Markets live chat transcript for the chat ending at 12:14 on 5 Mar 2008. Participants in this chat were: Helen Thomas (HT) Neil Hume (NH)
HT: Good morning - and welcome to Markets Live
NH: Morning all
HT: Neil Hume is with me
NH: and what a great morning it is
HT: and it’s safe
HT: something good happened in the world of football
NH: yep
HT: or so I hear
NH: I managed to track down ITV 4
NH: and watch the Arsenal dismantle AC Milan
NH: I wonder if this dreadful scheduling decision will be mentioned at the ITV results presentation today??
HT: yes, yes Neil - it’s an outrage
NH: actually I heard Michael Grade on the Today this morning
NH: and boy was he angry
NH: ask the awful share price performance of ITV
NH: and he went into one
NH: then he want into an even bigger rant when asked if ITV should separate their content and broadcast businesses
NH: amusing stuff
NH: the BBC hack was speechless and quite unprepared for the onslaught
NH: a bit like Milan
HT: ah ha - the hoof
NH: anyway ITV up 0.3p at 66.7p
HT: wants us to move on
HT: the reader is always right neil
NH: will try and find some comment on the figures later
HT: where to next?
NH: Liberty mentioned below by VP
HT: yes
NH: shares on the move this morning
NH: in fact they are the biggest riser in the FTSE 100
HT: shares up 50p to 993p
HT: so what’s going on?
NH: Bit of a strange one this
NH: this morning Jermey Warner
HT: respected City ed of Indy
NH: Yep
NH: and he wrote this in his column this morning
NH: Wedneday’s a takeover rumour, Liberty International, the shopping centres property group, is one of those hardy perennials that never seems to go away.
NH: At the right price, both GIC, one of Singapore’s two sovereign wealth funds, and Westfield, with extensive interests in Australian and US shopping malls, would happily buy. The problem has always been Sir Donald Gordon, Liberty’s founder. With more than 20 per cent of the stock, he’s not in the past been a seller, even to the ultra-expansionary Frank Lowy, founder of Westfield and one of Australia’s richest men.
Now that Sir Donald has retired from the business, has Mr Lowy, or even the Singaporeans, finally persuaded him? That’s the story, but what about the price? The time to have sold was more than a year ago, when Sir John Ritblat bailed out of British Land. Back then, everyone believed that property values would rise for ever, companies were queuing to convert into Real Estate Investment Trusts, and property shares were still riding high. Today, the share price of Liberty International, whose focus on shopping centres ought to make it relatively immune to the downturn in the rest of the property sector, is down in the dumps alongside everyone else.
NH: It seems unlikely in these circumstances that anyone would pay the 1500p a share that Sir Donald used to demand as the price of his exit. Westfield, with problems in the US, probably couldn’t afford it even if it felt so inclined, while even the Singaporeans, who certainly have the money, would surely baulk.
Yet what about a merger with Westfield, or even the GIC shopping centres, to create what would be far and away the largest specialist property company of this kind in the world? That might appeal to the still engaged Sir Donald. In the past, he’s always turned Mr Lowy away. Word is that he may now be open to offers.
NH: As for the company itself, Liberty seems to be unaware of any impending deal, and is quietly getting on with its business of building and operating shopping centres. Yet it has always known that its fate lies largely in Sir Donald’s hands, even though he’s no longer involved in the business. Ultimately, it is he who will play kingmaker.
HT: hmmm
HT: Warner is not normally given to speculation
HT: so he must believe this
NH: and so does the market
NH: as we said earlier shares on the move
HT: what are the company saying?
NH: naturally, they are playing it down
NH: saying they are not in merger talks
NH: and pointing out that brokers are sceptical
HT: and what do you think??
NH: well
NH: Peter Lowy, the CEO of Westfield, was speaking a Citi property conference yesterday said they had no interest (more upside from their existing portfolio).
NH: But I can’t help feeling there is something in this
NH: Or there was at some point
NH: anyway, here’s some broker comment
NH: this is from Harm Meijer at JPMorgan
NH: Liberty/Westfield rumoured talks emerge…again: The Independent Online reports today that talks are taking place (again) between Liberty International, Westfield Group and GIC Real Estate about a potential merger. The article suggests that Liberty’s life president, Sir Donald Gordon, is understood to hold the key.
NH: His family holds a 21% stake in the group and until his retirement as chairman in June 2005, he was resistant to a sale. Since stepping down, though, Sir Donald could have become more willing to countenance a deal. GIC declared a 3% stake in Liberty in early January, subsequently increasing this stake to 5%. Liberty already had links with the Singapore fund after it signed a strategic partnership over the MetroCentre, the shopping centre in Gateshead. GIC agreed with Liberty’s subsidiary Capital Shopping Centres to buy a 40% stake in the largest mall in the European Union. Neither company has commented on this latest story.
NH: We note that while this story could be true – Liberty has ventures abroad in India and China – speculation has been there for a while. The key is in the hands of ex-chairman Sir Gordon (21% stake). We would say there is a higher likelihood than other stories but it is not clear whether Liberty is really waiting for this. However, you may recall the story in an earlier daily about my three year old daughter (who was annoyed with me after I teased her three times and suddenly bit me hard in the nose): I think some shorts may be closed today…..
NH: and this is from the property team at Merrill Lynch
NH: Plenty of press chatter today - headlining is a suggestion that Liberty may be in talks with a group that might create the world’s biggest shopping-mall company - Westfield & GIC were both speculated. Call me a sceptic. Anyone would have to pay a full price. WDC is down 16% ytd & at the moment are very focused on getting White City right.
