationale solid — We continue to believe that the combination of the two
entities makes sense. The new player would have a stronger presence in Military
Training and Nuclear. Further, there would be good opportunity for operational
synergies in its Defense business.

 Supportive to raised bid — We continue to believe that this is a good deal for
Babcock and that future potential synergies could support an increased bid. From
a VT perspective a bid at in this range would be a 27%-34% premium to the 3
month average price for VT.

 Retain Buy Recommendation — We retain our Buy recommendation on Babcock,
even within the proposed range, we believe that the company would trade on a pro
forma c.9x 2011E PE and c.7.7x EB/EBITDA. We retain our Hold recommendation
on VT Group (VTG.L; £6.22; 2M).

MJ
and here is Liberum
MJ
- The FT today suggests that Babcock is expected to increase its bid to 685p-715p. This is higher than the 680p, we suggested. VT have just confirmed this, showing that the increase comes in cash. They have rejected this offer for four main reasons: The offer is still largely in shares, the balance sheet of the enlarged group would be stretched, the enlarged group would be overweight defence outsourcing, and a new point for us, that the synergies would have to be shared with the government.
MJ

Other reports of an 800p bid do not make sense to us.
- There are rumours of a bid for Babcock. The main candidates for a bid are a pac-man defence from VT with BAE and then Lockheed Martin. We continue to think that both are unlikely, given the spread of Babcock’s businesses, but not impossible. There could be a white-knight bid for VT, again perhaps Lockheed Martin, but again we think that is unlikely since the synergies would be lower than those that Babcock could achieve.
MJ
Our view – There are clearly a variety of possible outcomes. We believe that the most likely, although less likely than yesterday, is still that Babcock successfully acquires VT, although it would have to make a higher, perhaps final bid. That would leave Mouchel to go it alone, which could conceivably require a rights issue.
BE
Ok – thanks for all that.
BE
DP: I’m not sure Babcock knows exactly how much Babcock can fund right now.
11:21AM
MJ
Right – BAE?
BE
Seems the natural place to go
BE
BAE has of course been flagged as a potential counterbidder for VT
BE
Which we reckon looks a bit unlikely.
BE
Anyway, numbers today are a bit better than expected
BE
And, as rumoured, they’ve started a share buyback
BE
Can cut to a bit of comment on that.
BE
Morgan Stanley first
BE

Quick comment: FY09 results beat MSe and
consensus. Revenue and underlying EBITA came in at
£22,415mm and £2,220mm versus MSe of £21,045mm
and £2,154mm and consensus of £20,824mm and
£2,109mm. At the divisional level, the main beat came in
P&S which grew both revenue and EBITA 36% over
2008 and came in 31% and 28% above MS estimates.
This should be taken positively given concerns over UK
budget cuts.
BE

2010 guidance should see consensus rise ~5%. For
2010, management is pointing to growth in all divisions
other than US Land (although return on sales in this
division are expected to improve). This guidance should
see consensus rise approximately 5%.
£500mm buyback announced whilst dividend up
10% on 2008. BAE has announced a £500mm buyback
for 2010. Further, the dividend for the year has
increased 10% to 16p (versus MSe of 15.4p).
BE

Pension deficit stable at £4.6bn. The pension deficit
has remained stable on 1H09 at £4.6bn (pre-tax). Whilst
this is still a large deficit, recovery plans are in place and
BAE’S balance sheet remains healthy, so the firepower
to make additional contributions is available if needed.
Cash generation strong: Cash inflow for the year from
operating activities was £2,232mm (FY08: £2,009mm)
with FCF for the year at £1.06bn. Net cash for 2009
came in strongly at £403mm (up from £39mm at FY08).
BE

Despite today’s strong results, BAE must
demonstrate their ability to show long-term growth
in order to drive shares materially higher. Whilst we
expect a positive reaction to today’s results, we think
management will need to demonstrate their ability to
offset weaker global budgets and specifically the
expected fall in their US Land Business in order to drive
a material re-rating in the stock. On our estimates, BAE
is currently on 8.0x 11e P/E and 5.6x ’11 EV/EBITA.
BE
And UBS
BE

