The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Macquarie: The 'great unwind' is coming
  2. Further reading
  3. Further reading
  4. Britain's top export - drunks
  5. Charts du Jaws
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Finance and Resources Director
Recruiter: International Accounting Standards
Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Project Accountant
Recruiter: Retail/ Private Banking
Finance Business Partner
Recruiter: Unilever
Head of Operational Rigour
Recruiter: Barclaycard International
Financial Controller – British Gas Business (ACA, ACCA, CIMA, CPA)
Recruiter: British Gas Business
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society

Site Navigation


Principal content

The Inflation Conundrum

Why, if everybody is wringing their hands on inflation, do market-based measures of expectations remain so low?

Morgan Stanley cite polling from their Global Credit Summit last week in Venice. Inflation was the number one macro concern of about a third of the crowd, while three quarters of those attending expected US headline inflation to average 3 per cent or higher over the next three years.

Yet the breakeven inflation rate on US TIPS over five years - the difference between the yield on nominal Treasuries and inflation-protected TIPS - is just 2.2 per cent.

The bank offers two explanations. Either investors trust that central banks will ensure that inflation stays in check over the longer term by taking appropriate action, or market-based market measures are distorted by crisis-induced buying of bonds. Their answer is a bit of both.

The relative sizes of the nominal and the inflation-linked market mean there’s a liquidity premium contained in the so-called breakeven rate - one which is likely to have increased during the crisis, say MS. The bank’s model for fair value of 10-year Treasuries shows a widening gulf between yield and fair value.

We attribute a large part of the widening gap between actual yields and fair value since the start of the credit crisis to safe-haven buying and the heightened demand for good collateral. If so, breakeven inflation rates are also depressed due to this factor and true inflation expectations in the bond market are likely to be higher than this indicator suggests. Once the credit crisis abates and the exceptional demand for government subsides, breakeven rates should thus rise, revealing higher true inflation expectations.

But Morgan Stanley also thinks that investors are putting too much faith in the central banks’ ability to control inflation. Global factors are no longer disinflationary and the targets date back to a time when globalisation, deregulation and strong productivity growth weighed down on inflation. Emerging market economies have become a source of inflation, the productivity boom has ebbed, and monetary policy has been expansionary for most of this decade.

Morgan Stanley’s bottom line:

Central banks are likely to keep missing their targets, and we expect the debate about raising the targets to pick up. Look for both true inflation expectations and breakeven inflation rates to rise over time.

Related links
Fed hints at pause as rates cut to 2% - FT.com

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. May 07   23:43 Posted by Die Inflation bleibt wohl der Schlüssel • Börsennotizbuch [report]

    […] FT Alphaville, The Inflation Conundrum […]

  2. May 01   20:07 Posted by rdnh [report]

    Is it not that we are looking at the wrong real yield. The one country that does not have an inflation problem (at the moment) is the US. Look at UK index linked bonds and a rather different picture emerges.

  3. May 01   15:17 Posted by burnt quant [report]

    If investors didn’t trust the official statistics would they not require a higher yield on the inflation protected securities or am I misunderstanding something?

    I think that the depressed yields of long term securities stem in part from expectation that a prolonged period of economic weakness will take the sting out of inflation. I still think the Japanese case is the most likely path for this “recession”.

  4. May 01   15:13 Posted by rtah100 [report]

    The is of course the New Labour Third Way - deflation. Perhaps nobody expects any inflation because they expect a depression? Or is that outcome too obvious / miserable to be considered?

    Unless the commodities speculators intend to take delivery and stockpile what they are buying, then any drop in demand below supply will pop the commodities bubble. Western land and housing costs are already plummeting. Energy prices will remain high only because of supply-side shocks (eleventh-hour attack on Iran by the House of Bush/Saud) or market distortion.

  5. May 01   12:50 Posted by TheWord [report]

    It’s because everyone who knows anything knows that the official inflation numbers are rubbish.

    http://www.shadowstats.com/

    This isn’t just an American problem. These virtual world adjustments have infested all Western countries.

  6. May 01   12:22 Posted by G Cox [report]

    A complicated way of saying ’sell Treasuries’

This post is closed to further comments.