NH: Liberty - The Independent is reporting that Talks are taking place that may see Liberty International team up with a major rival to become the world’s largest shopping mall group, citing an unidentified person close to the matter. Westfield & GIC are mentioned as potential suitors. ‘’A source close to the negotiations said talks had occurred, although Liberty may not yet have been approached.'’ So who are they talking with then? GIC hold a c. 5% stake already. Please disregard the press suggesting that Merrill Lynch identified Liberty as a potential target for Westfield.
HT: so merrills are distancing themselves
NH: Looks that way
NH: and finally this is from Martin Allen at Morgan Stanley
NH: Quick Comment: Report suggests bid talks “taking place”.Today’s Independent newspaper in the UK asserts that “talks are taking place” that may lead to a merger with Westfield or a take-over by GIC Real Estate, which owns 5% of Liberty’s shares. The paper reports that “a source close to the negotiations said talks had occurred, although Liberty may not have been approached” [sic]. The article goes on to suggest that Mr Donald Gordon, life president of the company, may now be more willing to consider selling his family’s 21% holding in the company now that he is no longer the company’s chairman. The company has not commented on the report.
NH: Liberty is strategically attractive. Liberty International has a dominant position in the UK’s regional and super-regional shopping centre market. We think the type of assets it owns and its high market share could make the company very attractive to a whole range of international investors, including both quoted property companies and institutional investors.
NH: However, it is controlled by the Gordon family. However, the key to Liberty International is Donny Gordon’s family’s 21% stake. Given his longstanding commitment to Liberty, Mr Gordon may well be considering the longer-term future of his family’s stake in the company. Mr Gordon is 77. However, he has been previously quoted in the press as saying he believes that this stake in Liberty International is the best inheritance he could possibly pass on to his family. In addition, Mr Gordon is a very hard negotiator and has demonstrated in interviews over the years that he values his family’s stake in Liberty well above the price attributed to it by the stock market.
NH: ![]()
NH: lots of comments below
NH: and one from Paul Murphy
NH: we are just checking to see if this is the REAL Paul Murphy
HT: don’t you think neil - that when people go on holiday they should actually, you know, go on holiday
NH: as regular readers will know our very own Handy Andy is at home this week working on some DIY projects
NH: yes I do
HT: the murphy household will not be looking much cop at this rate
NH: think people on holiday should not comment
HT: agreed
HT: I’ll just see if I can tweak the settings on our spam filter
NH: good idea
HT: moving on
NH: ![]()
NH: going back to a point mentioned yesterday on a grey market in Northern Rock
NH: have had one reply
NH: looks like Canto Spreadfair is quoting 33-34p in the former bank
HT: let’s move onto Aviva/Pru
NH: yep, this Ping An stakebuilding rumour is around again
NH: driven the shares up 30p to 632p
NH: and here’s why
NH: PING AN TO FOCUS ON ACQUISITIONS RELATED TO CORE BUSINESS
*PING AN `NOT WISE’ TO ONLY HOLD RMB ASSETS, CHEUNG SAYS
*PING AN MAY MAKE FURTHER BANK ACQUISITIONS, CHEUNG SAYS 2318 H
*PING AN’S CHEUNG `CONFIDENT’ ABOUT 2008 EARNINGS :2318 HK
*PING AN EARNINGS `NOT STRONGLY LINKED TO STOCK MARKET’
*PING AN MAY SELL SHARES IN OTHER OVERSEAS MARKETS, CHEUNG SAYS
*PING AN MAY SELL SHARES IN SHANGHAI, H.K. IN FUTURE :2318 HK
*PING AN CHAIRMAN DENIES RUMORS THAT FIRM WILL INVEST IN HSBC
*PING AN SEEKS MORE EURO-DENOMINATED ASSETS, CHEUNG SAYS
*PING AN EQUITY SALE WON’T AFFECT EPS, CHEUNG SAY :2318 HK
*PING AN HAS NO REFINANCING PLANS IN H.K., PRESIDENT SAYS
NH: March 5 (Bloomberg) — Ping An Insurance (Group) Co.,
China’s second-largest insurer, is seeking to invest in more
euro-denominated assets, President Louis Cheung said.
The Shenzhen-based insurer, part-owned by HSBC Holdings Plc,
was not wise to hold only yuan-denominated assets, Cheung said
during a shareholders’ meeting in Shenzhen. He didn’t provide any
more details.
NH: not sure that really adds much to the earlier rumours
NH: Ping An could be buying stock at the moment
NH: it could have a 2.9% holding
NH: neither would surprise me
NH: the Pru is attractive
HT: but Ping An’s shareholders have approved their capital raising right?
NH: i think so
NH: there was a worry last week that it was going to be scaled back or even pulled
HT: Here’s reuters
HT: SHANGHAI, March 5 (Reuters) - Shareholders in Ping An
Insurance (Group) Co <601318.SS><2318.HK> approved on Wednesday
its plan for an offer of new shares and convertible bonds that
could raise about $17 billion, official Chinese media said.
The approval came at a meeting of the second-largest Chinese
life insurer’s shareholders in the southern boomtown of Shenzhen,
reported www.p5w.net, the Web site of Shenzhen’s official
Securities Times.
Ping An’s planned issue of up to 1.2 billion new domestic A
shares, or 16 percent of its current share capital, plus
convertible bonds with warrants could raise some $17 billion at
the last market price of its A shares, making it the world’s
sixth-largest corporate fund-raising.
NH: interesting
NH: just checking the volume in the Pri
NH: 8.5m traded already
HT: what’s the average?
