Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:13 on 14 Dec 2009. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT Miles Johnson, FT
Results of Rights Issue:
£13.5bn Fully Underwritten Rights Issue
95.314% take-up (34,794,322,592 shares)
Rump Placement Size:
1,710,765,987 Shares / c. £962m
(100% Primary)
2000p (from 1600p), and upgrade our 2010E Eps by c19%. Our forecast
upgrades result from our greater confidence on revenue progression as
rising rates lead to NIM improvement from 2010E onwards, wealth
management sales continue their improving trend, and the Wholesale Bank
maintains its revenue momentum on the back of economic improvement.
comforting statement on the group’s Dubai exposure with the group stating
that they do not expect any material impairment, given CRE exposure in the
UAE of just US$400m. The statement also encouragingly highlighted
continued revenue momentum in the Wholesale bank and further
improvement in Consumer banking revenues. Standard Chartered has
underperformed the European banks by around 5% over the past three
weeks, which we now expect to reverse following this trading update.
ratio of c77% at end 2008A on our estimates, Standard Chartered screens
as one of the best funded banks in the European Bank sector. This places
the group well to benefit once rates begin to rise, which our economists
expect from early 2010 in Korea, China, India and Indonesia. We now
forecast NIM improving by c12bps in 2010E and c15bps in 2011E as a result.
TNAV. We see the premium to the European banks sector on c1.5x TNAV
as justified given the attractive geographic focus, balance sheet strength and
higher RoTE generation. We have revised our target price to 2000p, set in
reference to our P/TNAV model, based on our 2011E RoTE of 22%, CoE of
10% and growth of 3.5%. This implies c38% potential upside to the current
share price.
talks is not a surprise. Indeed, most of the online operators
regularly speak on an informal basis. It seems inevitable
that there will be substantial online corporate activity
whether or not it is Bwin or now. As a major online player
and with an ambitious management team, PartyGaming is a
valuable strategic asset.
suggesting that Bwin and PartyGaming have held informal merger talks. This
doesn’t come as a surprise as online groups frequently talk informally. However,
we believe that the recent sector consolidation will gain momentum through 2010
and it is only a matter of time before we see further sizable deals.
appear to make sound strategic sense. The combined entity would have an
attractive product and geographic mix and forecast net gaming revenues of
c US $1.25bn in 2010. The enlarged group would also have a market leading
position in all product areas (outside of the two US facing poker offerings of
Poker Stars and Full Tilt).
c $400m of personnel and administration costs from which to obtain savings
from. This is before media buying and other savings derived from economies of
scale. Therefore, it would not appear unreasonable to expect them to achieve a
minimum of $50m of annual cost savings. Pro forma forecast EBITDA (adjusted)
for the enlarged entity would be c. $375m before any cost savings.
Simply a matter of time. The combination of mature markets, new markets
opening up and substantial cost savings make industry consolidation a
compelling theme. We have already see Bwin acquire Gioco for its geographic
strength in Italy, while PartyGaming purchased Cashcade to develop its bingo
presence. Bwin’s strength in sports means that it would be an ideal partner for
Party. But even if it is not Bwin and Party, there will be further deals. Given
Party’s market position and management ambition we continue to rate the
shares a Buy.
The Sunday Times (December 13) reported that PartyGaming is in merger
talks with bwin. According to the article, the deal would be structured as a
merger of equals, if it were to occur. However, discussions are reportedly
at an early stage and there is no certainty that a deal would be agreed.
PartyGaming is expected to be asked by the Takeover Panel to clarify the
position before the market opens on Monday morning, December 14.
