The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Macquarie: The 'great unwind' is coming
  2. The €5.5 trillion unwind
  3. Further reading
  4. Britain's top export - drunks
  5. Further reading
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Head of Operational Rigour
Recruiter: Barclaycard International
Financial Controller – British Gas Business (ACA, ACCA, CIMA, CPA)
Recruiter: British Gas Business
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society
Corporate Tax Manager
Recruiter: New Look
Business Analyst
Recruiter: Credit Suisse
CFO/Finance Director
Recruiter: AMS Baeshen & Co

Site Navigation


RSS Feed

Comments

  1. May 16   10:10 Posted by Sam Jones [report]

    Kamekon/Charles.

    Apologies for the confusion. While the two bonds earlier this week indeed priced just 15bp apart, the chart in the above post is for the CDS on the two - and is rebased. Was merely intended to show a sharp divergence in perceptions of default risk in the market. I suppose also, a degree of “decoupling”

    Sam/Alphaville

  2. May 15   17:26 Posted by Kamekon [report]

    Charles - According to Reuters the difference between the spreads was indeed 15bp: the Brazil bond was priced at 140bp over Treasuries, while the spread on the 10y BH bond was 155bp. But, as you suggest, the chart points to a much larger spread difference.

    (And to add to the confusion: Brazil is only rated BBB-/Ba1, whereas BH has a triple-A rating.)

  3. May 15   15:43 Posted by Charles [report]

    150bp lower, no?

  4. May 15   15:32 Posted by wdm [report]

    compare it to the spread on California credit

This post is closed to further comments.