Markets Live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:17 on 6 Jan 2010. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT Bryce Elder
iSOFT Group Limited cooperated fully with the FSA throughout the investigation, which involved former management of iSOFT Group plc and had no bearing on any of the current management or employees of iSOFT Group Limited.
None of the former iSOFT Group plc directors that were investigated are employed by iSOFT Group Limited or any subsidiary of the company.
“The FSA result brings to a conclusion one of the remaining legacies of the former iSOFT which we acquired in 2007,” said Gary Cohen, iSOFT Group Limited Executive Chairman & CEO. “We cooperated fully with the investigation and welcome the FSA’s decision.”
five-year gilts on Wednesday, drawing a strong response from
investors who put in bids worth 2.68 times the amount on offer.
more than 10 ticks to hit a session high after very strong
demand at a sale of 4 billion pounds of 2015 gilts on Wednesday.
The March contract hit a high of 114.59, up 18 ticks
on the day at 1042 GMT, rising from levels of around 114.44
before the auction result was published at 1035 GMT.
anyone had a short hedge against it they’d be rapidly taking it
off,” said Marc Ostwald, strategist at Monument Securities.
through — I wouldn’t expect so. We thought beforehand it would
fly out the window, and fly out the window it did. It’s cheap to
its peers and banks have a lot of gilts to buy. Bidding was
extremely tight.”
Ten-year gilt yields were down 1 basis point on the day
after the auction at 4.00 percent.
RBS has GBP14.1bn of preference shares and innovative tier 1 securities (as at 30
September 2009). Pursuant to the European Commission’s “burden sharing” edict,
c.GBP700m p.a. of coupons on (some of) these instruments are to be suspended for
two years. As a consequence, these instruments are (generally) trading below 50p in
the £. The solution seems obvious – RBS should act now to secure a discounted
buyback or conversion of a substantial portion of these instruments, and crystallise a
material gain, thereby further enhancing core tier 1 capital, and its key valuation
metric, tangible book value. For those with a little greater foresight than us, the
coupon-savings in 2012 and beyond would be accretive to future earnings too.
On the 3 November 2009 conference call, CEO Stephen Hester said “we are currently
resistant to the idea of decimating our store of Tier 1 capital ahead of understanding
how important Tier 1 is in the new regulatory regime.” As discussed in our note Basel
Committee proposals: more restrictive than expected, 18 December 2009, the
(provisional) answer would appear to be that, beyond core tier 1, little credit will be
given. Note that the GBP3bn gain we assume raises diluted tNAV by 2.8p per share.
We published our report Things can only get better? on 4 January 2010 and things
have indeed got 21% better for RBS shareholders over the past two days. However,
as discussed in that report, whereas we already assume that RBS will achieve a
GBP3bn gain through fresh liability management action in 2010, consensus does not.
RBS Management is already doing the right things to operationally reposition the
Group. It should act now to crystallise a gain of (we estimate) GBP3bn and/or secure
partial relief against the Government’s GBP1.6bn 5-year Contingent Subscription fee.
in our (unchanged) forecasts, that consensus does not, as well as potentially triggering
material relief against the GBP1.6bn of Contingent Subscription fees expected to be
taken against equity over five years.
like sales +0.8% vs our +1.8% estimate. General Merchandise LFL was
+1.2% vs our +3.0% estimate, and Food LFL sales were +0.4% in line with our
+0.5% forecast. International sales were worse than we forecasted at +6.0%
(BofAMLe +12%) partly owing to a slowing of franchise sales eg in the Middle
East.
c.2pp better adjusting for the timing of the sale, as M&S has one sale day
included last year compared to none this year (we expected a c.1pp impact).
Nevertheless, this is a slight disappointment against easy comps and after two
years of negative growth over the crucial Christmas period (GM LFLs -8.9% Q3
09, -3.2% Q3 08), although it is the first positive quarterly LFL performance
posted in 2 years.
WERE LOOKING FOR A GROSS MARGIN BEAT
M&S is continuing to guide for gross margin to be between 50bp and 100bp down
for the year compared to our expectation of flat. In clothing M&S showed much
better inventory control this year, however in Food “investment in innovation and
better value for our customers” (i.e M&S cut prices) drove the slightly better sales
performance. We still think M&S will achieve a full year gross margin guidance at
the top end of this range or beat it slightly but were hoping for slightly better.
