Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:08 on 25 Sep 2009. Participants in this chat were: Neil Hume, FT (NH) Bryce Elder (BE)
A weak pound will lift the competitiveness of UK companies, thereby boosting their exports and supporting them in their domestic UK markets against imports. The beneficial impact of the weak pound for exporters will hopefully be reinforced over the coming months by improving domestic demand in key export markets. Particularly important for UK exporters the US and Eurozone economies appear to be returning to growth. Meanwhile, by making imports relatively more expensive, the weak pound should help UK companies to gain market share in their domestic markets from importers.
A weaker pound will make the UK more attractive as a tourist destination for foreign visitors. It could also encourage shopping breaks by foreigners. Meanwhile, people in the UK are more likely to take holidays or short breaks at home rather than go overseas, which will help spending in this country.
The UK will become cheaper and, therefore, relatively more attractive for overseas companies to invest in.
Hardest hit will be companies and retailers who source a significant amount of their supplies/products from overseas will be hit as they will be paying more in sterling terms
By pushing up import prices, a weak pound will have significant inflationary consequences. Inflation has already proved to be significantly stickier in coming down than elsewhere in Europe – with the weak pound clearly being a major factor. By pushing up inflation, a weak pound will hit people’s purchasing power and could lead the Bank of England having to raise interest rates sooner and more quickly than would otherwise be the case.
Were sterling to fall too far, too quickly, it could seriously undermine investor confidence in the UK
On balance, a weak pound will probably do more good than harm for the UK economy in its current position. But it is not a free lunch and considerable harm could occur if sterling falls too far, too quickly.
Frontier Miners, Developers & Explorers segment.
This is a segment for investors with a high-risk / highreward
investment profile. With only one of Coal of
Africa’s (CoAL) three mines in the ramp-up stage and
the other two in development, there are many steps still
between extracting the ore and selling it at market.
However, if these steps (operational and infrastructure)
are executed successfully, our bull case sees the stock
more than quadrupling vs. halving in our bear case. We
think this attractive risk-reward profile warrants an OW.
is dependent on project execution, we give full DCF
value for the project already in ramp-up (Mooiplaats)
and 50% of the NPV for the projects in development
(Vele and Makhado) to derive our price target of 150p.
Strategic location and key supplier relationships.
CoAL’s assets are in close proximity to its key potential
customers such as ArcelorMittal and South Africa’s
Eskom, which gives the company a competitive pricing
advantage over its peers as well as the opportunity to
secure earnings stability in the future through long-term
off-take agreements. ArcelorMittal’s 16% shareholding
provides additional credibility to the investment case.
Exposure to coking and thermal coal – our favored
commodities. Vele and Makhado are mainly coking
coal producing assets while Mooiplaats is a thermal coal
mine, thus rendering CoAL a pure South African coal
play (c80% coking).
profile. CoAL’s investment case is largely dependant on
the timely delivery of infrastructure projects that will
transport the mines’ output to seaport terminals for
export and on-time execution of the project pipeline.
Although agreements are in place for these
infrastructure developments, execution is ultimately out
of CoAL’s control.
which Dana has a 30% working interest is dry. This has now been confirmed by
Dana and we expect a press release to be issued by the company later this
morning. A statement on the NPD website confirms that drilling at this well in
Block 6609/10-2 offshore Norway has been concluded and that the well has been
plugged and abandoned.
Trolla prospect was one of the most material prospects within Dana’s near-term
drilling campaign representing c55% of our risked exploration value. The next
material prospect within Dana’s exploration portfolio is the Tornado prospect (59p
risked, 169p unrisked) in the West of Shetlands where drilling is set to commence
shortly.
our coverage universe…We have argued for some
time that DSGi shares could be worth 80p+ in a bull case
(if management delivers in full on its medium-term
recovery plan) but that a debt-holder control scenario
also remains plausible. Our view on this doesn’t change
today.
reasons:
1) We are concerned by the extent to which DSGi is
underperforming its main peers in the UK electricals
market. We believe that the most likely explanation
for this is poor instore availability. This report
summarises proprietary analysis conducted by
our AlphaWise colleagues, which we think
suggests Currys may have significant
availability issues at present.
as increasingly challenging. With Best Buy
preparing for a major assault, John Lewis planning a
new chain of out-of-town ‘Home’ stores, and
Comet’s repositioning continuing, the ‘service’ end
of the market is set to become very crowded.
we believe that DSGi offers investors more leveraged
upside into a consumer recovery than any other stock
we cover, the prospect of our Bull Case scenario playing
out looks increasingly remote to us. With DSGi shares
up c.50% in the last three months, we think investors
should be taking profits now. We retain our central case
fair value, but no longer apportion probability weightings
to our scenarios, so we no longer set a price target.
60%
such that products were reservable for immediate collection
only 60.5% of the time (ie in 39.5% of cases, the store tested
had less than three units of stock available of that line). This
average did not appear to be heavily distorted by lack of
availability on a group of slow-moving SKUs, nor by particularly
poor availability in a handful of stores2.
Worryingly, however, it did show considerable variability by
manufacturer, with many leading brands much lower than the
average (which was boosted by good availability on some
lesser-known brands).
