Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:14 on 20 Nov 2009. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT (NH) Bryce Elder (BE)
Who Art At Goldman,
Blankfein Be Thy Name.
God’s Work Be Done,
We Have No Fear Of Correction.
And Bankrupt Our Nearest Competitors,
Just As You Taught Lehman And Bear A Lesson.
For Thine Is The Treasury,
The House And The Senate
Forever And Ever.
Goldman.
Rothschild, the independent investment bank, is planning to announce the hire of John Kingman, the departing chief executive of UKFI, the body responsible for managing the UK Government’s stakes in financial institutions, on Monday.
Overweight to Equal-weight and on Thomas Cook from
Equal-weight to Underweight. We are reducing forecasts for
both to reflect a weaker operating environment and more
expensive debt refinancing. TCG appears to us to have the
most forecast risk as it has above-average margins and, we
believe, needs to refinance its debts quicker than the market
believes, potentially including new equity. TT is our preferred
tour operator owing to its potential for margin catch-up and
specialist holiday expansion, though the upside from these has
been pushed out somewhat further than we expected.
aided by substantial merger synergies, which are now running
out, and significant capacity cuts, which are getting harder to
deliver, we think. Both TUI Travel and Thomas Cook Group
have generated solid margin increases since their mergers, but
2010 looks like being a tougher year, with costs currently rising
faster than sales, given that fuel was hedged at much higher
prices. There are signs of unhelpful capacity additions from
Rewe and Alltours in the more fragmented German market,
and Kuoni recently made some worrying comments about
Scandinavia, the highest-margin mainstream market. We show
new analysis in this report of how low cost carriers are
expanding into medium haul markets. External risks also seem
to be growing: for example, swine ‘flu, unemployment, currency,
the UK general election and the 2010 World Cup.
cash generation and growing debts, particularly at TCG, driven
by weak working capital, adverse currency moves, higher than
expected exceptional costs, and acquisitions. Coupled with
lower interest income on customer deposits, net financial
charges have been rising faster than we anticipated. This is
likely to continue into 2010, we believe, with TT recently
refinancing its loans early via a convertible and new RCF, and
TCG needing to refinance its May 2011 facility soon given its
covenant steps down from 3.75x to 3.25x adjusted debt/
EBITDAR, leaving only 10% headroom on our forecasts.
Indeed, with TCG’s balance sheet weaker than TT’s, and with
its majority shareholder Arcandor now having sold out, we
would not rule out a small equity raising from TCG.
in 2010 for TT and a £30m drop for TCG, and a £20m step up in
net financial costs. This leads to EPS cuts of around 15% for
both companies, such that we are around 10% below
consensus for TT and 15% below for TCG.
A total of £1.2m in payments were made to three directors – Andrew Knight , Deborah Kemp and Jonathan Paveley – who left the company over the past 12 months.
Chief Giles Thorley pocketed £874,000 from selling his share options in 2008, which vested from 2004 incentive plans. Stripping out the option gains, Mr Thorley saw his total package increase 20 per cent to £681,000 in 2009. In spite of racking up £406m in annual losses, £172,000 of bonuses were paid out to executive management, with Mr Thorley – who received no bonus in 2008 but was given £336,000 in 2007 – netting £60,000.
Banks are working on convincing the Ferrero family of the advantages of
the plan. The main assets of CBRY which are in Ferrero’s sights (gum and
candy) could be valued at around EUR5bn. The resistence of Michele,
traditionally a sceptic of major expansion is in contrast to his sons
Pietro and Giovanni. Nonetheless sources believe that the split could be
resolved in a short time. Everyone is noting the possibility that Kraft
raises its own offer for CBRY.
Mediobanca (main adviser) and Rothschild (operating from London) and
with other banks that are seeking a possible role in the financing of a
deal. Among these will be mostly Italian istitutions, including Intesa
and Unicredit.
