The FSA and Treasury seem determined to throw the whole arsenal of legal weaponry - developed in the 70s and 80s to crack the IRA in Northern Ireland - against those who might dare to abuse London’s precious financial markets.
Alistair Darling is to give Britain’s financial watchdog new powers to clean up the City by adopting a US-style whistle-blower system that will grant immunity from prosecution in return for evidence about market manipulation.
Alarmed by the illegal raid that drove down the share price of HBOS last week, the chancellor will outline plans for new legislation over the next few months that will give the Financial Services Authority plea bargaining powers already granted to tax officials, the Serious Fraud Office and the director of public prosecutions.
In an interview with the Guardian, Darling said: “I can’t allow us to get into a situation where people quite deliberately manipulate markets for personal gain and with the potential to destabilise the financial system.”
This will involve giving FSA officials “specified prosecutor status,” allowing the regulator to develop a system of City grasses shopping each other to save their own skins.
Let’s hope they use their new powers more wisely than the Serious Fraud Office, which has been clamouring for the abolition of juries for years - only to be told recently by the House of Lords that in the biggest case it had pursued in years — against Goldshield, the drug maker - the alleged fraudster had not even committed a crime.
According to supergrass expert David Bonner, author of Combating Terrorism:Supergrass Trials in Northern Ireland, criminal accomplices have been used as competent witnesses in English law for centuries. But it was only in the 70s, when the Metropolitan Police used the approach to crack a series of armed robberies in London and when the Italian authorities used such witnesses to prosecute the Red Brigade, that the term ’supergrass’ gained traction.
In Northern Ireland, this tool of the law came into its own, with some 500 alleged terrorists charged on the word of 27 supergrasses — seen by many at the time as a specific strategy to remove all suspects from the community in one extensive swoop.
How far and wide the FSA is now planning to sweep is anyone’s guess. But what is worrying here is that our chancellor, Alistair Darling, is framing legislation on the back of a supposed crime that didn’t actually happen.
The Magna Carta is being picked apart in response to a media invention - namely that a “modern day bank robber” syphoned £100m from mug punters on the London stock market by spreading false rumours last week about HBOS.
The truth is more prosaic. Rumours about companies - such as the one effecting HBOS - circulate every day, and have done so for 200 years. It is no more ‘organised’ now that it has ever has been. In the main, the tittle-tattle circulates among low-brow retail speculators, talking up their little books, and bad-mouthing someone else’s down.
For the most part it is ignored - or quickly tested and discounted. It is only during periods of great uncertainty that such chatter gains any sort of traction - as happened last week.
To respond by using measures best suited to extreme violent crime would be laughable if it did not betray how little the Treasury understands about the way financial markets operate.
Supergrass … I like the sound of that. Maybe Darling should have some too and chill. Then again … he probably wouldn’t inhale
All of this of course misses the point about ‘what exactly should they be concentrating on at the moment’?
“Alarmed by the illegal raid”, both the hack and sub who managed to get that into print should be made to read every line of the inevitable 500 page report this will generate, twice.
Or maybe they are just lining up some patsy to take the fall for Crock and retroactively justify it as a victim of market manipulation. Opps, my tin foil hat just slipped off..
Didn’t notice any rush to set up a unit to investigate the liars who circulated untrue rumours about weapons of mass destruction as a result of which more than 1 million are estimated to have since died ?
oh no HBOS share price falling is much more serious
it is isn’t it ?
come on you know it is the guys in the club were seriously shocked all these share options lapsing for nil value etc
right Murphy we’ve had enough of that - your nicked
I’ve got a list as long as my arm of “joke” institutions - this only confirms the valididty of certain entrants on that list.
HM Govnt, BoE (post-Crock), FSA, LSE, SFO..
Who made the real money off the HBOS tank? Oh yes - the directors, who piled in on the dip. Isn’t that how markets work? (I might point out that a 20% sudden intra-day fall like that deserves an explanatory RNS - rather than off-market briefing by the co and the felts, and some director purchases that only get mentioned later.)
Lock ‘em all up I say.
It’s always a cause for concern when politicians rustle up ex-post solutions. With a bank collapse and other shortcomings, the FSA’s watchdog image is akin to a poodle: giving it a studded collar won’t change much.
The gov’t is looking to cover it’s own backside…they can blame the whole collapse on a bunch of rumours! The banking system may be far from transparent, but Darling is see-through.
boring possible explanation
last week was also 1/4ly option expiry for indiv stocks