NH: just checking
NH: reuters slow today
NH: very slow
HT: chug, chug, chug
HT: ![]()
NH: here it is
NH: 90-day avg volume is 16m
NH: so half way there already
NH: ![]()
NH: right. let’s have a look at these UBS Alt-A rumour
NH: what do we make of them??
HT: UBS shares were up about 1.25 per cent on the back of rumours that it has offloaded a $20bn portfolio of Alt-A mortgage securities to Pimco
NH: well I don’t think there’s any doubt that UBS would like to get shot of this stuff – as would most banks
HT: the story is saying they’re keen to the tune of 70c on the dollar
HT: their Alt-A exposure, of about $27bn, was part of the new bad news in their Valentine’s Day results
HT: which I seem to remember was someone’s birthday. Monkey maybe?
NH: yes anyway….UBS?
HT: yes, so alt-A is considered bad news – same reckless lending as in subprime with ARMs, piggy-back loans etc
HT: and securities backed up by the same rosy default assumptions that did for subprime backed securities
HT: according to Bill Gross, founder and CIO of Pimco
NH: ah, so he’s not keen on this stuff
HT: no – so says his latest newsletter – and this isn’t just an opportunity to get plastic surgery into Markets Live
HT: and the card game Old Maid – Bill Gross really likes his metaphors
HT: here we go - extracts
HT: Old Maid now has a second life mimicking our financial markets, and at PIMCO we’ve played it frequently in our Investment Committee over the past several months. “Who’s got the ‘Old Maid’?” we ask over and over again – not to make us feel good that we don’t – but to make sure we won’t draw it when its holder tries to pass it on. This shunned lady in asset form was originally identified as a subprime mortgage, aggregated into levered financial conduits which in turn were guaranteed to be AAA hotties either via their securitized structures or the solemn pledge of monoline insurance firms. No Old Maids in those hands, investors were assured; they were Babes with a stacked deck. Ah, but Father Time has a way of exposing plastic surgery and there have been implants aplenty in recent years. Most of the silicone to be sure involved mortgage-related assets – first the subprimes, then the Alt As, and now perhaps even levered primes. Yet those that claim that the Old Maid necessarily resides in a deck composed of mortgage loans are missing the larger point. This parlor game is best defined by leverage and not the assets that have been dealt out to more than willing players over the past decade. That subprimes have garnered the headlines is only because they were the asset class that failed first. Now as the U.S. economy slows to what Alan Greenspan labels “stall speed,” levered structures holding commercial loans, and auto and credit card receivables are the new Babes in waiting – waiting to be exposed for what some of them could be: Old Maids with collagen carelessly injected by Moody’s and S&P.
HT: further down he concludes
HT: PIMCO wants to sit at this more attractive return table – to provide an attractive return on your money (no matter what the asset class) as well as a return of your money. No Old Maids. No silicone AAA ratings. And ladies – no crotchety old bachelors either. The game, as well as the name of the game, is changing. It’s no country for Old Maids anymore.
NH: right, so no fan of the Alt-A MBS
HT: but the rumour-monger has gone as far as making their numbers add up
HT: at the end of Q4, UBS had a total of $26.6bn in Alt-A, on which it had taken a 2bn writedown
HT: so the total at an average of 70c on the dollar would be $20bn
NH: why an average?
HT: I rattled through the numbers earlier - also see sam’s post
HT: within that pool of $27bn, UBS took the bulk of their writedown on the higher risk stuff – on which they had a smaller exposure
HT: at the end of Q4, they were already marking that stuff down to 80c on the dollar
HT: the other, higher quality exposure, was on the books at 96 cents after losing value in the last few days of Dec
NH: so the numbers work
HT: almost too conveniently
HT: have values deteriorated enough this year for the lot conceivably to go for 70c? – yes
HT: does UBS want rid and need cash? maybe, can’t rely on SWFs indefinitely
HT: would Pimco be interested in this stuff? doubtful
HT: in fact, I don’t see it
NH: ok – thanks
NH: you have made your view clear
HT: one more thing
HT: if / when I’m wrong - and it turns out that UBS have flogged this stuff to Pimco or anyone else, let’s resist the classic “is this a floor” rubbish
HT: It’s not.
HT: One idiosyncractic seller, one buyer – doesn’t make any sense to start drawing conclusions about the entire marketplace
NH: ok, ok – calm down – bad as me and football
HT: ![]()
HT: moving on
HT: ![]()
HT: wider market?
NH: FTSE 100 currently up 46.4.5 points at 5,814.1
NH: but that’s a bit misleading because today is a huge ex-dividend day
NH: Loads of big names gone ex, and they have taken around 30 points off the index
HT: details pls
NH: going ex today we have
NH: Barclays, Lloyds, RBS, Thomas Cook, Diageo, BAT, RSA, British Energy, Persimmon and Tui Travel
HT: so that’s why the banks are all so weak
NH: yep
HT: see emap conversation also below
Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS:LSE): Last: 357.50, up 13.35 (+3.88%), High: 358.50, Low: 345.00, Volume: 21.94m
Barclays (BARC:LSE): Last: 446.00, up 11.75 (+2.71%), High: 449.25, Low: 435.00, Volume: 20.16m
Lloyds TSB Group (LLOY:LSE): Last: 430.50, down 9.75 (-2.21%), High: 431.00, Low: 421.00, Volume: 14.80m
HT: hang on then - what about HBOS
HT: they’re up - 25p
HT: what’s that all about?
NH: Bargain hunting I think
NH: HBOS has been annihilated since the figures last week
NH: fallen from 700p
NH: and that has prompted a few brokers to come this morning and say the sell off has been overdone
HT: who?
