Selected highlowlights from Thursday’s early statement.
Emphasis ours.
Moody’s downgrades Dubai GRI rating
DIFC, November 26, 2009 — Moody’s Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of all six government-related issuers (GRI’s) in Dubai and left them on review for possible downgrade.
Ratings affected by today’s action are the following:
- DP World issuer and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2 from A3;
- Dubai Electricity & Water Authority (DEWA) issuer and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2 from A3;
- DIFC Investments (DIFCI) issuer and debt ratings were downgraded to Ba1 from A3;
- Jebel Ali Free Zone (JAFZ) issuer and debt ratings were downgraded to Ba1 from Baa1;
- Dubai Holding Commercial Operations Group (DHCOG) issuer and debt ratings were downgraded to Ba2 from Baa1;
- Emaar Properties issuer ratings were downgraded to Ba2 from Baa1.
The rating action reflects today’s announcement by the Dubai government of a restructuring of Dubai World, including a requested standstill on all financings to Dubai World and its subsidiary Nakheel. Moody’s has to this point incorporated a substantial level of government support in the Dubai GRI ratings. However, following today’s announcement we have reduced the government support that has been factored into its Dubai GRI ratings, moving them within one to three rating categories of their fundamental credit profiles.
Moody’s has always highlighted that the way the government will deal with Nakheel’s upcoming liabilities will represent a litmus test for Dubai. Although Nakheel is not rated by Moody’s, it sets a major precedent for a high-profile, seemingly strategic company facing debt repayment difficulties and thus relying on the government for support. A restructuring of its obligations would indicate that the government is prepared to allow a GRI to default on its obligations — a precedent that needs to be interpreted accordingly for those companies that are rated by Moody’s.
Neither Dubai World nor Nakheel are rated by Moody’s, however, two of Dubai World’s subsidiaries, DP World and JAFZ, are rated. Moody’s understands that debt obligations of DP World and JAFZ are not part of the restructuring announcement, though this remains to be confirmed. Also, no cross default provisions exist between Dubai World and DP World or JAFZ. However, the restructuring of its parent company creates uncertainty for both entities’ ratings.
Moody’s ongoing review of all of the Dubai GRIs will focus on the implication that the restructuring of Dubai World has on the expected level of government support for all of the rated entities in Dubai. We will also consider which entities within the Dubai World group are affected by the restructuring, the degree to which this poses additional risk to the credit profiles of rated subsidiaries of Dubai World, as well as the terms and conditions of the standstill request and the degree to which it gives creditors an option for timely repayment.
The government’s decision to restructure highlights the government’s intention to strictly adhere to its stated policy of supporting only those companies with viable long-term business prospects, which implies that support for distressed or weaker companies may be less forthcoming. Therefore, confirmation of such policy could result in further reductions in support assumptions that would align ratings entirely with the companies’ fundamental credit profile.
Therefore, confirmation of such policy could result in further reductions in support assumptions that would align ratings entirely with the companies’ fundamental credit profile.
Related links:
Dubai shock after debt standstill call – FT
A friend in need…is a friend in de(fault)? – FT Alphaville
Nakheel: The famous last words… – FT Alphaville
A forced seller at the LSE? – FT Alphaville