The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Further reading
  2. What killed the Ospraie?
  3. Draaisma: "We're in the dull phase"
  4. Further reading
  5. Cheap or spicy? - the polarisation in asset management
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society
Business Analyst
Recruiter: Credit Suisse
Head of Finance
Recruiter: ESCP-EAP
Group Chief Accountant
Recruiter: Misys
Lead Economist, Development Research Department
Recruiter: African Development Bank
Finance Manager
Recruiter: London 2012
Group Manufacturing Leadership Programme
Recruiter: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group

Site Navigation


Principal content

Leveraged loan clearout, Citi edition

Following in Lehman’s footsteps? More questions than answers are raised by the news that Citi is shifting $12bn in leveraged loans to a group of private equity firms.

The proposal is ostensibly a scaled-up version of Citi’s October plan to shift $10bn of LBO debt in a joint venture with KKR. The twist then was that the LBO debt was almost all KKR’s in the first place.

This time around, however, KKR is not to be seen. Instead, the lineup involves Apollo, Blackstone and TPG, set to buy Citi’s loans at a 10 per cent discount. Apollo is understood to be taking 50 per cent of the portfolio.

Details, however, are thin on the ground.

It’s not really clear exactly how similar this latest deal is to the putative KKR scheme. Back in October the plan was for a seperate holding company to buy the $10bn of loans. A holding company in which KKR would provide the equity ($2bn) and Citi would supply leverage ($8bn).

Now, though, the suggestion is that the loans are to be sold outright, or at least, in three parcels.

A major impediment to that, however, lies in the sheer amount of paper we’re talking about. Sure, Apollo has large, established, distressed debt funds (some established in the last LBO slump of 1990-92) but $6bn would be quite a lot to swallow in one go. Ditto the remaining $6bn carved between TPG and Blackstone. Where, in short, would the financing to buy the debt come from?

Might the alternative, then be a joint venture between all four parties? A joint venture in which Citi might provide the leverage, as was proposed in October. Doing that would reduce Citi’s exposure, and have the added benefit of taking the sting out of having to accept 90 cents on the dollar. That, after all, adds up to a loss of $1.2bn.

Were that the case, then Citi wouldn’t be quite ridding itself of $12bn. It would still have a major stake in some kind of LBO holding company or CLO.

All of which is speculation, of course. The reports are that Citi will make details of the arrangement public at the same time as its Q1 results. Out next Thursday.

Related stories
LBO freeze cuts Q1 fees to Wall Street by 75% - Bloomberg
Leveraged loans: the sound of a logjam breaking? - Lex

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Apr 09   16:10 Posted by Anonymous [report]

    Sorry,

    That should have said “10% return plus interest”

  2. Apr 09   16:10 Posted by Anonymous [report]

    A couple of ideas:

    1. The PE firms gets a 10% return interest on their own debt — before leverage.

    2. Citi gets some much needed marks for their LBO portfolio right before earnings.

  3. Apr 09   13:01 Posted by JM [report]

    Why would they be buying at 10 cents discount to par when most assets are trading below this level in the market?

  4. Apr 09   12:08 Posted by Ando [report]

    And what about the PE houses buying the debt? If the portfolio includes large amounts of their own LBO debt (albeit bought from Citi at bargain prices), aren’t they taking a big bet on themselves? If one of the companies they loaded up with cheap debt fails, wouldn’t the fact that they hold the debt as well as the equity multiply their losses several times over (the flipside of leverage increasing returns)? If some of the PE houses overpaid for companies last year and now we are in a recession, isn’t it likely that some of the acquired companies will fail? Perhaps they’ll save on administrator costs and creditor disputes in event of a bankruptcy, by owning both the equity and the debt…

This post is closed to further comments.