NH: Cazenove
NH: and ABN Amro
NH: Here are the notes
NH: HBOS - Valuation over-states risks [HBOS LN HBOS.L], 544p, Outperform, sector - Neutral
We reduce HBOS estimates to reflect higher Corporate impairment charges, lower investment realisations and slightly lower banking margins. We have adopted a more cautious view of 2009, particularly on corporate realisations and impairment (both Retail and Corporate) despite little evidence of deterioration to date.
NH: After a sharp increase in impairment in H2 2007, we expect Corporate Banking losses to return to levels seen in 2002-3 when UK GDP growth was at a similar rate to that forecast over the next two years. The strong growth (22%) in commercial property lending in H2 is notable, but raises concerns over the medium term impairment outlook rather than the immediate future.
Like other UK banks, HBOS is experiencing higher wholesale funding costs which will cause its net interest margin to decline further in H1 2008. Significantly, we believe the repricing of mortgages will have a beneficial impact in H2 so the rate of attrition will slow.
NH: We expect continued strong growth in deposits (+12%) in 2008, which we estimate will fund 5% loan growth and also replace some of the maturing secured term debt (£12bn in 2008). HBOS’ short term (<3 months maturity) wholesale debt should therefore remain steady at £110-115bn. If funding conditions deteriorate from here, we expect management to slow asset growth further.
HBOS trades on 1.1x tangible book and 5.7x 2008E earnings. The valuation is similar to RBS, yet it shares none of the specific risks facing that bank (relatively weak capital position, ABN Amro integration and reliance upon capital markets earnings). We maintain an Outperform rating on HBOS, believing the valuation discount will narrow as fears of significant treasury write-downs and divergent wholesale funding and impairment performance prove unfounded.
NH: that was Caz
NH: and this is ABN
NH: BOS: Upgrade from Sell to Hold entirely on valuation grounds (leaving our EPS &
Target Price unch at 92p & 545p). Whilst we expect 1H08 EPS and B/S results to
be extremely uncomfortable (= sustainable share price recovery unlikely until
3Q08 at the earliest), the stock now trades at 1.1x FY08F tangible common equity
(1.0x if one strips out the 32.3p divi next Wed), which should limit further
downside. We see further downside from here if HBOS is forced to start selling
some of its GBP81bn treasury assets (of which GBP18bn is marked to model), given
that current market prices are significantly lower than book value.
Val 08F: 1.1x p/TCE, 9.1x div yield and 5.8x PE.
NH: Detail
* Worst earnings, balance sheet and outlook from results season of all large UK
banks. For FY08F we are on 92p op EPS, GBP5.00 tangible common equity (TCE) per
share and 49p flat divi. This assumes a further GBP750m Available for Sale write
downs direct to equity.
NH: BP42bn ABS (GBP7.1bn Alt-A, GBP6.6bn CDO & GBP3.3bn -ive basis exposure) and GBP16bn
FRN disclosure implies substantial further treasury write down risk if credit
spreads continue to widen. Write off ratios booked FY07 appear uncomfortably
low vs peers, especially given that GBP18bn is “marked to model”. The fact that
debt market prices may be exaggerating the quantum of future credit losses
does not avoid the fact that HBOS’s reported Tangible Common Equity is
flattered vs peers. Every GBP1bn pre tax treasury write down = 51p per share.
NH: 59% of HBOS’s wholesale funds mature < 1 year, implying GBP136bn FY08F. Every
10bp extra cost here = GBP140m, 2.4% group PBT. At 130bp, HBOS's 5 yr CDS is
105bp wider than the FY07 average 26bp. Of course, only some maturing debt
will be termed out, and over time loan margin repricing will compensate: but
in the short term at least, this quantifies the potential drag on HBOS's
margin. Also, expect the issuance of more preference shares to boost reported
tier 1 ratio to drag further on EPS.
NH: e expect regulatory capital ratios to deteriorate through FY08F, even with
the benefit of Basle 2. Equity tier 1 ratio fell from 6.1% FY06 to 5.5% FY07.
This will lead to a growing concern over the likilihood of new equity issuance
in order to support even the restricted loan growth ambitions set out for
FY08F (high single digit).
NH: HBOS is down 45% since we downgraded from Buy last October. For FY07, it now
trades at 1.1x TCE of GBP4.77, 9.1% div yield and 5.1x PE. For FY08F, it trades
on 1.1x TCE of GBP5.00, 9.1% div yield and a 5.8x PE. EPS FY08-09F op EPS we
forecast 92p flat. Assuming flat dividend and no further AFS writedowns post
FY08F, TCE should rise from GBP5.00 to GBP5.45 FY08-09F.
NH: Unless HBOS is forced to start selling treasury assets at current prices
(which would undermine the argument that they are in a strong enough position
to hold to maturity, and so largely ignore current market prices), TCE should
act as something of an anchor for the share price. This implies limited
further absolute downside from here, even though we remain of the view that
the financial outlook is bleak, with no sign of improvement expected until
H208F at the earliest.
HT: thanks for that
HT: ![]()
HT: anything else moving?
HT: any raw for us today?
NH: yep a couple of bits
NH: Inmarsat
NH: satellite communications group
NH: Biggest shareholder with 29% is a US hedge fund called harninger
NH: they can be quite activist
NH: as the board of the New York Times can testify
NH: anyway, rumour this morning that harbinger are set to bid 550p a share
NH: and merge ISAT with some of their existing telco/satellite assets
HT: what do you think
HT: does this come with a bandit rating?
NH: yes
NH: ![]()
NH: it could happen
NH: I presume harbinger have not bought 29% for nothing
NH: and they do have investments in the sector
Inmarsat (ISAT:LSE): Last: 491.50, up 7.25 (+1.50%), High: 500.00, Low: 480.00, Volume: 1.19m
HT: ![]()
HT: anything else of a raw nature?
