Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:05 on 31 Jul 2009. Participants in this chat were: Paul Murphy (PM) Neil Hume, FT (NH)
failing that, Q4. However, at some stage, probably before the end of
the year, the anaemic nature of the recovery, so typical of bank crisis
resolution periods, will become apparent and the bear market rally
will stall.
‘normal’: this one is already the deepest since the 1930s.
Bank crisis recessions are also typically longer than ‘normal’, by three
quarters or so. This one officially started in the US in December 2007, so
an end some time in Q3 would constitute a six to seven quarter long
recession, a duration bang in-line with past bank crises.
opposed to ‘normal’ V-shaped ones, namely the extremely sluggish nature
and low trajectory of the recovery profile, should remain the base-case
scenario. It is debatable whether current market strength accurately
discounts that likelihood.
Stoxx 600 trades at 10.4x 2010 earnings. The market appears to be implying a 2.6% 5-year annualised earnings decline on normalized ERP.
On most measures we look at, valuations appear to be very attractive. On our top down earnings growth forecasts for 2010 (+34%), the market trades at little more than 10x earnings. Based on real trend earnings since 1973, the market trades on 9.5x or 11x ex-financials. On a cyclically adjusted Shiller multiple, the
market is on 11.8x 2010E compared with a long run average of 15x. Adjusting for inflation, the current multiple is the lowest since the 1970s.
Valuations relative to competing asset classes are also compelling. Even taking into account further sharp falls in dividends implied by the dividend swap market, the yield ratio is close to the lowest level in the UK
since the 1950s.
On GS DDM, the implied ERP has fallen to 5.7% and there is 91% potential upside to our estimate of equilibrium valuation assuming a normalized real bond yield and ERP – consistent with our view that the market could double by 2014. Using a 3% ERP implies the market is discounting -2.6% annualized earnings
growth over the next five years. Meanwhile the dividend swap market still implies a 45% fall in dividends from the 2007 peak with 2010 forecast dividend yield at 3.5%.
better than expected — The operating loss of £94m (-4.7% margin) was slightly
better than the £100m loss guidance. Net loss of £106m (9.6p/share) was
better than our expected net loss of £117m (10.1p/share).
expected, and will shortly be boosted by £350m convertible bond proceeds. All
capex to 2012 is pre-funded (with c.£3bn facilities) and general purpose
facilities amount to £460m. Ending net debt of £2.27bn beat our estimate of
£2.85bn and fell £114m from end March 2009 due to weaker US$ debt.
no visible signs of improvement, as expected. However, passenger volume and
load factor are expected to improve in the peak summer months. July traffic
data will be released next week on 5th August. We expect passenger traffic
(RPKs) for July to have risen by 0.5%, driven by a 1.5% fall in capacity (ASKs)
and a 2 point improvement in load factor, but we expect the -15% premium
traffic decline to have continued. Yield outlook is uncertain. Despite media
attention to swine ‘flu, travel volume does not appear to be affected so far.
could catalyse the shares (in either direction) remain: i) ongoing
pay/productivity negotiations; ii) pension deficit; iii) American Airlines JV antitrust
approval; iv) Iberia merger. There may be some colour on these issues on
today’s call (2pm UK time) but we doubt management will give much away.
and M & A
We estimate BA trades on a FY03/10E EV/IC multiple of 0.29x. We think the
current trough valuation (35% discount to historic average) reflects the low point
in the industry cycle and does not discount benefits from further capacity
reductions, economic stabilisation and cost savings. M & A-related synergies
would be a further positive if deals (e.g BA/AA) are agreed/approved.
We are updating our estimates to reflect the new divisional proforma
numbers released last week. Our forecasts do not change materially as the
main differences were reclassifications of line items. However, we have
pushed back the £15.6 bn B shares equity injection from 1H09 to 2H09; this
changes our reported 1H09 tangible book value per share from 105p to
100p and Equity Tier 1 ratio from 11.5% to 6.2% (we expect profroma
Equity Tier 1 to remain at 11.5% while trough TBVPS increases 1p to 88p).
There is no impact on our assumptions on GAPS losses in 1H09 as the
assets will be priced as of December 31, 2008.
