Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:17 on 27 Jan 2010. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT Bryce Elder
guidance/expectations while capex spend of £690m was below our forecast of
£775m. Net debt at end-09 was c£720m. First oil at the Jubilee development
offshore Ghana remains on track for Q4 2010 while the 2010 exploration and
appraisal campaign appears more busy than expected albeit skewed to 2H.
existing share count which we believe could raise up to c$1.6bn. Tullow recently
exercised its rights of pre-emption in respect of the proposed sale by Heritage of
its 50% interest in Blocks 1 and 3A to Eni for $1.5bn. The funds from the placing
will be used to facilitate the Ugandan acquisition and, together with the proceeds
from their anticipated farm-down in the country, to provide Tullow with a more
appropriate capital structure for the medium term – likely spend includes a
minimum $500m/yr expl. spend, accelerated Ugandan dev’t spend and additional
appraisal and development in Ghana.
initiated with Tullow increasingly committed as a long-term investor in Uganda. In
parallel with the exercise of its pre-emption rights over Heritage’s assets, Tullow
has been conducting its own farm-out process with potential partners supportive
of Tullow’s decision to pre-empt. Tullow has guided to end-Feb for completion of
their own farm-down process with recent reports in the FT naming potential
partners as CNOOC and Total. A 6-well exploration campaign in Block 1 is
expected to recommence in April 2010.
oil in Q4 2010 with all the planned development wells now drilled. The
accelerated 2010 exploration and appraisal campaign in Ghana includes 7 wells
including additional drilling at Tweneboa and Mahogany.
1 well in Liberia in 2H 2010. The company also plans on drilling prospects along
the Latin America Transform Margin in French Guiana and Guyana in 4Q 2010.
Tullow is committed to Uganda over the long term while also emphasizing the
ongoing exploration potential across its portfolio. There remains much uncertainty
as to the eventual outcome of negotiations in Uganda; however, it would appear
the company’s strategy is beginning to take more of a weighting towards organic
production than the recent past. Trading at less than a 10% discount to our
£14.00 Risked NAV (versus sector at 15%), we believe the risk-reward trade-off
Before going through the trading statement, let’s look at the massive equity raise TLW has launched this morning: 80.4 m shares (10% of current shares outstanding) or £1 bn…the largest equity raise ever done for an E&P. The cash will be used to finance its expanded exploration and development activities, partially because of the group’s intention to retain a larger than previously planned stake in its Ugandan licences. Talking about Uganda, Aidan Heavey confirmed the market rumours that Cnooc and Total were the two majors that will join it as partners. The Ugandan president will have the last word on this matter. Operationally there is little new to report in today’s statement. The focus for the coming months will remain on appraising Uganda and Ghana. Bottom line: TLW remains THE reference in the E&P sector; I think though the placement is opportunistic given TLW’s current rich valuation. There is better value found elsewhere.
Later in the morning yesterday, GKP announced it drew down £4m of its £30m Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, resulting in another 4.5m shares being issued ranking pari parsu with existing common shares. So in total, they drew down £17 m up to date. So let’s look at some numbers… the OOIP for Shaikan ranges between 1.9 bn and 7.4bn bbls with Pmean standing at 4.2 bn bbls. This evaluation covers data from the Cretaceous, Jurassic and Triassic and was performed by Dynamic Global Advisors. Taking the Pmean and applying 25% recovery factor, 75% commercial risk, GKP’s NAV is about 110p but don’t get too excited since there is upcoming dilution. Why? Well, cash in the bank stands at $25m, and financial requirement for the remainder of 2009 is estimated at $16m. However, $15.6m of cash is restricted in Algeria, so there appears to be a funding shortfall for year to come. Bottom line: if you want to play the Kurdistan drill bit, BUY HOIL for the Miran West-2 and Miran East-1 and use GKP and VST CN as sources of fund. SELL GKP
impact of Basel proposals on distributions and this,
plus political uncertainty, means dividends will be
very constrained. We cut dividend forecasts for DBK,
CASA, CSG, GLE, BBVA, UCG, ISP, BNP, POP & KBC
amendments (eg minorities) the proposals could
still hit European banks hard – and hence we think
revisions or “national interpretations” are likely.