Only a week ago, Ferrero – which in several years has never attempt a major such acuisition – finally decided to consider CBRY. Now that
Ferrero has confirmed its interest, everyone will be trying to get a
piece of the action. Many banks are however tied up financing the KFT bid. So a combined Hershey-Ferrero bid will need to find other sources
of funding. Ferrero can seek assistance from the major Italian banks,
while Hershey is speaking with private equity funds (KKR’s name is
circulating). One thing is certain, the Ferrero family will push the
case for not putting too much debt into the operation.
family has in the past had little inclination to run businesses together
with other parties. Of the EUR5bn value placed on the assets Ferrero
would like to own, half could probably be funded by bank loans. Looking
at the accounts of Ferrero International, it can be seen that this
commitment would be entirely be feasible for the family. The holding
company holds “distributable reserves” of some EUR2bn. There is a
shareholder loan worth EUR1.3bn. In the last nine years, Ferrero has
guaranteed to the family dividends worth over EUR1bn.
Higher oil prices, and, in the case of some, exploration success have contributed to this strong
outperformance, and we think it will continue. Consequently, we remain positive on the European E&P
sector into the end of 2009 and 2010, and have updated our price targets to reflect 2011 earnings and
cashflow estimates. We also incorporate recent 3Q results and interim management updates, and adjust
currencies for current forward rates, all of which causes our price targets to rise by 17% on average. As
we forecast average oil prices around $100/bbl oil prices in 2011, our P/CF derived price targets now
coincide with our net asset values which also adopt a long term oil price close to $100/bbl.
target of £36 which closely compares with our NAV of £37/share. This NAV includes only
£2.50/share of value for exploration, determined using the recent implied valuation from the Petronas
farm-in to the acreage. As discussed in our recent research about exploration potential offshore
Greenland, we believe there are untested Cretaceous plays for Cairn to exploit. With our calculated
NPV/bbl of $7-$8/bbl for a discovery in the region, Cairn’s early identified 14 leads (if converted to
drillable prospects) found in 2 of their 8 blocks could equate to material further upside. Specifically,
applying a 5% exploration success level to prospects in the 300Mbbls range (using Canadian analogues)
and our NPV/bbl would equate to £5.50/share. If success levels recorded offshore Eastern Canadian of
15-18% were achievable would lift this estimate much higher. Furthermore, our NAV assumes only a
50% probability of success for the enhanced oil recovery project at the MBA field, although we remain
confident it will be successful and deliver the full 300Mbbls – hence our NAV has further upside.
emerging market index by an average of 49%, led by the Russian gas sector (78% relative
performance versus 30% for Russian Oils). While the movement in the Russian Oils has been strong
(and against our recommendations), we do however remain cautious on Russian oil output and still
expect visible declines in the near term. Added to cost escalation, growing maintenance capex, low
probability of further tax cuts and now lofty valuations, we remain cautious on the oil stocks at this time.
We continue to see fundamental reasons why the gas stocks (Gazprom and Novatek) should continue to
do well in 2010 and rate them both Outperform.
disaggregated the profitability of Gazprom’s natural gas business and as a result we expect first-time
profitability from the domestic business by the end of 2009 due to liberalization of domestic prices. In
particular, we expect average EBIT/boe of $6/boe over last 5 years to rise to $10-12/boe from 2009-2013,
and argue that the stock should see a re-rating. Moreover, across the Bernstein energy coverage universe,
Gazprom is the cheapest stock with an EV per barrel of proven reserves of $1.70/boe versus an average
of close to $20/boe.
We continue to believe that oil prices will remain high, around or above the marginal cost of $75/bbl. We
believe we are now entering stage two of a classic upcycle and continue to recommend adding to high beta
E&Ps. We also continue to recommend exposure to natural-gas exposed names, rating BG, Gazprom and
Novatek outperform. For investors hoping to gain from the boost in oil, we recommend Cairn as our top oilleveraged
pick (Outperform). We also continue to rate Tullow Outperform and post our valuation update
see upside in Premier Oil, though not yet enough to warrant an Outperform rating.
Please find attached an invite to the exclusive world unveiling of Emblaze Mobile’s long rumoured ‘Project Monolith’, now revealed as the ELSE device.
The private event is being held between 11 and 12am on November 24th at SKETCH, 9 Conduit Street, London W1S 2XG.