Solid FY09 results – Strong growth at Programmes and International
BAE reported FY09 revenues of £22.42bn, (+3% vs. UBS-e); underlying EBITA of
£2,220m & underlying EPS of 40.7p – we believe both in line with consensus & UBSe
(40.9p). BAE reported solid underlying sales growth of 7% attributable to strong
growth in Programmes & Support (33%) & International (15%). This was offset by
sales in Land & Armaments that were down 8% due to the MRAP headwind. EBITA
margins across the group were broadly inline with our expectation.
BE

Cash flow better than expected – Pension in line – Share buy back to begin
BAE had a strong cash performance, with a year-end net cash of £403m (UBS-e
£236m). BAE announced that it will buy back £500m of its own shares, which we
believe will be taken well. Despite the buy back, we expect BAE to continue to invest
for organic growth & the level of buy back should not impede any M&A opportunities.
The post-tax IFRS pension deficit of £3.0bn was in line with H1 2009 & UBS-e.
BE

We expect consensus upgrades – Underlying trading / FX and buy back
Our EPS forecasts are c4% above consensus in 2010 & c11% above in 2011.
Whilst the mix may change, we do not see anything significant to change our EPS
forecasts due to the trading environment from these results. Combined with a stronger
US$ & a share buy back, which given low interest rates on cash will be accretive to
EPS, we expect consensus estimates to move up towards our forecasts. We estimate a
£500m buy back would add c2% to 2010 consensus EPS expectation & c5% to 2011.
BE
Ok – that’s more than enough defence.
BE
Where now, Miles?
11:25AM
MJ
Well
MJ
there is alot of excitment unfolding around us
MJ
over the 10 year gilt spread over bunds
MJ
Exciting is maybe the wrong word
MJ
But seems like it is at a four year high
MJ
So UK is becoming the new Greece
BE
That’ll please our Spanish viewers
BE
However, the data on this one’s very confusing
BE
There’s about ten basis points difference between the Reuters and the Bloomberg readings this morning
BE
So we’re trying to get some clarity there
BE
Or rather, Jamie Chisholm, our global markets uber-reporter, is.
11:28AM
BE
Ok – how about our daily visit to the Falklands?
BE
Saw the story made the splash in the Sun this morning.
BE
“Task Force 2″
MJ
this is going to run and run
MJ
Rig arrives tomorrow I have heard
MJ
And drilling begins on Monday
MJ
And all the meanwhile, the Argentine government
MJ
Are making angry noises
BE
There we go
BE
Even bigger news than Simon Cowell getting hitched.
MJ
Emoticon
MJ
Thing is
MJ
there is very little the Argentinian govt can actually do
MJ
Maybe the best thing
MJ
would be for them to wait for the companies to do the heavy lifting
MJ
And see if they get anywhere
MJ
The war footing is being vastly overplayed
BE
Can you give us a few share prices?
MJ
One sec
Rockhopper Exploration (RKH:LSE): Last: 62.75, down 1.75 (-2.71%), High: 65.00, Low: 62.75, Volume: 231.59k
Desire Petroleum (DES:LSE): Last: 106.50, down 1.75 (-1.62%), High: 109.00, Low: 104.25, Volume: 1.17m
Falkland Oil and Gas (FOGL:LSE): Last: 146.90, down 5.1 (-3.36%), High: 153.00, Low: 146.90, Volume: 177.61k
BE
Ok – ta for that.
11:33AM
BE
Ok – I think it’s time for some RAW
RAW is market chatter – information that has not been formally tested through traditional journalistic channels (PRs etc). The story might be complete rubbish, but if we believe there is some substance to it we will say so. Either way, Reader Beware.
MJ
I have missed that
MJ
So what are you hearing?
BE
Well, there seems to be some sniffy buying of Arriva this morning
Arriva (ARI:LSE): Last: 519.00, up 9 (+1.76%), High: 521.00, Low: 509.50, Volume: 157.33k
MJ
(DP – BHP are already partners with FOGL)
MJ
Whats the sniff?
BE
Wekk, this is totally untested raw …
BE
But the suggestion seems to be that there could be another interested party
BE
Continental Europe mentioned, with Deutsche Bahn among the possible names.
BE
There was apparently a Deutsche Bank note knocking around yesterday on this, which I haven’t had time to dig out yet.
MJ
Anything else?
BE
Well, you may have caught the latest Resolution line in the Telegraph this morning
BE
Linking Cowdery to Irish Life and Perm
MJ
(LYO – you should invest in some defence systems)
MJ
Ah yes
BE
Which, as the Telegraph noted, seems a bit far fetched.
BE
Now the story we’ve heard is that Irish Life might in fact be a target for Roger Jenkins’s new vehicle
MJ
Does that vehicle actually exist at the moment?
BE
Um …. it’s hard to say.
BE
There was a Sunday Times interview with the great man a few weeks ago
BE
Which would seem to lend a certain amount of credence to the ILP angle
BE

