<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/lib/css/styleRSSFeed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:ft="http://www.ft.com/FTRSSExtensions">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clear Channel deal in tatters</title>
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/03/27/11844/clear-channel-deal-in-tatters/</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville from FT.com</description>
	<copyright>Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2006. "Alphaville", "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times.</copyright>
	<webMaster>help@ft.com</webMaster>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:15:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bhavin P. Kapadia</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/03/27/11844/clear-channel-deal-in-tatters/#comment-16111</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/03/27/11844/clear-channel-deal-in-tatters/#comment-16111</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[This deal would have been the biggest of the year (I would imagine).

May have given PE firms - and everyone else -  a glimmer of hope that there is light at the end of the tunnel.]]></description>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