NH: Nestor Healthcare
NH: provides out of hours GP services
NH: stock collapsed last week
NH: on rumours takeover talks had ended
NH: company then rushed out a statement saying it was still in talks
NH: However shares did not rally
NH: as no one believed the company
NH: now, my sources tell me that what happened was that 3i, which was granted a period of exclusivity, ran out of time and could not bid
HT: so they’re still interested?
NH: I believe so
NH: but they are no longer the front runner
NH: another private group is
HT: Who??
NH: Cinven
NH: this went up on Reuters a little earlier
NH: Private equity firm Cinven Ltd [CINV.UL] is eyeing an approach for British healthcare services firm Nestor Healthcare Group Plc
Nestor, which said on Friday it was still in talks with a number of suitors and may get a takeover offer, has been linked with private equity groups CVC Capital [CVC.UL], and 3i
Cinven was not available for comment. A spokesman for Nestor declined to comment.
NH: Nestor shares up 7p at 55.5p
HT: so you believe it
NH: I do
NH: but apart from Cinven I hear there is also a trade buyer interested
NH: and Nestor could go out over 70p
HT: Thanks
HT: Politics Live raging below
HT: your view neil?
NH: am with sam - VC does not have a clue
NH: best of very bad bunch
NH: so that’s not saying a lot
NH: let’s get back to some markets stuff
NH: got some interesting stuff on the BHP/Rio deal
HT: go on
NH: it’s from a new broker called Liberum
NH: which has just launched
NH: they have recruited some top people from Cazenove
NH: sorry Jay, I only do CNBC at the moment
NH: anyway, Liberum have been looking at the spread on the BHP/Rio deal
HT: and?
NH: well
NH: in the last couple of days it has started to to trade at a small (0.35%) discount to the formal 3.4:1 BHPB offer terms (see chart below).
HT: so what is that telling us
NH: Hang on will get the note from Liberum
NH: This could imply three things:
NH: 1) The market does not expect another ‘bump’ will be needed to secure the deal. Earnings momentum has possibly been better for BHPB in February after a poor January (iron ore and aluminium favoured RIO in Jan and it had less exposure to SA power issues and Australian coal disruptions) on rampant coking coal pricing and resurgent nickel. This more even momentum may negate the need to bump materially, but a top up is still needed in our view. Interestingly, our contacts in the arbitrage community are still very much expecting a bump from BHPB within the next month or two as it attempts to seek an agreed bid prior to going into Phase II EU anti-trust negotiations. With the EU submission still not made, a Phase I ruling is at least a month away, implying no imminent news. However, BHPB is reported to be attempting to close a $55bn debt financing package now. Terms are reported to be at 55-60bp above LIBOR, an aggressive level given credit default swaps for BHPB are at 80bps above LIBOR.
NH: 2) The chances of completion of the deal are falling because of shareholder feedback/antitrust concerns/a competitive offer. There has been no new news on antitrust issues save for the fact that the Chinese have jurisdiction over the deal when their anti-trust legislation comes into force in the summer. Chalco have remained silent on their intentions regarding their stake build as have other potential partners such as Shenhua and Anglo American. In addition the Australian government has made it clear a sovereign led bid will face very tough hurdles from the FIRB. Shareholder sentiment pro the deal does seem to be wavering in some quarters, with BHBB shareholders resisting the further dilution that may be required to complete the deal set against RIO shareholders demanding much more for a take-out.
NH: 3) There are technical factors pulling in the spread – specifically arbitrage funds unwinding long RIO/short BHPB positions in the face of reduced credit availability or, worse, the imminent wind up of a large fund. We have reason to believe this third factor is weighing on the spread.
NH: Valuation update
The table below shows the current valuation metrics based on our base case assumptions and a marked to market basis. It is clear that both stocks are very cheap here, with BHPB shading it on base case assumps, more on marked to market basis. We feel both stocks remain excellent value whatever the outcome of the deal. Contrasting the valuation of RIO to that of another bid tareget Xstrata is interesting – the consensus EV/EBITDA multiple for Xstrata is 7.6x in 2008 and more like 6x on a marked to market basis. These ratings are at 33% and 46% premia to RIO’s respective EV/EBITDA multiples. Whilst RIO probably has a lower probability
HT: interesting stuff
HT: Rio up 79
NH: i think the point on the fund unwinding is interesting
HT: indeed
NH: and BHP?
HT: up 10p
HT: somehow politics and football have got intertwined below
HT: worst of all worlds
HT: neil’s just looking for a nugget for you
HT: on fund unwinding
HT: spare a thought for this lot
HT: Focus Capital, the London-based Emerging Markets Asset Manager
HT: sent round this earlier
HT: clarification that there are two companies sharing the same name
with no links to each other -
Given recent press reports regarding Focus Capital, the Swiss/US hedge fund manager, please note that there are two companies sharing the name Focus Capital. Focus Capital, the independent specialist emerging markets asset manager headquartered in London has no links to the Swiss/US hedge fund.
Launched in October 2006, Focus Capital, headed by John Cleary, who has more than 20 years investment experience, looks at global emerging markets from a different perspective, investing exclusively in emerging markets by allocating between equity, bond, cash and hedge funds through a fund of funds approach.
HT: happy to help clear that up
HT: follows the story that Focus - the swiss/US one - is liquidating positions after missing margin calls
HT: set to become a theme
HT: banks brining shutters down
NH: indeed
HT: ![]()
HT: Neil - someone was slapping you on the back earlier
HT: well through cyberspace
HT: we need to have a look at FKI
NH: er yeah
NH: ![]()
HT: explaining to do?