Excluding revisions or management action, we calculate
banks may need €83bn extra capital by 2012, or have to
shrink RWAs by 11% (ie €1.0trn). We think banks would
be likely to reprice loans and reduce credit further – we
already model less than 1% loan growth for European
banks in 2010. We think Basel 3 and US proposals
could mean – unless amended – corporates face a
higher cost of credit and need to take on more liquidity
risk, as the banks are asked to shed risk.
be another brake on US large cap bank earnings
(3-5% each for large cap US banks). This said, we
think US banks may outperform European, as funding
and capital/dilution concerns should be more intense in
1H, but we see more risk of upgrades from credit
recovery. O/W BAC, JPM, and NTRS.
which could reinforce the EM trade. We are
Overweight Garanti, Yapi Kredi, Standard Bank.
strategists’ key calls – is reinforced by our work.
good number of banks, but uncertainty on regulation and
divis is likely to overhang sector performance. Top
picks: KBC, CSG, SAN, BARC, SHB, AIB, Baer. Least
preferred: DX, RI, CBK, SEB. We cut CA to EW as we
think a pragmatic Basel 3 outcome is discounted. We cut
Swedbank to UW as it trades at TBV and we see better
value elsewhere and close our UW on Popular, as our
methodology now reflects normalized 2012 earnings.
At its core, the US Administration’s most recent proposal on bank reform seeks to deal with too-big-to-fail by calling for size caps and reduced proprietary investing. In this note, we focus on size caps.
Capping size is a very difficult lead to follow in Europe, as banks are much larger relative to “home market”
GDP. Consider: (1) The largest banks by market cap in the US (BAC) and the UK (HSBC) have the same
level of total adjusted assets (€1.5 tn). However, these represent 15% of US GDP for BAC and 96% of UK
GDP for HSBC. Cutting HSBC’s assets down to 15% of UK GDP would require a dramatic 81% asset
reduction, or a six-way split.
level of total adjusted assets (€1.5 tn). However, these represent 15% of US GDP for BAC and 96% of UK
GDP for HSBC. Cutting HSBC’s assets down to 15% of UK GDP would require a dramatic 81% asset
reduction, or a six-way split.
only falls to US levels if the cumulative EU GDP, rather than that of individual member states, is used as the
denominator.
Europe likely to continue on current path
We see three potential outcomes to the European size debate: (1) Reducing banks’ size in line with home
market GDP. In our view, this could substantially restrict European banks’ scope. (2) Introducing an EU-wide
and EU-funded mechanism for dealing with failed banks; and (3) status quo on size caps for now.
In the near term, the most likely scenario is for Europe to stay on the current path of regulatory change, in our
view – introducing more demanding capital, liquidity and risk.
Credit Suisse has the largest US presence among European banks, with c.US$400 bn of assets. This is
relatively small compared to US banks and suggests that European banks are unlikely to be affected by any
future size caps, in our view.
run.
The company have indicated that the problems of AHL in exploiting trends are most likely
connected with quantitative easing which has been running over the last year during
which AHL is down by 16%.
essentially by the Federal Reserve and Bank of England is synchronised or not. It would
be worse if it were synchronised – which looks quite possible. This is what happened in
Q1 2009 and AHL has been suffering.
If true this implies a further period of inadequate returns until QE is withdrawn.
That may well mean further downside in the shares though we continue to expect them to
recover eventually. Current PT 300p.
following the recent trading update and the weak AHL returns in the last fortnight. Man group noted on their conference call
that the weak AHL returns in December would result in US$1bn de-leveraging of these funds in January. Moreover in the
last two weeks AHL’s NAV is down 5% and this has a negative impact of around $1bn on group AUM. These drive 6% and
4% downgrades to our March 2010E and March 2011E AUM forecasts to $41.7bn and $49.7bn. We have reduced our
management fee forecasts for the y/e March 2010E by 4% to $472m and y/e March 2011E by 6% to $535m. Our new EPS
forecasts for y/e March 2010E of $0.25 and y/e March 2011E of $0.29 are 4-5% downgrades. Given AHL is now 18% below
its performance fee high watermarks we have assumed that it starts the following financial year below its highs and are
reducing our performance fee forecast for the y/e March 2012E by 28% to $302m and our EPS forecast by 16% to $0.42.
We are reducing our target price to £3 (from £3.2) to reflect our EPS downgrades.
flat at 44 cents in the y/e March 2010E given the cash generation of the business and the strong capital base.