ROGER JENKINS, the former high-flying Barclays executive, is plotting a series of deals focused on Ireland’s troubled banks.

He is working on plans to buy portfolios of distressed loans or property assets that are currently destined to fall into the hands of the Irish government. Jenkins is also examining the possibility of leading the refinancing of one of the Irish banks, possibly with Middle Eastern backing.

The financier, who set up the £7 billion refinancing of Barclays at the peak of the credit crunch, has launched an advisory firm in Dublin called Elkstone Capital.

11:40AM
MJ
Talking of Jenkins
MJ
We should give his legacy handywork at Barclays a mention
BE
Oh yeah – good point
BE
Shares going well this morning
Barclays PLC (BARC:LSE): Last: 309.05, up 6.75 (+2.23%), High: 312.40, Low: 298.50, Volume: 32.03m
BE
That’s after Abu Dhabi paid £1.24bn to convert a majority of its warrants into stock
BE
At 197.78 pence a share
BE
Giving it 5.2% directly along with 1.1% in warrants
BE
And, most importantly, they’ve no plans to slot them
MJ
Abu Dhabi do look like shrewdies
MJ
Made a fair bundle on this deal
BE
It certainly does look like a good bit of business for them.
BE
Made a $1bn turn on the deal inside a year.
BE
Anyway, it’s not too bad for Barclays either
BE
Here’s Ian Gordon at BNP Paribas
BE

An unexpected positive development on the GBP2.25bn residual warrants
Barclays has announced that PCP Gulf Invest 3 Limited will be exercising
626,835,443 (or 83%) of the warrants they hold, i.e. GBP1.24bn of warrants with an
exercise price of 197.775p, keeping GBP260m. (The balance of GBP750m is held by
Qatar Holding LLC, who exercised half their warrants last October, selling shares at
360p to fund the exercise.) The good news is that, after exercise and the issue of
ordinary shares, PCP “has no plans to sell such shares”, keeping its interest at 6.3%.
BE

► The apparent removal of a (future) technical headwind
Our base case assumption was (and still is) that all remaining warrants will be
exercised during 2010. The (modest) implicit dilution is already embedded into our
calculations for 2010 and beyond. However, as discussed in More capital than you
can shake a stick at!, 16 February 2010, we had speculated that the future exercise of
GBP2.25bn warrants (after further material appreciation in the share price) might
again trigger sales to fund the exercise. We appear to be wrong, which is good news!
BE

► We assume that the ex-dividend date has triggered PCP’s decision
Although the Barclays and PCP’s statements are silent on the issue, we assume that
PCP’s rationale for exercising (most of) its warrants now is to qualify for the final
dividend of 1.5p (ex div date: 24 February), allied with an assessment (which we
share) that the risk of the Barclays share price falling below 197.775p is now remote.
Mr Ali Jassim representing PCP said “we will seek to maintain a close commercial
and strategic relationship with Barclays in the future”.
BE

