The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. "We're only half way through...We're going to see a whopper!"
  2. Further reading
  3. Merrill's surprise CDO writedown, revisited
  4. From the desk of David Einhorn (When rights issues aren't so good)
  5. Things really were that good in US housing...
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Divisional Financial Controller
Recruiter: TRL
Financial Accountant
Recruiter: UK Athletics
Finance and Resources Director
Recruiter: International Accounting Standards
Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Programme Director
Recruiter: Barclays
Project Accountant
Recruiter: Retail/ Private Banking
Finance Business Partner
Recruiter: Unilever

Site Navigation


Principal content

How much is enough? The HBOS edition

No official word from HBOS on Monday regarding the plans for a rights issue at the bank with the “exceptionally strong balance sheet.” But the papers were in agreement: HBOS is finalising plans for a £4bn capital raising.

Is that enough? RBS put the frightners on last week by aggressively writing down its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and leveraged loans. Hbos last year took a mere £227m hit to profit, against its Scottish rival’s latest £6bn effort. More writedowns ahead then.

But of particular concern for HBOS was the emergence of RBS’s Alt-A nasties. The portfolio that barely merited a mention at year end was written down by 50 per cent. HBOS meanwhile is sitting on a £7.1bn Alt-A book.

HBOS, with a core Tier 1 ratio of about 5.7 per cent, was always considered a possible rights issue candidate after RBS made 6 per cent its new gold capital standard. But the prospect of up to £4bn of losses to come, on a straight read across from RBS, put it in pole position to be the next bank with the begging bowl.

A consensus was emerging in the press on Monday that the writedown figure would be closer to £3bn. March surely the culprit again. Not an overly rosy take at year end, or kitchen-sink rights issue accounting of course.

Analysts from Cazenove last week ran the numbers on Hbos’ AAA-rated Alt-A and concluded that the bank was unlikely to see underlying losses related to defaults on its book. The bank’s portfolio is 77 per cent loan-to-value and benefits from subordination of 30 per cent, meaning losses would have to reach that threshold in the underlying loan portfolio before the notes suffer losses.

On a first reading, analysts at Pali argue that an HBOS raising looks less dilutive than the RBS variant. For HBOS, £4bn is 20 per cent of shareholders’ equity, against £12bn which was 27 per cent at RBS. With its higher capital ratios, HBOS can more credibly argue that it has not had its hand forced by regulators.

But an about-turn would still be hugely embarrassing after its light year-end writedowns and March’s faux outrage about rumour-raking short-sellers. It also raises the question of what happens to the bank’s dividend this year. Analysts at Numis on Monday were bemoaning the value destruction that a rights issue would involve. Better to go without a dividend this year, they argue, and avoid passing value directly to the banks underwriting an equity sale.

Related links
HBOS to raise up to £4bn from rights issue - FT.com
From criminal to comical at HBOS - Alphaville

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Apr 28   11:45 Posted by Anonymous [report]

    HT - thanks. Might wade through the detail later!

  2. Apr 28   11:14 Posted by Helen Thomas [report]

    Morning Monkey, more detail in the linked story - but think Caz’s point is that Hbos only has to mark to market in the P&L on their trading book so you’re looking at a £2.4bn portfolio to worry about, not £7.1bn. The rest gets marked to market through the AFS reserve and doesn’t hit regulatory capital - unless there’s a realised loss through defaults or it’s sold at a loss.

    Agree that ultimately you’ve still got a bunch of stuff not worth as much as it was - but their point is that a straight read across of -50% from RBS doesn’t work in terms of the current need for a capital raising.

  3. Apr 28   10:57 Posted by Monkey [report]

    Does it really matter whether Cazenova believe HBOS are going to see underlying losses related to defaults on its books? If the market thinks differently and they mark to market they have an accounting loss and they will need to cover it surely? Unless they dont mark-market. Which is worse. Or is it? I don’t think there is an easy answer to this question - and it is a question that is causing massive problems to monolines and anyone else who has perceived high quality debt that no one wants to buy for love nor money.

  4. Apr 28   10:42 Posted by VP [report]

    “If” they do come out with a rights issue, it further raises questions about bank management - heavy buyers of their own shares on that “criminal” tank (seemingly not criminal to fail to put out a “no reason” RNS whilst buying your own co’s shares).

    Hard to have faith in any of them to see beyond the end of their own noses - Fred saying no rights issue needed, and all raising their divis at a time when the market was showing with housebuilers and share prices which way the wind was blowing.

This post is closed to further comments.