The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. Macquarie: The 'great unwind' is coming
  2. The €5.5 trillion unwind
  3. Further reading
  4. Britain's top export - drunks
  5. Turning Japanese? UK house prices
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Finance and Resources Director
Recruiter: International Accounting Standards
Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Newly Qualified Accountants
Recruiter: Ernst & Young
Project Accountant
Recruiter: Retail/ Private Banking
Finance Business Partner
Recruiter: Unilever
Head of Operational Rigour
Recruiter: Barclaycard International
Financial Controller – British Gas Business (ACA, ACCA, CIMA, CPA)
Recruiter: British Gas Business
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society

Site Navigation


Principal content

As clear as alphabet soup: banks’ CDO exposures

Forget the banks’ Q3s. By any account, they’re billions of dollars out of date. For banks holding CDOs - and that’s most of Wall Street - writedowns will have greatly increased in the past three weeks.

The trouble is, no one, not even the SEC, knows exactly what banks’ exposures are. But the losses are beginning to come out of the woodwork: for Citi, in the news Monday, a $8bn-$10bn loss on the value of some assets. For Merrill Lynch, last week, it worked out at $8bn. For UBS, reporting their Q3s last week, $3.4bn.

Citi have painted the most comprehensive picture to date. But rather than making things clearer, it simply casts doubt on the other banks’ disclosures. Citi, for example, are reporting $8-10bn writedowns on a portfolio containing $10bn of high-grade CDO paper - which has been the principal faller in the past two weeks. But UBS only report writedowns of $3.4bn. And they hold $20bn of high-grade CDO paper.

There are very few proxies which can be used to judge banks’ CDO holdings. Even a league table of CDO deals arranged is a pretty poor indicator:

CDO league table

An added complication is the fact that banks are using wildly different estimates on the pricing of CDO assets. Although indices such as the ABX and TABX are valuable proxies for the market’s prices as a whole, they don’t necessarily reflect where banks individually are pricing their debt.

As reported in today’s FT, for example, Merrill Lynch, has written down mid-quality ABX debt to 63 cents in the dollar, even though the bank’s own analysts say its worth only 40. UBS, meanwhile, assumes the same debt to be worth 90 cents in the dollar. “Simple math would imply that UBS needs an additional $8bn write-down [on its $15.4bn holdings] if the ABX pricing is correct,” Merrill themselves had the cheek to point out in a report on their rival.

Here’s a breakdown of the main CDO exposures:

Citi
$10bn senior rated CDO debt
$8bn mezzanine CDO debt
$2.7bn “warehoused” CDOs
£200m CDO squared

Merrill Lynch
$8.3bn senior rated CDO debt
$5.3bn mezzanine CDO debt
$1bn “warehoused” CDO debt
$600m CDO squared

UBS
$20.2bn senior rated CDO debt
$1.8bn warehoused CDO debt

Total exposure undisclosed:

Bank of America
Undisclosed

Barclays
Q3s due November 27

Deutsche
$1.6bn on “trading activities in relative value trading in both debt and equity, CDO correlation trading and residential mortgage-backed securities.”

JPMorgan
$339m (net of hedges) “on collateralized debt obligation (CDO) warehouses and unsold positions.”

Lehman Brothers
Undisclosed

Morgan Stanley
Undisclosed

Wachovia
$534m writedown on CDOs

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Nov 05   12:28 Posted by david wallace [report]

    Sam

    I presume that’s Chinese alphabet soup you are comparing the difficulty of debt analysis to

  2. Nov 05   11:08 Posted by C&C [report]

    Very Interesting! Merril and Citi have written down ~20% of their holdings, while Wachovia and JPM have written-off only 2.5% and GS has made a profit!!!

  3. Nov 05   10:56 Posted by Carlomagno [report]

    FAZ (German paper) is reporting more trouble:


    Frankfurter Allgemeine has a report according to which the defaults in the subprime sector are likely to be much higher than previously estimated. It recalled a Deutsche Bank forecast from July, which put the total global losses of this segment at $60-90bn. Now Josef Ackermann, chairman of Deutsche Banks, puts it at $150-250bn. There are now fears that there are more big write-offs to come. FAZ also names two German banks - WestLB and a specialised banks which serves doctors and pharmacists only - as possible next victims of the crisis.

    Via Eurointelligence (http://tinyurl.com/2vlt5h).

This post is closed to further comments.