New research published by the Paris-based equity strategy team at Societe Generale suggests the common assumption that the (non-American) football World Cup has a positive economic impact on the host and winner countries is actually false.
Sure, the host usually sees improved GDP growth and subsequent stock market performance, but links between market performance and performance on the pitch are elusive.
So the SocGen team are suggesting a couple of pairs trades:
Go long the JSE South Africa index and short the Brazil Bovespa or long the JSE and short the Argentina Merval.
Which struck us as odd, since according to William Hill the latest betting favourite to pick up the FIFA World Cup is actually Spain, at 9/2.
Maybe the French bank feared a paranoid backlash from southern Europe…
There’s also Britain (sell gilt-edged and wager the proceeds?) at 5/1, along with Brazil at the same price. Argentina is out at 9/1.
Either way, SocGen are also offering the 2010 World Cup basket – 16 stocks that have performed well ahead of past competitions, beating the DJ Stoxx 600 by 13.6 per cent in the period around the five World Cups between 1990 and 2006.
Full details in the usual place.
Article Series - South Africa 2010
- World Cups good for tourism, bad for industrial production, BofAML says
- The Germans always win
- The World Cup pairs trade (ex-Spain)
- South Africa: back of the net - not
- World Cup beer goggles = 180bps
- UBS on which stocks - and teams - will win the 2010 World Cup
- England to win World Cup, says JPM quant model
- England sponsor confident England will lose
- Two very different quant models say Brazil will win World Cup
- Take on the World Cup quants
- Introducing the Soccer Power Index
- The World Cup effect
- Anything but Holland vs Germany...?
- Paul the octopus, conqueror of quants
- Higher GDP makes footballers more attractive