Whether or not DSGi is able to improve availability before
‘Peak’ depends, in our view, on what is causing the problem. If
it is an operational issue (and the group is undergoing major
changes at the moment as part of its recovery plan) it is very
possible that availability could improve rapidly. There is a
possibility, however, that poor availability (and particularly the
variability shown in Exhibit 3) may be evidence that DSGi is
struggling to source enough inventory from some of its
suppliers. If that is the case then we think it unlikely that
availability levels will improve much this side of Christmas.
Indeed, in this scenario it could get significantly worse
11:31 25Sep09 RTRS-DSG
11:31 25Sep09 RTRS-DSG
11:15 25Sep09 RTRS-TURKEY’S GENEL ENERJI TAKING OVER “DAY TO DAY” OIL ACTIVITIES OF DNO IN IRAQ – KURDISTAN GOVERNMENT
since the March issue of the Global Outlook (“Green shoots have arrived”). The markets
have come a long way since then, and the question now is whether it is time to reduce
exposure. Our answer at this time is “not quite yet”.
corporate bonds may even have overshot somewhat, at least in some sectors. However, we
believe that a combination of surprisingly strong economic news and policy settings still at
“crisis” levels is a potent brew that will keep driving risky asset prices higher. While
economic recovery is now generally priced into markets, investors appear to be discounting
an unusually weak recovery in countries such as the US that have lagged the global
recovery. Yet the US is exhibiting all the characteristics of a classic, V-shaped economic
recovery – just as we have seen in most of Asia – that is typical following a severe recession.
that the global economic recovery will falter. Rather, we believe that it is the strength of the
recovery itself – or at least the recognition of it – that provides the greatest source of risk to
the continuation of the market rally. Once investors embrace that a “normal” recovery has
arrived, they will quickly conclude that the current “crisis” settings for policy – such as nearzero
interest rates – are no longer appropriate. That – along with the impending withdrawal
from direct purchases of duration by central banks – will drive interest rates higher and
make it much more difficult for stock and corporate bond prices to keep rising. In other
words, the good news that the patient has recovered will shift toward the more sobering
news that the bill has come due. That recognition – which is likely to be fostered by still
more positive surprises on the economic data front, especially in the US – will be the signal
to reduce exposure, and it could well come before the end of the year.
Trading update for 6m to 27 August
Ø Luminar has this morning updated on trading for its first half-year to 27 August – the trading environment is described as ‘difficult’ with high and rising levels of unemployment impacting the group’s customer base
Ø Following the group’s share placing in July, trading in September is said to have ‘worsened’
Ø Weekend admissions in particular are below the board’s expectations and overall sales (continuing business) fell by 5.9% in the first 26wks
Ø As they were minus 3.3% in the first 18wks this implies something like minus 11% for the last 8wks (though the late August Bank Holiday may pull this back to around minus 7.5%)
Ø Margins are lower than H1 last year but up on earlier this year – there is a ‘significant risk’ that the co will not hit this year’s estimates and we are cutting our 02/10 forecast from £16m to £12m (c11p of EPS and no DPS)
Ø The company is reviewing its carrying value for 3DE (in which it has a 49% stake) and is not likely to accrue interest on its loan note – Eminence Leisure (20% stake) is also considering a creditors voluntary liquidation
Ø July’s share placing (£35.7m) will insulate Luminar somewhat and it is likely to be outperforming its peers – furthermore, Christmas trade is critical
Trading clearly worsened in August and has worsened again in September. LfL sales are currently running >10% down and, though the group will be outperforming its competitors, shareholders will be understandably concerned as to the achievability of profit targets. 3DE is not trading well and the Eminence situation is unhelpful. The High Street is clearly a difficult place in which to do business and, though we acknowledge that Luminar is the most successful operator in its field, we are reiterating our SELL recommendation.
fundraising must raise questions about the growth
assumptions on which the money was raised, and for some
will cast doubt on the business model until recovery
begins to be seen. We reduce our target to 90p and rate the
shares a SELL
this and the company no longer accruing interest from 3DE, we are cutting our
forecasts by an average of 20%. This may prove over-cautious as the LFL sales and
gross margin comparatives should be easy in H2, but the trading outlook is very
unclear.
Trading has weakened at the weekends, undermined by higher youth unemployment and
distressed competitors discounting irresponsibly, during what is a quieter period of the
year. In H1, the weakness in LFL sales derived from drinks revenue (down 6.6% due to
lower drinks prices) rather than admission revenue (down 0.2%).
Forecasts. We are cutting our 2010E PBT forecast from £17.5m to £12.8m (EPS
10.9p) to now assume that:
n LFL sales fall by 6.5% in 2010E. In H1, LFL sales fell 4.5% versus a comparative of
-1.9%; our forecast assumes H2 LFL sales fall 8.5% versus a comparative of -7.5%.
forecast allows for 81.1% gross margins even though gross margins and prices are
increasing.
n The £1.7m pa interest income accrual from 3DE ceases from September 2009.
n There is no adjusted P&L impact and minimal exceptional exposure to Eminence
entering voluntary liquidation.
