Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:05 on 30 Jul 2008. Participants in this chat were: Bryce Elder (BE) Neil Hume (NH)
Profit crash rocks banks
Hugo Duncan and Simon English
30.07.08
Britain’s banks were rocked today when Lloyds TSB reported a plunge in profits of £1.4billion – a 70 per cent fall.
The result was far worse than a pessimistic City was expecting and raised fears for high street rivals.
HBOS, which owns Halifax, reports tomorrow and Alliance & Leicester the day after.
Lloyds TSB blamed the global credit crunch and losses in its insurance business. The figures will heighten government fears that more small banks could collapse such as Northern Rock. Lloyds was regarded as the most conservative of the big banks and had won praise for resisting the temptation to make risky loans during the boom years.
Lloyds said it expected house prices to fall by up to 15 per cent this year, which would push tens of thousands of people into negative equity.
Banks have come under fire from consumer groups for squeezing customers with high charges as they themselves struggle with the downturn. Critics of the industry say not enough banking bosses have accepted responsibility for their failures by resigning.
Lloyds TSB chief executive Eric Daniels warned that the British economy was facing a sharp slowdown in the coming months, and will grow by only
1.6 per cent this year – far lower than Treasury estimates of two per cent.
He said the crisis in the financial markets and falling house prices “have impacted consumer confidence and contributed to lower growth” in Britain in the last six months.
Mr Daniels insisted that Lloyds TSB will continue to deliver a strong operating and financial performance”.
Lloyds TSB made £599 million in the six months to June, down from almost £2 billion a year ago. The bank said its underlying performance reflected good “momentum”.
But the City is now fearful of the future prospects for the company. Simon Pilkington, an analyst at Cazenove, said: “The dividend is unsustainable. We perceive a long-term challenge to the group’s capital position.” Bank shares across the world have collapsed this year in the wake of the credit crunch.
This morning Lloyds TSB fell 15p to 306p. It insisted it will not have to raise fresh cash from investors unlike rivals. Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays and HBOS have all been forced to raise billions of pounds to shore up balance sheets.
and growth will be harder as the UK macro slows further, the 2% interim
dividend hike signals LLOY’s intention to trade through this credit crunch.
Underlying PBT of £1.57bn was down 19% yoy and underlying EPS of 19.6p was down 24% yoy; both were 10% below our forecasts. The interim dividend has been raised by 2%, confounding expectations (not ours) of a cut.
Gross customer loans grew by 9.4% in 1H08 and were up 14.7% yoy, driven in particular by £16.8bn of gross new mortgage lending (£7.3bn net of redemptions). This gave them an 11.3% share of gross new mortgage lending and a 24.4% share of net new mortgage lending in 1H08.
The lower-margin mortgages had a mix effect on overall Banking
Margins, which were flat half-on-half at 2.82%.
The overall impairment charge of £1,099m was up 31% yoy and up 15% hoh; credit
quality trends are deteriorating in both Retail and Wholesale, and we expect this will
accelerate through 2009.
So where does this leave us? We will review our 2008 EPS forecast of 41.7p, but our
forecast of 32.6p for 2009 looks about right. Maintain Hold.
c3% represents the pro-cyclical impact of falling house prices under Basel II. A
combination of faster balance sheet growth and higher than expected credit
market losses and insurance volatility resulted in an Equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.2%,
60bp below our forecast. Although not especially weak we would have
preferred to see Lloyds TSB strengthening its capital position at this point in
the cycle. While the dividend has been increased, growth has slowed to 2% in
1H08 (CIR 5%) reflecting the deteriorating economic outlook
enough to increase the dividend in such uncertain times; our forecast was for a flat
dividend. However, fortune does not always favour the brave – with the shares
yielding 11.2%, it is clear that the market has severe doubts about the sustainability of
the dividend – rightly so. In our core macro scenario, which is for the UK to flirt with
recession, the dividend will be uncovered on a statutory basis in 2008, with cover
improving to 1.5x in 2010e. In this scenario, we think Lloyds TSB can squeak through
without a dividend cut. Of course in a 1990s macro scenario, the dividend is toast.
The dividend decision reflects a robust operating performance in the first half of 2008
– subject to a raft of headwinds in the second half of 2008 and beyond. Equity Tier 1
tumbled to 6.2%, which includes a 2.6% “double counting” benefit from the embedded
value sitting in the life business. Half of the double counting will be eliminated from
2012 – bringing forward that adjustment takes Lloyds TSB’s core Tier 1 to 4.9%.
