This week on FT Alphaville,
© The Financial Times Ltd 2016 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
Assigning specific causes to stock market swings is always a mug’s game, and doubly so in summer when volumes have cratered — especially this year.
Intuitively we know this. Yet after this month’s rally, it’s still hard not to wonder just why the S&P remains up more than 11 per cent this year, and roughly 25 per cent over the past twelve months, given that the macro data has been mostly disappointed in the last few months and that the earnings picture has worsened (same with earnings guidance). Read more
In our preview of the last FOMC meeting, in discussing the possibility of mortgage-backed securities included in any further asset purchases, we noted the low net supply of MBS and a recent history of settlement fails when the Fed increases its share.
There is a risk, therefore, that the size of QE3 might disappoint expectations depending on how worried the Fed is about market disruptions. Read more
Post-debut, at pixel time Manchester United shares were clinging to the $14 listing price like the Glazers to Old Trafford. (The stock was $14.06 as we went to pub.) Read more
It’s a trend of late. Beaten up investors struggle to cope with the unique brand of uncertainty that has come with a financial crisis and a sovereign debt crisis. They twitch at the thought of daring to dip into equities, and instead run into the increasingly expensive arms of a choice few safe haven government bonds. Hungry for the yield that such bonds cannot offer them, they move, cautiously, into corporate bonds too.
Or as Hans Mikkelsen at Bank of America Merrill Lynch put it (emphasis ours): Read more
Corporates have been hoarding increasing levels of cash since the start of the finanical crisis. Investors tend to frown on it, (see Apple’s cash pile) but are the alternatives really that much better? UBS has done some number crunching and found that the opportunity cost of higher cash levels is lower than you might expect, although the best way for corporates to improve return on equity is to buy back equity.
First, a quick note on methodology. Stephane Deo, Ramin Nakisa and Rob Mellor used data from ‘World Inc’, a UBS construct which provides consolidated financial statements for global sectors and markets, as though they were a single company — with the bottom-up numbers supplied by UBS industry analysts around the world. Read more
John Hempton of Bronte Capital was gobsmacked this week when Richemont, the Swiss-based luxury goods group, warned that profits in the first half were likely to be rather better than the market was expecting.
Hempton was short the stock on the sensible view that in the wake of the Bo scandal in China, Chinese kleptocrats were less likely to be adorning their wrists with things like Vacheron Constantin watches. Read more
Cheap labour isn’t forever. The act of taking advantage of it enriches the work force over time. At least, that’s what should happen.
As America proved, a work force can, in effect, end up aiding its own overall decline due to a lack of competitiveness on wages and pensions. That sort of rigidity, whether good or bad, isn’t the only thing that can lead to a decline in manufacturing employment. Automation can too. Read more
China’s export growth slowed much faster than expected in July. Year-on-year growth for the month was 1% compared with consensus forecasts of 8%. Imports rose 4.7% against expectations of 7%. The trade surplus narrowed from $25.1bn from $31.7bn in June. Asian stocks extended losses after the data was released (Bloomberg).
“The US Department of Justice has decided not to charge Goldman Sachs or any of its employees following a high-profile investigation of the bank’s subprime mortgage deals, including the infamous “Abacus”.” The DoJ spent a year reviewing a report by the Senate subcommittee on investigations completed last year, after a request from committee chair Carl Levin. However it said “…based on the law and evidence as they exist at this time, there is not a viable basis to bring criminal prosecution…” (Financial Times). Read more