We have cut our 2011E PBT forecast from £20.5m to £16.8m (EPS 11.6p) to assume
-3% LFL sales and a slight improvement in gross margins and the initial benefits of
expansion.
Based on revised forecasts, we expect net debt:EBITDA to stabilise around 2.3x
(versus 3.0x covenant). We believe our 2010E downgrades may be over-cautious;
but possible reduced expansion is a risk to longer term growth. The 5.3x
EV/EBITDA (2010E) valuation is still lowly. As a well-capitalised, 40% freehold
operator Luminar should emerge as the last man standing in a sub-sector currently
falling in supply at 10.3% pa.
a capital value of £484psf, a 7.7% retail equivalent yield and a capital value of £603psf (our estimate).
We estimate the reported NAV of 33p translates into a proforma NAV of 1.27p. At this level, as we highlight above the
office net initial yield is 7.3% with a capital value of £517psf (our estimate), the retail equivalent yield is 7.2% with a
capital value of £644psf (our estimate
profits (£89.7m vs our forecast of £58m reflecting higher than expected profit recognition on pre sold
properties). Whilst the occupational market is clearly tough (ERV’s down 12% over the 6 months to £37.50psf),
Canary Wharf’s vacancy rate remains relatively low at 2.3% rising to c.6.9% post the Morgan Stanley lease
break and there is a limited amount of new space coming on stream. The office properties were valued off a
7.3% average net initial yield which has arguably moved in since then given investor appetite for well let long
leased properties
Therefore, as highlighted several weeks ago the company is also taking the opportunity to announce a
£1.03bn (of which £620m is ordinary equity) capital raise today. The proceeds will be used to repay the loan
as well as acquire an additional 8.5% stake in CWG to increase Songbird’s total holding in CWG to c.69.3%.
The net effect will be twofold; financial stability as well as a simplified shareholder structure with an increased
interest in CWG
Petrofac shares have witnessed superior performance YTD, up 186% versus 85%
for the sector. This has been driven by (1) its superior project execution,
(2) steady development of its oil & gas production portfolio, and (3) new contract
awards which doubled the backlog to over US$8bn (at 1H09). However, we
believe that the stock is at the stage that it is priced for perfection offering no room
for disappointment. We downgrade PFC to Underperform with a PO of 930p.
Following its exponential backlog build up, the key questions remain the
company’s ability (1) to continue to execute at a high level and (2) maintain above
par margins in the E&C segment at a time when competition has heightened and
contract terms and conditions (and importantly, contingencies) have tightened. At
a group level near term margins are set to benefit from the higher contribution
from the Energy Developments segment. However, post 2010 we factor in slight
margin deterioration in the remaining divisions.
We leave our 09-11E estimates unchanged. Although we continue to like
Petrofac’s strong position in the Middle East and its superior project execution, we
believe that the risk/reward is skewed to the downside. Our reverse SoP analysis
shows a stretched valuation. Stripping out the estimated NAV for the Energy
Developments (E&P arm) of 192p, the current share price puts the Service
segments (engineering plus operations) on 16.5x 2010E P/E, a c20% premium to
the sector average.
struggle to sustain the current level of production.
Current market valuations do not differentiate
companies on growth prospects, yet the Top230
winners (Shell, Statoil, BG) should benefit from
differentiated cash flow and production growth.
We believe there will be a strong energy demand recovery in 2010, consistent with our economists’ 4.1% global GDP growth
forecast. This should benefit the oil price and refining margins. However, we believe the best way to exploit these trends is through
oil price exposure, rather than refining: our analysis shows that refining overcapacity will likely take many years to be absorbed in
Western Europe, while OPEC spare capacity will be consumed much faster than expected. We are upgrading our coverage view of
refining from Cautious to Neutral, but still prefer the Integrated Oils and Oil Services sub-sectors as plays on demand recovery.
(Conviction Buy from Buy); CGG (Buy from Sell);
Subsea 7, Acergy, Soco, Motor Oil (Buy from
Neutral); Wood Group, Aker Solutions (Neutral
from Conviction Buy);Petrofac, Saras (Neutral
from Buy); Hellenic (Neutral from Sell); Prosafe
(Sell from Neutral).
Investigations into who or what ETAMIC is, however, have come up short with only an explanation that it is a private investment group based in the UAE. There is no further information on who its beneficial owners might be. Which has posed some scurrilous questions over whether ETAMIC might in fact be linked to Gulf Keystone directors.
What an extraordinary coincidence.
Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) — Cadbury Plc contacted the U.K.
Takeover Panel over “serious misrepresentation” of Chief
Executive Officer Todd Stitzer’s remarks at an investor
conference, according to spokesman Trevor Datson.
“We have proactively been in contact with the panel in
regards to some of the serious misrepesentation of Todd
Stitzer’s comments,” Datson said by phone, declining to
comment further.
The Financial Times reported earlier that the regulator was
examining the CEO’s remarks. A Reuters report of his discussions
at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch’s conference this week said he
discussed a fair value for his company, which has been
approached by Kraft Foods Inc. Merrill subsequently said Stitzer
hadn’t discussed a valuation for a Cadbury sale.