We reduced our rating on M&S to Neutral yesterday given our concerns about the
UK consumer outlook for 2010/11 and following a strong rally in the share price in
2009 (+90%). We believe the shares are now more fairly valued versus the sector
at c.12.5x cal. 2010E P/E, a 10% premium to the UK general retail sector, with
consensus estimates likely to remain unchanged in our view. We think M&S
deserves a premium on account of its size, asset backing and international
growth prospects, but we think the shares are likely to consolidate for a while as
earnings momentum has stalled and as we await the arrival of new CEO Marc
Bolland by May of this year. Given the strong run in the share price we may see
some profit taking in the shares.
beat by Next. We do not anticipate any change to profit estimates today. The pick-out points in a not very exciting statement
are likely to be the continuing under-performance of food where margin pressure continues and sales growth is probably
almost 10% points below Waitrose’s over the quarter, and International where sales growth has trailed off to +6% despite
an obvious currency benefit from +16% in Q1.
Sales growth in General Merchandise of 1.2% LFL benefited we estimate by about 250bps from 30% growth in online
sales. Clearly there were some other influences as well in terms of weather and exclusion of a Clearance Day this year. We
felt that the Home sales figure was disappointing (total sales -0.7% despite evidence of more space going into this category
and Next’s comments yesterday).
against M&S’s +0.4%. M&S is still calling continuing need for price investment here and Asda’s price announcement
yesterday makes it clear that this is an area where conditions are unlikely to get easier any time soon.
Guidance on the P&L categories has been held. The company is still expecting to hit the top end of its gross margin
guidance of 50-10 bps down yoy (after -50bps in H1). It seems that H2 negative gross will all be in food, underlining the lack
of progress here on establishing a sustainable medium term position.
Our view here is the same. The business needs re-capitalising to deal with a range of issues – modernisation, re-positioning
and the pension fund to name a few. This may not be the predominant investment theme as the market anticipates the
arrival of new CEO Marc Bolland. But these issues will have to be dealt with in due course.
specific set of criteria that will convert them from a casual browser to a
paying customer. Successful online business depends on the ability to
‘unlock’ that criteria, and deliver exactly the right content, at the right
time, to individuals. Autonomy Interwoven’s Meaning Based Marketing platform
builds on its deep heritage in search, pattern recognition, and web content
management (WCM) technologies to enable organizations to deliver an unmatched
level of precise and relevant content to consumers. As a result, Autonomy
Interwoven’s Advanced Search Marketing module transforms the casual search
from a bland, irrelevant experience to a stimulating and compelling process
that generates more revenue for businesses and higher satisfaction for
customers.
options to address its continued disappointment with the markets valuation of
the company.
shareholders, the Board of DP World has decided to seek a premium listing on
the London Stock Exchange whilst maintaining the existing primary listing on
Nasdaq Dubai. It is currently envisaged that we will seek admission for
listing in the second quarter of 2010.
they will also benefit from this move.
DP World aims to enhance customers’ supply chain efficiency by effectively managing container, bulk and other terminal cargo.
The company constantly invests in terminal infrastructure, facilities and people, working closely with customers and business partners to provide quality services today and tomorrow, when and where customers need them.
In taking this customer-centric approach, DP World is building on the established relationships and superior level of service demonstrated at its flagship Jebel Ali facility in Dubai, which has been voted “Best Seaport in the Middle East” for 15 consecutive years.
blizzards, our clients are probably inclined to think of warm
destinations with nice beaches and coconut trees. Unfortunately, this
daily is not about Thailand, Indonesia or Brazil, but is instead about
Iceland. This is because we believe that Iceland’s decision yesterday
to hold a referendum on a depositor accord with the UK and the
Netherlands is momentous.
buying up assets all across the continent. As the domestic pool of
Icelandic savings was far too shallow to finance this expansion
(Iceland only has some 320k people), Icelandic banks pooled savings in
the UK and Holland by offering retail savers higher rates than local
banks. Then, as the crisis ensued, Icelandic banks went bust or were
nationalized and policymakers found with horror that thousands of
British and Dutch depositors risked losing their hard-earned, but
poorly invested, cash. Governments in the UK and Holland stepped in to
protect local depositors and then turned around and presented a
US$5.5bn bill to Iceland
Icelandic president has vetoed, opting instead to let the people
decide in an upcoming referendum. This comes after more than 60,000
people signed a petition denouncing what has been known as the
‘Icesave accord’. Polls show some 70% of Icelandic people do not
really see why they should pay up because British and Dutch people
were careless enough, or simply too greedy, and placed their money
with Icelandic banks which then squandered it. So it is most likely
that the referendum will be voted down. In turn, the failure to pass
the “Icesave accord” could jeopardize an international bailout
agreement and payments from the IMF; a possibility which yesterday led
Fitch to downgrade Iceland debt to ‘junk’ status.
rated junk. After all, the implosion in its financial industry in 2008
was really second to none. However, beyond the downgrade (which did
not make Bloomberg’s top stories), we find this news item interesting
in that it may very well lead to copy-cat behavior across Europe.