NH: remind mind never to try and write stuff over the weekend
NH: anyway, I must admit I have amazed Melrose have come back with a higher offer
NH: they are prepared to offer 85p in a mixture of cash and shares, subject to a string of conditions
NH: these are: finalisation of debt and equity financing documentation;
(ii) the final FKI dividend with respect to the financial year ending 31 March
2008 not exceeding 3 pence per FKI share as announced by FKI earlier today;
(iii) completion of due diligence satisfactory to the Board of Melrose; and (iv)
final approval by the Melrose board
NH: Now on point iv I should point out that FKI has opened its books to Melrose
HT: I see
NH: but make no mistake this is an audacious move
NH: Because Melrose are planning to finance the cash portion of the proposed offer with a rights issue
NH: I estimate that FKI will result in Melrose’s issued share capital tripling
HT: wow
NH: and remember this is a company that pays a 4.5p dividend
HT: So they have 133m shares in issue at the moment
HT: and that would rise to over 400m
NH: and every single one would require a 4.5p dividend
NH: On top of that Melrose would also be taking on FKI’s debt
NH: which stood at £350m at the end of September
HT: what’s the market cap of Melrose?
NH: £203m
HT: I see what you mean
NH: on top of that they have to find someone to underwrite the cash call
HT: so its no wonder that FKI shares are trading at a big discount to the mooted price
HT: hang on
HT: currently up 4.25 at 77p
NH: that said, the management team at Melrose are highly impressive
NH: all ex Hanson people
NH: and they went on to create Wassall, which they sold to private equity for a tidy sum
HT: not to be underestimated
NH: no
NH: and given the returns they have made on the Dyncast and Mckennie deals
NH: and I also note that they signed up Cazenove as house broker a while ago
NH: and that should help get a rights issue off the ground
NH: however, they are big risks with this deal and that’s why the shares are unlikely to trade close to 85p
HT: any comment?
NH: yep
NH: this is from Evolution Securities
NH: FKI has given Melrose due diligence with an offer at c85p which includes the 3p final dividend. In our February note ‘running some FKI scenarios’ we ran through some possible scenarios of what a deal might look like and the shape is pretty near our core scenario.
NH: The basics are threefold: 1) assuming just £10m of synergies the new group would be capable of 19/20p in the first year; 2) the deal produce a radically different strategy to FKI which has the scope to deliver the value we all know is within FKI; and 3) the paper element provides the opportunity for FKI shareholders to participate in the value realisation.
NH: DETAILS - The fact that FKI has given Melrose access suggests that Blackstone is not there. The most critical element of the Melrose proposition over a straight cash bid is providing FKI shareholders with the opportunity to participate in the unlocking of FKI’s value. 40p cash and 0.277 new Melrose for each FKI share plus the 3p dividend puts FKI at c85p.
NH: Post the deal, there would be 452m shares in issue which would value Melrose at £680m so puts it back into the mid cap indexes. Combined net debt would be £300m and interest cover 4.3x and net debt ebitda 1.8x so comfortable financially.
VALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION - This is a real opportunity for both Melrose and FKI shareholders. Melrose can sort out the debt structure and employ a different strategy to the current one which was to sell the two weaker businesses into a falling market. Melrose is in no rush and has Dynacast to play to give it further momentum. The big plus is that Melrose can run Hardware and Logistex through the cycle and realise maximum value in the process. A track record of a compound total shareholder return of 18% pa in the form of Wassall between 1988 and 2000 and a 95% return in the current form of Melrose highlights the opportunity. 10x 20p in Newco points to 200p and we suspect that there is much more than this to come.
NH: and this is from Andrew Carter at Landsbanki
NH: Melrose (NR) has announced this morning that it has made a revised
indicative 85p offer for FKI (H). The approach appears friendly - as
evidenced by FKI offering due diligence access. The offer is an improvement
on the original 70p, which we had speculated would be no more than an
opening shot.
The indicative 85p splits 43p cash (including 3p in lieu of
dividend) and 42p in Melrose shares. It is not entirely clear how Melrose
would finance the £252m cash portion - the group reported having only £32m
of cash balances at end December with its results today.
NH: While the approach appears friendly, we still believe FKI’s Board will struggle to recommend a takeover at only 7.8x calendarised 2008E earnings, a significant discount to the UK Capital Goods sector on 11.3x, when any sensible sum-of-parts
calculation would result in a price of 100p or more. We still think there
must be a significant risk that the Board chooses instead to raise fresh
equity, possibly on very unattractive terms, rather than pass so much value
to Melrose. Might today’s news be designed to flush out any other bidders?
The Independent wrote on 11th February 2008 that Blackstone is “considering
its options” on a potential bid within the 90-95p range. We continue to see
FKI as a very difficult one to call and retain a Hold recommendation.
HT: thanks
HT: now what were you just investigating?
HT: ![]()
NH: sorry just the FTSE 100 index change next week
NH: just been looking to see who will go in and out
HT: any answers?
NH: looks like Yell, Rentokil and Taylow Wimpey are going
NH: and coming in will be ENRC
NH: First Group and Tate & Lyle
NH: however, there could be a problem with ENRC
HT: Kazakh metals group
NH: this company has a free float which is less than 25%
NH: usually that means you can’t list on the main market of the LSE
NH: but somehow they got around it
NH: now some people think that FTSE will prevent them from entering the FTSE 100 on that basis
NH: however, the company’s PR people say it will not be a problem
NH: and that ENRC will just have a tiny investibility weighting
HT: why make the exception?