Lloyds is reporting their 2009 interim results Wednesday, August 5. We
expect focus to be on: (1) the outlook for credit quality and net interest
income. We expect Lloyds to report lower loan losses in 2H09 vs. 1H, but
net interest income to continue to decline in 2H09; (2) the progress being
made on finalizing the terms of the governments asset protection scheme
(GAPS); and (3) earnings capacity of the group, with a focus on funding
structure, losses on non-GAPS assets and balance sheet size “post
restructuring”.
Our 12-month price target remains 107p and is calculated using 2011E
ROTE, COE and trough TBV. Lloyds is currently trading on 5.7x 2011E EPS
and 0.86x TBV. This compares to the large cap European banks which are
trading on 8.5x and 1.2x respectively. We maintain our Conviction Buy due
to Lloyds attractive valuation, strong downside protection and potential to
benefit from structural changes in the UK banking market.
The partly state-owned banks, LBG and RBS, have rallied in recent weeks
reflecting previous underperformance and optimism on long-term earnings.
We remain very cautious in this regard. APS clearly has the potential to provide
one or two years of solid earnings once the Government starts to make
insurance payments, but this is likely to be short lived as APS assets begin to
refinance and move back onto bank balance sheets. Associated impairment
charges will likely rise (particularly if the accounting has moved to through the
cycle) and risk weighted assets could increase sharply (as loans move from
10% of normal weighting to 100% of normal weighting)
Right now though, our bigger concern remains margin where we think there
is scope for a big negative surprise, particularly in the second half of the year.
While new asset margins have widened, what is important is the yield on stock.
We suspect this is improving only slowly
trusts show an improvement in yield, net of swaps, of just 10-15bps so far
this year, and while this is likely to underplay the improvement, we expect an
increase of only 30-40bps. That’s around £2bn extra revenue for the domestic
banks against deposit income of £12bn and additional wholesale funding costs
of £2bn, on our numbers. More stability in margins should be seen next year,
but we expect further declines in net interest income across the sector.
– particularly at LBG – could be far too high. Some might argue this is
cyclical. We don’t, and think banks with structural imbalances are likely to suffer
notable, secular deterioration in margin. In this regard it is worth considering the
Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s decision to enforce a “core funding ratio” of
at least 75% on local banks. Disclosure hampers comparisons, but we believe
LBG is nearer 64% and 50% excluding Government sponsored funding. Getting
to 75% would require a dramatic and expensive repositioning of the balance
sheet costing £3-4bn per annum of LBG’s net interest income, on our estimates.
With interim results next week, we also publish our half year forecasts for the
five banks in this research. We don’t expect any major surprises, but do expect
margin to be a key focus. Combined with potential pressures on NAV from
pension fund deficits and currency moves, and with both LBG and RBS trading
at 1.4 times 2010E TNAV, we reiterate our Underperform ratings on both
– particularly at LBG – could be far too high
The Department of Finance last night published draft legislation detailing the
functioning of the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA). The draft bill
contains detail on the valuation method to be applied to transferred assets,
however, there is little in the document enabling us to draw further conclusions
on the level of haircuts that will be applied. Therefore, from an equity market
standpoint, we see little in this draft bill to advance the debate. We think more
clarity will follow publication of the final bill in September. Consequently, we
maintain our base-case assumption that AIB and BoI will transfer loans totalling
€28.0bn and €18.1bn at discounts of 18% and 15%, respectively. We retain our
Market Perform recommendations on both Allied Irish Banks (ALBK ID, €1.74,
TP €1.90) and Bank of Ireland (BKIR ID, €1.86, TP €1.60).
referenced to their current market value, with an adjustment where necessary to their
long-term economic value, “a value that it can reasonably be expected to attain in a
stable financial system when current crisis conditions are ameliorated”. More detail
on how the long-term economic value is reached will be published in September,
which may provide us with further clues as to the level of haircuts to be applied. This
process is consistent with existing EU Commission guidelines.