Scope for confusion? Stripping out GBP585m of toxic waste write-downs (GBP387m
already owned up to in the Interim Management Statement for Q1 2008), GBP505m
negative investment variance/GBP289m policyholder interests in its long-term savings
business, and a GBP180m terrorism-related charge (already disclosed), Lloyds TSB
reported an 11% increase in underlying underlying PBT.
We continue to recommend a switch into RBS or HBOS (or our third pick Barclays).
Admiral
(ADM.LN, 825p, Outperform, Target: 1315p)
1H08 results – beating consensus
Admiral reported its 1H08 results, with pre-tax profits up 16% YoY to
£100.3mn, beating KBWe and consensus of £95.8mn and £95.5mn, respectively. A
key driver of the beat was the underwriting result of £20mn (KBWe £17.3mn),
which was driven by a better-than-expected combined ratio of 85.8%, supported
by a reserve release of £18.4mn that positively contributed 24 percentage points
to the combined ratio. 1H08 net profit increased 19% YoY to £71.9mn vs. KBWe
of £67.1mn. This meant that Admiral increased its dividend per share by 26%
YoY to 26p, equivalent to a payout ratio of 95%. Management maintains its
dividend policy to only retain what funds the business needs to provide prudent
contingency and support its plans for growth. We believe Admiral is
well-positioned for an expected upturn in the UK motor market pricing cycle and
we have an Outperform recommendation on the stock.
Bullish investment case. The stock is not expensive in our view and is believed to be
well placed to benefit from a forecast pricing cycle upturn in the UK retail motor
market. Confused.com is expected to be a long-term winner in an anticipated
consolidation phase in the internet price comparison site market. The stock uniquely
has very very limited balance sheet risk and should produce growth despite the current
economic turmoil.
Positive comments on UK motor market. The pure year combined ratio deteriorated
to 109.6% (KBWe 108.2%) for all business. But this was due to the expense ratio
increasing to 20.8%, which primarily reflects the mathematical result of increased
premium retention in 2008. A positive result was the improvement in the pure loss
ratio to 88.8% (KBWe 89.7%) vs. 90.3% in 1H07. Comments from management on
the recent rises in market premiums and a relatively benign claims experience over the
last 18 months mean that Admiral is seeing, for the first time in seven years, a real
prospect of falling underlying loss ratios in its UK business.
UK underwriting drives profits. A 1H08 combined ratio of 80.1% vs. 88.7% in
1H07 in the UK is driven by an 11 percentage point reduction in the loss ratio.
Reserve releases of £18.4mn positively impacted the loss ratio by 25% in the UK.
While there has been no change to Admiral’s prudent reserving strategy in 2008. An
increase in the UK expense ratio primarily reflects the mathematical result of
increased premium retention to 22.5% from 27.5% in 2008.
Low premium rate growth benefits policy number growth. Admiral put through
c3% YoY rate increases in the UK, which, according to management, is 2-3
percentage points lower than the overall market. Admiral did not match the substantial
price increases in the market that occurred in 2Q08, which management believes
contributed to the robust growth in vehicle count in 1H08.
saw revenues increase 7% YoY and a record number of quotes in 1H08. However,
operating profits fell -21% to £15.6mn due to increased marketing spend as Confused
continues to defend its position in this market. We expect Confused to be a long-term
winner in the price comparison market.
Ancillary profits unaffected by economic conditions. Concerns over the sensitivity
of ancillary profits to the economy appear unjustified as ancillary revenue per vehicle
reached £71 in 1H08 compared to £68 in 1H07. This increased ancillary operating
profit by over 20% YoY to £45.5mn.
International expansion continues. Policyholder numbers in Europe have reached
60k and 10k in Spain and Germany, respectively. And Admiral’s Italian operation was
launched on-time and under-budget in May this year.
Reinsurance and quota-share agreements. Admiral increased its retention of UK
motor premiums to 27.5% in 2008 from 22.5% in 2007, which will be maintained at
this level for 2009. New arrangements have been finalised for 2010 and 2011, with
Admiral having to retain a minimum 25% of premiums, but also having the option to
increase its retention level by 5% each year from the 27.5% base of 2009, i.e. the
maximum retention level for Admiral in 2010 and 2011 is 32.5% and 37.5%,
respectively.