Indeed, in our latest Quarterly, we argued that one of the most
important questions for investors was whether the populations of
various European countries would continue to take it on the chin in
order to remain a member of the greater ‘European project’, or whether
some may decide that tightening belts to ensure that foreign investors
and/or domestic retirees continue to earn their coupons is no longer
politically feasible.
and Ireland announce dramatic deflationary budgets with reductions in
pensions, public employee wages, hospital and educational services
larger than any ever seen in a democracy in peace time. And these two
countries may actually get away with it (Latvia’s population may make
do as it is desperate to trade the cold embrace of Russia for the
warmer brotherhood of the European Union, while Ireland has the
advantage of being an English speaking country and so desperate young
people can always emigrate to Canada, Australia, the US, the UK…).
But will Greece? Will Hungary? Will Spain and Italy? Will the local
populations decide that paying up to settle the interest owed to
foreigners is simply not worth taking large cuts in public benefits?
And if that is the case, will the local populations be offered the
Icelandic way (a democratic referendum) to make their point? Or will
they have to take to the streets?
The company has also guided that 2009 production will be at the lower end of guidance given in November which was for 7.1Mt (this was a cut of 500kt at the time) lower production is due to poor geological conditions at its three operations. This is being addressed however the tone of the statement looks likely that guidance for 2010 will be lowered when the company puts out its pre close statement at the end of January. Powered roof support installation at Daw Mill was supposed to be in place in January, this has been pushed back by a month to Feb. Kellingley and Thoresby appear to be on track.
We retain our 120p target price for the moment with the expectation that the company will mitigate some of this lost production with higher prices, however we expect to see the shares softer today.
Drax’s share price rose 5.7% yesterday, we believe on the back of increased optimism around the outlook for gas and power prices triggered by the recent cold weather in the UK which is forecast to last for the next couple of weeks.
We believe it is worth making the following points about the recent rally in near-term gas prices:
The rally in near term gas prices has been driven by a large increase in gas demand: According to National Grid data total UK gas demand in December 2009 was 11,794 mcm which was 9.8% higher than the average December over the last 10 years and 5.5% higher than December 2008. So far in 2010 total gas demand has been 2,053 mcm, 16.8% higher than the 10 year average for the first 5 days of the year and 8% higher than last year.
Gas storage levels are higher now than they were this time last year. According to National Grid figures total gas in storage as at 3rd January 2010 was 39,092 GWh some 8.5% higher than at the same time last year.
The forward gas curve has had a muted response: According to Bloomberg data, winter 2010/11 gas prices have only risen 1.5% since the beginning of the year to 49.75p.
Forward clean dark spreads have fallen since the beginning of the year: On our estimates winter 2010/11 clean dark spreads have actually fallen since the start of the year, due to the sharp rise in thermal coal prices.
Drax is strongly contracted for 2010, with around 22.2 TWh of capacity contracted representing around 93% of expected output for this year; and
Forward dark spreads have actually fallen over the last couple of days, as the gas forward curve has not followed the spot price up but forward coal prices have rallied.
Drax is strongly contracted for 2010, with around 22.2 TWh of capacity contracted representing around 93% of expected output for this year; and
Forward dark spreads have actually fallen over the last couple of days, as the gas forward curve has not followed the spot price up but forward coal prices have rallied.
Ryanair – [RYA.I RYA ID] €3.46 Outperform Sector Neutral
Update ahead of investor day
Ryanair management will hold an investor update meeting on Thursday. This follows the announcement just before Christmas that Ryanair and Boeing had failed to agree terms for a new order for 200 737 aircraft for delivery after 2010. As a consequence the group has stated that it will now “bring forward plans to significantly reduce growth and capital expenditures, in order to maximise cash balances for distribution to shareholders during the period 2012-2015.” This is likely to involve a significant reduction in FY2011 and FY2012 capital expenditure as the group reduces its rate of capacity growth.
We expect management to provide details of the capital expenditure plan at the meeting on Thursday and to flesh out the practicalities of running the business for cash. This is likely to involve a degree of network rationalisation and a focus on higher yielding routes while maintaining cost discipline. As the rate of capacity growth slows in the coming years it is likely that the group will experience some unit cost pressure, measured on a per passenger basis, but this is likely to be offset by commensurate improvements in yield.
As can be seen from the table below, our no growth scenario suggests that Ryanair EPS could emerge 20% higher than our present forecasts in FY2011 and 35% higher in FY 2012. We expect to refine our assumptions after the management presentation on Thursday.
A special dividend of €1.12 is equivalent to a yield of 32% on the current share price.
