The 6am cut - Alphaville by email

Most Popular Posts

  1. The Weekender
  2. US covered bonds? Frederick II would be turning in his grave
  3. Fannie and Freddie link fest - updated with key US Treasury pdfs
  4. Further Fannie and Freddie
  5. Dr Doom: More gloom, the Kondratieff wave and what comes next
  6. Show more...
  7. Show less...
  8.  

Blogs we're reading

Classified Jobs

Director of Finance and Corporate Services
Recruiter: NSPCC
Head of Customer Service - Savings
Recruiter: Nationwide Building Society
Business Analyst
Recruiter: Credit Suisse
Head of Finance
Recruiter: ESCP-EAP
Group Chief Accountant
Recruiter: Misys
Lead Economist, Development Research Department
Recruiter: African Development Bank
Finance Manager
Recruiter: London 2012
Group Manufacturing Leadership Programme
Recruiter: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group

Site Navigation


Principal content

“A snapshot of a fast moving situation with a long exposure camera”

That is how Bank of England governor Mervyn King described his submission to the House of Commons Treasury select committee, released on Wednesday.

The paper, sent to committee chair John McFall ahead of Mr King’s appearance before the committee on September 20, is a look at what central banks can do in resposne to recent market turmoil.

The letter and entire paper are available to read online. But here’s the conclusion - and it’s hardline. Don’t expect the Bank to get you out of this one.
The path ahead is uncertain. There are strong private incentives to market players to recognise early and transparently their exposures to off-balance sheet entities and to accelerate the re-pricing of asset-backed securities. Policy actions must be supportive of this process. Injections of liquidity in normal money market operations against high quality collateral are unlikely by themselves to bring down the LIBOR spreads that reflect a need for banks collectively to finance the expansion of their balance sheets. To do that, general injections of liquidity against a wider range of collateral would be necessary. But unless they were made available at an appropriate penalty rate, they would encourage in future the very risk-taking that has led us to where we are. All central banks are aware that there are circumstances in which action might be necessary to prevent a major shock to the system as a whole. Balancing these considerations will pose considerable challenges, and in present circumstances judging that balance is something we do almost daily.

The key objectives remain, first, the continuous pursuit of the inflation target to maintain economic stability and, second, ensuring that the financial system continues to function effectively, including the proper pricing of risk. If risk continues to be under-priced, the next period of turmoil will be on an even bigger scale. The current turmoil, which has at its heart the earlier under-pricing of risk, has disturbed the unusual serenity of recent years, but, managed properly, it should not threaten our long-run economic stability.

RSS Feed

Comments

  1. Sep 14   2:00 Posted by Fair & Biased » Blog Archive » “Turmoil in financial markets” [report]

    […] FT’s Alphaville blog provided a link to the paper that Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, submitted to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee ahead of his appearance before the committee on September 20 (”A snapshot of a fast moving situation with a long exposure camera,” Helen Thomas, September 12, 2007). […]

  2. Sep 12   17:36 Posted by Carlomagno [report]

    I’d like to see the reaction in the US if Bernanke sent Sen. Dodds such a letter! Jim “Mad Money” Cramer for one would go apopletic. The President might have to close down the NYSE until Wall Street recovered from the shock!

    Good to see that there are still central bankers with some spine out there.

This post is closed to further comments.