To be precise, 15bp lower, according to Thursday’s FT. Crunchproof chart of the day:

Related links
The short view: world equities - FT
This entry was posted by Sam Jones
on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 at 14:40 and is filed under Capital markets. Tagged with bazil, berkshire hathaway. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Kamekon/Charles.
Apologies for the confusion. While the two bonds earlier this week indeed priced just 15bp apart, the chart in the above post is for the CDS on the two - and is rebased. Was merely intended to show a sharp divergence in perceptions of default risk in the market. I suppose also, a degree of “decoupling”
Sam/Alphaville
Charles - According to Reuters the difference between the spreads was indeed 15bp: the Brazil bond was priced at 140bp over Treasuries, while the spread on the 10y BH bond was 155bp. But, as you suggest, the chart points to a much larger spread difference.
(And to add to the confusion: Brazil is only rated BBB-/Ba1, whereas BH has a triple-A rating.)
150bp lower, no?
compare it to the spread on California credit