Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:14 on 4 Nov 2009. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT (NH) Miles Johnson, FT (MJ)
FT Alphaville
offshore Ghana may hold as much oil as the nearby Jubilee field,
Tim O 19/64Hanlon, vice president for Africa, said at a conference in
Cape Town today.
If the the non-G7 central banks want to shift their gold allocation to 10 per cent, this would require the purchase of 370m troy ounces — or around 20 per cent of current, non-official, above ground supplies.
If the non-G7 central banks want to match the current c.35 per cent gold position of the G7 nations then they would have to purchase 1.3bn troy ounces, or 65 per cent of all non-central bank gold, according to Tudor Jones’ research.
about 357.7 tonnes of gold before the purchase, which means that it has more than
doubled its holdings. However, our calculations (using the RBI’s annual report released in March this year and current prices for gold) show that gold reserves as a percentage of total reserves still remain relatively low at 8%, compared to key European central banks and the US which hold over 50% of their reserves in gold.
close at 1062. The metal has taken out our topside resistance at 1067
and 1070 triggering stop loss buying. The focus has returned to the topside
in Gold with measured target 1106. Look for support now back near
former resistance levels
USD weakness is, however, already prompting further currency discussion from policymakers overseas, as foreign currency strength is proving painful at the macro level. While initial comments were more out of the political side, we have been recently hearing more commentary from central bankers, including ECB officials.
Policymakers in commodity producing countries have been particularly vocal. Concerns over recent currency strength against the USD are starting to influence monetary policy decisions in Norway, Canada and New Zealand. This rhetoric also reflects our view that previous G10 foreign currency strength is laying the groundwork for its own demise because of the damage it does to those economies
The current formula is as follows: “the Committee…continues to ancitipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.” Translated from Fedspeak: the committee does not expect to raise interest rates from the current level of near zero for a period some officials define as at least six months, others as longer than this.
Unlike most analysts, I don’t think we can rule this out. But I do agree that the likelihood of a change this time is a good deal less than 50-50 – for two reasons: a) internal debate on this subject – which only recently got going – is lively and may not be ripe for resolution b) I believe that the Fed will prepare the ground for a statement change through speeches, testimony and/or minutes first in order to minimise the risk that it is misinterpreted by the market.
Allow me to elaborate – with the caveat that this post is based on my own evaluation and not any eleventh hour tip-off from chairman Bernanke (Trust me: that isn’t how it works).
Meanstream officials think the time has come when they need to start thinking about scaling back the “extended period” language. They worry that this implies a false degree of certainty as to their own expectations for the path of interest rates.
Mainstream officials do not expect to raise rates in the next six months, but think there is a chance they may have to do so. They do not want to be boxed in by their guidance and would like the statement to give a better sense of the range of possible outcomes and the way they would respond to different developments – ie their reaction function.
Jailed a-b glöbâl chief has shock new plans
Harry Kravis, one of KRR’s founding partners, is understood to be leading an acquisition team that has been working on a bid for at least three months. However, formal proposals have yet to be put to the a-b global board and sources close to the situation warned that an offer might yet fail to materialise
While a-b global has a presence in 30 countries, it is best known in Britain for the antics of its attention-seeking divisional chairman, Martin Lukes, whose enthusiastic promotion of a-b’s Integethics concept has drawn some scathing media coverage. Mr Lukes also found himself embroiled in a row with Greenpeace recently after shooting a polar bear while on a corporate team building exercise in the Arctic Circle.
Asked about the price move on Wednesday, a spokeswoman for the Financial Services Authority said she could not comment on individual companies, but added that all suspicious price movements were examined as a matter of course.