NH: need to check that with FTSE as all the changes are subject to approval by a steering committee
NH: index changes will be based on next tuesday closing prices
NH: and additions, relegations will come into force a few weeks after
NH: ENRC up 18p at £11.23
NH: company has a staggering market cap of almost £14bn
HT: Kazakhmys owns a chunk of ENRC don’t they?
NH: they do
NH: trying to get hold of the share register now
HT: then the government has another big holding
NH: as Reuters don’t have any info on it. not bad for a company likely to join the FTSE 100
NH: FXTrader, i keep hearing that story on Yell but the price keeps sinking
NH: this company could breach its banking covenants
HT: maximus - glad to see someone remembers our caviar express
HT: we might have to revive our train service
NH: which they have never disclosed
HT: are we done neil?
NH: VP - is Dragon Oil and Aim company??
NH: yep am done now
NH: see you all tomorrow
NH: when we have BoE rate decision
HT: do start posting your predictions here
NH: and you can start now
HT: we’ll do the now traditional tally during tomorrow’s chat
NH: in that case VP, Dragon all could be in the running, although as you correctly point out FTSE seem to have some opaque rules
HT: thanks maximus for kicking us off
HT: I’m a no change
NH: me too
HT: someone must think something else?
NH: anyone else
HT: we’re looking sheep like
HT: independent thinkers welcome
HT: blackswan - and monkey - thanks
HT: for the effort
NH: and what about the ECB??
HT: oh no - not them
HT: we’re wrapping up
HT: until tomorrow
HT: bye
HT: do keep putting up your forecasts
NH: that’s it for today
NH: see u all tomorrow
HT: bye neil
NH: bye
ECB = no change this time but talking up 25bps due to worries about inflation
Nationwide said 80% chance hold 20% chance cut.
Hold it is. The ones screaming for a cut (CML, retailers) aren’t screaming quite as loud as they did the last time it was actually cut…
no cut from the ecb
Rien
Bernanke is more interesting - you know it wont be 25bps, because in his world it has to be 50 or 75 or something radical.
no change
Well, it’s not like Merv had left any doubts in it…
75bp cut. Actually no change
50bp
No change from the BoE
No change from uncle merv & Co
No change
well, clearly no change. It’s Dec, Feb, and next cut should be April.
No change
BofE - no change still asleep
True - it did go into private equity ownership - hence loaded with debt - that doesnt mean the fundamental business model cannot still be profitable. It’s just a yell specific problem.
Dragon is main market listed
Neil - fully listed now.
FTSE review committee do what they want, & frequently get it wrong by their own rules.
What about Dragon Oil, £2.4bn co?
re Yell - possibly, but meanwhile still highly cash generative. plus, given the relative cheap cost, how many of your local specialty shops, plumbers etc would want to be left out?
sorry Mar 17th - if anyone is at all interested!
Caviar Express again?
isnt yell business model fundamentally going to die (i.e. bit fat yellow directory on your door and a simplistic web site) and be replaced by more sophisticated ways of matching buyers of services with suppliers …thoughts?
Lev-X series 2 finally coming out on Mar 19 after a few false starts. The Loan market is apparently ‘poised’
Cabin - I agree, I think this gold run has at least a couple more years to run. Also, this isn’t just a weak USD story - it’s a general story of fiat money devaluation (check the figures for money supply by Central Banks - it’s been consistently 3-4 times GDP growth - unsustainable) , hence revaluation of “real” assets. Also, the media and talking heads keeps banging about “USD falls, Gold rise” - in Nov USD/EUR was 1.49, it’s 1.51-52 today, gold was in the 600 it’s now close to 1000 - not denying any effect entirely - everything always matters, but it’s not that strong a correlation.
Also interesting insight in FT indicating that massive investment by SWFs in equities will cause emerging market currencies to harden!
Re Gold Isn’t the problem that the US Fed and gov’t have adopted a ‘wreck the dollar’ policy which means that there is no longer a global ‘reserve currency’ worthy of the name. Thus if for no other reason than diversification OPEC countries, China etc are alsmost compelled to store some of their wealth in gold. Of course a global recession that led to a sharp fall in oil prices and food prices might bring gold down but I would have thought that would take ayear or two to ‘play out’
ADP number at 1.15pm, expecting a v poor count - 10k increase - still potential for a shocker.
3M Libor still ticking up by c. 1bp 5.774%
Where’s 3m LIBOR today?
a gold one??
“Exx-acctly”.
Cable may = Spurs, but Darling is Accrington Stanley.
No offence to the Lib Dems - but come on! It’s like saying Spurs will win the Premiership next year!
perhaps we should get you on Question Time as a panellist Neil
I think the ONS stuff on Granite is confusing. They are NOT saying that Granite will have to be nationalised. (Indeed, it wont, and shouldnt be)
VP =- Vince Cable doesnt have a clue what he’s talking about
Yes, it’s worth repeating, if this was Tonbridge Wells crock the government would have acted very differently!
vince cable is the only politician who seems to understand any of this
fxtrader - even Vince Cable and Clegg (or was it Ming) would have done a better job with Crock IMO.
it would be nice to get the mortgages off the govt balance sheet though wouldn’t it?
worth remembering on the kitemark idea that the US have had the same thing with freddie/fannie for the past 70 years or so, and it hasn’t saved their mortgage market.
Looking forward to the Budget next week, to see just how much further Darling can dig himself under.
Can we stop picking on the easy target? (the Govt) Cameron and Osborn would have been just as powerless and indecisive. NRK management failed and was incompetent - that’s the end of it.