► Barclays’ core tier 1 capital ratio moves even higher, to 10.4% proforma
Clearly the market will welcome the further early strengthening of Barclays’ robust
capital ratios. All in all, we regard tonight’s development as extremely good news.
BE
And here’s Deutsche Bank
BE

PCP3 exercises warrants over £1.24bn in Barclays stock
Barclays announed last night that PCP Gulf Invest 3 Limited (PCP3), an Abu
Dhabi government investment vehicle, has exercised 626m of its 758m
Barclays warrants at 197.8p a share. This adds £1.24bn to Barclays’ core
capital base, equivalent to 32bps at end 2009, bringing pro-forma core tier
1 to 10.4%. The share issuance dilutes stated EPS by less than 5%. We
calculate PCP3 now owns 6% of the enlarged Barclays group, with 5.2% in
shares and a further 0.8% in the remaining 132m warrants it owns. A statement
from PCP3 confirmed it “has no plans to sell such shares”.
BE

Additions to capital confirm “investability” of Barclays
Our conversations with clients around the UK banks this year have focussed
on fears around capital adequacy, funding and earnings. We regard Barclays
as increasingly attractive on all three, with a historic Basel 2 core tier 1 ratio
of 10.4% adjusted for this capital higher than most European peers. Soc
Gen, for example, this morning reported a core tier 1 ratio of 8.4%. Including
our forecast near 40% expected increase in BarCap RWAs in 2010 (market
risk and counterparty risk), we have 9.4% core tier 1 at end 2010.
BE

Valuation remains attractive
We have Barclays trading at 0.85 of 2010 tangible NAV per share of 355p.
We regard this as too cheap for an adequately capitalised, profitable European
bank with good medium term growth prospects. Buy, TP 380p.
BE
Montesquieu – thanks as ever for your comments. Very informative.
BE
And XWAP, I don’t have that damn JPMorgan banks note handy. If you play nice I may be able to bring you it by the end of the show, but not before.
11:46AM
MJ
Right
MJ
Some more penny share busting at the FSA this morning
MJ
This time from close to your patch Bryce
BE
What? Shepherds Bush?
MJ
Here
MJ

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Glasgow-based stock broking firm Direct Sharedeal Limited (DSL) £101,500 after its appointed representative, First Colonial Investments LLP (FCI), used misleading sales pitches which failed to set out the inherent risks of buying penny shares.
DSL specialises in spread betting and share dealing. It provided an avenue for FCI to carry out penny share sales, and should have made sure that FCI was providing customers with accurate and sufficient advice to make informed decisions about whether to invest in penny shares.
However, an FSA investigation found FCI’s sales showed scant regard for their customers. Potentially misleading sales pitches were used to persuade people to buy shares, regardless of whether those shares were suitable. FCI failed to mention the risks associated with their recommendations, and made misleading statements about the companies they were advising people to invest in.
MJ
Do you know any of them?
BE
[cough]
BE
Er …. Glasgow’s a small place.
BE
I think the Taxi Driver may have been friendly with one or two of those chaps
MJ
What? Emoticon?
MJ
The man with a bloomie in his cab?
BE
I’m not sure we even give The Taxi Driver a number any more.
MJ
Second FSA action in a week against that sort of thing
MJ
Hit Wills & Co yesterday, but it had already wound down
BE
(Er – Titleist 3: no. We don’t. We’ve no enthusiasm for getting hauled up on charges of contempt of court.)
MJ
Titleist – its not very wise to comment on ongoing cases
BE
And that seems a good segway into smallcap corner ….
11:51AM
MJ
Yes please
MJ
Rudi is mentioning GKP on the right
MJ
But can we try to stay clear of that
BE
Ah – what the hell
MJ
I suppose it drives traffic to your website
BE
And, for whatever reason, they still think “Mr Fume” is the one who is out to get them.
MJ
singlehandedly trying to ruin their wealth
BE
So anyway, what’s happening with the Next Great Supermajor today?
Gulf Keystone Petroleum (GKP:LSE): Last: 85.00, down 0.75 (-0.87%), High: 87.50, Low: 83.00, Volume: 1.52m
MJ
Not much
MJ
But there was this out
MJ

Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd (“GKP, the Company”) is pleased to announce that it has negotiated an agreement with BG North Sea Holdings Limited (“BG”) that settles, on confidential terms, the claims and counterclaims between the parties in the previously announced arbitration.
The agreement provides for the immediate stay of the arbitration and the proposed transfer of the Company’s interests in the Hassi Ba Hamou (“HBH”) Permit for a net cash payment from BG of $9.9m to GKP. The agreement is subject to the conclusion of separate transfer documentation which will require the approval of Sonatrach and any necessary Algerian governmental authorities. Whilst the Company is confident that the necessary approvals will be forthcoming, there is no guarantee this will be the case.
BE
(DP and Rudy: settle down or you’re both banned. Final warning.)
BE
Right. What does all that mean?
MJ
Erm
MJ
Not very much
MJ
Not much cash involved anyway
MJ
But anything for the excuse eh Bryce?
BE
Hm. All these “proposed transfer of the Company’s interests” type statements make me uncomfortable.
BE
Wonder when we’re going to see the fundraising on this thing?
MJ
Its been in the pipeline for yonkers
BE
And there’s been no delay … no problem … etc. etc. etc. But it’s still not here. Odd.
BE
Anyway, there is a note out of Evolution looking at the Kurdi diggers.
BE
Doesn’t say much we don’t already know, but gives a good overview of the problems.
MJ
that would be good to see
BE

The Kurdish/Iraq export impasse
The KRG and Iraqi government are still to agree a payment mechanism
through which Kurdish operators will be reimbursed for exports from the
region. Despite the KRG and Iraqi governments suggesting that exports
would resume in “the near future” DNO said at its 4Q results that it
would not recommence exports from its Tawke field until the mechanism
was in place. A case of once bitten twice shy.
BE

Lots of talk but little progress
Since the start of the year, both the KRG and Baghdad have made encouraging
statements about restarting exports from the Kurdistan region. Both have
suggested that oil exports into the main Kirkuk pipeline would commence “in the
near future” and it appears that Baghdad’s refusal to acknowledge the PSCs
signed between the KRG and Kurdish operators is waning somewhat. Details on
talks between the KRG and Baghdad remain thin but press reports suggest that
the KRG has put forward a compromise to which Iraq has agreed through which
operators would be reimbursed by Baghdad for the cost of producing oil but not
for any profit oil. The debate as to who pays for the operators’ share of profit oil
remains unsolved and we believe that Baghdad will push for the KRG to pay this
element out of its 17% share of total Iraq oil revenue that it receives.
BE

No progress can be made though without the co-operation of the operators. On its
4Q conference call today DNO suggested that it had yet to be involved in any
formal discussions with the KRG about restarting exports. Indeed the company
admitted that it had no further insight into the KRG/Baghdad talks than the KRG
press releases. With DNO having to write down by 50% the value of receivables
on its balance sheet relating to non payment of exports from Tawke between June
1st and Sept 22nd we expect the company to play “hard ball” and hold out for a
resolution that encompasses both cost, and profit oil.
In reality, we do not anticipate either the KRG or Baghdad to be a position to
formalise any resolution until after the Iraqi parliamentary elections in March and
we believe that negotiations could drag on until well into the second half of 2010.
BE
They have a reduce on GKP
BE