The ELSE is not a PDA, Smart Phone, or Feature Phone. The ELSE is an attempt to revolutionize the way we think about the handset industry, and what a handheld device can and SHOULD do.
This site is intended to act as a meeting place for shareholders of Dragon Oil Plc, an Irish company that is in danger of being taken over by it’s majority shareholder ENOC (Emirates National Oil Company).
The current takeover offer made by ENOC of £4.55 seriously undervalues Dragon Oil plc. The company could be worth 100% to 200% more than this right now and far more in the years to come. Don’t sell out on the cheap!
Dragon Oil has valuable oil and gas assets in the Caspian Sea which are only just now starting to achieve their potential we must not allow ENOC to snatch this company away just as it’s starting to make good.
You should first read the NCP/Peter hutton research brief and then contact your stock broker and make sure you are able to vote. Most nominee accounts are not allowed to vote unless you make arrangements in advance.
This site is being run by me, Robert McKay. You may contact me at robert@mckay.com. I will try and get back to you.
I think there is a lot that could be done to improve this process.. I understand they don’t want to make it too easy for direct junk mail marketeers however in situations such as the one we’re in with Dragon Oil there needs to be a better way for shareholders to communicate with one another. I would suggest some kind of electronic messaging system (preferably not email) maybe something a bit more like the RNS system where shareholders could send messages which would be automatically picked up by all the share websites and maybe also displayed on the websites of corporate registrars like capita.
Ross Evans has setup a google checkout account for accepting donations.
Ross has stated that the funds will be used as follows:
1. Reimbursing Robert for costs incurred in acquiring the shareholders register and other cost associated with its utilisation.
2. Fund expansion of google adwords campaign to ensure that the many shareholders that will be searching on google for terms relvant to the takeover see the savedragon.com link.
3. Placement of press releases stating shareholders dissatisfaction with the situation with PRWeb and related agencies, ensuing our views receive a wide audience.
4. Using contacts to have favourable articles placed in mid-tier online publications.
I (Rob) do not need to be reimbursed; please spend all the money on the other items instead.
We upgrade PT to 211p and rating to Buy. We see rapidly expanding cash flow on Paragon’s
back book, as well as expecting the group to return to originating new assets from 2011. The
s.tock is trading at 0.7x P/BV 2009E
We estimate cash flow available to shareholders at £ 68m for 2010 and £70m for 2011, more
than 15% pa of market cap. This robust picture is thanks to a fall in redemptions, which supports
stable assets volumes and rising spreads as the share of “teaser” rate mortgages falls away.
Good underwriting and low rates have kept Buy-to-let losses at 12bps. The mechanics of
P.aragon’s securitisations allow the rising cash flow to drop out the bottom to shareholders.
Demand for BTL is supported by a combination of low interest rates and resilient rent yields.
There are first signs of recovery in the securitisation market. We expect PGC to return to assets
origination in 2011.
We value PGC discounting 5 year forecast cash flows (12% discount rate), noting that free cash
flow is well ahead of IFRS PBT in the near-term. Even so, our 2010 EPS forecast is almost 50%
ahead of consensus. Value of cash flow beyond 2014E is captured in the TV, derived assuming
4% nominal asset growth. Previously, the valuation was based mainly on discounting cash to be
returned to shareholders from its securitisation vehicles (run-off assumption).
It’s not clear yet whether the Cosmen family will participate in an upcoming GBP360 million rights issue the company has planned.
Last week a spokesman for the family said Jorge Cosmen, who represents the family on the board of National Express, “voted against the rights issue as a member of the board of directors, but the Cosmen family is evaluating whether it will support the rights issue.”
A full vote on the rights issue by shareholders is scheduled for Nov. 27.
The group had net debt as of Sept. 30 of about GBP1.1 billion, with significant refinancing necessary in September 2010, and again by June 2011.
National Express last month abandoned merger talks with rival bus-and-rail operator Stagecoach Group PLC (SGC.LN) to focus on reducing its debt with an equity fund raising.
approach.
current multiple) payable with ITRK shares at yesterdays closing share price, and a margin of
17% for DNVs certification division, the deal would be neutral to ITRKs EPS in year 1. SGS
and BVs margin in that division are 19.7% and 18.4% respectively but it is highly likely that,
as a foundation, DNVs profitability is not as high. However until we know the full terms of the
deal a more accurate impact on ITRK accounts is hard to calculate.