Catalysts: Man will outline the next AUM update in late March.
Valuation: With the shares off 25% in the last 3 months it looks to us that the new numbers are fully reflected in the share
price. It may however require a recovery on AHL/private client flows for the shares to start outperforming again.
The Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal reported that Greece was turning to China to buy up to 25 billion euros of its bonds to help it through its fiscal crisis, with U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs promoting the deal to Beijing.
But the first big European bank to report results described its 2009 bad loans ratio as “near to the peak of the cycle”, saying new bad loan entries slowed in the fourth quarter.
The sharp deterioration in credit quality at Spain’s second largest bank fuelled an increase in provisions which depressed BBVA’s bottom line, particularly in the fourth quarter when the bank’s net profit evaporated to 30 million euros, hit by one-off charges, from 1.38 billion in the third quarter.
EUR705m relating to writedowns in the US). In contrast, interest margin continued to
hold up nicely and costs remained under control. Net profit fell 94%
year-on-year to EUR31m, and much lower than expected (consensus stood at
EUR1.05bn).
• Interest income came to EUR3.6bn (up 16% year-on-year). Resilient despite tough
low-interest rate conditions.
• Retail, Spain/Portugal (49% of earnings): loans at end-2009 (down 1.2%), deposits
(down .3%). Interest margin held up (down 1.2% year-on-year to EUR1.2bn in Q4).
Continued tight grip on costs with the cost/income ratio still low at 35.6% over the
quarter.
ratio of 57% at group level, down relative to end-September (68%). The generic
provision buffer stood at EUR3bn at year-end (down 26% versus end-September).
• Solvency: Tier 1 ratio of 9.4%, core Tier 1 of 8.0%. Internal capital generation
amounted to 30bp over Q4, cancelled out by 30bp on China Citic Bank. However, the
group easily topped its full-year target of 80bp.
provisioning. Trading at a 2011 P/E of 9.0x versus the sector average of 8.5x, the
share is fully valued in our opinion. The group’s relatively strong fundamentals are
priced in. No change to our Fair Value rating (TP EUR13.1) due to a lack of upside.
sinking than initially anticipated. It is clear the bank has done an exercise
of trying to upfront some of the losses expected for future years, though the
US figure was not expected by the market and hence will probably not be
taken well. Otherwise, a decline of Mexican provisions is not happening
yet (we believe it is more a H1 10E story), so non-domestic units do not
provide in Q4 the necessary momentum to overcome Spanish concerns. All
that said, pre-provision profit came comfortably ahead of expectations,
capital/funding remain solid, and we do not see material downside potential
to our forecasts outside the US, so the long term OW picture remains there.
Short term, numbers will probably lead to additional weakness – we
suggest picking up the stock if the market overreacts.
DETAILS – A$445m bullet repayment of debt associated with the Hazelwood brown coal plant, has been rolled into the amortising portion of A$297m, with repayment due June 2012, and margin 400bp. This would fix at 9.2%. The original debt was amortising to 2014, with 185bp margin and locked in at 7.8%. IPR also announced financial close for a 110 MW plant in Thailand.
VALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION – The re-financing issues surrounding debt is sufficiently far out not to weigh on the market. The main current issue is the bid speculation with GDF Suez and how IPR will respond to this. We believe IPR will move to a higher payout ratio.
Announcement of closure of a110MW project in Thailand show company still has opportunities to grow
This £415m refinancing following on from the pay down of debt on the US merchant fleet completes a period in which we think International Power has successfully put its balance sheet in order. The shares have persistently shown a discount reflecting a perceived risk that the company would be unable to refinance its various and significant debt tranches. We now think that this risk is past and that any remaining discount should unwind. The margin on this refinancing (strictly speaking it is a restructuring of existing debt) is perhaps a little expensive but the tenor is long enough to clear the obvious uncertainty over the introduction of carbon legislation in Australia whilst being short enough to allow for renegotiation once that legislation is in place. With the uncertainty over whether refinancing was possible at all now gone the company comes off the back foot and can now look forward. The announcement of the financial closure of the 110MW TNP 2 project shows that International Power is already doing that.
The takeover by KKR comes after a highly competitive auction between some of the world’s biggest private equity groups for Pets at Home, which persuaded its owner – Bridgepoint – to ditch plans for an initial public offering.
