The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Edwards: "We are on the cusp of an equity meltdown that will slash and shred portfolios like Freddie Krueger"
  2. Further reading
  3. Spooked by Sirri
  4. What's driving mortgage defaults? Not just negative equity
  5. Calling oil wrong
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Group Director of Resources
Recruiter: Arcadia Housing
Relationship Managers
Recruiter: Barclays Commercial Bank
Technical and Quality Manager
Recruiter: Nexia International
Financial Controller (UK)
Recruiter: Tennant UK Ltd
Finance Director
Recruiter: Fast Moving B2B Distribution
Head of Finance - Centrica Resources Nigeria
Recruiter: Centrica Energy
Director of Finance and Resources
Recruiter: City of Westminster
Finance Director
Recruiter: First Choice Coffee

Site Navigation


Principal content

The “buyer of last resort”

Step forward the New York Fed.

Bank of America’s Jeffrey Rosenberg notes that the central bank has taken on a whole new role in assuming a $30bn portfolio of assets as part of the JPMorgan deal with Bear Stearns. “The extraordinary measures, while reassuring financial markets today, attest to the depths of the credit crunch and its constricting impact on the economy,” he writes.

Its loan to facilitate the deal is nothing of the sort:

The New York Fed will take, through a limited liability company formed for this purpose, control of a portfolio of assets valued at $30 billion as of March 14, 2008.

In other words, a SIV. Those assets, adds the statement, will be managed by BlackRock, so as to “minimize disruption to financial markets and maximise recovery value.”

Steven Waldman at Interfluidity runs through the details. The cited interest rates are largely irrelevant, he concludes. The economic effect of the arrangement is that the Fed is buying up MBS and other assets at the “value of the portfolio as marked to market by Bear Stearns on March 14, 2008.” His concern is what exactly is going into the fund:

Will this new “limited liability company” have contingent liabilities to any parties other than the Fed, J.P. Morgan, and BlackRock for ordinary management fees? Will its portfolio consist of any positions that would make the fund a counterparty, potentially with obligations to pay, not merely rights to receive, future cash?

Over the course of the credit squall, SIV sponsors found their reputational and de facto obligations to their vehicles went beyond their legal commitments. Waldman would like assurances that the Fed hasn’t just been made a derivatives counterparty of last resort.

Rosenberg writes that the transfer of these assets has removed the liquidity and mark to market triggers which would put pressure on a private balance sheet.

The guidelines for the management of those assets suggest that the Fed will not be an immediate seller. So the Fed will wait it out, in the hope that the recovery value for those assets will come out above the purchase price. A federally backed super-SIV, if you will.

Related links
Statement on Financing Arrangement of JPMorgan Chase’s Acquisition of Bear Stearns
Summary of Terms and Conditions Regarding the JPMorgan Chase Facility

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Mar 26   1:31 Posted by Bhavin P. Kapadia [report]

    This notion of super-SIV fund, was this not deliberated end of last year?

  2. Mar 25   21:36 Posted by Matt [report]

    It strikes me that, assuming these purchases are in fact within the Fed’s authority, the public would have the right to know the exact contents of the portfolio along with the purchase prices. However to this point I haven’t seen even general portfolio characteristics. Does anyone know whether they will divulge this information?

  3. Mar 25   14:18 Posted by Anonymous [report]

    and,…wait for it,….BSB. No hint of criminal charges!!!!! Yes, the Fraudulent FED is working, but, on whose behalf we just don’t know.

  4. Mar 25   13:59 Posted by Aurangzeb Bozdar [report]

    Time to create the much desired super SIV guaranteed by public funds. The perverse logic can be that since it is general public who is defaulting on subprime loans creating this credit mess in the first place (and not the banks who missold those products), by creating a Fed sponsored super SIV it is being made sure that poor bankers do not suffer the same fate there are no forclosures on their homes.

    Excellent wealth redistribution; forget taxes cuts just create SIVs :-)

  5. Mar 25   13:18 Posted by bsb [report]

    outright illegal

This post is closed to further comments.