Surely this kitmark thing is the initial inklings of an idea to issue govt mortgage backed bonds backed by the Crock’s mortgage portfolio
I’m referring to Coleridge - the acient mariner.
james brown - surely given this latest Granite revelation ‘Mill Stone round his neck’ would be more apt. Sorry. Couldn’t resist
Darling is the perfect Chancellor… for the Prime Minister. A useful lightning rod to conduct blame.
Northern Rock will be the albatross around Darling’s neck - so old labour!
looks bad. really really bad.
yes sorry bsb, got interrupted it looks awful?
Re: Crock - nice to see Darling knew what he was doing re: Granite. Not nationalised - nothing to do with me. Errr … actually. What a safe pair of hands he has proven to be
maximus - just found the piece
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=avH68.TOCYHM&refer=home
auction rate securities - this is fast becoming a crisis!
More bank trouble predicted too…
http://www.cimaglobal.com/cps/rde/xchg/live/root.xsl/Insight054137_4201.htm
Credit crisis: banks have deluded us, says top fund manager
Robin Geffen
Neptune slams banks’ financial reports and says expect ‘three more layers of pain’.
“A top UK fund manager has been sharply critical of financial reports from the banking industry. Robin Geffen, managing director of Neptune, claimed that UK banks have not yet reported several key negative factors in their businesses.”
Back to Kite marks : who needs them when you can get gold plated mortgages from a government owned former building society?
maximums - tsys?
that esplains it - only seeing risers/fallers and had not seen the story
yet another spooky story from Bloomberg on failed US bond auctions - hit 70% yields doubling. Yet another market totally stalled. Thoughts folks? Hardly very upbeat stuff
Don’t forget though Gross has tonns of cash to invest - and that Pimco is a holder for long term. Alt A at 70c over 10/20yrs is a great deal
Lol Jay - paid out 461p today, hence the fall.
As I understand it gold has some industrial applications, uses for jewellery, and then the mysterious economic sentiment value. I’m not quite sure of the relative importance of those factors. BTW other more down-to-earth commodities have taken a bit of a hit too.
EMAP - down 50%??!!
It was my birthday - am touched you remembered!
cabin fever: I think there are opportunities to exploit distressed property sellers but plain vanilla deals still look unappealing to me on traditional risk/reward basis
fxtrader: what % of the daily value of gold trade is destined for physical consumption?
www.gold.org - indeed it now can be used in catalysers…
But fxtrader does gold have the same utility as platinum to industry - catalysers etc?
As for gold, it’s not just an inflation story! Supply is less than demand, and with platinum through the roof, some have found ways to use gold as replacement.
Re Liberty Int/l I have no idea about the bid story but there are some hardened property professionals who are definitely looking at property with more interest. I attach a quote from Mckay Securities (a quoted property company based in the Thames Valley). Whilst quite small this company has been run conservatively for many many years. And for what it is worth a director promptly bought £75,000 of shares
‘Commenting on the Company’s additional finance, Simon Perkins, Managing Director of McKay, said “this is the right time in the current market to be in a position to increase gearing, and we appreciate the continued support of our bankers who recognise this.
The market tide has turned faster and harder than many expected to the potential benefit of those with funds and the skills to exploit opportunities”. ‘
In a few years time we’ll probably be whinging about the quality of our triple kite-marked rated securities. But you told me they were safe!!
any thoughts on that UBS alt-A rumour? Seems a cracking deal for Pimco if Sam’s post is true.
Kitemarks - as I read it they want to become a raings agency. I have never heard anything so absurd (well maybe I have) from this government.
Give me a prospectus and I’ll judge for myself. Why would a Treasury kitemark help? The buyers are sophisticated investors, not retail punters. Only if HMT acts as an insurer would things be different, but I don’t see them wanting to emulate Ambac.
so the consensus here seems to be - more harm than good. sounds very similar to everything else alistair darling has done then…
Kitemark mortgages “banks have warned that the move could lead to ….putting up costs for more risky borrowers ” Who ever made that comment can’t work at a bank? banks SHOULD be pricing more risky loans at higher prices (and when they don’t we get to the situation we are in now)
bsb - had to laugh at the FT article on that. Apparently the downside risk is that it will make a 2 tier system whereby people who can’t afford loans wont be able to get them whereas people who can will. Crazy! The world is so unfair
bsb- if you kitemark them then maybe the govt can get rid of some of the northern rock mortgages
Ahh
Hey Neil…”Arsene knows ” …bet he shorted the banks 9 months ago !
Re Paul Murphy
I think we are being spoofed!
Any trips to casualty yet with DIY induced injuries, Paul?
How about insurers? Aviva and Pru up strongly on the Ping An rumours
GKB. Who knows with gold. It’s as much an emotional thing as a fundamental one. What I’d be interested to know is where gold would go in the event of a deflationary recession. We know about gold and inflation, but what about deflation?
any thoughts on alistair darling’s “kite mark” plan for mortgage backed securities? am hearing there’s no worries over the credit quality of the safest uk mortgages anyway, just that there’s no demand for mortgage backed securities full stop at the moment, and the kite mark plan wont solve this
The long-awaited gold/commodities “correction” has to some extent happened - gold down about 3% - do people think that was it, or that there’s more to come?
Very funny from Ambac’s website…they have posted a log graph of their share performance to make it look not so bad.
http://ir.ambac.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=80774&p=irol-stockquotechart
You don’t see log graphs much nowadays!
Bah! I don’t understand the fascination with Yob-ball!
Arsene Wenger’s magic he wears a magic hat & when he saw the European Cup he said i’m having that
surely you mean Southampton’s 94th minute equaliser last night?
Prop. doing well today - any truth to LII rumours? What about CAL, anything? TIA.
On FKI: great job Neil, you were spot on yesterday…again!