11:13 04Nov09 RTRS-EURO FALLS AROUND 20 TICKS VS DOLLAR TO $1.4740
11:18 04Nov09 RTRS-10-YR IRISH/GERMAN GOVT BOND YIELD SPREAD WIDENS 2 BPS TO 148 BPS AFTER FITCH DOWNGRADES IRELAND
11:25 04Nov09 RTRS-IRISH 5-YR CDS WIDENS TO 144.7 BPS FROM 142.4 BPS AFTER FITCH DOWNGRADES IRELAND – CMA DATAVISION
management changes on the same day that the UK government
has announced investments in its competitors. The reporting
structure after FY09 is unclear, and we are concerned about a loss
of visibility on the divisions. To allay fears, Barclays has issued
guidance that group PBT in 3Q09 was consistent with the run rate
in 1H09. The 3Q09 trading update is on 10 November. HOLD
Two new business groupings. A new Global Retail Banking division (GRB) has been created that will embrace UK Retail, Barclaycard, and the former GRCB Western Europe and Emerging Markets businesses after the FY09 results. It is the former Global Retail and Commercial Banking (GRCB) grouping minus Barclays Commercial Bank. GRB will be run by Anthony Jenkins, formerly head of Barclaycard. Frits Seegers, erstwhile head of GRCB, will leave.
and Investment Management) with the imminent loss of BGI is being recast as
Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) and Wealth, with the inclusion of Barclays
Commercial Bank (formerly in GRCB). The division within Barclays of a self-funding GRCB and wholesale dependent IBIM is undone further with the transfer of the Commercial Bank to add to Wealth and the corporate deposits in Barcap.
Reporting structure uncertain in 2010. After the FY09 results, there is no clarity on
how much detail within the two new groupings will be disclosed. There is a risk that
deteriorating trends within the UK bank and Barclaycard may become obscured in
2010. SME lending on businesses below £1m turnover is reported within Retail and
otherwise in the Commercial Bank. In addition, we forecast a small loss in 2010 in both Barclaycard and UK Retail, driven by higher impairments and rising unemployment.
We believe these forecasts are at the bottom of the consensus range.
Executive Committee expanded from three to 11, as heads of business and
function heads join. This is being billed by Barclays as a promotion of talent as well as recognition that regulation and risk management are taking a more prominent role in the business.
strengthening in the business has coincided with significant news from Lloyds and
RBS. However, to allay fears that these changes portend bad news at the upcoming
interim management statement, Barclays has included a one-line guide to 3Q09 that
group pre-tax profit was consistent with the run rate for 1H09.
7% downside to unchanged target price. Barclays will issue its 3Q09 trading update on 10 November. We maintain our HOLD rating in the meantime.
- Headline PBT of £298.3m compares with last year’s £297.8m (Caz estimate £286m, consensus per M&S £285m). As expected, the interim dividend has been reduced by 33% to 5.5p, in line with the reduction flagged with the final payment at the prelims.
- Sales performances have already been announced (GM lfl -1.6%, Food -0.2%). Gross margins were -30bps in GM (est: flat) and down by just 65bps (est: -220bps) in Food with better buying and lower wastage partially mitigating price investment. H1 opex rose by 0.4% pre the bonus provision. UK Retail EBIT fell from £318m to £299.1m (estimate: £293m) after a higher bonus provision that we would have expected at this stage of £30m.
- M&S is not changing its existing guidance on FY10 full year gross margins (-50bps to -100bps), which looks at odds with the better than expected performance in Food in H1, operating costs (flat to +1% pre bonus) or capex (£400m). However, given the interim PBT number and the bonus provision already taken together with the positive comments on October trading (Food as well as GM we understand), we are likely to upgrade our full year PBT estimate of £585m (EPS: 26.6p) to at least £630m (EPS: 28.6p).
- While we maintain a sceptical view of M&S’ fundamentals looking out into the medium term, sentiment is already negative with the shares having behaved poorly since the upgrades on the Q2 IMS and the Investor Day, and should be due a rally on the back of upgrades which we do not believe had been discounted.
- Next Directory sales are 5.1% ahead versus Next’s expectations of flat to +2% in H2 as a whole, with this guidance now revised to +4% to +6%.
- While the shares have recently held up better than a number of retail peers, in our view today’s update provides scope for further upside, with the PE (10.2x to January 2010E) on our revised numbers showing a material discount to the sector of around 25%. In this context the likelihood that Next may be on the verge of turning lfl positive for the first time in over four years could prove to be a watershed moment for the valuation.
property disposals) of £298mn vs our £291mn estimate and consensus of
£285mn. Fully diluted EPS was 13.7p compared to our 13.3p (-3% yoy) estimate.