Clearly, as yet, this is only press speculation. However, if it were to occur,
we believe such a deal would make strategic sense as it would provide
PRTY with a leading sportsbook product and the combined entity would be
the largest poker operator outside the US (with peak traffic of c.12000, vs.
c.8000 for Playtech’s iPoker, which is the current leader). The breakdown in
current market cap is broadly similar to the breakdown of expected 2010
EBITDA between both companies (45/55 ratio for PRTY/bwin)
December 11, PartyGaming had a market cap of €1.15 bn with bwin at €1.4
bn. Based on Reuters consensus, PartyGaming is expected to generate
2010 EBITDA of €108 mn (margin: 30%) and bwin is expected to generate
EBITDA of €135 mn (margin: 26%). The combined entity would also
potentially benefit from various cost synergies, mainly from administrative
and back office expenses. Moreover, any potential accretion would be
magnified if the US online poker and casino markets are both legalized
(see our June 29, 2009 report, Focus on the US; Playtech pricing least
optionality, in our view).
If this speculation is confirmed, we would anticipate a positive reaction
from both stocks. We would also expect other stocks within the online
gaming sector to rally as this news reignites consolidation expectations.
We retain our estimates and price targets for bwin and PRTY. We have a
Buy rating on bwin and Neutral rating on PRTY.
$4.1bn will be used immediately to bail out the government owned investment company, Dubai World
The remaining $6bn will be used to support the ‘needs’ of Dubai World until April 2010
A positive move and should help improve sentiment around the entire region, given the
recent collapse in confidence
This news should be taken positively by companies in our sector with Middle East
exposure – Interserve* (BUY) and Carillion* (BUY) standout
New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS) have reached provisional agreement on the
actuarial basis to calculate the deficits in each pension scheme as at March 31st
2009.
On the basis of this agreement, the deficit in APS would be £1.0bn and the deficit
in NAPS would be £2.7bn.
The airline and trustees will now work together to develop a recovery plan, a
process which will involve the company consulting with employees and their trade
unions. The regulatory deadline for the valuation process, including agreement on
future contributions required and the recovery plan, is June 30th 2010.
The €3.7bn size of the deficit is in the range of expectations. BA currently commits
£330m in cash annually to fund pensions, with the current payment period over
ten years. We would expect this period to be elongated.
Separately, the UNITE union ballot for strike action among cabin crew takes place
today (December 14th). If affirmative, this allows strike action within seven days.
However, we think strikes over the Christmas period are unlikely
Combined deficit of GBP3.7bn: A deficit of GBP2.7bn for NAPs and
GBP1bn for APS as of the end of March 2009 is towards the high end of
market expectations. The actuarial valuation in March 2008 was a combined
deficit of GBP1.8bn using discount rates of 5.8% and 4.9% for NAPS/APS
respectively. The doubling of the deficit reflects the 34% fall in the stock
market (over 60% of assets are in equities) partially offset by a discount rate
of 6.1% for NAPS (which lowers the liabilities). However the APS discount
rate was lowered to 4.6% (from 4.9%) reflecting the a lower exposure to
equities.
Recovery plan: The legal deadline for a recovery plan is June 2010. The
company had hoped not to raise the annual cash-top ups of GBP180m but
simply to extend the recovery period. However, even taking into account
the rise in the stock market since March (we estimate that the deficit is
GBP2bn rather than GBP3.7bn at current market levels) it seems that more
money will have to be found for the pension deficit. This could either come
from the company or employees.
ballot to strike. We expect that the ballot will be in favour of strike action
most probably in the New Year to keep the public onside. However whether
or not a strike occurs depends on the turnout. The majority of crew would
not appear to have a motive to strike given that the changes to conditions
affect new staff and many crew recently benefitted from a pay rise and a
move to part-time. However, given the latest deficit, the company may be
forced to rengotiate pension benefits with employees if it is to avoid using
more of shareholders cash. Induistrial unrest could therefore worsen over
the next few weeks.