Bridgepoint is expected to make about an eight-times return on its initial equity investment in the pet accessories retailer, which it bought for £230m in 2005. The price paid by KKR was at the top end of the company’s expected IPO valuation range.
IF this does indeed prove to be the case, then I would expect to see a move in S&P thru 1080, 1030 and into the 950/1000 range over the rest of Q1. In this move credit does badly, esp. weaker rated credit, and govvies do well, as does the GBP and the UST. Why? Because the market will be pricing for lower grwth, and tighter money + smaller deficits esp in the UK and US).
Again, IF this is the path we are going to follow, I would be extremely surprised if we did not see at least 1 decent multi-mth counter trend rally, but I also think we see lower highs. So think S&P going form 950/1000 back up to 1080/1120 in Q2. The driver for this counter trend rally will be the mrkt belief that the grwth story can survive even with tighter policy. Lagging grwth indicators and overly optimistic fwd looking ‘subjective’ indicators will support this, + also lower bond yields will provide ‘some’ support.
We see upside for the media sector in absolute terms, with scope for both a
re-rating and advertising-led upgrades. However, we believe its market
multiple represents fair value on a relative basis. We have a strong cyclical
bias given BofAML macro forecasts are well above the consensus, and our
belief that the cyclicality of advertising has yet to be fully recognised by the
market. Our key Buys are TF1, ProSieben, ITV, JCDecaux, WPP and BSkyB.
Our key Underperforms are Pearson, Lagardere, Mediaset and Telecinco.
We expect advertising to recover in 2010 given our economists’ projections of a
stronger than expected macro recovery, easy H1 comparables and quadrennial
benefits. Importantly, we believe the market is underestimating the cyclicality of
advertising and the scope for activity to recover from low levels relative to GDP.
After adjusting for structural pressures and consumer risks, we expect this to
drive stronger than expected growth over the next 3-5 years, even in the event of
a muted economic recovery. We forecast 3.8% European advertising growth in
2010E, rising to 6.8% in 2011E and 6.3% in 2012E, significantly above Zenith
forecasts of -0.5%, 2.8% and 3.9%, respectively. (See page 12).
Media owners offer twice the sector’s gearing to a macro recovery, with a 1%
change in GDP adding 6% to average earnings across 2010/11E, and we believe
they are the best way to play BofAML’s expectation of macro upgrades. Based on
our models JCDecaux, ITV, ProSieben and TF1 offer the highest cyclicality in the
sector, and BSkyB, Pearson and Wolters Kluwer the least. (See page 22).
We expect E-books to become an important issue for investors in the coming
months given explosive growth in e-reader sales. The music experience suggests
the impact will be at best uncertain, and at worst profound, with downside risks to
forecasts from pricing pressure, the loss of the hardback window, piracy,
disintermediation and the cost of rationalizing physical activities. Consumer
publishing represents 60% of Lagardere’s profits, and 10% for Pearson, and we
would argue for a de-rating until visibility improves. (See page 25).
digitalizing books has been possible for many years, it is only in the past 12
months that the price of e-reading devices has fallen sufficiently to drive mass
adoption. There is now a wide range of e-book readers, capable of holding
hundreds, if not thousands, of titles in ‘digital ink’ form (a non-back-lit screen
technology that resembles the experience of reading a physical book).
avoid some of the problems identified, they will have to manage the transition
to digital, during which time they will have both physical and digital costs.
This will be challenging, managing a cultural shift for its workforce and
constantly changing stock requirements, and also the steady downsizing of
physical production and distribution facilities (with associated restructuring
charges).
distribution, stock management, sale or return, pulping and remaindering),
authors may begin to question the role of the publisher. There will still be an
important role for advances, editing, marketing, distribution management etc,
but the simplified business model could allow talent agencies or online
distributors such as Amazon to provide these services. At best, the lower
barriers to entry are likely to constrain publishing margins.
established authors who already have a strong brand and following. In a
digital world, with the opportunity to go direct to retailers / customers, and
lower publishing costs, authors could demand higher royalties
Diamond lashes out at Obama bank plans
“If you say that large is bad and we move to narrow banks the impact on jobs and the global economy will be very negative,” said Bob Diamond, who also heads Barclays Capital, the group’s booming investment banking arm.