Net debt was £2.4bn, below our £2.85bn forecast and DPS was 5.5p as
expected. M&S states that it has made a “good start to the third quarter” but
predictably remains cautious about the outlook for Christmas and the year ahead.
earnings stream going forward.
On pension M&S has stated that its deficit for accouting purposes was £521mn at
H1, up from £152mn at the full year, owing to an increase of £1bn in liabilities,
offset by an increase of £700mn in assets. M&S is not yet in a position to give an
update on the size of its pension deficit following its triannual actuarial review,
however we do not expect any onerous cash contributions – our model assumes a
£50mn cash contribution per year over the next 10 years.
Following these results we see £40-50mn upside risk to consensus PBT
estimates of £580mn. We view M&S’ valuation as attractive at these levels, as it
is trading at a 3% discount to the UK non-food retail sector, despite its size, asset
backing (property last valued at £3.6bn in the summer of 2004) and increasing
international exposure.
were +2.2% ahead of our -0.6% forecast, with LFL sales -1.3% vs. our -4.0%
estimate and Directory sales +5.1% vs. our -0.8% forecast. Given improved
consumer confidence among mid market shoppers and given Next’s stable
relative pricing, we thought our LFL sales estimate was likely to prove
conservative, and that buy side expectations were closer to flat, even so this is a
very strong performance.
PBT will increase by around £30m to circa £472m (BofAML current forecast
£447mn). This would represent an increase of 10% over last year’s profit of
£429mn, compared to its guidance given at the time of the half year results on
Sept 16 for PBT to be around the same level as last year. This comes from better
cost control and a less damaging FX impact than anticipated.
Prior to today, Next was trading on c.10.5x cal. 2010 P/E, a c.10% discount to the
UK General Retail sector average. Valuation looks particularly undemanding
relative to return on capital employed. However for us to generate meaningful
upside to our price objective Next would have to generate positive LFL sales
growth next year.
Nigeria continues to build Afren’s exploration inventory
in the Cretaceous play (alongside Cote d’Ivoire and
Ghana) – see reserve update overleaf. Following on
from the positive update on Ebok (Nigeria) appraisal and
development yesterday, confirmation of the proposed
admission to the LSE main board highlights the
momentum behind the growth story at Afren. Listing is
targeted for early December subject to approvals from
the UKLA and the LSE. We expect further colour with
the analyst presentation this afternoon. Maintain OW
announced a farm-in to Block OPL 310, offshore
western Nigeria with 70% effective working interest
alongside indigenous player Optimum Petroleum. The
block is adjacent to the Aje field which has recently been
declared commercial. We think the upfront commitment
from Afren is relatively small (c.US$3m), with a further
US$10m payment when the license converts and
subsequent US$4m at first oil. Seismic data for the area
has been acquired and a number of prospects identified,
albeit drilling is not planned until 2011 – in aggregate,
the company resource estimate for the block is 330mb
unrisked.
addition to applying understanding of the West Africa
Cretaceous play on blocks CI-01 (Cote d’Ivoire) and
Keta (Ghana), Afren highlight the additional potential
from block OPL 310 where a number of prospects in the
Cenonian and Turonian sandstone reservoirs (Upper
Cretaceous) have been identified and potentially
increase Afren’s exposure to this play.
Near-term catalysts: 1) Analyst presentation today at
3pm (UK time). 2) A further update on the drilling of the
deeper D2 and Qua Iboe sands at Ebok-5. 3) Post
completion on Ebok-5, the Adriatic IX rig will then move
on to the D2 Southern Lobe prospect with results
expected in December (unrisked c.6p/sh). 4) Publication
of the listing prospectus ahead of the move to the main
board in early December.
Demand/activity/reservation rates- summer did not see normal slowdown, and
reservations remained solid at 0.56 units per site per week vs 0.4 this time last
year and 0.65 in H1. Autumn has seen this continue.
Cancellation rates at 16% vs H1 at 19%.
Forward orderbook- fully sold for 2009, selling into next year. Stands at £1bn vs
£1.06bn this time last year.