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS TO ISSUE $17 BILLION OF COMMON STOCK AND $3.5 BILLION OF TANGIBLE EQUITY UNITS
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS TO REPAY $20 BILLION OF TARP TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP – AGREEMENT WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORS TO TERMINATE LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENT
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITI TO SUBSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL COMMON STOCK FOR CASH COMPENSATION
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS DECIDED TO ISSUE IN JANUARY 2010 $1.7 BILLION OF COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS TO EMPLOYEES IN LIEU OF CASH
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITI SAYS WILL CEASE TO BE A BENEFICIARY OF TARP ‘EXCEPTIONAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE’ BEGINNING IN 2010
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP – U.S. TREASURY TO SELL UP TO $5 BILLION OF ITS COMMON SHARES VIA CONCURRENT SECONDARY OFFERING; PLANS ORDERLY EXIT
11:30 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP -REPAYMENT WILL RESULT IN AN APPROXIMATE $8 BILLION PRE-TAX LOSS
11:31 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP – WILL ALSO TERMINATE THE LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENT WITH THE GOVERNMENT
11:31 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP – TO CANCEL $1.8 BILLION OF THE $7.1 BILLION IN TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES IT ORIGINALLY ISSUED TO THE GOVERNMENT
11:31 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS TO ISSUE $3.5 BLN OF TANGIBLE EQUITY UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY $0.7 BILLION OF SUBORDINATED NOTES
11:31 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS IT MAY ISSUE UP TO $3 BILLION OF TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2010
11:32 14Dec09 RTRS-CITIGROUP SAYS AFTER GIVING EFFECT TO TODAY’S TRANSACTINS, WOULD HAVE HAD ABOUT $117.4 BLN TCE AT THE END OF Q3 2009
11:32 14Dec09 RTRS-RPT-CITIGROUP SAYS MAY ISSUE UP TO $3 BILLION OF TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2010
Vikram Pandit, Chief Executive Officer, said on behalf of the entire Citi Board of Directors, “The TARP program was designed to provide assistance until banks were in a position to repay it prudently. We are pleased to be able to repay the U.S. government’s trust preferred securities and to terminate the loss-sharing agreement. We owe the American taxpayers a debt of gratitude and recognize our obligation to support the economic recovery through lending and assistance to homeowners and other borrowers in need.”
Citi will immediately issue $20.5 billion of capital and debt, comprised of:
* $17 billion of common stock, with an over-allotment option of $2.55 billion; and
* $3.5 billion of tangible equity units (consisting of approximately $2.8 billion of prepaid common stock purchase contracts (recorded as equity) and approximately $0.7 billion of subordinated notes (recorded as debt).
In connection with Citi’s offering, the U.S. Treasury (UST) will sell up to $5 billion of the common stock it holds in a concurrent secondary offering. After the secondary offering, the UST is subject to a 45-day “lock-up” period. The Treasury has also announced that it plans to sell the remainder of its shares in an orderly fashion over the next 6-12 months.
In addition, Citi has decided to issue in January 2010 $1.7 billion of common stock equivalents to employees in lieu of cash they would have otherwise received. Subject to shareholder approval at the company’s annual meeting on April 1, 2010, the common stock equivalents will be replaced by common stock.
As agreed with the U.S. government and its regulators, following the successful completion of the $17 billion common stock offering and the $3.5 billion offering of tangible equity units, Citi will repay $20 billion of TARP trust preferred securities. The repayment will result in an approximate $8 billion pre-tax loss ($5.1 billion after tax). Citi will also terminate the loss-sharing agreement with the government and cancel $1.8 billion of the $7.1 billion in trust preferred securities it originally issued to the government as consideration for the benefits provided by that agreement. This will result in an approximate pre-tax loss of $2.1 billion ($1.3 billion after tax). The termination of the loss-sharing agreement will increase Citi’s risk-weighted assets by approximately $144 billion.
Company releases its defence document this morning re the Kraft offer and a trading update.
1. Trading – FY09 guidance unchanged
Company confirmed its previous guidance for 2009 of sales growth in the middle of the 4-6% range and margin at least 135bp better y-o-y. NE 5.2% and +160bp for FY09.
No change in FY09 guidance might come as a slight disappointment; however, company says that it wanted to focus people more on medium-term targets and not lots of ST new info.