Cycle Turning
Earnings Better than Expected — At £100m, Admiral’s H108 profits were better
than our £96m forecast. We would expect consensus profits for 2008 to rise
over £200m, setting the stock on 15x. A pay-out ratio at the full year similar to
H108 (95%) implies a dividend of 52p, giving a yield of 6.3%.
Mix Issues — Confused.com, which had made £20m in H107 and £17m in
H207, came in with £16m in H108. While revenues are still rising (6%), the ad
spend to generate quotes is also up, reflecting increased competition. There
are few signs that the war is abating. The shortfall here was more than made
up by higher reserve releases/ profit commissions as the back years developed
still better than predicted (a £6m difference versus our forecast).
Pricing Cycle Issues — Industry data (from the AA and Deloitte’s) pointing to a
6% Y-on-Y increase in rates has yet to be reflected in Admiral’s experience
(+3%). The group has used the jump in market rates in Q208 to increase
volume (UK vehicles up 7% in H108). Management sees real prospects for a
market turn now and, combined with benign claims, an improvement in U/W.
Re-think on Underwriting Stamp — The group has re-thought its policy. It is
now intending to continue ceding two-thirds or more of the business – not
because it is less confident on the cycle but because lucrative new reinsurance
terms mean it has a similar earnings opportunity at lower risk.
Ancillary Income Flourishes — UK Ancillary income/ policy rose from £69 at
December to £71 now, lifting profit by 19% to £44m. There are no signs of a
recessionary squeeze. Spain is beginning to show some form – rising volumes,
falling loss ratio and ancillary income already at £59 per policy.
Remaining Positive — The shares have trod water for 18 months waiting for a
cycle turn to provide greater earnings impetus – this is now at hand.
1. Lead prices have bounced 45% off the bottom. Zinc is up 10% from the bottom. Nickel remains weak but copper and Aluminium remain resilient.
2. The equities have sharply de-rated to p/e’s of 5-6x ’09.
3. Concerns on downgrades due to rsing costs are diminishing as stronger top line offsets higher costs. Bodes well fro reporting season.
4. China macro shift more toward growth concerns than curtailing inflation is helpful. Good costs performance form Vedanta today.
5. As world falls apart elseweehere (MER), all those that jumped wisely off the mining wagon a few months ago might find themselves wanting to climb back on now as risk/reward has swung firmly in the other direction as valuations look very cheap again.
downgrading our ’08 EPS by 7% to $6.35 per share to reflect a $150 per
ounce cut in our platinum estimate to $1,850 per ounce. Platinum represents
some 28% to Anglo’s EBIT and has suffered ETF liquidation and concerns of
weak automotive demand. Despite a lower than expected contribution from
AngloPlats, we expect group EBIT will rise 9% YoY to $5.94 billion in the 1st
half, helped by a weaker rand and strong results in Coal and Ferrous.
implies a PE of just 8.8X. Even on a worst case scenario assuming platinum
averages $1,600 per ounce and copper drops to $3 per pound the group is
still on track to deliver $6.26 in 2009 (current forecast $7.08) as higher iron
ore, coal and manganese contract prices begin to hit the bottom line. In short,
trough earnings look robust, illustrating the benefits of diversification.
building by the day and the industry continues to suffer production misses
like those from Escondida, Freeport and Codelco last week. Coal prices are
firming again and iron ore settlements for ’09 could beat our current +20%
forecast.
Valuation: Anglos is trading on trough ’08 earnings of just 8.8X and the
recent bounce is just the beginning of a more sustained rally.
PGM price forecasts fall on weaker demand
We are revising our commodity price forecasts to take into account
weakening global demand for PGM products. We continue to expect
platinum prices to increase through 2009 from current spot levels, but
acknowledge that significantly weaker demand for platinum jewellery
products will likely lead to looser platinum markets than we had previously
forecast. Our platinum price forecasts fall to $1,907/oz and $1,963/oz from
$2,107/oz and $2,300/oz for 2008 and 2009 respectively.
Earnings and price targets fall on lower revenues
We are adjusting our earnings forecasts to take account of our PGM price
revisions, and updating our cost assumptions following Anglo Platinum’s
1H08 results. As a result we downgrade our earnings estimates and price
targets for Anglo Platinum, Impala and Lonmin. We retain our sector
relative Neutral ratings for all three stocks.