Appeal process. The draft bill provides an appeal process for the banks with regard to
the acquisition values applied by NAMA. Any adjustment in favour of the banks
would however be predicated on approval from both the valuation panel and the
Minister of Finance. Even then, an adjustment would only take place in a case where
the current market value was above the original acquisition value.
Timeline. The formal publication of the bill is due in September. Following this, the
Dail will return on 16 September to discuss the bill in the context of a wider debate on
the future of the financial sector. In the intervening period, the European Commission
will be consulted with relation to State Aid approval. Following enactment of the bill,
it is expected that asset transfers to NAMA will begin later this year, starting with the
loans of the largest borrowers.
for an arrangement whereby the banks continue to service transferred loans (e.g.
management, administration, restructuring and enforcement services) in return for an
appropriate fee. Payment may take the form of an adjustment to the acquisition value,
performance fees or via profit-sharing schemes.
No decision taken on tax relief. The issue of setting off tax against losses on
transferred assets will be addressed upon publication of the Bill in September. We
currently assume full tax-deductibility on these losses (see ‘The Waiting Game’, 5 July,
2009, for further details).
an outing…
favourite for this – CRIME SCENE at 10/3 – but hey we got there
first! While foolish not to follow a previous good return & with
Frankie taking the ride, I am hoping to bring another longish shot
home – INDIAN DAYS 11/1, proven over this distance and though
disadvantaged by low drawer (this track favours high draws) looks a
good EW chance. Out of respect I’ve Crime Scene on the nose and
have also done a FC.
2:45 Wide open sprint here so have done something completely daft:
trained and ridden by Anne Stokell at 12/1 PAWAN – though last couple
runs disappointing has the ability to surprise, but more a place than
win option. And if you want to be dafter, couple him with last time
winner SPIRIT OF SHARJAH 10/1trained by Miss Feilden – so am really
going out a limb for the ladies, (don’t have Murphy’s yellow
triangles but there’d be 3 of them here!)
favourite CLOUDY START @ 7/1 and 2006 winner of this SPECTAIT @ 9/1 –
and both high (well) drawn for this track. So if I were playing safe
it would be one of these two – but I’m not! Sticking with one I
followed couple of weeks ago HUZZAH, creditable 4th in classy field
at Sandown and 6lb better off here so have gone EW at 18/1 and a
Tricast too.
So a little bravery (and madness) required to follow me today!
And an early one for Saturday:
3:05 our last time winner BARSHIBA quoted at tens … I will follow
her again and hope she can make it pillar to post once more.
Will try and send update on the rest of Saturday but obviously not on
Markets Live.
Shrewdette
Pradesh, which accounts for one-third of India’s sugarcane production, declared drought in 47 of 70 districts, raising the possibility of steep downward revisions to India’s production outlook in 2009/10.
Meanwhile, heavy rains in Brazil’s Center-South region are hampering the crush, and
could mean lower sucrose content and reduced sugar production going forward
In Brazil meanwhile, the YoY increase in the Center-South crush has faded. From April 1 through July 16 the crush is up 19%, but in the first half of July alone the crush was down 4.6% YoY.
Similarly with respect to Brazil, we were already on the conservative side with an assumption of 43% of cane going to sugar. Given recent developments, this looks about right. Heavy rains earlier in the season will reduce sucrose content in the cane, and the soggy ground hampers harvesting machines. El Niño can often result in heavy rains at the end of the harvest, posing another downside risk to the production outlook.
CFTC data indicate that specs are buying sugar again. It is risky to come to the party this late, but the growing open interest in March 2011 $0.30/lb calls indicates just how high hopes are running.
New copper discoveries at Los Sulfatos (1.2bt resources at 1.6% – 17.5mt of contained copper) and San Enrique (900mt at 0.8% – 7.2mt of contained copper), both within the Los Broncos district were an exciting development. Both discoveries are separate satellite deposits and confirm the prospectivity of Anglo’s tenements in the region.The two discoveries add approximately 50% to the group’s copper resources and will add expansion optionality within the base metals division.
Still no commentary on the Xstrata offer, clearly management have taken the decision to let the numbers do the talking. The announcement of additional resources within their copper division should help to bolster their stocks in the eyes of the market.