NOMURA European Food Research
_______________________________________________________________________________
Alex Smith +44 20 7102 1459 Alex.Smith@nomura.com
David Hayes +44 20 7102 1341 David.Hayes@nomura.com
Guillaume Delmas +44 20 7102 6918 Guillaume.Delmas@nomura.com
_______________________________________________________________________________
14 December 2009
Cadbury (NEUTRAL, TP 805p)
Company releases its defence document this morning re the Kraft offer and a trading update.
1. Trading – FY09 guidance unchanged
Company confirmed its previous guidance for 2009 of sales growth in the middle of the 4-6% range and margin at least 135bp better y-o-y. NE 5.2% and +160bp for FY09.
No change in FY09 guidance might come as a slight disappointment; however, company says that it wanted to focus people more on medium-term targets and not lots of ST new info.
2. Defence – Improved medium-term targets
Re the defence. Rejects Kraft offer as inadequate. Says revised medium-term plans given momentum are:
Ø Organic sales growth in the 5-7% range (was 4-6%). NE was 4.7% CAGR 2010 – 2013
Ø Margins 16%-18% by 2013 (previous 2011 “mid teens”). Compares with c. 15%+ in 2011 implied. NE was 15.8% 2011 and then c. 16.2% ongoing
Ø 80-90% cash conversion – implies better NWC management from here. 2009 FCF conversion c. 50%
Ø DD dividend growth from 2010 (in NE est, 2010E 19.5p)
Broadly, if we run 6% sales growth and margins at 18% by 2013, we would increase PT from 780p to c. 910p all else equal.
Sales growth increase driven by;
– Higher proportion of emerging markets (currently 38% of sales) in the mix and growing more quickly (was +12% in 2008)
– Absence of portfolio rationalisation (2007-2009 sales growth 6% with this offset)
– More mix and innovation in developed markets. More selective about growth projects.
Margins from ongoing initiatives, no new major restructuring. Says will take c. 70-80bp of ongoing restructuring charges (within margin guidance), ie c. £50m per annum. (£180m restructure costs in 2009).
Says that the cash conversion will be from the absence of big restructuring outflows and NWC management post the reconfiguration of plants.
Following press speculation yesterday, the Board of Mouchel Group plc (“the Company”) confirms that it has been in receipt of two unsolicited approaches from VT Group plc to acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital of the Company.
The Board believes these approaches to be wholly inadequate and at a level which substantially undervalues the Company.
The Board has discussed these approaches with its advisors and has unanimously rejected them.
The Board understands that VT Group plc remains interested in pursuing a transaction.
particularly in BPO. It is cheap despite the strong run. Investors are weary.
Acquirers are hungry for deals. We believe that a buyer could pay 300p, giving
further upside of 57%.
received two unsolicited approaches from VT Group. We believe that VT is a
credible buyer. We estimate £125m of cash post the BVT disposal. We expect
that VT would be willing to take on c. £100m of debt. The balance of the EV,
including the estimated £100m of Mouchel’s debt, would have to be funded with
equity.
believe that it has attractive assets, particularly BPO (estimated 38% of FY 2010
EBITA). We believe it would be attractive to other buyers, including Serco, but
also US companies, such as Aecom, CH2MHill and Jacobs, who were reported
in the trade press last week to be seeking a UK acquisition
seen as high risk. However, unusually low staff churn-rates across the industry
suggest that staff have limited other jobs to go to. Mouchel’s visibility is much
higher than the engineering consultants, like WSP. It is unlikely that a buyer
would justify a deal primarily on the basis of cost synergies, however, only 1% of
sales would represent £7m of synergies
guidance. The shares are trading on a CY 2010 P/E of 7.3x and EV/EBIT of 6.5x.
Taxing the synergies at 28%, adding them back, and applying a FY 2010 P/E of
10x would give a price of 300p, an EV/EBIT of 8.3x, further upside of 57%
The group has confirmed that it has received unsolicited bids from VT which
explain the 20% rise in the share price last Friday. While the trading update,
also last Friday, indicated improving fortunes, it still has some way to go to
meet FY expectations. But with bid focus now on the shares a cautious
recommendation is no longer appropriate; we move to neutral.