The forces of consolidation clearly seem to be at work in this sector.
yesterday: Dana highlighted both the value in the
existing portfolio and upside from 2010 exploration and
longer-term opportunities in Morocco, Mauritania and
Guinea. Cashflow remains a key priority with asset
swaps into producing assets increasingly likely to fund
exploration. 2009 exploration results and
communication has been unquestionably disappointing.
Yesterday’s update offered little materially new, but it
should reassure investors that the asset trading/
exploration model is intact – importantly the E&A
program for next year is largely unchanged and still
offers investors material upside potential. Our NAV at
the forward curve is 1,548p/sh.
days: Current 2D seismic has indicated a lead with up to
3.6bn bbl potential (P90 c.600mb). A further 9,000km of
2D seismic is being acquired at the moment to aid the
relinquishment decision by year-end. 3D seismic
acquisition is expected to take place in 2010 with a
commitment to spud a well by end-2011.
2010 drilling program intact: A c.14 well program with
high impact wells at Anne-Marie (UK), Tolmount (UK)
and Bamboo (Egypt) remains on schedule and worth in
aggregate up to c.£6/sh unrisked at the forward curve.
Bamboo will be one of the first results in the new year
and alongside Papyrus will be important in ensuring
West El Burullus is commercially viable and sanctioned.
Development highlights: First gas from Babbage (UK)
is expected in 2Q10, modestly pushed back from 1Q10
to allow for further work on the platform offshore.
Western Isles remains the key mid-term development
where project sanction is targeted for 4Q10 with first oil
in 2013 at initial rates of up to c.25kb/d (net Dana).
Near-term catalysts: The Papyrus well in the West El
Burullus concession, Egypt is currently drilling with a
result expected by late December (unrisked c.20p/sh).
Elsewhere look for an update on Dana’s interest in
Guinea post the November 30 deadline for a letter of
intent to Hyperdynamics by another party.
resurface so watch out SEBA SS & the rest of the Scandi Bubble which is
bursting…
few weeks. Potential upside, within limits – ALERT
Yesterday we spoke to Ofcom about its forthcoming publication on the
question whether BT’s access charges should take account of its pension
deficit contributions. We learnt that this publication is due ‘in the next few
weeks’. We believe the review has upside potential for BT, however some
positive outcome is already expected and we present a number of reasons
why we don’t think the review will be transformational.
contributions: Ofcom’s proposed charge controls (mainly unbundled
line, wholesale line rental, and interconnect charges) do not take into
account BT’s pension deficit. In the light of the increased materiality of
pension deficit contributions (BT’s annual top ups have increased from
£280 to £525m a year since the last triennial valuation) Ofcom earlier
this year promised a review which has given rise to hopes by some that
they would follow the ‘precedent’ set by other UK regulators.
• Ofcom looks like the odd one out: At present Ofcom is the only UK
regulator which does not fully or at least partially recognize pension
deficit contributions in its price control calculations. For instance
Ofwat is recovering 50% of the deficit over 5 years (for a useful
overview of other UK regulator approaches to this question please see
http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/networks/Documents1/Centrica%20pension
%20appendix.pdf). Of course of full recovery of BT’s £6.8bn post tax
pension deficit through price controls would be a huge positive for BT,
with the current deficit at 88p/share (60% of the market cap).
presentation Ofcom said, ‘Companies … are cash-called in order to fill
the (pension) hole and take the view that this is a part of the cost base
and we need to address that question directly, whether it is or it isn’t, or
whether some parts of it are and some parts of it aren’t,’ but also
cautioning ‘that it is a complex and potentially quite important issue
and while we have previously had a policy on this in relation to charge
controls, it is probably also the case that we haven’t been completely
explicit about what has driven that policy in the past and we felt it was
appropriate to open it up to consultation so we could get a view… from
stakeholders as to the appropriate treatment of these issues’.