ASPs have edged higher, c9% up y-o-y at £163,000, reflecting underlying price
improvemenst as well as mix changes.
active sites.
Still very little activity in the land market, but some liquidity coming back.
North America- continued to be stable and prices are flat vs H1 at $275k.
Selling rates flat vs h1 at 0.6 units per site per week.
Cause for optimism into next year.
Foreclosures still an issue but have not made any additional negative effect in H2,
while affordability described as good and inventories have continued to reduce.
Orderbook $0.95bn vs $1.21bn this time last year.
Net group debt was £860m (gearing of 54%) and indicates that y/e will be under
£800m, £100m lower than previous guidance.
Indicate that they do not expect further land provisions unless their is materialadverse change to main markets.
Our current forecasts as follows:
2009 PBT of -£111m and EPS of -3.8p.
2010 PBT of £5.5m and EPS of 0.1p
Happy to retain a BUY opinion, price target of 67p.
back of a mainly upbeat IMS from TW, a good 97% rights take-up from Redrow
(but slightly more circumspect IMS, rec: Hold) and a less-bad-than-anticipated
92% rights take-up from Barratt (Sell).
better than in same period in 2008″. Its own performance had been
“encouraging”.
The UK business is now fully sold for 2009 (normal at this time of year, in our
view). It is managing price rises due to the mix and underlying increases. The
£177k average price in the order book is higher than the £172k in our FY10E
estimates, but we believe this may be at the expense of lower volumes.
Transactions in the land market are “well below normal levels” and company is
“cautious on large scale land purchases”.
sale of the business. We believe the group should retain the US, but suspect
that the market wants a sale.
There is an analyst visit to Andover today. If the company reveals that a US sale
is unlikely in the short-term, there could be downward pressure on the shares.
We remain cautious on the sector, but as we stated in our 14 September sector
initiation, ‘Curb your enthusiasm’, we see short-term trading opportunities, and
after recent steep falls in the sector, stocks are arguably approaching interesting
levels.
The sell-off came despite Kraft reporting earnings of 55 cents per diluted share, exceeding the 48 cents that Wall Street analysts expected.
estimates now that Cadbury has clarified that sales force costs are not part
of marketing and selling expenses and are actually included in
administrative expenses (see note). We now project $1B in cost benefits
vs. $1.6B before (our number is not too far above the combined KFT
synergy estimate of $625M and VIA potential gains of $155M).
• We doubt KFT will go over 780p. In its 3Q call on Tuesday evening
KFT reminded investors of its four deal criteria: cash EPS accretion by
year 2, ROIC well ahead of WACC, able to keep investment grade, and
maintain dividend per share. We calculate that our above guidance cost
benefits assumptions would allow KFT to pay an extra 70-80p (on the base
offer currently worth 735p) and keep its IROIC target. We also argue the
company could increase the cash component of the offer to c70% (from
40% in the base offer) and end up with a still investment grade 3.5x net
debt/EBITDA on 2010 targets. Taking the low end of our fair valuation
range of 12-13x FV/EBITDA on our below guidance 2010 estimates (20-
30% discount to Mars deal) yields a 780p offer price (we used 12.5x
before). Such an offer with only a 30% stock component may be enough
Kraft and a weaker than expected sales performance. We continue to
advise investors to hold the stock as we expect they will realise c800p
either from the Kraft offer being formalised (probably hostile) or from
the standalone value if the approach is unsuccessful. Also provides
optionality into a counter offer.
the limit that it could afford (ie from 300p in the initial proposal to
440p). This would value an offer today at 867p, including the 3% fall in
the Kraft share price after hours (vs Dow Jones of -0.2%). We now see
this as less likely – assuming Kraft raises the cash component from
original proposal to mid way of our estimated limit (+70p to 370p),
would value an offer for Cadbury offer at 797p (current Cadbury share
price 777p).
* We would also highlight our last published standalone value for
Cadbury is 625p dated 11 September. However, applying WACC adjustments
consistent with those made across the sector and extrapolating the 2-3%
implied increase to FY numbers with the Cadbury IMS on 21 Oct, would
theoretically raise our standalone fair value for Cadbury to 777p (based
on a 10 year DCF, WACC of 8.9%).
