Print

Markets live transcript 23 May 2008

Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 15:23 on 23 May 2008. Participants in this chat were: Paul Murphy (PM) Neil Hume (NH) Helen Thomas (HT)

PM:
Novelty this
PM:
Afternoon
PM:
Just thought I would open this session as we go about doing final checks on a little story we are planning to publish soon
PM:
You will to wait for the detail — sorry
PM:
Just putting a call in to 7404 5959
PM:
Some of you might know that as the offices of Brunswick
PM:
London’s biggest financial PR
PM:
and provider of talent to No 10 Downing St
PM:
OK
PM:
Next call is going in to the FIG head at a certain advisory firm
PM:
it is a parisian number
PM:
I’ve got the person’s direct no
PM:
Should be fun
PM:
Hmmmm
PM:
That was an off the record conversation
PM:
But so long as im not attributing, i think it is fair to say that he suggested this was a “false thing”
PM:
Sorry Super SWF and others — FIG reference was misleading
PM:
Now putting call into the head of press at the predator company
PM:
Ok, very polite assistant
PM:
Left full msg, details of what we are planning to print etc
PM:
Spelt out my name
NH:
hi
PM:
Desk number and mobile
NH:
while we are waiting for calls back
PM:
Hi Neil
NH:
just want to post an update on the Panmure stuff we were talking about earlier today
PM:
Nice one
NH:
as we said, rivals seemed to be putting round stories about why certain resolutions were pulled at the AGM
NH:
but now understand the following happened:
NH:
Wyatt is Chairman of Loudwater- a quoted company Panmure act for. Apparently Panmure cannot be Nomad to a company where one a Directors is Chairman (new Aim guidance it seems).
NH:
the other guy Stonehill is working pretty well full time in Geneva. so he can’t find the time
NH:
hope that clears things up
PM:
Thank you Neil
PM:
We are just going into a huddle
PM:
You can bear with us — or go and do something else for your Friday afternoon
PM:
Oh, and I can recommend the pop up — hit the button to the right
PM:
Although it doesnt include the comments below, which are obviously the interesting thing so far
PM:
Ok — thanks for bearing with
PM:
helen is just checking over the copy
PM:
Neil will be posting — cos this is his story
PM:
We are confident now on this
PM:
This is not RAW — this number has been thoroughly grilled
PM:
patience patience
PM:
I know this will be a complete let down
PM:
Dicing with death i fear
PM:
But you know, its tricky converting stories like this
PM:
No back track
PM:
PM:
InBev, the brewing giant created through the merger of Interbrew and AmBev, is working on a $46bn takeover approach for Anheuser-Busch, the iconic American brewer of Budweiser, FT Alphaville has learned.

The deal is being billed as a “transformational” move by those executives and bankers involved, and is likely to herald the long-awaited end-game in global drinks industry consolidation. InBev’s aim is to create the fifth largest consumer products group in the world.

A direct approach to approach to Anheuser chief executive August Busch IV is being planned, although expecting a cool reception, the InBev team are preparing to send a follow up letter to the American group’s entire board, mapping out terms that are expected to be pitched at $65 a share. If Anheuser refuse to commence friendly talks, InBev is considering a public appeal direct to the target’s shareholders.

On Friday, sources indicated that while extensive work had been carried out on the transaction, InBev was “not about to push the button.”

Putting the two companies, however, together would create a business capitalised at close to $100bn and would constitute the most ambitious piece of corporate consolidation since the onset of the credit crisis last summer. Anheuser and InBev together would be almost equally balanced between developed and emerging market operations across the globe, pumping out around 350m hectolitres of beer and other beverages annually. Annual revenues would be around $20bn, producing earnings of close to $6bn at the ebitda level.

A financing package – which stretches to $50bn in total – has already been provisionally arranged through JPMorgan and Santander. It is envisaged that a takeover would be followed up with a rights issue in about 12 months time, when the newly enlarged group would raise somewhere between $10bn and $17bn to pay down a bridge financing facility.

The matter was discussed at length at an InBev board meeting on April 28 and then again at a fresh meeting held this Thursday.

Antonio Weiss at Lazards in Paris is the prime corporate financier advising the InBev board on the matter. On the financing side, direct negotiations are believed to have been held between Felipe Dutra, InBev’s financial officer, and Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan, while former IMF head Rodrigo de Rato has led discussions on behalf of InBev with Emilio Botin at Santander.

Sullivan & Cromwell are providing legal advice, with the firm’s top M&A partner, James Morphy, working on the deal from New York.

Sources with a close knowledge of the putative deal said an approach to Anheuser by InBev was first made informally last October, but August Busch insisted he would protect Anheuser’s independence and wanted time to show his mettle at a job to which he had only recently been promoted.

But InBev’s advisers believe Mr Busch would now succumb to shareholder pressure to open merger talks and are banking on the fact that Anheuser’s board would feel duty bound to follow due process and formally consider a bid if they received a private offer pitched at a substantial premium.

Anheuser has been codenamed Aluminum for the transaction, while InBev is referred to as Nest.

The parties involved would not comment publicly or did not return calls.

neil.hume@ft.com

PM:
Bud & Becks
PM:
hi there
PM:
I’m trying to conduct interviews for helen’s replacement while doing this
PM:
utter madness
PM:
Will try and get some more content up on the main AV home page
HT:
Right all
HT:
Paul is interviewing
HT:
We’ve just published another couple of posts on the site
HT:
I’ve been charged with shutting this down
HT:
Enjoy your long weekends
HT:
You can read more here
HT:
and here
HT:
thanks for joining us this afternoon
HT:
and apologies for the slight (!) delay in delivery
HT:
See you on Tuesday
Print