Kurdish operations: Although not currently in a position to turn on the taps
from its Shaikan discovery the company does intend to commence an Extended Well
Test (EWT) in May 2010 from the Shaikan-1 well at a rate of c.10,000 bopd (gross).
Additionally the company is drilling the Bijeel-1 well and intends to start drilling the
Sheikh Adi-1 exploration well sometime in July. In all, Gulf Keystone has an interest
in four licence blocks in Kurdistan with a net unrisked resource potential of c.750
million barrels.
Share price reaction: We forecast that GKP ended FY09 with $16.5m implying an
available cash balance of only $0.9m once the Algerian liability of $15.6m has been
subtracted. Since then the company has drawn down a further £4m under its SEDA
arrangement with Yorkeville, leaving £12.94m left undrawn. With a capex plan for
2010 of $51m GKP will clearly have to raise fresh capital or farm down its interests
in Kurdistan (unlikely) if it wants to fulfil this ambition. The ability to sell oil from the
EWT at international prices, rather than locally at half the price, would clearly be
more beneficial for the company’s cashflow and limit the amount of future dilution.
As such, we think that there would be a strong rally should the payments
mechanism dispute be resolved.
BE
And buys on Heritage and Sterling
BE
I’ll stick the full note in the usual place if anyone’s interested.
MJ
Some more small cap stuff
BE
Sure
11:59AM
BE
Well, ENRC has bought an African minerals company.
BE
Albeit not African Minerals.
MJ
Emoticon
MJ
Ah yes
MJ
For background – Frank said ENRC were looking at African Minerals
BE
(DP – Long Room)
MJ
And ENRC had to put out a statement denying this
MJ
So – whats the company they bought today?
BE
Chambishi Metals
BE
Zambian copper and cobalt
BE
Along with one of its market makers
BE
Here’s Deutsche Bank on the deal
BE

Fleshing out the African presence
ENRC has announced a potential US$300 acquisition of two companies; Enya
Holdings which owns 90% of Chambishi Metals, a Zambian copper and cobalt
producer and Comit Resources, which market’s Chambishi’s products. The move
reinforces the company’s strategy to move into Africa. We believe that ENRC’s
entry into copper in Africa offers significant upside to the company that is not
factored into the share price as yet – however we believe this transaction is
unlikely to be the catalyst. We maintain our Buy rating.

BE

25ktpa copper and 6ktpa cobalt (~10% of world’s refined cobalt capacity)
The Zambian smelter has 25ktpa copper capacity and 6ktpa cobalt capacity and
ENRC stated that it plans to upgrade copper production capacity to 55ktpa for
US$80m of capex by the end of 2011. The smelter is 300km from its recently
acquired copper cobalt mine in the DRC and ENRC clearly plans to run them as an
integrated operation, stating that acquisition enables it to fast track its mine
expansion to 130ktpa copper and 12ktpa cobalt by 2012 (at this stage we only
model an expansion to 75kt by 2013). Details of the integration and process flow
are yet to be revealed. Comparisons with other African copper smelter
transactions show this one to look at face value fairly high, however we
acknowledge that these other smelters do not have a cobalt processing capability
and the price remains cheaper than building a Greenfield operation.
BE

Not yet the catalyst
The proposal represents a related party transaction as the current owners are the
founding shareholders of ENRC. At US$300m and more than a year after the last
related party transaction this transaction is below the thresholds that would trigger
a shareholder vote. Without the detail surrounding the mechanics of the
integration with the DRC operations yet available, we do not believe that this
announcement will be the catalyst for recognition of the African upside to the
company.
GBp1217 price target and Buy rating maintained
Our Pt of GBp1217 is line with our DCF valuation of GBp1217 (WACC 10.3%, CoD
7.5%, CoE 11.6%, beta 1.3). Key risks include unforeseen political events in
Kazakhstan and the DRC, movements in the local currency (Tenge), movements in
commodity prices, execution risk on projects, unforeseen operational difficulties,
greater than expected cost increases.
Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation PLC (ENRC:LSE): Last: 1,034, up 28 (+2.78%), High: 1,036, Low: 995.00, Volume: 926.24k
12:02PM
BE
Sorry – we were just having one of those off-air, totally unpublishible conversations.
BE
One day we’ll introduce a red button premium service so you can get access to those.
BE
Then we’d really be in trouble.
MJ
Bring people over the wall
BE
Which is kind-of what the Long Room is, in truth.
BE
Anyway, before we leave small cap corner …
MJ
(Bryce is readying the zapper, beware)
BE
Interesting name appeared on the shareholder register of MWB Group this morning
MJ
MWB group?
BE
That’s the owner of Malmaison and Hotel du Vin
MJ
ah
BE
And it appears Audley Capital Development has taken some quite big lumps
BE
8.33% and 6.9% split between two vehicles
MJ
Adn these Audley capital chaps?
BE
That’s Julian Treger’s fund I think
BE
Activist. Very activist sometimes.
BE
Were instrumental in getting Pilklington sold, if I remember right, and have had their noses in all sorts of “special sits”
BE
However …..
BE
It seems they picked up the stake as part of MWB’s rights issue earlier this year
BE
So there’s no reason to believe they’re in to make noise.
MWB Group Holdings PLC (MWB:LSE): Last: 39.25, no change, Volume: 0.00
MJ
ta for that
12:08PM
MJ
Smells like lunchtime
BE
It does.
MJ
And lunchwrap has to be done
MJ
And I am welling up with nostaligia
MJ
So prob best to go
BE
Hang on – should quickly mention BT Group after S&P knocked it back to one notch above junk
MJ
ah yes
BE
Some people making dark noises about the dividend on the back of this
BE
Well, Saeed Baradar at SocGen is, although it’s probably fair to note he’s been in the permabear camp on BT for some time.
BE
Here’s his email
BE