VT to acquire the group. The board believes these to be “wholly inadequate” and
“substantially undervalue the company”, so have been rejected. The Mouchel statement
also suggests that VT remain interested in pursuing a transaction. Press speculation
suggests that other groups including Capita and Serco are watching events closely.
FY trading was expected to be in-line with expectations although the usual H2 bias
would be accentuated. There has been an increase in the contract win rate towards the
top of its historic range. The order book is £2bn while the pipeline is up 20% to £2.6bn.
trading on a calendar 10E PE of 6.8x and EV/Ebitda of 5.1x. Neither of these is
expensive relative to its own trading history and to the sector. The dividend yield is
3.4%.
PE of 9.5x for Mouchel. The challenge for any acquirer would include retaining the key
consulting asset, being the people, and how much of the hybrid consulting/BPO model
that would be retained. With interest now focused on the group a negative
recommendation is no longer appropriate so we move to a neutral stance. Our target
price remains unchanged at 190p.
The London Stock Exchange is holding up the planned flotation on Aim of the latest vehicle of Frank Timis, the entrepreneur, because of concerns about his past.
Romanian-born Mr Timis, whose past includes three narcotic convictions, had been in the advanced stages of bringing his company to market in a £60m ($98m) flotation
Although the exchange has given African Petroleum no official written notice, it has offered guidance in discussions to Mirabaud that it would not like to see Mr Timis with a position on the board.
The move from the exchange is highly unusual as the vetting process and regulation of London’s junior index is normally devolved to nominated advisers. The LSE has been looking to bolster the reputation of Aim after a series of high profile failures and accusations of minimal regulation. The London Stock Exchange declined to comment.
The planned listing is due to take place just weeks after the LSE imposed a record fine on Regal Petroleum, the oil exploration company Mr Timis founded.
They included Regal failing to take reasonable care to ensure that announcements were not misleading, false or deceptive, and did not omit material information.
However, the ruling made no criticism of Mr Timis, who was ousted from the board in 2005 but who has retained an 8.8 per cent stake.
However, Mr Timis remains chairman of another Aim-quoted stock, African Minerals. At £737m, the Sierra Leone-focused company is one of the index’s largest mining stocks.
Part of the African Petroleum’s portfolio were assets off the Liberian coast that were the target of a reverse takeover by another Aim-listed group, Sound Oil. However, discussions were terminated earlier this month.
DETAILS – Despite being recommended by the Independent Committee, ENOC’s offer was accepted by only 48.9% by value of shareholders, below the 75% requirement for the bid to be binding.
VALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION – In the short term, we see few catalysts for Dragon’s shares to reach the levels seen during the bid period. Therefore we switch our recommendation to Reduce. Our new target price of 350p is 12% below Dragon’s core value of 400p and 24% below the core + risked NAV of 459p.
made by way of a scheme of arrangement. To succeed required over 50% of the
shareholders and 75% of the shares to vote in favour. Over 75% of voting
shareholders were in favour, but these represented fewer than 50% of the shares
voted.
ENOC has already announced that no increase in the price will be made and has
also stated that it will not sell any shares before the end of 2011. This effectively
precludes a bid from another third party, and ENOC cannot make any further offer
for 12 months under the takeover panel rules. This means market attention will
now refocus on Dragon’s ongoing development of its two wholly-owned oil and
gas fields in the Turkmenistan offshore.
We believe there will be a period of price instability as the market adjusts to the
new reality. Nonetheless, a market price of 455p per share has been set by an
informed buyer. This sets the near-term target price, and the stock is a buy up to
this level.
taxloss 5320 5294.51 5335 40.5
bullsvsbears 5350 5335.01 5353 18.0
Shrewdette 5356 5353.01 5361.5 8.5
