<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/lib/css/styleRSSFeed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:ft="http://www.ft.com/FTRSSExtensions">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No party, defaults update</title>
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville from FT.com</description>
	<copyright>Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2006. "Alphaville", "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times.</copyright>
	<webMaster>help@ft.com</webMaster>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ausfallraten der Unternehmensanleihen nehmen zu. In absoluten Zahlen verbleiben sie aber auf niedrigem Niveau. â€¢ BÃ¶rsennotizbuch</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21830</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21830</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[[...] Eine wichtige Entwicklung â€” die Ausfallraten bei den Unternehmensanleihen. Obwohl FT Alphaville etwas zu laut über eine Verschlechterung spricht, verbleiben die Ausfallraten noch im historisch sehr niedrigen Bereich. Gleichwohl informiert Standard & Poorâ€™s, dass die Ausfälle zunehmen. In diesem Jahr sind bereits mehr Unternehmensanleihen ausgefallen als 2007, die allermeisten in den USA: Standard & Poorâ€™s have already informed us that with 28 defaults logged, 2008 has already surpassed last yearâ€™s total in terms of corporate woe. And with 27 default hailing from the US, and one from Canada, it is thus far an entirely north American affair. [...]]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: leroygardner3.com &#124; finance &#124; technology &#124; syndicated live &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekend Rolling&#8230;Happy Memorial Day!</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21822</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21822</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[[...] Corporate bond defaults are on the rise. (FT Alphaville) [...]]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Murphy</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21815</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21815</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Monkey - Heard what here first?]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alea &#124; #Links</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21810</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21810</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[[...] No party, defaults update [...]]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Monkey</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21468</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21468</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[OK - no worries.  Private company anyway - will try to be a little more careful in future.  That said, when it does go down you heard it here first]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Murphy</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21466</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21466</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Monkey - apols for censoring your comment.  We've got to be careful of naming names when saying a biz might fail.]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Monkey</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21464</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21464</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Bound to be some UK casualties soon.  My guess is that the 1st default over here will be XXXXX  Business model looks shot - Loans (if they are trading) quoted sub 30p in the Â£1.  Dum dum de dum, dum de dum de dum de dum]]></description>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TheWord</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21463</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/05/23/13304/no-party-defaults-update/#comment-21463</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Would love to know what S&P were rating those 28 defaulters at 6mnths, 3mnths, 1mnth and 2wks prior to the event.]]></description>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