Upcoming sector catalysts
Updates to 2008 and 2009 production guidance from Lonmin and Impala
during their upcoming results presentations (August 7 and 28 respectively)
will be important for PGM prices and platinum share price performance. In
addition, news flow regarding the ability of companies to develop new
mines within the context of limited power supply will likely direct PGM
price sentiment in the medium term.
The Marquis Estate is the largest private estate in St. Lucia and is located on the North East of the island. Situated 15 minutes from the Capital City of Castries, this 600-acre site will comprise three 5-Star hotels, a marina, two signature golf courses, a world class casino, luxury spa & fitness centre, conference & business suites, numerous gourmet restaurants, equestrian, polo, cricket, football and tennis academies and state-of-the-art medical facilities.
St. Lucia has a stable economic and political environment with a high probability of price appreciation over the next ten years. St. Lucia has many of the same advantages as Barbados but property prices are currently up to 60% lower. The World Bank has recently placed St. Lucia in the top 30 countries in the world to invest, making St. Lucia the only Caricom country to make the top 30, ahead of Barbados and Antigua.
fall, a significant number of U.K. mortgage borrowers could fall into negative
equity, about 1.7 million by our estimation, according to a report published
today by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services.
“The downward trend in U.K. house prices now seems well established, and we
expect prices to continue falling in the near term,” said credit analyst
Andrew South. “In a separate article published today, our economists forecast
a further drop of around 17% before prices flatten off in 2009.”
scenarios, and estimate that:
– The average U.K. mortgage has a loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of only around
54%.
– Nevertheless, around 70,000 or 0.6% of U.K. borrowers are currently in
negative equity.
– A further house price decline of 17% would raise this number to around 1.7
million (14%).
– Borrowers in the buy-to-let and nonconforming sectors are more exposed to
negative equity under this house price decline assumption.
outstanding mortgage loans from the pools backing residential mortgage-backed
securities (RMBS) and covered bond transactions that we rate.
“House price declines and rising LTV ratios generally are an indicator of
rising mortgage credit risk, and are therefore an important factor in our
rating analysis for RMBS notes,” Mr. South said. “Ratings on both junior and
senior notes could therefore be sensitive to house price deflation, which we
have explored further in our recently published scenario analyses.”
Volatile is probably the best way to describe share price movements in the sector and for a month at least (and at last) shorting the housebuilders was not a one-way bet in July.
The news at the trading updates was awful
but not as awful as had been feared. Land writedowns in some cases were not as large as the punditry had expected; Barratt appears to have refinanced successfully and set a precedent for others to follow; two-year
swap rates and fixed rate mortgages are coming down. All is well with the world – or is it?
agents are selling fewer homes than at anytime in the last thirty years, or since records began.
Most importantly, in our view, is the reaction of those in the front-line, the housebuilders. They are cutting or passing dividends, laying off staff and have not bought their own shares.
In June mortgage approvals were 36,000, another record low. A worrying development for the first-time buyer is that following the demise of the 125% and 100% there are now so few 95% LTV mortgages on offer that the Bank of England has stopped providing data on them as there are now too few products to track.
As we head into the results season we see few, if any, positive share price catalysts.
housebuilders to hold even reduced prices.
Later in this note we review the write-downs announced or forewarned so far. We would suggest that reviewing land values appears to be more of an art than a science and that the inadequacy of IAS2 in relation to housebuilding provides significant scope for different interpretations.
from the +5% trends during the first 2 weeks of May. We know from the ONS
data that the clothing market slowed sharply in June. Today’s stronger than
expected top line across the 2Q suggests that Next may have picked up some
market share ahead of the sale period. With a deteriorating macro environment,
we fear the worst is still to come with downside risk to our January 2009 and
2010 Next earnings forecasts
back of today’s results we retain our January 2009 PBT forecast of £430m
(EPS 152p, -9% yr on yr). This excludes any incremental share buyback
assumption, beyond the £54m of committed activity.
outlook in 2008 and 2009, combined with potential gross margin deterioration
and growing cost pressures, will outweigh Next management’s current growth
initiatives, we struggle to argue for any material recovery target valuation
multiples. Our 1050p target price references a sector average 5x target January
2010E EV/EBITDA multiple. This equates to 7.5x 2010E earnings and a 6%
dividend yield.
