<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/lib/css/styleRSSFeed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:ft="http://www.ft.com/FTRSSExtensions">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Kite is &#8220;random noise,&#8221; not Amaranth</title>
	<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007/02/05/2300/red-kite-is-random-noise-not-amaranth/</link>
	<description>FT Alphaville from FT.com</description>
	<copyright>Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2006. "Alphaville", "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times.</copyright>
	<webMaster>help@ft.com</webMaster>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Excuses are Coming: Red Kite is in No Danger (Ha!) &#171; Market Risk</title>
		<link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007/02/05/2300/red-kite-is-random-noise-not-amaranth/#comment-275</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007/02/05/2300/red-kite-is-random-noise-not-amaranth/#comment-275</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[[...] Feb 6, 2007 in Energy, Sentiment   Excuses for Red Kite and the rest of the energy sector hedge funds are showing up in the press. No doubt the PR engine for these funds have hit the media circuit. [...]]]></description>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
