The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Further reading
  2. What killed the Ospraie?
  3. Draaisma: "We're in the dull phase"
  4. Further reading
  5. Further reading
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society
Business Analyst
Recruiter: Credit Suisse
Head of Finance
Recruiter: ESCP-EAP
Group Chief Accountant
Recruiter: Misys
Lead Economist, Development Research Department
Recruiter: African Development Bank
Finance Manager
Recruiter: London 2012
Group Manufacturing Leadership Programme
Recruiter: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group

Site Navigation


Principal content

More from the Crock Report

The bill charged to Northern Rock by the Treasury, Bank of England and the FSA for professional fees ran to £12.5m in the second half of 2007, according to former bank’s annual report, published on Monday. Professional fees run up by Rock for its own advice and the like were £21.2m.

Neither number seems that shocking in the circumstances.

Other nuggets:

The 2007 charge for customer loan loss impairment amounted to £239.7 million (2006 — £81.2 million) representing 0.26% of mean advances to customers (2006 — 0.10%). The increases in the loan loss impairment charge and year end impairment provision balances reflect the increase in default rates highlighted by higher arrears and properties in possession but also a significant deterioration in forecast recoveries on impaired loans. The reduction in house prices reported for the last quarter of 2007, together with further anticipated falls as evidenced by trends in losses in the first quarter of 2008 have resulted in an increase in expected losses to be incurred on impaired mortgage loans. Anticipated recoveries on impaired unsecured loans have also fallen dramatically as customers’ equity in their residential properties is expected to continue to fall and the market for debt sales since the year end has substantially disappeared.

- Statutory loss of £168m, against a profit of £627m in 2006, after a £410m impairment charge on treasury assets and non-recurring expenses of £127m, etc. Underlying profit put at £422m, down from £587m.

- Tier 1 capital falls from £2bn to £1.6bn.

Outlook statement:

In accordance with European legislation, the Government is required to seek approval for the granting of the facilities to Northern Rock under State aid law, and the continuation of these facilities is dependent upon approval by the European Commission. A submission to the European Commission was made by the Government on 17 March 2008 and at the date of the approval of the Report and Accounts remained under review.

Going forward the Company’s business plan will be aligned with the objectives of the Tripartite Authorities at the time of taking Northern Rock into temporary public ownership. Together with compliance with European State aid law this will necessitate a significant contraction in the Group’s balance sheet driven by increased loan redemptions. At the same time, new business levels will be significantly lower than in previous years. New business will be focussed on prime residential mortgages with absolute levels dependent on new funding generated mainly from retail deposits in the UK. Longer term, it is intended that Northern Rock will return to the private sector as a lower risk, financially viable mortgage and savings bank.

Northern Rock’s annual report

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Mar 31   10:39 Posted by bsb [report]

    pg 53, section entitled “Principles underlying going concern assumption” is pretty interesting….

  2. Mar 31   10:21 Posted by VP [report]

    Nice. Clearly a “kitchen sink job” but would be interesting to see the same at the likes of BB, AL. & one-I-dare-not-mention-for-fear-of-starting-a-rumour. Clearly the deteriorating housing market is having a knock-on effect on arrears (let alone the difficulty/cost in getting a remortgage atm).

    Suspect the Govnt going to make Crock’s results bad to (quite rightly) aid the “shareholders get nothing” arguments; but I wonder how that will square with govnt/central bank efforts to resolve the LIIBOR probs by pumping in more money? If I were stupid enough to be an NRK shareholder, it might irk me somewhat - “why intervene to fix LIBOR now, and not when NRK were in trouble?”.

    (Sorry for dodgy syntax, hard getting out of bed this morning).

This post is closed to further comments.