Flying somewhat under bankers’ radars on Thursday, obfuscated as they are by new bonus taxes, are the maneuverings of the Basel Committee.
The Committee met on Tuesday and Wednesday to discuss a package of potential reforms to the global banking system. Under discussion were issues such as living wills, liquidity buffers, possible leverage ratios (the three `L’s if you like). And if the below story, from Risk.net, is anything to go by it looks like they’ve made some early progress on the draft reform — which is due to be published by the end of January.
Here are some excerpts, with our highlights:
. . . After two days of negotiations in Basel, the Committee made much progress on the two liquidity ratios that have been drawn up by its liquidity working group – one ratio to mandate the size and composition of a liquid assets buffer, and the other to constrain banks’ ability to use short-term funding for longer-term assets.
There had been in-depth discussion on what would constitute a liquid asset that could be held within the liquidity buffer, and whether the rules should be applied at the group level only, or also at the local subsidiary level – an unpopular requirement that could lead to trapped pools of liquidity in the subsidiaries of large cross-border firms.
While there will be room for discussion and adjustment during the consultation phase, the Committee member says broad agreement has been reached, and the liquid assets definition should not be too broad, but “quite conservative”. That could mean banks would be forced to hold only government bonds in a liquidity buffer – a suggestion made recently by the UK Financial Services Authority that has met with widespread opposition.
A second area of major progress at the Basel meeting is on measures to limit counterparty credit risk. The Committee is expected to publish detailed technical information in the consultation document.
Although such plans have not previously been made public, the Committee member suggests there will be recommendations on capital incentives for the central clearing of over-the-counter derivatives – in other words, uncleared trades would attract a capital hit. Dealers have feared such a move but there has been no confirmation something is in the pipeline. In addition, as reported by Risk on Monday, there could be a move to ratchet up the capital held against bank credit risk by increasing the correlation assumption used in the internal ratings-based approach to 25% for financial institutions.
The Committee was also set to address two other changes to the Basel framework that could result in increases in capital requirements — the introduction of a counter-cyclical capital buffer and a leverage ratio. While these proposals were discussed this week, the Committee member admits progress has been slow and the consultation document is unlikely to include much more detail on either measure than is already known, leaving the calibration to be worked out next year, after the quantitative impact study and industry consultation . . .
So that’s leverage ratios (unloved by bankers), liquidity buffers (also unloved), additional capital requirements for uncleared trades (unloved) and a potential increase in the capital required for holding bank credits (i.e. more than that required for holding corporate credits — and also unloved), all due to come into force, if the report proves accurate.
A bad week for banks, and bankers, then.
(H/T an anonymous reader).
Liquidity buffer inclusion to support covered bonds – The Cover
Leverage rules could force big banks to cut balance sheets – FT
Banks criticise liquidity rules – FT
Regulators agree tough rules on bank capital – FT