The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Macquarie: The 'great unwind' is coming
  2. Further reading
  3. Further reading
  4. Britain's top export - drunks
  5. Charts du Jaws
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Finance and Resources Director
Recruiter: International Accounting Standards
Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Project Accountant
Recruiter: Retail/ Private Banking
Finance Business Partner
Recruiter: Unilever
Head of Operational Rigour
Recruiter: Barclaycard International
Financial Controller – British Gas Business (ACA, ACCA, CIMA, CPA)
Recruiter: British Gas Business
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society

Site Navigation


Principal content

JPMorgan’s mystery cash call

The timing seems designed to unnerve.

Jamie Dimon was on Wednesday reserved in his outlook for the global economy and for the capital markets. But the overriding message heard by investors was that the worst was over. There were no nasty surprises in the bank’s numbers and the absence of outright disappointment was good for a 6.7 per cent share price bump.

So why launch an unexpected capital raising, which by virtue of its timing appeared rather clandestine?

Pass. But last night JPMorgan lodged a preliminary prospectus for the issue of perpetual preferred stock, which Bloomberg interpreted as follows:

JPMorgan Chase & Co., hours after saying the credit-market crisis is almost over, made plans to raise $6 billion in its biggest offering of perpetual preferred stock, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The non-cumulative securities priced to yield 419 basis points more than U.S. Treasuries due in 2018 and pay a fixed rate of 7.9 percent for 10 years. If not called, the debt will begin to float at 347 basis points more than the three-month London interbank offered rate, a borrowing benchmark, currently set at 2.73 percent. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

It’s the stuff that conspiracy theorists’ dreams are made of. Why not refer to a capital raising in the results or on the conference call, wonders Paul Jackson at Housing Wire?

Felix Salmon is similarly bemused:

A yield of 7.9% over 10 years is expensive capital indeed for a bank which is (a) profitable, (b) currently well capitalized, and (c) doesn’t have an obvious stock of loans needing to be written down. That’s $474 million a year in interest payments: three years’ interest, and you’ve got the entire Bear Stearns acquisition price. And raising this money the day of your earnings announcement, without so much as mentioning it on the conference call?

Investors may have taken Dimon’s suggestion that the credit squall was “working itself out” as a signal of sunnier times ahead. But the bank faces a stream of provisions in its traditional lending business, with an uptick in prime and Alt-A delinquencies.

JPMorgan’s weakened capital ratios, with Tier 1 down 10bp to 8.3 per cent, are well ahead of the regulator’s requirements - but they may prefer a more substantial cushion given with prospect of a hard economic landing ahead.

As CreditSights put it: “As the economy softens and asset (namely housing) prices seemed poised for further declines, the company faces a difficult challenge to prudently manage growth in light of a high level of uncertainty for future credit expectations.”

Alongside the complexities of handling the Bear buy and Dimon’s restated interest in seeking growth through acquisitions, the appeal for the bank of raising funds when it can, rather than when it has to, is obvious. In nervy markets, though, the impression of being less than frank is unfortunate.
Related links
JPMorgan seeks fresh acquisitions - FT.com
JPMorgan’s strength - Lex note

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Apr 18   19:06 Posted by Deal Journal - WSJ.com : Afternoon Reading: Earnings, Cabbages and Kings [report]

    […] Portfolio.com’s Market Movers blog, written by Felix Salmon, skips along a few befudding data points about Citigroup’s results before noting that expectations of this being the “kitchen-sink” quarter that ends all writedowns are probably overblown: “Given the vicious cycle in which the debt markets are still embroiled, I wouldn’t count on it,” he writes, and Calculated Risk phrases their similar doubts pithily. Salmon also isn’t buying the idea that J.P. Morgan’s dead-of-night $6 billion capital raise was “routine,” and FT.com’s Alphaville blog called it “clandestine” and “the stuff conspiracy theorists’ dreams are made of.” BusinessWeek has a story about Citigroup’s other problems, mainly from clients worried about hedge-fund blowups. […]

  2. Apr 18   10:05 Posted by the watch [report]

    herethe xcomes funny money

  3. Apr 17   18:14 Posted by D Merkel [report]

    As I said over at Felix’s blog: Sometimes the economic capital required to avoid ruin is greater than that allowed by the regulators. JP Morgan has a very large derivatives book, and has extensive lending operations. They probably sense internally that even if the regulators are fine with their capital level, and remember, they had to get a waiver for the Bear Stearns transaction, it doesn’t hurt to have even more of a cushion during bad times. Borrow when you can, not when you have to. Or, fill in holes when the regulators can’t find them yet….

  4. Apr 17   15:57 Posted by Anonymous [report]

    They did say they wanted to make acquisitions. It’s possible that this offering is for a war chest to do just that. ;)

  5. Apr 17   11:28 Posted by hedgehog [report]

    OK lads let’s go over it one last time so we don’t **** up.

    When I point to the sky and say “oh look ist that a bird or a bee” you slip the slide up for a nano second about the need, sorry wisdom, of raising $6 billion.

    RIght let’s go see those suckers

    FT Alphaville has automatically blocked suspected profanities in this comment.

  6. Apr 17   11:03 Posted by PC [report]

    Jamie long on JPM stock :-)

This post is closed to further comments.