Sell, target price 1050p — We retain our Sell/Medium Risk investment code,
target price 1050p.
will not host a conference call for analysts and investors regarding the trading update.
• Full price Retail LFL in 1H08 came in at -6.0%, slightly ahead of company guidance and consensus
estimates of -7.0%. Nevertheless, as Next indicates that end of season sales volumes are likely to be
down on lean inventory, we expect 1H08 total LFL sales to be lower than -6%. Next Retail LFL
improved in 2Q to -2.4% (ahead of consensus estimates of -4.5%) from -9.4% achieved in 1Q, leaving
LFL in 1H08 at -6%.
weather patterns in the 1H07 which distorted comparables. Next brand sales was down -1.8% in 1H08
with weakness in Retail sales (-3.1%) partially offset by growth in Directory (+2.0%) (Exhibit 1).
weigh. Next indicated that it expects full year 2008 LFL to be in line with 1H08 (-6.0%). This matches
our current forecast for the full year but is a reduction of previous company guidance of -3% LFL
purchase budgets for the FW season. CBI data released yesterday indicates that the UK consumer decline
we saw in June continued in July for clothing (Exhibit 2). This confirms the negative trend for the A&F
market reported in the recent monthly TNS data (Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4).
suitable for a mature ‘middle ground’ player. Moving to better product content and higher price points,
as well as to a structurally lower SG&A cost position, would seem the right thing to do in the ‘new world’
competitive environment, as supermarkets and discounters occupy the value position. The risk here
would be for Next to price itself out of its market and stall, as it exaggerates margin defense and/ or fails
to provide credible product content at a higher level. This, and reduced revenue prospects from space
expansion and directory growth, have put off investors and caused material multiple compression.
• The Next share price has marginally risen from recent troughs just after the M&S profit warning.
Continuing negative LFL guidance, partially convincing fashion and product range in womenswear,
possible FX headwinds on COGS make us cautious on share price performance in the next 6 – 12
months. We rate Next Market-Perform with a price target of 1125p.
Cadogan’s assets are undeveloped discoveries which have been overlooked by previous owners due to poor Soviet-era technology and, until recently, a low gas price.
Management believes the potential of this acreage can be unlocked through modern drilling techniques and Western reservoir management practices. The early indications have been positive.
Estimate that current share price implies only 18% probability of a successful resolution of legal proceedings, but UBS notes that management’s confidence remains high and neither JKX nor Regal lost licences when faced with ownership issues
Sector-leading near-term drilling offers significant upside potential
Cadogan offers stand-out near-term drilling, with several key wells expected to reach target depth by the end of the year.
Initiating with a Buy rating and a 200p price target
Our price target of 200p is set at a 35% discount to underlying NAV of 306p/share to reflect Cadogan’s current licence uncertainties.
At the current share price investors get an attractively priced option on the outcome of the legal proceedings, although risks do remain.
HBK Master Fund 7.15
QVT Financial 6.20
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 5.03
William Jeffcock 4.85
DB UK Holdings Limited 4.57
JP Morgan 3.89
Ingalls and Snyder LLC 3.17
Hillside Apex Fund Limited 3.02
Roy Williams 2.34
weakness in Cadogan’s share price was blamed on unlocked-up, pre-IPO
investors who had acquired their positions at between 62p and 123p/share. It
was believed that these holders were capitalising on the enhanced liquidity
enabled as a publicly-listed company to lock-in profits. This situation arose
from the lack of a secondary component to the IPO to soak up this supply, as
well as the diverse and inaccessible nature of Cadogan’s (often noninstitutional)
shareholder base, which made it difficult to lock-up.
in the table below, approximately 61m pre-IPO shares were unlocked-up,
while 73m Cadogan shares have traded in the market since IPO. As a result,
assuming not every pre-IPO investor was looking to sell their entire holding,
we believe this selling pressure should now largely have dissipated
Directors and senior management 5,018,731 2.2
Institutions (locked in) 103,911,290 45.0
Institutions (not locked in) 36,650,988 15.9
Individuals (not locked in) 24,083,566 10.4
IPO shares 61,427,159 26.6
Total 231,091,734 100.0
shareholder base
We believe that a BA