On our current forecasts, based on assumed capacity growth of 15% in the year to March 2011 the stock trades on a 2010E calendar adjusted PER of 16.2x, which compares to 11.2x for easyJet, where the share price has recent come under some pressure following the announcement of the departure of the CEO.
If our no growth scenario turns out to be correct the PER falls to 13.7x which is undemanding in our view. Thus the prospect of faster EPS growth and tangible cash returns in a few years time makes this stock attractive and we reiterate our Outperform recommendation.
Ongoing selective investment in Gulfsands.s mature US assets makes sense to us, although
we would be supportive of efforts to divest these interests sooner rather than later. We also
see little chance of any progress on the Maysan gas-gathering project in Iraq. As a result, we
believe the investment case would benefit from diversification, and management needs to
articulate more clearly where and how it wants to expand.
We calculate a core NAV of 271p and risked exploration upside of 56p for the identified 2010
exploration wells in Syria. This results in a total valuation of 327p. With growing production
from Syria and what is, in our view, an attractive 2010 exploration programme, we believe
the current share price discount is unjustified. If this is sustained, and there is
encouragement from the early wells in the drilling campaign, we believe Sinochem (as the
other partner in Block 26) could move to acquire Gulfsands.s interest. We derive a 325p
target price, implying 35% potential upside from current levels, and initiate coverage with a
Buy recommendation
the US (sequential improvement of 2-3%), while Europe’s growth should remain
subdued until H2 2010. This bodes well for a slight pick up in demand in Q4.
of drama, but has it changed the fundamentals? We read Berkshire not as
trying to impose a veto, but challenging Kraft’s management to back their
convictions with more cash (debt) and less equity. Given what we see as the
strength of Kraft’s intent (and enhanced capacity for leverage post the Pizzas
disposal) we leave our TP of 795p unchanged. Hold and await events.
the Kraft/Cadbury bid saga. In a press release issued at 14.27 yesterday
London time, 9.4% Kraft shareholder Berkshire Hathaway indicated that it was
intending to vote ‘no’ to Kraft’s proxy call for new equity. In a pungently-worded
comment, Berkshire has challenged Kraft’s management to justify both the bid
per se and its dependence on Kraft equity. This has led some commentators to
conclude that Kraft’s move on Cadbury is now dead in the water.
Hathaway’s intervention, while embarrassing for Kraft management, is arguably
ultimately not unhelpful to their cause, and nor should it necessarily be toxic for
Cadbury’s share price.
now stands at 765p per share as of last night’s close. This is 3% higher than its
initial value of 740p on 7 September. The value of Kraft’s acquisition currency
has therefore risen, giving succour to the conspiracy theorists who have
speculated overnight that this was Berkshire’s ultimate objective
notwithstanding, we are maintaining our fundamental view on Kraft’s ability to
pay for Cadbury. We continue to think that Kraft can afford a bid of up to 820p
aggregate value, of which (pace the Pizzas disposal) well north of £4 could be in
cash, consistent with maintenance of an investment grade rating.
300p to 450p and stay on the right side of an investment grade rating (we
continue to assume a net debt:EBITDA limit of 4.3x, the way the rating agencies
might look at it). The underlying factor is that, post the disposal of Pizzas, Kraft
now has material incremental debt capacity. We think that its pro-forma net
debt:EBITDA should now come down to c.2.2x on a stand-alone basis.
concerns around dilution. With the increased cash component of the deal and
Kraft’s shares up by 5%, only c.280m new shares would need to be issued. This
would be substantially below the 370m for which Kraft are currently requesting
authorisation and with which Berkshire are apparently so unhappy.
trying to enforce – is whether management really are confident of the delivery of
$625m of synergies. Bear in mind that our scenario terms have been calibrated
to equate only to earnings neutrality, not accretion as Kraft have specified. And,
with leverage up towards the max, any slippage could tip them out of investment
grade and/or imperil the dividend. Think Premier Foods/RHM for the ultimate
nightmare scenario from Kraft’s point of view
The plan, which the government opposes and says is unconstitutional, passed with 35 votes in favor and 22 against in the final round of voting today, speaker Jassim al-Kharafi said.
The government plans on asking Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmed al-Jaber al-Sabah to reject the law, Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs Sheikh Ahmed al-Fahad al-Sabah said on Jan. 4, the state news agency KUNA reported. The central bank said yesterday that the bill includes legal and technical violations and can’t be applied, Kuna reported, citing a bank statement.
Kuwaitis stepped up borrowing as a decade-long oil boom through 2008 fuelled growth. Like spenders worldwide, Kuwaitis used bank loans to pay for homes, cars and vacations and many struggled to meet payments. The issue of bailing out debtors led to political rows in the oil-rich country, which has run a budget surplus for the past decade.