**** IS DIVIDEND PAY-OUT COMING UNDER PRESSURE? – Last night, S&P downgraded BT credit rating to “Triple B minus” from “Triple B” (with stable outlook). This is now only one notch above investment grade.

**** CURRENT PENSION DEFICIT PAYMENTS NOT SUFFICIENT – The crystallisation of the pension deficit last week when the actuaries validated a IAS 19 deficit of £9.0bn, and a potential need for higher future contributions are the key drivers behind the downgrade.

BE

**** RISKS TO DIVIDEND PAYOUT INCREASING – On results day we highlighted that rising pension contribution payments would dent ability to de-leverage given current dividend pay-out. S&P seems to reiterate that view stating that “The long-term nature of pension recovery payments, together with an expected gradual increase in dividend pay-out, represents a “MORE PERMANENT REDUCTION TO DISCRETIONARY CF GENERATION”.

**** Importantly, the rating already reflects BT ability “to maintain focus on cost savings and incremental improvement to FCF with net debt/EBITDA ratio to trend down toward 3.0x” (from 4.2x). As a result, if access to credit market reduces, management may have limited options other than reviewing dividends policy to ensure a smooth debt re-financing.
**** CONCLUSION : FURTHER PRESSURE ON THE STOCK TO BE EXPECTED. LAST SET OF RESULTS ONCE AGAIN REDUCED VISIBILITY ESPECIALLY ON FUTURE FCF USE. UNLESS WE GET MORE CLARITY THAT ORGANIC FCF IS IMPROVING AS GLOBAL SERVICES TURN-AROUND IS ACHIEVED, I CAN SEE THIS STOCK TRENDING TOWARDS THE 100P LEVEL AGAIN.

BT Group (BT.A:LSE): Last: 112.10, down 5.1 (-4.35%), High: 116.50, Low: 111.30, Volume: 43.85m
12:11PM
BE
OK
BE
It is indeed time to wrap up.
BE
And to all requests on the right to zap ….
Warning to rude and abusive commenters – your ability to comment will be terminated immediately and permanently, without warning. Henceforth, FTAlphaville has instituted a One Strike and You Are Out policy. We’ve had enough. We are going to clean up these pixels once and for all.
BE
That’s not how it works. You can’t go up to the referee and demand cards.
MJ
You can get zapped for that
BE
Indeed. FT Alphaville is largely self policing
BE
If order breaks down, we trust you to re-establish it.
BE
XWAP – you have been marked as a troublemaker. Please keep your nose clean.
BE
I have been lenient today. I won’t be tomorrow.
MJ
Thats a throwdown
BE
And, because I’m also a churlish type, you’re not getting that JPMorgan banks note.
MJ
Thanks for (most) of the comments today
MJ
Bye
BE
Good afternoon.
BE
(Tas – apply for membership to the Long Room.)
Print