* Following the “shock” of the Kraft approach, we believe that
Cadbury (as part of its defence to remain independent) is in a strong
position to push cost reduction measures (plant closure/ head count
reduction) more aggressively than the current guidance.
The US software company has refused to offer any concessions to European regulators to meet their concerns about the deal, according to one person close to the process. That has left Brussels close to issuing an official statement of objections, the first step on the path to blocking it, this person added.
The complaint could come within days, but there is still a chance that one side or the other will back down, according to observers in Brussels. Neither side commented yesterday.
The life and pensions company, which is seen as a potential target for Resolution, Clive Cowdery’s consolidation vehicle, said that keeping its annuity, protection and asset management businesses under one roof brought valuable “synergies” across all three.
Tim Breedon, chief executive, said that about 30 per cent of its new business either came from cross-selling or was business the company would not have won if it did not have all three elements.
Upgrading Target Price after positive Panmure sales meeting
Our confidence in Imagination’s prospects is increased following a meeting
with Panmure Sales. We gained further insight into the Meta processor core
and the Pure business, both of which have the potential to significantly
exceed our expectations. We upgrade our price target to 250p from 200p,
which would still represent reasonable revenue multiples compared with
ARM when it was in its high growth stage. Re-iterate Buy.
a key building block of its graphics, video and communications products and could is
becoming a product in its own right. There is significant potential to penetrate market
for applications processors for Android based devices. It appears licences have already
been sold for this type of application and it would be reasonable to expect a partner to
be shipping product within a 1.5-2 year timeframe
best Android phone to date and a worthy iPhone competitor) uses a TI OMAP with
Imagination graphics.
! From our discussion of the Pure business, we concluded its prospects are stronger than
we had previously believed. One of its leading customers has recently said that in the
UK, Pure is the 2nd most important audio brand after Apple. Another indicator of its
ability to penetrate new markets is evidence by that fact that Pure has built a 65% market
share in Switzerland for DAB radios.
value to Pure at this point and therefore if it continues to execute so well, this would
drive further upside.
! Imagination is in a stage of positive momentum. We believe newflow will continue to be
favourable and that will drive a premium rating. We upgrade our price target to 250p
from 200p. After stripping out the Pure business, the new target represents an
EV/Revenue of 11x FY10E and 8x FY11E. As a comparison, in the timeframe between
ARM’s IPO in 1998 and before the severe inflation of the tech bubble in 1999, ARM
traded at 10-15x revenue. We re-iterate our Buy recommendation
The board of directors wishes to announce that Mr Hugh Bevan has notified the Company that he has decided to resign as a director of the Company with immediate effect.
Hugh Bevan, a Chartered Accountant, joined the company in April 2002. Between 1987 and 2001 he worked for Robert Fleming and Jardine Fleming, subsequently acquired by JP Morgan Chase. During this time, he worked mainly in the Hong Kong and London offices on fundraising and advisory transactions. In 1997 he became Chief Operating Officer of Jardine Fleming’s Asian Corporate Finance business, and in 1999 returned from Hong Kong to London as Head of Equity Capital Markets Execution.
We believe the market has overreacted to ING’s restructuring plan. Assuming conservative
proceeds of 18bn for the insurance business, we estimate ING is trading at a discount of at least
8% to tangible book and less than 6x corrected normalised earnings. We raise our target price to
12 and upgrade to Buy.
Given that ING will have more than four years to sell ING Insurance, we believe it will be able to
get a good price. In our view, 60% of ING Insurance consists of attractive activities, such as the
CEE, Asian and Latin American activities, and the US excluding variable annuities. We estimate
ING Insurance will generate a normalised net profit of 2bn, excluding the cost of the core debt
and holding leverage, and we conservatively estimate the total divestment proceeds to be 18bn
(implying a sale multiple of 8.3x corrected normalised earnings over 2009). ING intends to use
the proceeds to redeem double leverage (7bn), core debt (3bn) and potentially the remaining
7.5bn government support + repayment penalty. We estimate that a sale of ING Insurance
would result in net proceeds of at least 0.5bn.