Cost savings – in line
The group delivered $450m of cost and efficiency savings in the first half and is on target for $1b in savings by the end of the year and $2b by 2011. This is in line with our forecasts.
While there were no further details on capex spend, permitting is progressing in line with management expectations. First production is aimed for Q2 2012, with a ramp up to 26.5mtpa, and phase two beyond that to 80mtpa.
Tarmac – imminent sales unlikely
Speculation surrounding the potential sale of the company’s tarmac division was not entirely put to rest – although an imminent sale is unlikely. While re-affirming that the division is non-core, the company re-stated that it is unlikely to sell at valuations in the current environment.
Results by division
Base metals was the standout performer amongst the divisions yet to report, although the majority of the differential between our estimate was a $243m provisional pricing adjustment. The coal division was also strong, although industrial minerals underperformed.
Cynthia Carroll is doing to unlock the undoubted value inherent in the stock. A number of action points have been
highlighted in the statement, which are helpful but in terms of sentiment the analyst meeting will be even more
important. Cynthia Carroll’s job is under scrutiny, despite the fact that she has taken the hard but necessary actions.
The Xstrata situation and the arrival of Sir John Parker should act as a catalyst to unlock further value, which on a
SOTP basis still has good upside. BUY AngloAmerican with a TP of 2,200p
expectations. Operating profit of US$2.1bn vs expectations of US$1.9bn. BUT the real focus was on what the
management and the Group is going to present to prove that they are on track. The analyst meeting will be quite
important in that context in terms of sentiment;
larger high quality projects and health and safety is concerned. We would also highlight the options around
Tarmac, DeBeers and AngloPlatinum
hard route of cutting the dividend and costs rather than doing it the easy way by tapping shareholders; and
discount even on some quite conservative assumptions. At the same time when assuming a 60% trough to peak
rebound in commodity prices then the stock still looks reasonable value at around 11x P/E. Our target price of
2,200p therefore seems in reach
With structural considerations still pointing clearly to a weaker JPY, we
think the opportunity for notable JPY weakness is the best it has been all
year. We recommend clients consider being long USD/JPY with a target above
105.
Our basic view has been that the JPY belongs at weaker levels and the main
structural reasons on that front are if anything even clearer now than
earlier in the year. JPY remains two standard deviations expensive on
GSDEER (currently around 115), financial conditions in Japan are too tight
(and have continued to tighten) and the Broad Balance of Payments (BBOP)
is in large deficit – to the tune of 6.7% of GDP on a 12-mth ma – on the
combination of a weaker trade balance and significant portfolio outflows.
responded to these dynamics. The first reason is rate (and growth)
differentials. With US and Japanese policy rates both firmly anchored
around zero, rate differentials have been extraordinarily narrow. And even
as the US and global economy has stabilized, the notion that tightening is
not imminent in either country has left short-dated rate differentials at
historically low levels. Not only has this left the US as an alternative
funding currency within FX, but it has made it less costly (in a carry
sense) than it has been in a very long time for Japanese exporters and
life insurers to hedge against a stronger JPY. The second reason is that
speculative positioning has generally been substantially short JPY since
March, as our Sentiment Index has clearly shown.
likely to see clearer evidence that US growth has shifted more positively
as the inventory adjustment goes through. And we also think we are likely
to see more evidence that the US labour market is stabilising, an area
that remains high on the market’s concerns about the US recovery. While
our view is that the Fed will not hike rates either this year or next, the
last two months have already seen the market speculate more concretely
about eventual tightening and build a risk premium against it. We think
the data in the next couple of months are likely to reinforce the focus on
the improving US growth picture.
weakness but at the current levels we are closer to the bottom of our
dollar forecasts and the pace of dollar depreciation may be slower in the
months ahead exactly due to the dynamics described here. A more stable
dollar coupled with clearer evidence for a more positive shift in US
growth will also increase the reluctance to hedge.
At the same time, speculative positioning is now back to neutral levels
for the first time since early April after having been stretched short in
the meantime, according to our Sentiment Index.
There is some risk that with a US tightening cycle a long way off, this is
(still) too early for USD/JPY to move back to where we think it belongs.
But with the downside in our view relatively limited, lighter positioning
and some identifiable cyclical catalysts, we think the risk-reward is more
attractive than it has been for some time.
As the highest beta market in GEM (on a 52-week basis) the magnitude of the swings in the Russian RTS index performance are highly amplified as regional equity markets are buffeted between a mixture of economic news-some showing nascent evidence of a recovery in economic activity while others point towards a more protracted slowdown with the potential for a second downturn in global growth-with resulting swings in risk appetite.
1. Russia is more than ever a pure oil play and we are cautious on the crude price-principally on concerns over protracted levels of spare capacity.
2. The earnings revisions recovery led by energy will now stall in our view.
3. All hopes for metals demand are pinned on the (now consensus) bullish growth scenario for China. China may begin to tighten loan quotas in 2H09.
4. Green shoots are difficult to come by in the domestic economic recovery.
5. Challenges facing the banking sector will result in a protracted decline in profitability. We are concerned about (i) policy response, (ii) the loan to deposit ratio remaining far too high, and (iii) the risk of defaults.
6. As we expected Russia is proving not to be a disinflation trade.
8. Equity risk appetite has reaccelerated close to the ‘Euphoria’ zone.
9. Russia is now over-owned again by pan-emerging market equity funds.
10. Credit Suisse analysts forecast market capitalisation weighted downside of 24% for MSCI Russia.
In absolute terms, Russia is currently trading on a 12-month forward sector-adjusted earnings multiple of 12.2 times-at a premium to the January 2006 to June 2008 average multiple of 12.0 times. Relative to pan emerging markets on a sector-adjusted basis, Russia is only trading at a 12% discount.
Only LUKOIL and Rosneft (our only two EMEA focus list constituent names from Russia) among the blue-chip names have meaningful positive potential upside to Credit Suisse target prices of circa 20%
The Directors will continue to provide updates regarding discussions with their lenders as and when there are material developments.
This is negative for Man as its key fund, AHL, has 30% of its portfolio in commodities. The risk of less extreme price trends in commodities, and
therefore lower investment performance at AHL, has resulted in our FY10 EPS estimate falling 16% to 26c (20% below consensus). We are
downgrading Man to Sell, from Neutral
headwind facing Man Group. Given the strong correlation between recent trends in the oil price and AHL’s investment performance, any reduction in
price spikes could hit AHL’s future performance. This is a significant potential headwind as we estimate that AHL generates over 75% of Man’s PBT.
FY10E EPS cut by 16% to 26c The risk of lower investment returns from AHL has resulted in our FY10E EPS falling by 16% to 26c. This is 20%
below the current consensus of 32.5c.
now trading on a Cal 2010E EV/EBITDA of 8 times, in-line with the alternative asset managers. We believe Man deserves a discount to peers given
the headwinds it faces (incl regulatory risks, weak investment performance, and net fund outflows). Our SOTP target price of 245p is 16% below
current price. Sell.
We do, however, believe that valuations have moved a little ahead of events and are looking back to past victories rather than future challenges. In our view the sector faces little in the way of positive catalysts ahead of the autumn selling season to sustain the recent strong outperformance and one has to weigh that against what one may have to lose in the mean time.
The number of intermodal containers hauled on US railroads in the week ending Jul 25 (162,799) was the highest since early January.
Intermodal containers are used for shipping manufactured items (as well as some agricultural products) so haulage data is the best real-time proxy for activity in the manufacturing sector.
While the data on containers hauled shows strong seasonal variations, and is typically high in the weeks following the Jul 4 holiday, the rebound this year has been stronger than in either Jul 2008 or Jul 2007, giving perhaps an early indication that manufacturing production has started to stabilise and perhaps even increase.
Shipments of metals and products, waste and scrap, and coal are all showing signs of strength. Other sectors, such as chemicals, petroleum products, and coke, freight shipments appear to have stabilised.
If this proves correct, it would be consistent with expectations the US economy would hit a cyclical trough at some point during Q3 (Jul-Sep) and evidence from the Institute of Supply Management (ISM)’s manufacturing survey, which has shown declines in activity becoming less widespread, in a clear sign that the trough may be near.
